1. 土肥高效利用国家工程研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 山东农大肥业科技股份有限公司, 山东 肥城,271600
[ "高丽超(1997—),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土肥资源高效利用研究。E-mail:lcgao2020@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
高丽超, 郑文魁, 程运龙, 等. 长期施用控释掺混尿素对麦田土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):343-350.
GAO Lichao, ZHENG Wenkui, CHENG Yunlong, et al. Effects of Long-term Application of Blended Controlled-release Urea on Soil Enzyme Activities and Nutrients in Stubble Wheat Fields[J]. 2023, 37(2): 343-350.
高丽超, 郑文魁, 程运龙, 等. 长期施用控释掺混尿素对麦田土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):343-350. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.040.
GAO Lichao, ZHENG Wenkui, CHENG Yunlong, et al. Effects of Long-term Application of Blended Controlled-release Urea on Soil Enzyme Activities and Nutrients in Stubble Wheat Fields[J]. 2023, 37(2): 343-350. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.040.
为探究秸秆还田条件下长期施用控释掺混尿素对土壤酶活性及养分状况的影响。基于自2008年开始的长期定位施肥田间试验
于2021年小麦返青期、挑旗期、灌浆期和成熟期采集0—20 cm土壤样品
以不施氮肥为对照
研究秸秆还田条件下控释掺混尿素(CRF)和普通尿素(BBF)2种氮肥类型及不施氮(N 0 kg/hm2)、减量(N 120 kg/hm2
N1)、常量(N 240 kg/hm2
N2)和增量(N 360 kg/hm2
N3)4个施氮水平对麦季土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响
并对指标进行相关性分析。结果表明:相同施氮水平下的控释掺混尿素处理较普通尿素处理土壤蔗糖酶活性提高9.6%~21.0%
纤维素酶活性提高9.0%~31.5%。在小麦返青期和成熟期
控释掺混尿素处理的土壤硝态氮含量显著高于普通尿素处理
提高23.2%~145.0%。在返青期
CRF2处理土壤铵态氮含量较BBF2处理显著提高148.0%;成熟期
各施氮水平的控释掺混尿素处理的土壤铵态氮含量均显著高于普通尿素处理。CRF1和CRF2处理的小麦籽粒产量分别较BBF1和BBF2处理提高9.8%和12.4%。土壤脲酶、过氧化氢酶活性与土壤全氮、有机质、硝态氮含量呈显著正相关关系
过氧化氢酶、纤维素酶活性与速效磷和有效钾含量呈显著负相关关系。秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素较普通尿素提高小麦生育中后期土壤酶活性
更有利于小麦前、后期速效氮供应
长期施用显著提高土壤有机质含量
可提高土壤的保肥性和缓冲性
培肥土壤
其中以常量控释掺混尿素施肥为最优处理。
In order to investigate the effects of long-term application of blended controlled-release urea (CRF) on soil enzyme activities and nutrient status under straw returning condition to the field
soil samples ranging from 0 to 20 cm were collected from the field experiment of long-term positioning fertilization since 2008 at the rejuvenation stage
flag stage
filling stage and maturity stages of wheat in 2021.Without fertilized nitrogen as a control
the effects of CRF and normal urea (BBF)
and four application levels that no nitrogen application (N 0 kg/hm2)
reduced nitrogen application (N 120 kg/hm2
N1)
conventional nitrogen application (N 240 kg/hm2
N2) and increased nitrogen application (N 360 kg/hm2
N3) on soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients in wheat season were studied under straw returning
and the correlation analysis of the indexes was conducted.The results showed that under the same nitrogen application level
soil sucrase activity and cellulase activity were increased by 9.6%~21.0% and 9.0%~31.5% under CRF treatment compared with BBF treatment
respectively.The soil nitrate nitrogen content in CRF treatment was significantly higher than that in BBF treatment at the rejuvenation and maturity stages of wheat
increasing by 23.2%~145.0%.At the rejuvenation stage
the soil NH4+—N content under CRF2 treatment was significantly increased by 148.0% compared with that in BBF2 treatment.At maturity stage
the content of ammonium nitrogn in soil under CRF treatments was significantly higher than that of BBF treatments at all nitrogen application levels.Compared with BBF1 and BBF2
CRF1 and CRF2 treatments increased wheat grain yield by 9.8% and 12.4%
respectively.Soil urease and catalase activities were significantly positively correlated with the contents of soil total nitrogen
organic matter and nitrate nitrogen
while catalase and cellulase activities were significantly negatively correlated with phosphorus and available potassium contents.Straw returning combined with CRF increased soil enzyme activities at the middle and late growth stages of wheat compared with BBF
and was more conducive to the supply of available nitrogen at the early and late growth stages of wheat.Long-term application of straw returning combined with CRF significantly increased soil organic matter content
improved soil fertility retention and buffering
and improved soil fertility.Among them
the optimal treatment was CRF with conventional fertilizer application rate.
Zhang C, Ju X T, Powlson D, et al. Nitrogen surplus benchmarks for controlling N pollution in the main cropping systems of china[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2019,53(12):6678-6687.
孙帅欣,程杰杰,陈云鹏.玉米联合固氮菌Kosakonia radicincitans GXGL-4A转座突变体系的构建[J].微生物学通报,2018,45(8):1711-1718.
关瑞,张民,诸葛玉平,等.控释氮肥一次性基施提高谷子产量和氮素利用率[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(4):639-646.
Wang W H, Cheng Z C, Cong Q. The comprehensive utilization technology of crop straw[J].IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2020,446(3):e032047.
Zhang M M, Song D P, Pu X, et al. Effect of different straw returning measures on resource use efficiency and spring maize yield under a plastic film mulch system[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2022,134:e126461.
Qin X L, Huang T T, Lu C, et al. Benefits and limitations of straw mulching and incorporation on maize yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency[J].Agricultural Water Management,2021,256:e107128.
巨晓棠.氮肥有效率的概念及意义:兼论对传统氮肥利用率的理解误区[J].土壤学报,2014,51(5):921-933.
Wang Z, Wang Z, Ma L J, et al. Straw returning coupled with nitrogen fertilization increases canopy photosynthetic capacity, yield and nitrogen use efficiency in cotton[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2021,126:e126267.
Su Y, Kwong R W, Tang W L, et al. Straw return enhances the risks of metals in soil[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,207:e111201.
靳玉婷,李先藩,蔡影,等.秸秆还田配施化肥对稻-油轮作土壤酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响[J].环境科学,2021,42(8):3985-3996.
冯朋博,康建宏,梁熠,等.普通尿素与控释尿素配施比例和方法对土壤氮素供应和春玉米产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(4):692-704.
花可可,李蒙蒙,钟成虎,等.沿江单季稻区控释掺混肥施用效应研究[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(6):314-323.
肖其亮,朱坚,彭华,等.秸秆与缓控释肥配施对双季稻田氨挥发的控制效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(12):2788-2800,2809.
张华艳,牛灵安,郝晋珉,等.秸秆还田配施缓控释肥对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2018,49(1):140-149.
高永祥,李若尘,张民,等.秸秆还田配施控释掺混尿素对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].土壤学报,2021,58(6):1507-1519.
Zheng W K, Liu Z G, Zhang M, et al. Improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and profits by using mixtures of controlled-released and uncoated urea in a wheat-maize system[J].Field Crops Research,2017,205(6):106-115.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
Xu X W, Qu Q, Chen Y H, et al. Responses of soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon stability over time after cropland abandonment in different vegetation zones of the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2021,196:e104812.
Li Z Q, Li D D, Ma L, et al. Effects of straw management and nitrogen application rate on soil organic matter fractions and microbial properties in North China Plain[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019,19:618-628.
李委涛,李忠佩,刘明,等.秸秆还田对瘠薄红壤水稻土团聚体内酶活性及养分分布的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(20):3886-3895.
杨滨娟,黄国勤,钱海燕.秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤温度、根际微生物及酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2014,51(1):150-157.
秦玮玺,斯贵才,雷天柱,等.氮肥添加对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(1):170-175.
夏雪,谷洁,车升国,等.施氮水平对塿土微生物群落和酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(8):1618-1627.
钱海燕,杨滨娟,黄国勤,等.秸秆还田配施化肥及微生物菌剂对水田土壤酶活性和微生物数量的影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(3):440-445.
闫东良,何灵芝,李欢,等.控释尿素和普通尿素配比对不同氮效率玉米叶片衰老特性和土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9410-9421.
Shang Q Y, Gao C M, Yang X X, et al. Ammonia volatilization in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: A 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2014,50:715-725.
谢洪宝,于贺,陈一民,等.秸秆深埋对不同氮肥水平土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(24):79-83.
梁路,马臣,张然,等.有机无机肥配施提高旱地麦田土壤养分有效性及酶活性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(4):544-554.
张美曼,范少辉,官凤英,等.竹阔混交林土壤微生物生物量及酶活性特征研究[J].土壤,2020,52(1):97-105.
胡华英,张燕林,褚昭沛,等.红壤侵蚀区不同植被恢复阶段土壤酶活性和微生物多样性变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(3):734-741.
李慧永,刘小刚,张文慧,等.遮阴下滴灌施肥对小粒种咖啡土壤质量和水分利用的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,2022,43(2):57-67.
周利军,林小兵,武琳,等.镉污染稻田土壤理化性质、微生物及酶活性的差异性分析[J].环境工程,2020,38(10):202-206,227.
万盼,黄小辉,熊兴政,等.农药施用浓度对油桐幼苗生长及土壤酶活性、有效养分含量的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(1):73-80.
0
浏览量
996
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621