横坡与顺坡垄作模式土壤中水及示踪Br-分布特征

江鑫; 董文财; 付强; 董亮志; 孟雪

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.029

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

横坡与顺坡垄作模式土壤中水及示踪Br-分布特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 横坡与顺坡垄作模式土壤中水及示踪Br-分布特征
- Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture and Tracer Br-Under Transverse Ridge and Along-slope Ridge Planting Modes
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第2期页码：253-259
- 作者机构：
  
  东北农业大学水利与土木工程学院,哈尔滨,150030
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "江鑫(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事农业水土工程研究。E-mail:1391179783@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金重点项目(联合基金)(U20A20318)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.029
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
江鑫, 董文财, 付强, 等. 横坡与顺坡垄作模式土壤中水及示踪Br-分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):253-259.

JIANG Xin, DONG Wencai, FU Qiang, et al. Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture and Tracer Br-Under Transverse Ridge and Along-slope Ridge Planting Modes[J]. 2023, 37(2): 253-259.
江鑫, 董文财, 付强, 等. 横坡与顺坡垄作模式土壤中水及示踪Br-分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):253-259. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.029.

JIANG Xin, DONG Wencai, FU Qiang, et al. Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Soil Moisture and Tracer Br-Under Transverse Ridge and Along-slope Ridge Planting Modes[J]. 2023, 37(2): 253-259. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.029.

摘要

针对坡耕地横坡、顺坡垄作模式土壤水分及溶质迁移过程的差异

采用田间模拟试验的方法

以坡度为7°的大豆坡耕地为研究对象

以Br-为示踪剂

监测不同垄作模式垄台、垄侧、垄沟各位置的土壤水分和Br-浓度

探究坡耕地横坡、顺坡垄作模式对土壤中水分迁移及可溶性养分分布的影响。结果表明:2种模式最大土壤体积含水量横坡垄作分布在10—20 cm土层

顺坡垄作分布在5—15 cm土层

证明横坡垄作对雨水的拦蓄作用。横坡垄作模式最大土壤贮水量位置在垄上侧的垄侧处

顺坡垄作模式在垄沟处。不同垄作模式下各土层土壤体积含水量变异系数在0—5

50—60 cm处较大

介于8.97~11.90

中间土层的变异系数较小

在0.91~8.76间波动。顺坡垄作20—60 cm土层中Br-沿坡向迁移现象明显

横坡垄作40—60 cm土层中Br-沿坡向发生迁移;2种垄作模式垄台和坡向下方位置(横坡∶垄侧;顺坡∶株间)的土壤Br-总量比值均约为3∶7

顺坡垄作垄台中心处Br-总量为横坡垄作的54.33%

说明横坡垄作可以减少土壤中Br-沿坡向迁移。研究成果为在顺坡垄作条件下将非吸附性养分施在垄侧处可减少其迁移流失

有利于提高作物对养分的利用效率。

Abstract

In view of the difference of soil water and solute migration between transverse ridge planting and along-slope ridge planting modes in sloping farmland

a field simulation experiment was conducted to monitor soil water distribution and Br-concentrations distribution in different ridge planting modes

including ridge beds

ridge sides and furrows

taking the soybean sloping land with a slope of 7° as the research object and Br-as the tracer.To explore the effects of transverse and along-slope ridge planting modes on soil water migration and soluble nutrient distribution in sloping farmland.The results showed that the maximum soil water content of the two modes was distributed between the 10—20 cm soil layer in transverse ridge cropping and between the 5—15 cm soil layer in the along-slope ridge planting mode

which proved the effect of transverse ridge planting mode on rainwater storage.The maximum soil water storage was found in the ridge side on the upper side of the ridge under the transverse ridge planting mode

and that in the ridge and furrow under along-slope ridge planting mode.The variation coefficient of soil volumetric water content in each soil layer under different ridge planting patterns was larger in the range of 0—5 cm

50—60 cm

and was between 8.97 and 11.90.The variation coefficient of soil volumetric water content in the middle layer was smaller

and fluctuated between 0.91 and 8.76.The Br-ions migration along the slope direction was obvious in the soil layer of 20—60 cm under the ridge planting along the slope

while Br-ions migration occurred in the soil layer of 40—60 cm under the ridge planting on the transverse slope.The ratio of soil Br-ions total amount in the ridge of the furrow and the lower part of the slope (transverse ridge planting:side of the ridge;along-slope ridge planting:among the plant) was 3∶7 in the two ridge cultivation modes.The total amount of Br-ions in the center of ridge bed under the along-slope ridge planting modes was only 54.33% of that under transverse ridge planting mode

which could reduce the migration of Br-ions in soil along the slope.Based on the results of this study

it can be concluded that applying non-absorbable nutrients on the ridge side can reduce their migration and loss

which is beneficial to improve the utilization efficiency of nutrients by crops.

关键词

Keywords

references

王辉,王全九,邵明安.降水条件下黄土坡地氮素淋溶特征的研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):63-66,95.

王磊,何超,郑粉莉,等.黑土区坡耕地横坡垄作措施防治土壤侵蚀的土槽试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):141-148.

盖浩,刘平奇,张梦璇,等.黑土坡耕地横坡垄作对减少径流及土壤有机碳流失的作用[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):300-304,311.

马金龙,许欢欢,王兵,等.黄土高原坡耕地土壤物理结皮对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):45-49.

董文财,李林,付强.黑土区坡耕地次降雨硝态氮径流及壤中流迁移研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):1-6.

牟廷森,沈海鸥,贺云锋,等.黑土区垄作方式对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的调控效果[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):22-30.

He X L, Wang Y D, Li T X, et al. Phosphorus losses under heavy rain from the sloping farmlands in the purple hilly region of Southwestern China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019,19(2):4005-4020.

邱野,王瑄,李德利,等.不同耕作模式下坡耕地次降雨径流量及径流泥沙颗粒机械组成规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):62-65.

何彦星,张风宝,杨明义.

137

Cs示踪分析东北黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀对有机碳组分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(14):60-68.

桑琦明,王磊,郑粉莉,等.东北黑土区坡耕地斜坡垄作与顺坡垄作土壤侵蚀对比分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):73-78.

王小康,谷举,刘刚,等.横、顺坡垄作对黑土坡面侵蚀—沉积周期规律的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(2):430-439.

Kladivko E J, Griffith D R, Mannering J V. Conservation tillage effects on soil properties and yield of corn and soya beans in Indiana[J].Soil and Tillage Research,1986,8:277-287.

邱野,王瑄.耕作模式对坡耕地土壤水分和大豆产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(22):128-137.

刘兴土,阎百兴.东北黑土区水土流失与粮食安全[J].中国水土保持,2009(1):17-19.

魏永霞,王鹤,吴昱,等.生物炭对不同坡度坡耕地土壤水动力学参数的影响[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(3):231-240.

沈紫燕,王辉,平李娜,等.前期土壤含水量对粘性红壤产流产沙及溶质运移的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):58-62.

王辉,王全九,邵明安,等.翻耕与压实对坡地土壤溶质迁移过程的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(6):21-25,86.

王辉.降雨条件下黄土坡地养分迁移机理及模拟模型[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2006.

孙艳,李四高,张楠,等.不同农作处理对西南土石山区坡耕地水土流失特征的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(33):118-120.

田英,赵西宁,陈小莉,等.小麦/玉米垄沟套作条件下施肥部位对土壤水氮分布的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(1):72-78.

姜振萃,闵炬,陆志新,等.机械起垄侧条施肥对大白菜产量和氨挥发的影响[J].土壤,2020,52(1):10-15.

刘波. 耕作措施对黑土坡耕地氮磷养分平衡的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2018.

毛妍婷,刘宏斌,郭树芳,等.耕作措施对坡耕地红壤地表径流氮磷流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):26-33.

王双,叶良惠,郑子成,等.玉米成熟期黄壤坡耕地径流及其氮素流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):28-33.

浏览量

1166

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

川西高山峡谷区不同种植模式坡面微地形变化及其对细沟发育的响应

等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤质量的改良效果评价

等高犁耕对黄土坡耕地坡形与坡度的影响

基于梯度提升树模型的坡耕地土壤水蚀模拟与分析

不同耕作方式对豫西旱区坡耕地水肥利用与流失的影响