1. 宁夏大学土木与水利工程学院,银川,750021
2. 陕西省水利电力勘测设计研究院,西安,710001
3. 旱区现代农业水资源高效利用教育部工程研究中心,银川,750021
4. 省部共建西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室,银川,750021
[ "贾振江(1997—),男,博士研究生,主要从事旱区节水灌溉理论与技术研究。E-mail:2474697460@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
贾振江, 刘学智, 徐天渊, 等. 砂土混合覆盖下的土壤水分蒸发特性及其因子分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):227-236.
JIA Zhenjiang, LIU Xuezhi, XU Tianyuan, et al. Analysis of Soil Water Evaporation Characteristics and Its Influencing Factors Under Mixed Sand Cover[J]. 2023, 37(2): 227-236.
贾振江, 刘学智, 徐天渊, 等. 砂土混合覆盖下的土壤水分蒸发特性及其因子分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):227-236. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.026.
JIA Zhenjiang, LIU Xuezhi, XU Tianyuan, et al. Analysis of Soil Water Evaporation Characteristics and Its Influencing Factors Under Mixed Sand Cover[J]. 2023, 37(2): 227-236. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.026.
为明确不同砂土混合物覆盖对土壤蒸发过程的影响
基于土壤蒸发分阶段理论及微型蒸渗仪田间试验
深入探析了6种砂土混合覆盖模式(1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
分别为M1~M6)下的土壤蒸发动态变化及其作用机制。结果表明:土壤蒸发分阶段理论能够真实刻画砂土混合覆盖下的土壤水分蒸发状况
其累计蒸发量可用砂土混合比与蒸发时间进行定量表征。当砂土混合比≥0.8时
土壤蒸发过程仅存在2个明显阶段
抑蒸效果显著;当砂土混合比<0.5时
M3~M6处理的土壤蒸发稳定高峰期明显
且集中于前2.53~2.66天
水分主要散失历时则分别较M1增加6.49
6.49
6.49
7.09天;而当砂土混合比介于0.5~0.8时
覆盖层易诱发且能够更早地形成结构致密的覆盖干层
整体保墒效果反而凸显。受土壤蒸发阶段特性及覆盖模式的影响
蒸发第1阶段主要受下垫面净辐射通量供应的限制;而在蒸发第2
3阶段
砂层结构的作用凸显
土壤水力特性调控效应逐渐占优。总之
砂层结构恶化将加快土壤失水过程
增加农田水分的无效损失
当砂土混合比<0.5时
其抑蒸保墒功效将逐渐丧失
这对西北旱区砂田退化机理的揭示及压砂地可持续健康发展具有现实意义。
To clarify the influence of different sand-soil mixtures on the soil evaporation process
on the basis of soil evaporation theory and micro-lysimeter field experiment
the dynamic changes characteristics of soil evaporation intensity and its action mechanism under six mixed sand-soil mulching patterns (1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
denoted by M1~M6
respectively) were deeply explored.The results showed that the theoretical simulation of soil evaporation could realistically reflect the soil water evaporation under the mixed cover of sand and soil
and its cumulative evaporation could be quantitatively expressed by the mixing volume ratio of sand and soil evaporation time.There were only two prominent evaporation stages with significant evaporation inhibition when the the sand mixing ratio increased to above 0.8.When the mixing volume ratio of sand was decreased to below 0.5
the peak of soil evaporation stability stage under M3~M6 treatment had been concentrated in the first 2.53~2.66 d
and the main moisture dissipation duration was increased by 6.49
6.49
6.49 and 7.09 d compared with M1
respectively.However
when the sand mixing volume ration was between 0.5 and 0.8
the mulch layer was easily induced and could form the dense mulch dry layer earlier
while the overall moisture conservation effect was prominent instead.Under the influence of soil evaporation stage characteristics and mulching patterns
the supply of underlying net radiation flux mainly limited the first evaporation stage.In the second and third evaporation stages of evaporation
the role of sand layer structure came to the fore
and the regulating function of soil hydraulic properties gradually prevailed.In summary
the deterioration of sand layer structure would accelerate the soil evaporation process and intensify the ineffective water loss of farmland.When the mixing volume ration of sand was less than 0.5
the effect of evaporation and soil moisture retention would gradually lose
which has practical significance for revealing the degradation mechanism of gravel-sand mulched fields and its sustainable and healthy development in Northwest arid region.
刘学智.宁夏中部干旱带降雨和砂土混合覆盖对压砂地土壤水分蒸发的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学,2018.
杜延珍.砂田在干旱地区的水土保持作用[J].中国水土保持,1993(4):36-39.
李王成,王帅,王兴旺.砂田抑制蒸发功能随覆砂年限的演变规律[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(3):83-89.
吕国安,蔡崇法,陈明亮,等.丹江口库区石渣土土壤水分有效性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):106-109.
谭军利,王西娜,田军仓,等.压砂地砂层持水特性研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):319-325.
郑飞龙,王西娜,葛敏,等.压砂条件下灰钙土地区农田土壤水分垂直入渗特征研究[J].土壤通报,2021,52(2):314-321.
徐天渊,贾振江,李王成,等.宁夏中部干旱带微咸水灌溉对砂土混合覆盖下土壤水盐运移的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(5):138-144.
贾振江,赵广兴,李王成,等.宁夏中部干旱带砂土混合覆盖下土壤蒸发估算[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):219-227.
许强,吴宏亮,康建宏,等.旱区砂田肥力演变特征研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(1):37-41.
王超,王菲,吴秀玲,等.压砂年限对土壤质量的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(8):190-195.
李王成,王为,冯绍元,等.不同类型微型蒸发器测定土壤蒸发的田间试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(10):6-13.
翁笃鸣,陈万隆,沈觉成,等.小气候与农田小气候[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1981.
徐天渊.宁夏中部干旱带土壤蒸发模型研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2021.
Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements[M].Rome: FAO,1998.
张建华,赵燮京,庞良玉,等.风干表土对土壤水分蒸发阻力研究[J].西南农业学报,1999,12(增刊1):56-62.
杨婷,邢旭光,马孝义.凹凸棒土添加对土壤蒸发及裂缝特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(8):2187-2195.
Xiao B, Zhao Y G, Shao M A. Characteristics and numeric simulation of soil evaporation in biological soil crusts [J].Journal of Arid Environments,2010,74(1):121-130.
宋日权,褚贵新,冶军,等.掺砂对土壤水分入渗和蒸发影响的室内试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(增刊1):109-114.
Yuan C P, Lei T W, Mao L L, et al. Soil surface evaporation processes under mulches of different sized gravel [J].Catena,2009,78(2):117-121.
Suleiman A A, Ritchie J T. Modeling soil water redistribution during second-stage evaporation[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2003,67(2):377-386.
Li W X, Brunner P, Hendricks F H J, et al. Potential evaporation dynamics over saturated bare soil and an open water surface[J].Journal of Hydrology,2020,590:125-140.
李婉歆,尹红美,王文科,等.基于野外观测与能量守恒原理分析饱和裸土与水面蒸发量的差异[J].水文地质工程地质,2021,48(3):38-44.
钟芳,李正平,宋耀选,等.黄土高原西部土壤蒸发实验研究[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):608-611.
赵丹,李毅,冯浩.砂石条形覆盖下土壤水分蒸发动态研究[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1058-1068.
An N, Tang C S, Xu S K, et al. Effects of soil characteristics on moisture evaporation[J].Engineering Geology,2018,239:126-135.
崔向新,蒙仲举,高永,等.不同粒径砾石覆盖对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].中国农村水利水电,2009(3):21-23.
高扬子,何洪林,张黎,等.近50年中国地表净辐射的时空变化特征分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2013,15(1):1-10.
刘巧玲,李王成,赵广兴,等.覆砂和灌水量对退耕压砂地生态枣林土壤水热及枣果产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2022,39(5):940-947.
王冬林,冯浩,李毅.砾石覆盖对土壤水热过程及旱作小麦玉米产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(7):132-139.
0
浏览量
899
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621