贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院, 国家喀斯特沙漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵阳,550001
[ "王耀鑫(1998—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事数字喀斯特大地景观规划与生态修复研究。E-mail:mangowyx@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
王耀鑫, 高家勇, 张玉珊, 等. 喀斯特流域水源涵养功能时空分异及其对景观格局的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):169-178.
WANG Yaoxin, GAO Jiayong, ZHANG Yushan, et al. Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Water Conservation Function in Karst Basin and Its Response to Landscape Pattern[J]. 2023, 37(2): 169-178.
王耀鑫, 高家勇, 张玉珊, 等. 喀斯特流域水源涵养功能时空分异及其对景观格局的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):169-178. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.020.
WANG Yaoxin, GAO Jiayong, ZHANG Yushan, et al. Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Water Conservation Function in Karst Basin and Its Response to Landscape Pattern[J]. 2023, 37(2): 169-178. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.020.
针对喀斯特地区景观格局驱动水源涵养功能演变机制的相关研究较少
而水源涵养功能是岩溶石漠化治理等生态修复工程生态效益的关键指标之一
具有重要的研究意义。以地处西南喀斯特中心的野纪河流域为研究对象
基于InVEST模型、偏最小二乘模型(PLSR)、景观生态学理论等
探究野纪河流域2005—2020年水源涵养功能的时空分异特征及其与景观格局的耦合关系。结果表明:(1)野纪河流域景观类型以旱地、草地和灌木林等为主
各类型之间相互转化较为频繁
总体特征表现为旱地、灌木林和草地之间的转化以及建设用地对其余地类的挤占。(2)研究期间
旱地景观趋于破碎化
建设用地呈集聚性的扩张趋势
其他景观类型相对稳定。总体上
景观格局呈破碎化发展趋势
景观连通性呈小幅上升趋势。(3)研究区水源涵养量年际变化呈现持续增长趋势
在空间分布上呈现中部低、南北两侧高的态势。水源涵养深度由高到低排序为灌木林>有林地>疏林地>草地>旱地>建设用地>水田>湖泊>水库坑塘。(4)景观破碎化的增加及斑块质量的提高
可提升喀斯特流域水源涵养功能
但过高的景观破碎化程度可能导致水源涵养功能下降。总体来看
研究期间野纪河流域景观格局呈破碎化发展态势
水源涵养功能呈持续增加趋势
景观格局对水源涵养功能的影响具有复杂性。研究结果可为喀斯特流域景观规划、水资源保护等提供重要的科学依据。
There are few related studies on the evolution mechanism of water conservation function driven by landscape pattern in karst areas
and water conservation function is one of the key indicators of ecological benefits of ecological restoration projects such as the central of karst rocky desertification
which has important research significance.Taking the Yeji River Basin located in the center of the Southwest Karst as the research object
based on the InVEST model
partial least squares model (PLSR)
landscape ecology theory
etc.
this paper explored the spatial and temporal variation of water conservation function and its coupling relationship with landscape pattern in the Yeji River Basin from 2005 to 2020.The results showed that:(1) The landscape types of the Yeji River Basin were mainly dryland
grassland and shrubbery
and the mutual transformation between each type is relatively frequent.The general characteristics were the conversion among dryland
shrubbery and grassland and the squeezing of construction land on other land types.(2) During the study period
dryland landscape tended to be fragmented
the construction land showed an agglomerative expansion trend
and other landscape types were relatively stable.In general
the landscape pattern showed a fragmented development trend
and the landscape connectivity showed a slight upward trend.(3) The interannual variation of water conservation in the study area showed a continuous growth trend
and the spatial distribution showed a trend of low in the middle and high in the north and south.The order of water conservation depth from high to low was shrub forest > forest land > sparse forest land > grassland > dryland > construction land > paddy fields > lakes > reservoirs and ponds.(4) The increase of landscape fragmentation and the improvement of patch quality could improve the water conservation function of karst basins
but the excessive degree of landscape fragmentation may lead to the decline of water conservation function.In general
during the study period
the landscape pattern of the Yeji River Basin showed a trend of fragmented development
and the water conservation function showed a continuous increasing trend.The impact of landscape pattern on the water conservation function was complex.The research results can provide important scientific basis for landscape planning and water resources protection in karst watershed.
Schirpke U, Marino D, Marucci A, et al. Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas: Experiences and challenges[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,28(Part A):105-114.
龚诗涵,肖洋,郑华,等.中国生态系统水源涵养空间特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2017,37(7):2455-2462.
柯新利,普鹍鹏,杨柏寒,等.耕地保护对生态系统水源涵养功能的影响:以武汉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):391-396,402.
徐建英,樊斐斐,刘焱序,等.汶川县生态系统服务对景观格局及其变化的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4724-4736.
黄木易,岳文泽,冯少茹,等.基于InVEST模型的皖西大别山区生境质量时空演化及景观格局分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2895-2906.
王蓓,赵军,仲俊涛.2005—2015年石羊河流域生态系统服务时空分异[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(2):474-485.
熊梅君,李秋华,陈倩,等.基于GIS应用P-IBI评价贵州高原百花水库水生态系统健康[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(10):3093-3101.
杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.基于InVEST模型的黄河流域产水量时空变化及其对降水和土地利用变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(8):2731-2739.
Huang L, Liao F H, Lohse K A, et al. Land conservation can mitigate freshwater ecosystem services degradation due to climate change in a semiarid catchment: The case of the Portneuf River catchment, Idaho, USA[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,651:1796-1809.
吕乐婷,任甜甜,李赛赛,等.基于InVEST模型的大连市产水量时空变化分析[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):144-150,157.
顾晋饴,李一平,杜薇.基于InVEST模型的太湖流域水源涵养能力评价及其变化特征分析[J].水资源保护,2018,34(3):62-67,84.
窦攀烽,左舒翟,任引,等.气候和土地利用/覆被变化对宁波地区生态系统产水服务的影响[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(7):2398-2409.
刘树锋,陈记臣,关帅,等.基于InVEST模型的杨溪河流域土地利用变化对水源涵养功能的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(12):4746-4751.
Zhu Q, Guo X, Guo J X, et al. The quality attribute of watershed ecosystem is more important than the landscape attribute in controlling erosion of red soil in southern China[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2022,10(3):507-517.
唐玉芝,邵全琴.乌江上游地区森林生态系统水源涵养功能评估及其空间差异探究[J].地球信息科学学报,2016,18(7):987-999.
张志敏,杜景龙,陈德超,等.典型网状河网区域土地利用和景观格局对地表季节水质的影响:以江苏省溧阳市为例[J].湖泊科学,2022,34(5):1524-1540.
彭守璋.中国1 km逐月潜在蒸散发数据集(1990—2020).国家青藏高原科学数据中心, DOI:10.11866/db.loess.2021.001.
Xiao Y, Ouyang Z Y. Spatial-temporal patterns and driving forces of water retention service in China[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2019,29(1):100-111.
Baker T J, Miller S N. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed[J].Journal of Hydrology,2013,486:100-111.
Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, et al. InVEST 2. 5. 3 User's Guide[M].Stanford: The Natural Capital Project,2003.
郑宇,张蓬涛,汤峰,等.基于InVEST模型的昌黎县土地利用变化对生境质量的影响研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(7):121-128.
Carrascal L M, Galván I, Gordo O. Partial least squares regression as an alternative to current regression methods used in ecology[J].Oikos,2009,118(5):681-690.
Li Z W, Xu X L, Xu C H, et al. Annual runoff is highly linked to precipitation extremes in Karst catchments of Southwest China[J].Journal of Hydrometeorology,2017,18(10):2745-2759.
Onderka M, Wrede S, Rodny M, et al. Hydrogeologic and landscape controls of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved silica (DSi) fluxes in heterogeneous catchments[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,450/451:36-47.
郑博福,黄琼瑶,陶林,等.赣南地区景观格局变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):5940-5949.
夏林,安裕伦,姜海峰,等.基于InVEST模型的喀斯特流域水源涵养量:以贵州省内乌江流域为例[J].贵州科学,2019,37(1):27-32.
薛健,李宗省,冯起,等.1980—2017年祁连山水源涵养量时空变化特征[J].冰川冻土,2022,44(1):1-13.
李子,张艳芳.基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):178-185.
刘业轩,石晓丽,史文娇.福建省森林生态系统水源涵养服务评估:InVEST模型与meta分析对比[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1349-1361.
李莹莹,马晓双,祁国华,等.基于参数本地化InVEST模型的安徽省水源涵养功能研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(2):313-325.
陈骏宇,刘钢,白杨.基于InVEST模型的太湖流域水源涵养服务价值评估[J].水利经济,2016,34(2):25-29,84.
陈文波,肖笃宁,李秀珍.景观指数分类、应用及构建研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(1):121-125.
傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义[J].地理学报,1996,51(5):454-462.
0
浏览量
1149
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621