1. 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
4. 长江水利委员会长江流域水土保持监测中心站,武汉,430012
5. 中山大学土木工程学院,广东,珠海,519082
[ "马雪燕(1998—),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水文与水资源研究。E-mail:maxueyan0208@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
马雪燕, 穆兴民, 王双银, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复对土壤入渗影响及适宜模型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):67-75.
MA Xueyan, MU Xingmin, WANG Shuangyin, et al. Study on the Effects of Different Vegetation Restoration on Soil Infiltration and Suitable Models in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(2): 67-75.
马雪燕, 穆兴民, 王双银, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复对土壤入渗影响及适宜模型研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):67-75. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.009.
MA Xueyan, MU Xingmin, WANG Shuangyin, et al. Study on the Effects of Different Vegetation Restoration on Soil Infiltration and Suitable Models in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(2): 67-75. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.009.
研究植被恢复条件下土壤入渗特性及模型适应性
可为流域生态治理和效益评估提供科学依据。以延河纸坊沟小流域为研究区
采用野外单环入渗法和数值模拟法
对比研究不同恢复年限下的刺槐林地、柠条灌木林地、次生草地和农地的表层以下土壤和20 cm以下土壤的水分入渗变化特征
评价4种常用入渗模型在该区域的适应性。结果表明:(1)不同植被恢复地的表层以下土壤入渗过程在渗润阶段与渗漏阶段差异明显
相差4倍以上
20 cm以下的土壤入渗过程则在入渗稳定后的渗透阶段差异明显
相差5倍多;(2)不同植被类型及恢复年限会显著影响土壤入渗特征
整体呈现出林地>草地>农地的规律
并且随着恢复年限的增加
柠条灌木林地和次生草地的入渗能力增强
而刺槐林地入渗能力减弱;(3) Philip方程、Kostiakov方程、Horton方程与蒋定生方程对该地区土壤水分入渗过程均具有较好适用性
其中Philip方程适用性最好
决定系数(R2)能达到0.931~0.985
均方根误差(RMSE)相对最小
在0.057~0.283范围内
Kostiakov方程次之
Horton方程及蒋定生方程在个别情况下存在偏差。综上
植被恢复显著影响土壤入渗能力
且随恢复年限的增加呈现不同规律
多种入渗模型中Philip方程对该地区土壤水分入渗过程适用性最好。
The study on soil infiltration characteristics and model adaptability under vegetation restoration can provide scientific basis for watershed ecological management and benefit evaluation.Taking Zhifanggou small watershed of Yanhe River as the study area
the field single-loop infiltration method and numerical simulation method were used to study the variation characteristics of water infiltration below the surface layer and below 20 cm soil of robinia pseudoacacia forest land
caragana korshinskii shrub land
secondary grassland and farmland under different restoration years
and the adaptability of four common infiltration models in the region was evaluated.The results showed that:(1) The infiltration process of soil below the surface layer of different vegetation restoration areas were significantly different in the infiltration and leakage stages
and the maximum difference was more than 4 times.The infiltration process below 20 cm was significantly different in the penetration stage after the infiltration stability
and the maximum difference was more than 5 times.(2) Different vegetation types and restoration years had significant effect on soil infiltration characteristics
showing the law of forest land > grassland > farmland as a whole.With the increase of restoration years
the infiltration capacity of caragana korshinskii land and secondary grassland increased
while the infiltration capacity of robinia pseudoacacia forest land decreased.(3) Philip equation
Kostiakov equation
Horton equation and Jiang Dingsheng equation all had good applicability to the soil water infiltration process in the region.Philip equation had the strongest applicability
and the determination coefficient R2 could reach 0.931~0.985
the root mean square error RMSE was relatively minimum
which was in the range of 0.057~0.283
followed by Kostiakov equation
but Horton equation and Jiang Dingsheng equation had deviation in individual cases.In conclusion
vegetation restoration will significantly affect soil infiltration capacity and show different laws with the increase of restoration years.Among various infiltration models
Philip equation has the best applicability to the soil water infiltration process in this area.
朱显谟.黄土地区植被因素对于水土流失的影响[J].土壤学报,1960,8(2):110-120.
张炳勋,冯国章.林地拦洪作用及产流特点的分析[J].水文,1985(2):37-44.
芮孝芳.关于降雨产流机制的几个问题的讨论[J].水利学报,1996(9):22-26.
李宗善,杨磊,王国梁,等.黄土高原水土流失治理现状、问题及对策[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7398-7409.
王承书,高峰,孙文义,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟系统不同降雨类型的土壤入渗特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):3111-3122.
Zhang Y W, Wang K B, Wang J, et al.Changes in soil water holding capacity and water availability following vegetation restoration on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Scientific Reports,2021,11:e9692.
张缓,穆兴民,高鹏.黄土高原不同立地条件下枯落物蓄积量及持水特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):45-52.
肖茜,张洪培,沈玉芳,等.生物炭对黄土区土壤水分入渗、蒸发及硝态氮淋溶的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(16):128-134.
方正三.黄河中游黄土高原梯田的调查研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1958:53-59.
蒋定生,黄国俊.黄土高原土壤入渗速率的研究[J].土壤学报,1986,23(4):299-305.
Zhang Q Y, Chen W W, Kong Y Z. Modification and discussion of the Green-Ampt model for an evolving wetting profile[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal,2020,65(12):2072-2082.
Mao L L, Li Y Z, Hao W P, et al.A new method to estimate soil water infiltration based on a modified Green-Ampt model[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,161:31-37.
Gu C J, Mu X M, Gao P, et al. Influence of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019,19:716-728.
谭学进,穆兴民,高鹏,等.黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(2):713-722.
刘畅,张建军,张海博,等.晋西黄土区退耕还林后土壤入渗特征及土壤质量评价[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):101-107.
方书敏.陇中黄土高原典型人工林土壤水文过程研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2016.
李玉婷.晋西黄土区典型人工林特征及土壤水分动态研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2021.
李民义.晋西黄土区不同植被类型植物多样性及土壤水文物理特征研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
陈维梁,王树学,齐统祥,等.黄土丘陵区不同恢复年限人工刺槐林土壤水分时空动态及其时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5643-5657.
刘增文,时腾飞,杨森浩,等.黄土残塬沟壑区利用阔叶树种枯落叶对针叶林土壤极化的防治效应[J].土壤学报,2012,49(3):445-453.
王全九,来剑斌,李毅.Green-Ampt模型与Philip入渗模型的对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(2):13-16.
王经民,吴钦孝,韩冰,等.陕北黄土区土壤入渗模型的比较探讨[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2004,20(4):288-290.
刘卉芳,曹文洪,王向东.黄土区不同地类土壤水分入渗与模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(5):42-45.
吴思萱,刘卉芳,陈彩虹,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分入渗的时空分布研究[J].泥沙研究,2019,44(4):60-65.
0
浏览量
1007
下载量
13
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621