1. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉,430070
2. 丹江口市水土保持监测中心, 湖北 丹江口,442700
[ "杜映妮(1996—),女,博士研究生,主要从事水土保持与环境生态研究。E-mail:dyn1042056130@126.com" ]
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
杜映妮, 周怡雯, 李朝霞, 等. 丹江口库区不同降雨类型下典型植被措施的水土保持效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):51-57.
DU Yingni, ZHOU Yiwen, LI Zhaoxia, et al. Effects of Typical Vegetation Measures on Soil and Water Conservation Under Different Rainfall Regimes in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area[J]. 2023, 37(2): 51-57.
杜映妮, 周怡雯, 李朝霞, 等. 丹江口库区不同降雨类型下典型植被措施的水土保持效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):51-57. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.007.
DU Yingni, ZHOU Yiwen, LI Zhaoxia, et al. Effects of Typical Vegetation Measures on Soil and Water Conservation Under Different Rainfall Regimes in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area[J]. 2023, 37(2): 51-57. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.007.
为了进一步研究丹江口库区不同降雨类型下植被措施控制土壤侵蚀的效果
以丹江口库区典型生态修复小流域为研究对象
采用坡面径流小区观测法
基于长期野外原位监测的降雨和径流泥沙数据
以裸地为对照
研究不同降雨类型下典型植被恢复措施对坡面产流产沙和土壤侵蚀的影响
分析植被措施的水土保持效应对降雨类型的响应特征。结果表明:(1)中历时、中雨量、小雨强降雨(雨型Ⅲ)是研究区常见的降雨类型
短历时、小雨量、大雨强降雨(雨型Ⅰ)和长历时、大雨量、中雨强降雨(雨型Ⅱ)发生的频率相对较低
但雨型Ⅰ所导致的土壤侵蚀最为严重
占总侵蚀量的46.79%以上
降雨量和最大30 min雨强(I30)是控制该区域土壤侵蚀的关键降雨因子。(2)植被措施均具有显著的水土保持效应
减流减沙效益依次为紫花苜蓿草地>柏树林>枇杷林。相比于裸地
紫花苜蓿草地径流系数减少54.07%
含沙量减少50.80%
土壤侵蚀量减少65.47%
而枇杷林的径流系数、含沙量和土壤侵蚀量仅分别减少30.60%
36.21%
45.42%。植被措施在雨型Ⅲ下的水土保持效应最优
以紫花苜蓿草地效果最好
土壤侵蚀的减少量可达87.98%
而在雨型Ⅰ条件下稍差
其中柏树林的效果相对较好
侵蚀减少量为65.25%;植被措施的减流效益随着降雨量的增加逐渐降低
减沙效益则随着I30的增加而降低。当I30<41 mm/h
紫花苜蓿草地的减沙效果较佳;当68.8 mm/h>I30>41 mm/h
柏树林的减沙效果相对较好
但低于41.55%。研究结果对于丹江口库区水土保持及资源可持续利用具有重要指导意义。
In order to further study the effect of vegetation measures on soil and water conservation under different rainfall regimes
this study takes the typical ecological restoration watershed in Danjiangkou reservoir area as the research object and adopts the slope runoff plot observation method
to study the effects of typical vegetation restoration measure on runoff coefficient
sediment concentration and soil erosion amount in the slope under different rainfall regimes based on the rainfall
runoff and sediment data monitored in situ of long term field taking bare land as the control.The response characteristics of soil and water conservation effects of vegetation measures to different rainfall regimes were analyzed.The results are as follows:(1) Rainfall regime Ⅲ characterized by medium-duration
medium-rainfall and low-intensity was the most common type in the study area
while short-duration
low-rainfall and high-intensity rainfall (Rainfall regime Ⅰ)
and long-duration
high-rainfall and medium-intensity rainfall (Rainfall regime Ⅱ) occurred relatively infrequently.But the soil erosion caused by Rainfall regime Ⅰ was the most serious
accounting for more than 46.79% of the total erosion.Besides
the rainfall depth and maximum rainfall intensity of 30 min (I30) were the key rainfall factors controlling soil erosion in the study area.(2) All vegetation measures had significant effects on soil and water conservation
and the benefits of runoff and sediment reduction were in the order of MS>CF>EJ.Compared to the bare land
MS decreased the runoff coefficient
sediment concentration and soil erosion by 54.07%
50.80% and 65.47%
respectively
while EJ reduced the runoff coefficient
sediment concentration and soil erosion by 30.60%
36.21% and 45.42%
respectively.The soil and water conservation effect of vegetation measures was the best under rainfall regime Ⅲ
with the best effect of MS
the reduction of soil erosion reached 87.98%;while it was slightly weaker under rainfall regime Ⅰ
among which the effect of CF was relatively better
with the reduction of erosion was 65.25%.Furthermore
the reduction benefit of runoff coefficient for vegetation measures gradually decreased with the increase of rainfall depth
the reduction benefit of sediment concentration decreased with the increase of I30.The Medicago sativa measure had the better sediment reduction effect at I30<41 mm/h
while CF had the better sediment reduction effect at 68.8 mm/h>I30>41 mm/h
but lower than 41.55%.The results have important guiding significance for soil and water conservation and sustainable utilization of resources in the Danjiangkou reservoir area.
Qiu L P, Zhang Q, Zhu H S, et al. Erosion reduces soil microbial diversity, net work complexity and multifunctionality[J].The ISME Journal,2021,15(8):2474-2489.
Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J].Nature Communications,2017,8(1):1-13.
Zambon N, Johannsen L L, Strauss P, et al. Rainfall parameters affecting splash erosion under natural conditions[J].Applied Sciences,2020,10(12):e4103.
陈洋,张海东,于东升,等.南方红壤区植被结构类型与降雨模式对林下水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(5):150-157.
孙从建,侯慧新,陈伟,等.典型黄土塬区不同植物措施水土保持效应分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(7):1405-1416.
王小博,朱永清,吴宜进,等.不同植被下降雨类型对红壤坡地土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):6-11.
王葆,程金花,王文凯,等.北京北部褐土区2种典型植物措施减流减沙效应[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):56-61.
Zhu M Y. Soil erosion assessment using USLE in the GIS environment: A case study in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2015,12(73):7899-7908.
李细牛,刘学全,王常红,等.丹江口库区柏树生长主导因子及生长过程研究[J].湖北林业科技,2021,50(2):6-9.
王会良,何华平,龚林忠,等.湖北省枇杷产业现状、存在问题及对策[J].湖北农业科学,2017,56(6):1078-1079.
刘洋,郭安国,熊军波,等.紫花苜蓿在湖北省的适应性研究[J].湖北畜牧兽医,2015,36(11):5-7.
李太魁,张香凝,郭战玲,等.覆盖与间作对丹江口库区坡地茶园氮磷流失和土壤环境的影响[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(3):543-549.
李涛,鄢紫薇,王砚,等.丹江口库区不同种植模式下氮磷流失和经济效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):35-40.
李太魁,张香凝,寇长林,等.不同农艺措施对丹江口库区坡耕地茶园水土和磷素流失的影响[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(12):2324-2330.
王国重,李中原,田颖超,等.雨强和土地利用类型对豫西南山区产流产沙的影响[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2017,50(2):182-186.
Feng J, Wei W, Pan D L. Effects of rainfall and terracing-vegetation combinations on water erosion in a loess hilly area, China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:e110247.
Duan J, Liu Y J, Yang J, et al. Efficacy of orchard terrace measures to minimize water erosion caused by extreme rainfall in the hilly region of China: Long-term continuous in situ observations[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,278:e111537.
肖继兵,孙占祥,刘志,等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):159-166.
秦伟,左长清,晏清洪,等.红壤裸露坡地次降雨土壤侵蚀规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(2):124-132.
黄凯,刘瑞禄,覃莉,等.不同降雨条件下坡长对喀斯特坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):271-280.
Xu C, Yang Z J, Qian W, et al. Runoff and soil erosion responses to rainfall and vegetation cover under various afforestation management regimes in subtropical montane forest[J].Land Degradation and Development,2019,30(14):1711-1724.
杨帆,程金花,张洪江,等.坡面草本植物对土壤分离及侵蚀动力的影响研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(5):129-137.
Huo J Y, Yu X X, Liu C J, et al. Effects of soil and water conservation management and rainfall types on runoff and soil loss for a sloping area in North China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2020,31(15):2117-2130.
Li G J, Wan L, Cui M, et al. Influence of canopy interception and rainfall kinetic energy on soil erosion under forests[J].Forests,2019,10(6):509-523.
邵奕铭,高光耀,刘见波,等.自然降雨下黄土丘陵区草灌植物垂直覆盖结构的减流减沙效应[J].生态学报,2022,42(1):322-331.
0
浏览量
949
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621