不同植被空间配置下的坡面产沙及泥沙连通性变化特征

边熇; 朱冰冰; 黎珩; 闫帅旗

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同植被空间配置下的坡面产沙及泥沙连通性变化特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同植被空间配置下的坡面产沙及泥沙连通性变化特征
- Variation Characteristics of Slope Sediment Yield and Sediment Connectivity Under Different Vegetation Spatial Distributions
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第2期页码：45-50
- 作者机构：
  
  陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安,710119
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "边熇(1998—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土流失与植被恢复的生态效益研究。E-mail:861309005@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  陕西省重点研发计划项目"沙漠—黄土过渡带植被结构特征阈值与提质增效关键技术研究"(2021ZDLSF05-02);国家自然科学基金项目"黄土区退耕坡面植被恢复对坡沟系统侵蚀产沙的阻控研究"(41601285)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.006
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
边熇, 朱冰冰, 黎珩, 等. 不同植被空间配置下的坡面产沙及泥沙连通性变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):45-50.

BIAN He, ZHU Bingbing, LI Heng, et al. Variation Characteristics of Slope Sediment Yield and Sediment Connectivity Under Different Vegetation Spatial Distributions[J]. 2023, 37(2): 45-50.
边熇, 朱冰冰, 黎珩, 等. 不同植被空间配置下的坡面产沙及泥沙连通性变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):45-50. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.006.

BIAN He, ZHU Bingbing, LI Heng, et al. Variation Characteristics of Slope Sediment Yield and Sediment Connectivity Under Different Vegetation Spatial Distributions[J]. 2023, 37(2): 45-50. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.006.

摘要

植被是影响土壤侵蚀的重要因子

探讨坡面产沙和泥沙连通性对植被分布的响应对揭示土壤侵蚀过程机理及预测坡面侵蚀具有重要意义。通过室内人工放水冲刷试验

分析3种植被布设位置(坡上、坡中、坡下)在不同冲刷流量(3.2

5.2 L/min)和不同覆盖度(0

30%

50%

70%)下的减沙效益

结合坡面产沙潜力指数探究植被覆盖影响下的泥沙连通性变化特征。结果表明:(1)从不同盖度下的平均减沙效益及其稳定性来看

植被布局的减沙效益随盖度变化

且坡下植被空间分布最优。随冲刷流量增加

不同植被布局间的减沙效益差距缩小;(2)当植被盖度≤30%时

冲刷流量对坡面产沙的影响贡献较大;随盖度增加

植被的影响贡献程度大于冲刷流量

成为影响坡面侵蚀的主要因素;(3)坡面产沙潜力指数在不同植被盖度和分布位置下表现出明显差异。随盖度增加

产沙潜力指数减小

泥沙连通性减弱;坡下布设植被相比坡上和坡中产沙潜力指数最小

泥沙连通性最弱。该指数与产沙量之间存在显著的正相关关系

即产沙潜力越大

泥沙连通性越强

产沙量越大。研究结果可为深入探索土壤侵蚀机理及植被的生态效益提供科学依据

为黄土高原地区的生态建设提供参考。

Abstract

Vegetation is an important factor affecting slope soil erosion process

thus exploring the response of slope sediment yield and sediment connectivity to vegetation spatial distribution is of great significance to reveal the mechanism of soil erosion process and predict slope erosion.In this study

based on the indoor scouring experiment

the sediment reduction efficiency of three common slope vegetation distributions (upper slope

middle slope

lower slope) under different flow discharge (3.2 and 5.2 L/min) and vegetation cover (0

30%

50% and 70%) were analyzed.And a sediment connectivity index (the index of potential sediment yield) was used to explore the characteristics of sediment connectivity influenced by vegetation.The results showed that:(1) The sediment reduction efficiency of vegetation distribution varied with the coverage.According to the average and variable amplitude of sediment reduction efficiency

the effect of vegetation distribution on the lower slope was best compared with other vegetation distribution.However

its gap in different vegetation distribution was reduced with the increase of the flow discharge.(2) The effects of flow discharge on sediment yields were slightly greater than that of vegetation when the vegetation cover was smaller (≤30%).But the role of vegetation enhanced gradually and became the dominant influencing factor with the increase of vegetation cover.(3) The index of potential sediment yield was significantly different under varied vegetation cover and distribution.As the vegetation cover increased

the index decreased and the sediment connectivity weakened.And the index of vegetation distribution on the lower slope was smallest and its sediment connectivity was worst compared with that on the upper or middle slope.In addition

there was significant positive correlation between the index of potential sediment yield and sediment yields

that is

the greater potential of sediment yield meant the stronger sediment connectivity and thus the greater sediment yields.The results can provide scientific basis for the exploration of soil erosion mechanism and ecological benefits of vegetation

and further provide reference for ecological construction in the Loess Plateau.

关键词

Keywords

references

曹文洪,张晓明.新时期黄河流域水土保持与生态保护的战略思考[J].中国水土保持,2020(9):39-42.

Zhang G H, Liu G B, Wang G L. Effects of canopy and roots of patchy distributed artemisia capillaris on runoff, sediment, and the spatial variability of soil erosion at the plot scale[J].Soil Science,2012,177(6):409-415.

游珍,李占斌,蒋庆丰.植被在坡面的不同位置对降雨产沙量影响[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(6):28-31.

Ludwig J A, Tongway D J, Maraden S G. Strips, strands on stipples: Modeling the influence of three landscape banding patters on resource capture and productivity in a semi-arid woodlands, Australia[J].Catena,1999,37(1/2):257-273.

Boix-Fayos C, Martinez-Mena M, Arnau-Rosalen E, et al. Measuring soil erosion by field plots: Understanding the sources of variation[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2006,78(3/4):267-285.

闫帅旗,刘俊娥,周正朝,等.坡面不同植被覆盖格局下的水文连通性变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):228-234,242.

贾莲莲,刘雅丽,朱冰冰,等.不同草带空间分布对坡面细沟侵蚀调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):145-148,153.

于国强,贾莲莲,朱冰冰,等.不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):10-16.

秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.

于国强,贾莲莲,朱冰冰,等.不同坡位的植被缓冲带对坡面侵蚀产沙来源的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):9-13.

Mayor A G, Bautista S, Small E E, et al. Measurement of the connectivity of runoff source areas as determined by vegetation pattern and topography: A tool for assessing potential water and soil losses in drylands[J].Water Resources Research,2008,44(10):298-310.

Ludwig J A, Eager R W, Bastin G N, et al. A leakiness index for assessing landscape function using remote sensing[J].Landscape Ecology,2002,17(2):157-171.

Bautista S, Mayor A G, Bourakhouadar J, et al. Plant spatial pattern predicts hillslope semiarid runoff and erosion in a Mediterranean landscape[J].Ecosystems,2007,10(6):987-998.

Liu Y, Fu B J, Lü Y H, et al. Linking vegetation cover patterns to hydrological responses using two process-based pattern indices at the plot scale[J].Science China-Earth Sciences,2013,56(11):1888-1898.

刘时城.延河流域不同尺度水文连通性研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.

周佩华,王占礼.黄土高原土壤侵蚀暴雨的研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(3):1-5.

刘和平,王秀颖,刘宝元.人工模拟降雨下细沟与细沟间流速的沿程分布[J].地理研究,2011,30(9):1660-1668.

曹梓豪,赵清贺,左宪禹,等.黄河下游河岸坡面产流产沙特征及其与汇流路径长度关系[J].土壤学报,2018,55(6):1389-1400.

于现举,刘晨光,符素华,等.有黏性和无黏性沙坡面流的挟沙力比较[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(6):9-14.

张光辉.从土壤侵蚀角度诠释泥沙连通性[J].水科学进展,2021,32(2):295-308.

张冠华,刘国彬,易亮.植被格局对坡面流阻力影响的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(4):55-59,109.

鲁克新,李占斌,张霞,等.室内模拟降雨条件下径流侵蚀产沙试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):6-9,14.

宇涛,张霞,李占斌,等.不同草带覆盖位置条件下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):22-27,122.

任柯蒙,卫伟,赵西宁,等.黄土丘陵区坡面植被盖度及其配置格局的水蚀效应模拟[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):8031-8039.

马勇勇,李占斌,任宗萍,等.草带布设位置对坡沟系统水文连通性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):170-176.

余新晓,张学霞,李建牢,等.黄土地区小流域植被覆盖和降水对侵蚀产沙过程的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):1-8.

曹梓豪,赵清贺,丁圣彦,等.坡度和植被盖度对河岸坡面侵蚀产沙特征的影响[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(11):1892-1904.

魏天兴.小流域防护林适宜覆盖率与植被盖度的理论分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(2):170-176.

张思毅,梁志权,谢真越,等.植被调控红壤坡面土壤侵蚀机理[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):1-5,18.

浏览量

1115

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

小流域土壤侵蚀模型（SWEM）

秦岭水源地生态恢复下土壤全氮分布对侵蚀的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应

水力条件对不同地表粗糙度土壤分离能力的影响

三峡库区生态屏障区土壤侵蚀时空变化特征与驱动因素