宁南山区侵蚀沟不同部位土壤理化性质及可蚀性研究

王亚娟; 陈云明; 孙亚荣; 赵敏

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

宁南山区侵蚀沟不同部位土壤理化性质及可蚀性研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 宁南山区侵蚀沟不同部位土壤理化性质及可蚀性研究
- Study on Physical and Chemical Properties and Erodibility of Soil in Different Parts of Erosion Gully in the Mountainous Area of South Ningxia
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第2期页码：11-18
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨陵,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨陵,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王亚娟(1995—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事流域管理研究。E-mail:3259225914@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目"小流域水土保持与生态系统管理技术集成"(2020BCF01001)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.002
  中图分类号： S157
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王亚娟, 陈云明, 孙亚荣, 等. 宁南山区侵蚀沟不同部位土壤理化性质及可蚀性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):11-18.

WANG Yajuan, CHEN Yunming, SUN Yarong, et al. Study on Physical and Chemical Properties and Erodibility of Soil in Different Parts of Erosion Gully in the Mountainous Area of South Ningxia[J]. 2023, 37(2): 11-18.
王亚娟, 陈云明, 孙亚荣, 等. 宁南山区侵蚀沟不同部位土壤理化性质及可蚀性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(2):11-18. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.002.

WANG Yajuan, CHEN Yunming, SUN Yarong, et al. Study on Physical and Chemical Properties and Erodibility of Soil in Different Parts of Erosion Gully in the Mountainous Area of South Ningxia[J]. 2023, 37(2): 11-18. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.02.002.

摘要

侵蚀沟沟头前进

沟岸扩张

沟床下切严重影响区域粮食生产和环境质量。以宁夏彭阳县玉洼流域3个稳定侵蚀沟的沟头、沟床、沟岸为对象

通过野外调查取样与室内试验相结合的方法

分析了侵蚀沟不同部位(沟头、沟床、沟岸)的土壤理化性质及可蚀性K值

采集0—10

10—25

25—40

40—55

55—70 cm土壤

测定并计算土壤质量含水量(θ)、土壤容重(ρ)、土壤总孔隙度(φ)、土壤黏粒(CLA)、粉粒(SIL)、砂粒(SAN)含量、＞0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量(R0.25)、土壤平均重量直径(MWD)、土壤几何平均直径(GMD)及土壤有机质(SOM)含量

利用EPIC模型计算土壤可蚀性K值。结果表明:(1)侵蚀沟各部位平均质量含水量、总孔隙度、有机质、粉粒含量、＞0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量、平均重量直径、几何平均直径的大小顺序均为沟床＞沟岸＞沟头

各部位平均土壤容重、砂粒含量为沟头＞沟岸＞沟床

平均土壤黏粒含量为沟岸＞沟头＞沟床

各部位土壤机械组成均为粉粒含量＞砂粒含量＞黏粒含量;(2)侵蚀沟各部位土壤可蚀性K值在0.032 9~0.039 5(t·hm2·h)/(MJ·mm·hm2)

属于中可蚀性

平均可蚀性K值表现为沟头＞沟岸＞沟床;(3)侵蚀沟各部位土壤可蚀性K值与土壤粉粒、黏粒含量呈显著负相关

与土壤砂粒、有机质含量、质量含水量呈显著正相关

沟床土壤可蚀性K与R0.25、MWD、GMD呈极显著负相关(p＜0.01)。沟头作为侵蚀沟发育最活跃的部位

通过提高土壤有机质含量、粉粒含量来增加团聚体的数量和稳定性

从而降低土壤可蚀性。研究结果可为侵蚀沟生态稳定性及评估提供依据。

Abstract

The erosion of gully head forward

gully bank expansion

and gully bed cutting seriously affect regional grain production and environmental quality.Taking the gully head

gully bed

and gully bank of three stable eroded gullies in Yuwa Watershed of Pengyang County

Ningxia as subjects

this study combined field survey sampling with laboratory experiment.The soil physicochemical properties and erodibility K values of different parts of erosion gully (gully head

gully bed and gully bank) were analyzed.The 0—10

10—25

25—40

40—55

55—70 cm soil

soil mass water content (θ)

soil bulk density (ρ)

soil total porosity (φ)

soil clay (CLA)

soil silt (SIL)

sand (SAN) content

＞0.25 mm water-stable aggregate content (R0.25)

soil mean weight diameter (MWD)

soil geometric mean diameter (GMD) and soil organic matter (SOM) content were collected

and EPIC model was used to calculate K value of soil erodibility.The results showed that:(1) The quality of each part of the erosion gully average moisture content

total porosity

organic matter

silt content

aggregate content of water stability > 0.25 mm

average weight diameter and geometric mean diameter of the size of the order of gully bed > gully bank > gully head

the average soil bulk density and sand content of each part were gully head > gully bank > gully bed

the average soil clay content was gully bank > gully head > gully bed

the mechanical composition of the soil in each part was silt > sand > clay.(2) The K value of soil erodibility in each part of the erosion gully ranges from 0.032 9 to 0.039 5(t·hm2·h)/(MJ·mm·hm2)

which belonged to the medium erodibility.The average K value of erodibility was gully head > gully bank > gully bed.(3) The K value of soil erodibility was significantly negatively correlated with soil silt and clay content

and significantly positively correlated with soil sand content

organic matter and mass water content.Soil erodibility K value in gully bed was significantly negatively correlated with R0.25

MWD and GMD (p<0.01).As the most active part of erosion gully

the number and stability of aggregates were increased by increasing soil organic matter content and silt content

thus reducing soil erodibility.The results can provide basis for ecological stability and evaluation of erosion gully.

关键词

Keywords

references

Mendonca R, Mvller R, Clow D, et al. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs[J].Nature Communications,2017,8:e1694.

陈卓鑫,王文龙,郭明明,等.黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对不同地貌部位土壤可蚀性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(2):387-398.

陈琦,曹建军,汤国安,等.基于EEMD-瞬时频率变换的黄土高原典型地貌沟蚀活跃区识别研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(3):9-15.

Guo M M, Wang W L, Liang K H, et al. Changes in soil properties and erodibility of gully heads induced by vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Arid Land,2018,10(5):712-725.

鲍恩俣,熊康宁,刘子琦,等.喀斯特不同侵蚀场地土壤颗粒分布及可蚀性特征[J].森林与环境学报,2020,40(2):156-163.

梁博,聂晓刚,万丹,等.喜马拉雅山脉南麓典型林地对土壤理化性质及可蚀性

值影响[J].土壤学报,2018,55(6):1377-1388.

Gao X D, Wu P T, Zhao X N, et al. Soil moisture variability along transects over a well-developed gully in the Loess Plateau, ChY, Hattar B I. Variation of soil physical properties and moisture content along toposequences in the arid to semiarid area[J].Arid Land Research and Management,2010,24:81-97.

孙宝洋,李占斌,肖俊波,等.冻融作用对土壤理化性质及风水蚀影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(1):337-347.

姜芸,王军,张莉.东北典型黑土区侵蚀沟形态及分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(7):157-165.

吴汉,熊东红,张宝军,等.金沙江干热河谷冲沟发育区不同部位土壤水分的时空变化特征[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(2):384-392.

唐骏,党廷辉,薛江,等.植被恢复对黄土区煤矿排土场土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(16):5067-5077.

王文娟,邓荣鑫,张树文.东北典型黑土区沟蚀发生风险评价研究[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2058-2067.

Yves L B et al. Soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean and tropical agro-ecosystems: Effect of plant roots and soil characteristics[J].Plant and Soil,2018,424(1/2):303-317.

Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1983,38(5):381-383.

郭敏,熊东红,张宝军,等.干热河谷冲沟不同部位土壤水分物理性质研究[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(3):635-640.

丁新新,洪伟,陈建忠,等.不同经营模式下毛竹林土壤水分物理性质比较[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):74-78.

Totsche K U, Amelung W, Gerzabek M H, et al. Microaggregates in soils[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2018,181(1):104-136.

王文鑫,王文龙,郭明明,等.黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对沟头土壤团聚体特征及土壤可蚀性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(16):2845-2857.

张素,熊东红,校亮,等.冲沟不同部位土壤机械组成及抗冲性差异[J].土壤,2016,48(6):1270-1276.

胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等.典型岩溶山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):61-67.

魏慧,赵文武,王晶.土壤可蚀性研究述评[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2749-2759.

饶良懿,徐也钦,胡剑汝,等.砒砂岩覆土区小流域土壤可蚀性

值研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(4):763-773.

乔锋,王明刚,李晶,等.色季拉山垂直气候带土壤可蚀性研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(6):121-126.

白秀梅,韩有志,郭汉清.关帝山不同植被恢复类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):79-84.

马建辉,叶旭红,韩冰,等.膜下滴灌不同灌水控制下限对设施土壤团聚体分布特征的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(18):3561-3571.

Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2004,79(1):7-31.

徐红伟,吴阳,乔磊磊,等.不同植被带生态恢复过程土壤团聚体及其稳定性:以黄土高原为例[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(6):2223-2232.

浏览量

1001

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

施氮对高寒垂穗披碱草草地根际、非根际土壤肥力的影响

毛乌素沙地南缘改良与利用风沙土性质研究

晋西黄土区切沟对其上方集水区内土壤水分的影响

不同光照条件对侵蚀沟三维重建精度的影响

花岗岩崩岗不同层次土壤抗冲性及其影响因素