灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响

张健利; 王振华; 陈睿; 刘茹华

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.041

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响
- Effects of Irrigation Amount and Bio-organic Fertilizer on Water and Salt Dynamics and Soil Nutrient Properties of Jujube Field Under Drip Irrigation
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第1期页码：323-331
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,新疆,石河子,832000
  2. 现代节水灌溉兵团重点实验室,新疆,石河子,832000
  3. 农业农村部西北绿洲节水农业重点实验室,新疆,石河子,832000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张健利(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事节水灌溉理论与技术研究。E-mail:1228856528@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  兵团南疆重点产业创新发展支撑计划项目(2020DB004);兵团重大科技项目(2021AA003-1)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.041
  中图分类号： S275.6;S641.2
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张健利, 王振华, 陈睿, 等. 灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):323-331.

ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, et al. Effects of Irrigation Amount and Bio-organic Fertilizer on Water and Salt Dynamics and Soil Nutrient Properties of Jujube Field Under Drip Irrigation[J]. 2023, 37(1): 323-331.
张健利, 王振华, 陈睿, 等. 灌水量和生物有机肥对滴灌枣田水盐动态及土壤养分属性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):323-331. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.041.

ZHANG Jianli, WANG Zhenhua, CHEN Rui, et al. Effects of Irrigation Amount and Bio-organic Fertilizer on Water and Salt Dynamics and Soil Nutrient Properties of Jujube Field Under Drip Irrigation[J]. 2023, 37(1): 323-331. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.041.

摘要

通过探究不同灌溉水平下施用生物有机肥对红枣田土壤水分、盐分及土壤养分属性的影响

为红枣种植提供适宜的水肥方案。设置2个灌溉水平(W1:6 000 m3/hm2

W2:6 600 m3/hm2)

3个基施水平(S1:1 200 kg/hm2

S2:1 650 kg/hm2

S3:2 100 kg/hm2)

以不施加生物有机肥作为对照(W1CK

W2CK)

共8个处理

开展田间试验。施加生物有机肥可以提高土壤含水率、土壤有机质和总碳含量

且同一灌溉水平下

随施肥量的增加均表现为S3>S2>S1>CK。W1灌溉水平下

较CK处理相比

施加生物有机肥后0—150 cm土壤含水率、土壤有机质和总碳含量分别提高3.20%~17.97%

9.96%~20.31%

2.03%~5.42%

W2灌溉水平下

较CK处理相比

各项指标分别提高5.37%~20.19%

6.55%~21.18%

2.09%~6.34%。施加生物有机肥可以降低0—150 cm土壤盐分含量和土壤pH

且同一灌溉水平下

随施肥量的增加均表现为S3

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of bio-organic fertilizer application on soil moisture

salinity

and soil nutrient properties in jujube fields under different irrigation levels

providing suitable water and fertilizer solutions for jujube cultivation. Two irrigation levels (W1 6 000 m3/hm2

W2 6 600 m3/hm2)

three basal application levels (S1-S2-S3: 1 200—1 650—2 100 kg/hm2) were set up with no bio-organic fertilizer as the control (W1CK

W2CK)

totally eight treatments. A field experiment was conducted. Applying bio-organic fertilizer could increase soil water content

soil organic matter

and total carbon content at the same irrigation level. The increase in fertilizer application all showed that S3 > S2 > S1 > CK. At the W1 irrigation level

the water content

soil organic matter

and total carbon content of 0—150 cm soil increased by 3.20%~17.97%

9.96%~20.31% and 2.03%~5.42% after the application of bio-organic fertilizer compared with the CK. At the W2 irrigation level

the above indices increased by 5.37%~20.19%

6.55%~21.18% and 2.09%~6.34%

respectively. Application of bio-organic fertilizer could reduce the salinity content and soil pH of 0—150 cm soil at the same irrigation level. The increase in fertilizer application all showed that S3 < S2 < S1 < CK. At the W1 irrigation level

the salinity content and soil pH of the 0—150 cm soil decreased by 7.70%~15.74% and 0.86%~2.87% after the application of bio-organic fertilizer compared with the CK

while both indices were reduced by 8.90%~23.66% and 0.96%~2.52% respectively at the W2 irrigation level. In the comparison of different irrigation and fertlization (bio-organic fertilizer) treatments

the W1S3 treatment increased soil water content

soil organic matter

and total carbon content by 4.45%

21.85% and 7.31%

respectively

compared with the local conventional irrigation treatment (W2CK) at 0—150 cm

soil salinity content and soil pH decreased by 2.59% and 2.08%

respectively. Considering the local water scarcity and easy loss of water fertilizer

and also the risk of groundwater pollution reduction

it is suggested that W1S3 treatment instead of the local conventional irrigation treatment (W2CK) should be a more appropriate irrigation and fertilization management.

关键词

Keywords

references

陈灿平,高玉翔.西部地区生态环境与生态文明制度建设研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,34(12):138-141.

刘星宏,张青青,张鹏,等.北疆盐碱地空间分布特征分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(8):141-148.

王相平,杨劲松,张胜江,等.石膏和腐植酸配施对干旱盐碱区土壤改良及棉花生长的影响[J].土壤,2020,52(2):327-332.

王斌,马兴旺,单娜娜,等.新疆盐碱地土壤改良剂的选择与应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):111-115.

何凯,石纹豪,李振轮.生物有机肥防治植物土传病害研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2014,43(6):1-5.

Su Q R, Li W X, Chi F Q. Effect of organic fertilizer application on soil salt content and the yield of rice[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2006,22(4):299-301.

吕品.松嫩平原稻区防止次生盐渍化的研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2002(1):39-41.

邵孝候,张宇杰,常婷婷,等.生物有机肥对盐渍土壤水盐动态及番茄产量的影响[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(2):153-160.

朱海,杨劲松,姚荣江,等.有机无机肥配施对滨海盐渍农田土壤盐分及作物氮素利用的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(3):441-450.

李凤霞,王长军,肖国举,等.生物有机肥对宁夏盐碱地土壤理化性质及微生物的影响[J].宁夏农林科技,2021,62(7):18-22.

何建龙,蒋齐,吴旭东,等.哈巴湖国家级自然保护区固沙林地土壤颗粒分形特征[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(1):217-222.

顾美英,葛春辉,马海刚,等.生物炭对新疆沙土微生物区系及土壤酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(4):225-230,273.

陈文娟,李明思,秦文豹,等.水平翻耕措施对覆膜滴灌土壤水盐分布调控效果研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(3):276-286.

权国玲,谢开云,仝宗永,等.复合微生物肥料对羊草草原土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(2):27-36.

艾海舰.土壤持水性及孔性的影响因素浅析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(3):75-79.

董亚辉,戴全厚,邓伊晗,等.喀斯特山区退耕地水稳性团聚体演变特征及土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):138-141.

刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸.土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1209-1218.

史文娟,梁嘉平,陶汪海,等.添加γ-聚谷氨酸减少土壤水分深层渗漏提高持水能力[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(23):94-100.

邢旭光,张盼,马孝义.掺混菜籽油渣减少土壤入渗改善持水特性[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(2):102-108.

Tang J T, Fan C J, Lin Q F, et al. Smooth,stable and optically transparent microcapsules prepared by one-step method using sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as protective colloid[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2014,459:65-73.

Busscher W J, Bjorneberg D L, Sojka R E. Field application of PAM as an amendment in deep-tilled US southeastern coastal plain soils[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2009,104(2):215-220.

许迪,李益农,龚时宏,等.面向可持续灌溉农业发展的涝渍盐碱管理[J].排灌机械工程学报,2019,37(1):63-72.

项子宸,修海峰,马琨,等.淋洗条件下不同改良剂对浙江东部滨海盐碱土的改良效果[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2020,46(3):344-359.

程万莉,王淑英,赵刚,等.茶渣生物有机肥对温室盐碱土改良的效果[J].甘肃农业科技,2020(增刊1):49-54.

田小明,李俊华,危常州,等.连续3年施用生物有机肥对土壤有机质组分、棉花养分吸收及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,7(4):374-378.

耿泽铭.施用生物有机肥对盐渍土改良效果及玉米产量的影响[D].山东泰安:东北农业大学,2013.

谢承陶.盐渍土改良与作物抗性[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1993.

邓彩云,王玉刚,牛子儒,等.开垦年限对干旱区土壤理化性质及剖面无机碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):254-259.

刘冰逸,罗敏,邵阳,等.土壤根际区放射性核素迁移影响因素研究进展[J].环境工程,2021,39(12):227-233.

Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang C, et al. Origins of root mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints:A review[J].Plant and Soil,2003,248(1/2):43-59.

朱齐超.区域尺度中国土壤酸化定量研究及模型分析[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.

郭念,闫金龙,魏世强,等.三峡库区消落带典型土壤厌氧呼吸对铁还原及磷释放的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):271-276.

Garcíadíaz A, Marqués M J, Sastre B, et al. Labile and stable soil organic carbon and physical improvements using groundcovers in vineyards from central Spain[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,621(15):387-397.

Guo L B, Sims R E H. Litter decomposition and nutrient release via litter decomposition in New Zealand eucalypt short rotation forests[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,1999,75(1/2):133-140.

Kemp P R, Reynolds J F, Virginia R A, et al. Whitford.Decomposition of leaf and root litter of Chihuahuan desert shrubs:Effects of three years of summer drought[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2003,53(1):21-39.

陈庆强,沈承德,孙彦敏,等.鼎湖山土壤有机质深度分布的剖面演化机制[J].土壤学报,2005,42(1):1-8.

李艳,陈义,唐旭,等.长期不同施肥模式下南方水稻土有机碳的平衡特征[J].浙江农业学报,2018,30(12):2094-2101.

蒋太明,罗龙皂,李渝,等.长期施肥对西南黄壤有机碳平衡的影响[J].土壤通报,2014,45(3):666-671.

Hao Q J, Cheng B H, Jiang C S. Long-term tillage effects on soil organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon in a purple paddy soil of Southwest China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(5):260-265.

浏览量

871

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

化肥减量配施生物有机肥对油菜生长及土壤微生物和酶活性影响

施用生物有机肥对黄瓜不同生育期土壤肥力特征及酶活性的影响

生物有机肥部分替代化肥对莴笋及土壤理化性质和微生物的影响

生物有机肥与减量配施化肥对连作黄瓜养分利用率及产量的影响