黄土丘陵区植被群落水分利用策略对干旱胁迫的响应

罗立娇; 高晓东; 赵连豪; 安庆蓉; 马南方; 赵西宁

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土丘陵区植被群落水分利用策略对干旱胁迫的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 黄土丘陵区植被群落水分利用策略对干旱胁迫的响应
- Response of Water Use Strategies of Vegetation Community to Drought Stress in the Loess Hilly Region
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第1期页码：280-288
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "罗立娇(1998-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事农业水土资源高效利用研究。E-mail:luolijiao20@mails.ucas.ac.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  陕西省重点研发计划项目(2020ZDLNY07-04);陕西省杰出青年科学基金项目(2021JC-19)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.036
  中图分类号： S715.3
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗立娇, 高晓东, 赵连豪, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被群落水分利用策略对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):280-288.

LUO Lijiao, GAO Xiaodong, ZHAO Lianhao, et al. Response of Water Use Strategies of Vegetation Community to Drought Stress in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(1): 280-288.
罗立娇, 高晓东, 赵连豪, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被群落水分利用策略对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):280-288. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.036.

LUO Lijiao, GAO Xiaodong, ZHAO Lianhao, et al. Response of Water Use Strategies of Vegetation Community to Drought Stress in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2023, 37(1): 280-288. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.036.

摘要

为探讨气候变化下灌草群落中主要植物水分来源差异及动态变化。以黄土高原典型自然恢复植物(油蒿、苜蓿与藜)为研究对象

通过减少自然降水的15%(中度干旱)与30%(极端干旱)来控制干旱程度

研究植物水分利用来源与生长对干旱胁迫的响应特征。将植被群落潜在水源划分为浅层(0—20 cm)、中层(20—60 cm)与深层(60—120 cm)土壤水

采用稳定水同位素技术与MixSIAR模型定量分析不同干旱胁迫程度(减雨30%、减雨15%与对照)下植被根系水分吸收特征。结果表明:(1)土壤水与植物水中稳定氢氧同位素值(δD和δ18O)均位于当地大气降水线的右下方

说明土壤水同位素受蒸发影响发生富集;(2)3种典型植物在遭遇干旱胁迫时

其水分利用来源均可灵活转换于不同土层之间

呈浅层土壤水分利用比例减少

中层与深层土壤水分利用比例增加的规律

且随干旱胁迫程度增大愈加明显;(3)不同植被响应干旱胁迫的水分利用策略不同

平地

减雨30%、减雨15%及CK处理下油蒿均主要利用浅层土壤水(贡献率分别为48.2%

52.7%

57.6%)

而藜分别主要利用来自中层(43.5%)、浅层(49.6%)与浅层土壤水(53.6%);坡地

减雨30%、减雨15%及CK处理下油蒿均主要利用浅层土壤水(贡献率分别为42.5%

44.5%

58.1%)

而苜蓿分别主要利用来自中层(40.9%)、中层(46.7%)与浅层土壤水(53.9%)。这表明半干旱黄土丘陵区植被群落主要物种可通过可塑性转换水分来源以应对干旱胁迫

并在空间上分割群落水源以有效缓解对水分资源的竞争压力

从而通过在水分资源利用上的生态位分化促进物种间的共存。

Abstract

To explore the differences in water sources and dynamic changes of major plants in shrub communities under climate change

the response characteristics of water use sources and growth of typical natural recovery plants (Artemisia ordosica

Medicago Sativa and Chenopodium album) to drought stress in the Loess Plateau were studied. And the droughts were controlled by reducing natural precipitation by 15% (moderate drought) and 30% (extreme drought). The potential water sources of vegetation communities were divided into shallow (0—20 cm)

middle (20—60 cm) and deep (60—120 cm) soil water. The stable water isotope technique and MixSIAR model were used to quantitatively analyze the water absorption characteristics of vegetation roots under different drought stress levels (30%

15% and the control). The results showed that: (1) The stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope values (δD and δ18O) of soil water and plant water were both located at the lower right of the local atmospheric precipitation line

which indicated that the isotope of soil water was enriched by evaporation. (2) Water sources of three typical plants could be flexibly converted to different soil layers under drought stress

specifically

the proportion of shallow soil moisture utilization decreased

while the proportion of middle and deep soil moisture utilization increased

which became more obvious with the increase of drought stress levels. (3) Different vegetation responsed to drought stress through different water use strategy

Artemisia ordosica mainly used shallow soil water (contribution rates were 48.2%

52.7% and 57.6%

respectively) under flat land

rainfall reduction of 30%

15% and CK treatments

while Chenopodium album mainly used middle (43.5%)

shallow (49.6%) and shallow soil water (53.6%)

respectively. In slope land

rainfall reduction of 30%

15% and CK treatment

Artemisia ordosica mainly used shallow soil water (contribution rates were 42.5%

44.5% and 58.1%

respectively)

while Medicago Sativa mainly used the middle (40.9%)

middle (46.7%) and shallow (53.9%) soil water. This indicated that the main species of vegetation community in semi-arid loess hilly region could respond to drought stress by converting water sources through plasticity. And the community water sources were divided in space to effectively reduce the competitive pressure on water resources

which would promote the coexistence of species through niche differentiation in water resources utilization.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘自强,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京土石山区典型植物水分来源[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(7):2135-2142.

Chen L X, Zhang Z Q, Zeppel M, et al. Response of transpiration to rain pulses for two tree species in a semiarid plantation[J].International Journal of Biometeorology,2014,58(7):1569-1581.

IPCC. Climate change and land:An IPCC spercial report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems[S].UK:IPCC,2019:5-15.

Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(4):437-448.

Zheng K, Wei J Z, Pei J Y, et al. Impacts of climate change and human activitieson grassland vegetation variation in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,660:236-244.

Sun Q H, Miao C Y, Duan Q Y, et al. Temperature and precipitation changes over the Loess Plateau between 1961 and 2011, based on high-density gauge observations[J].Global and Planetary Change,2015,32(1):1-10.

Palacio S, Montserrat-Martí G, Ferrio J P. Water use segregation among plants with contrasting root depth and distribution along gypsum hills[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2017,28(6):1107-1117.

许素寒,朱雅娟,吴彩霞,等.鄂尔多斯高原3个水土保持树种的水分利用策略[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(9):2885-2892.

古丽哈娜提·波拉提别克,常顺利,李红梅,等.天山林区4种主要灌木夏季水分来源差异[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):1-11.

赵西宁,李楠,高晓东,等.基于

O示踪的不同树龄枣树土壤水分利用特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):135-142.

邓文平,章洁,张志坚,等.北京土石山区水分在土壤-植物-大气连续体(SPAC)中的稳定同位素特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(7):2171-2178.

丁丹,贾文雄,马兴刚,等.祁连山亚高山灌丛优势植物水分来源[J].生态学报,2018,38(4):1348-1356.

张欢,曹俊,王化冰,等.张北地区退化杨树防护林的水分利用特征[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(5):1381-1388.

朱雅娟,赵雪彬,刘艳书,等.青海共和盆地沙柳(

Salix psammophila

)和乌柳(

Salix cheilophila

) 的水分利用过程[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(2):281-287.

Wu H W, Li J, Zhang C C, et al. Determining root water uptake of two alpine crops in a rainfed cropland in the Qinghai Lake watershed:First assessment using stable isotopes analysis[J].Field Crops Research,2018,215:113-121.

吕婷,赵西宁,高晓东,等.黄土丘陵区典型天然灌丛和人工灌丛优势植物土壤水分利用策略[J].植物生态学报, 2017,41(2):175-185.

周艳清,高晓东,王嘉昕,等.柴达木盆地灌区枸杞根系水分吸收来源研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2021,29(2):400-409.

付昕宇,刘华民,于晓雯,等.岱海湖滨带湿地植物水分来源及利用策略研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(12):42-49.

张行,梁小英,刘迪,等.生态脆弱区社会-生态景观恢复力时空演变及情景模拟[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1450-1466.

Gao X D, Li H C, Zhao X N. Impact of land management practices on water use strategy for a dryland tree plantation and subsequent responses to drought[J].Land Degradation and Development,2021,32(1):439-452.

Stock B C, Jackson A L, Ward E J, et al. Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models[J].Peer J,2018,6:e5096.

Wang J, Fu B J, Wang L X, et al. Water use characteristics of the common tree species in different plantation types in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2020,288:e108020.

Zhao Y L, Wang Y Q, He M N, et al. Transference of

Robiniapseudoacacia

water-use patterns from deep to shallow soil layers during the transition period between the dry and rainy seasons in a water-limited region[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2020,457:e1127.

Barbeta A, Jones S, Clav'e L, et al. Unexplained hydrogen isotope offsets complicate the identification and quantification of tree water sources in a riparian forest[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2019,23(4):2129-2146.

Cao X Q, Yang P L, Engel B A, et al. The effects of rainfall and irrigation on cherry root water uptake under drip irrigation[J].Agricultural Water Management,2018,197:9-18.

杨国敏,王爱,王力.六道沟流域2种典型灌木不同季节水分来源及利用效率[J].西北植物学报,2018,38(1):140-149.

闫利军,米福贵,郭郁频,等.草地早熟禾幼苗对矿井再生水灌溉的生理响应[J].草地学报,2014,22(5):1031-1037.

Grossiord C, Sevanto S, Dawson T E, et al. Warming combined with more extreme precipitation regimes modifies the water sources used by trees[J].New Phytologist,2017,213(2):584-596.

傅思华,胡顺军,李浩,等.古尔班通古特沙漠南缘梭梭(

Haloxylon ammodendron

)群落优势植物水分来源[J].中国沙漠, 2018,38(5):1024-1032.

高晓东.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤有效水时空变异与动态模拟研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2013.

Zhou H, Zhao W Z, Zheng X J, et al. Root distribution of

Nitraria sibirica

with seasonally varying water sources in a desert habitat[J].Journal of Plant Research,2015,128(4):613-622.

李巧燕,来利明,周继华,等.鄂尔多斯高原草地灌丛化不同阶段主要植物水分利用特征[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(1):89-96.

浏览量

810

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土高原植被NEP时空变化及对气温降水和退耕还林（草）的响应

青藏高原典型区1970—2025年切沟发育特征及其影响因素

纳帕海高原湿地土壤铁结合态有机碳随水位下降的分布特征

基于无人机的黄土丘陵沟壑区极端降雨条件下小流域道路切沟侵蚀模拟和特征

基于DNDC模型分析气候变化和尕海沼泽草甸退化对CH₄和CO₂排放的影响