青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地枯落物持水特征

贺万鹏; 周晓雷; 解婷婷; 赵安; 曹雪萍; 杨富强; 陆刚

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.027

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地枯落物持水特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地枯落物持水特征
- Water Retention Characteristics of Litter in Fire-burned Land of Spruce and Abies Forests on the Northeastern Margin of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第1期页码：204-210
- 作者机构：
  
  甘肃农业大学林学院,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "贺万鹏(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事森林生态研究。E-mail:1012549380@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  甘肃省财政厅、甘肃省GEF/OP12项目(03619078)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.027
  中图分类号： S714
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
贺万鹏, 周晓雷, 解婷婷, 等. 青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地枯落物持水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):204-210.

HE Wanpeng, ZHOU Xiaolei, XIE Tingting, et al. Water Retention Characteristics of Litter in Fire-burned Land of Spruce and Abies Forests on the Northeastern Margin of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. 2023, 37(1): 204-210.
贺万鹏, 周晓雷, 解婷婷, 等. 青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地枯落物持水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):204-210. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.027.

HE Wanpeng, ZHOU Xiaolei, XIE Tingting, et al. Water Retention Characteristics of Litter in Fire-burned Land of Spruce and Abies Forests on the Northeastern Margin of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. 2023, 37(1): 204-210. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.027.

摘要

以青藏高原东北边缘云杉属-冷杉属林火烧迹地为研究对象

基于典型抽样法于2020年8月和2021年7—8月在火烧迹地和未过火天然林采集枯落物样品

采用室内浸泡法测定分析枯落的蓄积量、持水量、有效拦蓄量等指标

探究林火干扰下不同坡位枯落物的水文效应

为更好地促进森林水源涵养以及水土保持功能提供依据。结果表明:(1)在植被恢复过程中

枯落物的厚度和蓄积量随着恢复年限的增加而增加

且厚度为3.75~8.31 cm

蓄积量为6.16~8.13 t/hm2。恢复5

15年火烧迹地上、中、下坡枯落物厚度和蓄积量与天然林差异显著。(2)枯落物的最大持水量为20.94~26.22 t/hm2

恢复5

15年火烧迹地枯落物最大持水量与天然林差异达显著水平。在枯落物持水达到饱和前

不同恢复年限下各坡位枯落物持水量与浸水时间呈对数函数关系

吸水速率与浸水时间呈幂函数关系。(3)枯落物的有效拦蓄量为14.58~16.95 t/hm2

有效拦蓄深为1.44~1.78 mm。恢复5年火烧迹地枯落物有效拦蓄量表现为中坡>上坡>下坡

恢复15年火烧迹地和天然林有效拦蓄量均为下坡>中坡>上坡。综上所述

在植被恢复过程中

枯落物的厚度、蓄积量、持水性能都随着恢复年限的增加而提高

呈现天然林>恢复15年>恢复5年;火烧迹地枯落物的持水性能及持水过程呈现中、下坡大于上坡

即枯落物的水文效应受坡位和火烧干扰的影响。

Abstract

Taking the spruce-fir forest fire sites on the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau as the research object

the samples were collected from the burned sites. Ubed unburned natural forests in August 2020 and July-August 2021 based on the typical sampling method and indoor immersion method. Litter samples were measured and analyzed for indicators such as storage volume

water holding capacity

and effective storage capacity

to explore the hydrological effects of litter at different slope positions under the disturbance of forest fires

and to provide a basis for better-promoting forest water conservation and soil and water conservation functions. The results show that: (1) During the vegetation restoration process

the thickness and accumulation of litter increased

with the longer restoration years

and the thickness was 3.75~8.31 cm

and the accumulation iss 6.16~8.13 t/hm2. The more thickness and volume of litter on the above-up-slope

mid-slope

and down-slope in the recovery 5 and 15 years fire sites were significantly different from those in the natural forest. (2) The maximum water-holding capacity of litter is 20.94~26.22 t/hm2

and the difference between the maximum water-holding capacity of the litter in the 5 and 15 years of recovery and the natural forest reaches a significant level. Before the water-holding capacity of the litter reaches saturation

the water-holding capacity of the litter at each slope position has a logarithmic function relationship with the water immersion time

and the water absorption rate has a power function relationship with the water immersion time under different recovery years. (3) The effective storage capacity of litter is 14.58~16.95 t/hm2

and the effective storage depth is 1.44~1.78 mm. The effective interception of litter in the restored 5 years burmed are shows the order of mid-slope > up-slope > down-slope

and the effective intercepted amount of the restored 15-year-burned area and the natural forest is down-slope > mid-slope > up-slope. To sum up

in the process of vegetation restoration

the thickness

volume and water-holding capacity of litter improved with the increase of the restoration period

showing that natural forest > restoration 15 years > restoration 5 years; The water performance and water holding process showed that the middle and lower slopes were larger than the upper slopes

that is

the hydrological effect of the litter was affected by the slope position and the disturbance of fire.

关键词

Keywords

references

王正安,邸利,王彦辉,等.白桦纯林和华北落叶松纯林枯落物层的水文效应:以六盘山叠叠沟小流域为例[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2019,54(3):93-98,107.

杜杰,袁莉芹,蔡天培,等.亚热带北缘湿地松脂材兼用林凋落物持水特性[J].安徽农业大学学报,2022,49(1):41-47.

Wang C, Zhao C Y, Xu Z L, et al. Effect of vegetation on soil water retention and storage in a semi-arid alpine forest catchment[J].Journal of Arid Land,2013,5(2):207-219.

赵雨森,韩春华,张宏光,等.阿什河上游小流域主要林分类型土壤水文功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):203-208.

吴晓光,刘龙,张宏飞,等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物持水性能及土壤物理性质[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):137-144.

耿琦.云冷杉针阔混交林枯落物持水特性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020.

Stephens S L, Agee J K, Ful P Z, et al. Managing forests and fire in changing climates[J].Science,2013,342(6154):41-42.

孙龙,窦旭,胡同欣.林火对森林生态系统碳氮磷生态化学计量特征影响研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(2):1-9.

Butler O M, Elser J J, Lewis T, et al. The multi-element stoichiometry of wet eucalypt forest is transformed by recent,frequent fire[J].Plant and Soil,2020,447(1):447-461.

杨新芳,鲍雪莲,胡国庆,等.大兴安岭不同火烧年限森林凋落物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1359-1367.

韩雪成,赵雨森,辛颖,等.大兴安岭北部火烧迹地兴安落叶松人工林土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):183-188.

陆刚,黄海霞,周晓雷,等.迭部林区云冷杉林火烧迹地土壤有机碳及酶活性变化特征[J].草地学报,2022,30(4):943-949.

兰翔宇,叶冲冲,王毅,等.1995-2014年青藏高原水源涵养功能时空演变特征及其驱动力分析[J].草地学报,2021,29(增刊1):80-92.

王岩,王高潮,王胜男.军民协力地空配合打赢火场攻坚战:甘肃省迭部县达拉林场"3·02"森林火灾扑救纪实[J].中国应急管理,2016(3):59-61.

赵安,周晓雷,田青,等.迭山北坡云冷杉林火烧迹地灌木群落特征和物种多样性研究[J].西部林业科学,2021,50(5):90-100.

周晓雷,闫月娥,张婧,等.青藏高原东北边缘云杉-冷杉林火烧迹地不同坡向植物群落结构与多样性研究[J].草业学报,2022,31(5):144-155.

赵安,田青,周晓雷,等.迭山北坡云冷杉林火烧迹地灌木树种种间关联性[J].林业科学研究,2022,35(2):163-170.

金雅琴,李冬林,孙丽娟,等.南京近郊人工林地表枯落物的累积量及持水性[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):95-104.

李素丽,徐佳文,丁翊东,等.赣江中游水源涵养林乔木和蕨类植物凋落物持水和失水特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):170-176.

刘一霖,温娅檬,李巧玉,等.川西高山峡谷区6种森林枯落物的持水与失水特性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):151-156,162.

邱聪,秦倩倩,郑大柽,等.油松人工林重度火烧后凋落物分解及水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):196-204.

Keeley J E. Fire intensity,fire severity and burn severity:A brief review and suggested usage[J].International Journal of Wildland Fire,2009,18(1):116-126.

王飞,陈国鹏,齐瑞,等.甘南白龙江上游小流域主要林分地被物层的持水特性分异[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):242-247.

涂立辉.六盘山叠叠沟小流域四种典型植物群落的多功能评价[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2020.

凌继华,崔立奇,张章.冀北山地不同坡位油松林枯落物水文效应[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(2):117-121.

王卓敏.不同坡位乡土阔叶树种的林分改造生态效益评价[D].广州:华南农业大学,2018.

杨霞,陈丽华,康影丽,等.辽东低山区5种典型水源涵养林枯落物持水特性[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(9):2662-2670.

郑淼.华北土石山区不同林分类型枯落物及土壤水文生态效应[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(2):84-91.

张建利,王加国,李苇洁,等.贵州百里杜鹃自然保护区杜鹃林枯落物储量及持水功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):167-173.

王丽红,辛颖,邹梦玲,等.大兴安岭重度火烧迹地植被恢复过程中枯落物持水特征[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):262-267.

浏览量

728

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性

工程堆积体上不同植被类型枯落物和土壤水文效应

黄土丘陵沟壑区植物根系对土壤优先流的影响机理

采煤沉陷裂缝不同距离下植被类型对土壤蒸渗特征的影响

京津风沙源治理工程区土壤有机碳密度分布特征