干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响

张泽洪; 贾立志; 余建平; 陈小南

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响
- Effects of Grassy Slope Fire Prevention Project on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Arid Valleys Area
- 水土保持学报 2023年37卷第1期页码：37-44
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西华师范大学地理科学学院,四川,南充,637000
  2. 四川省干旱河谷土壤侵蚀监测与控制工程实验室,四川,南充,637000
  3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 拉萨高原生态系统研究站,北京,100101
  4. 钱江源国家公园管理局, 浙江开化,324300
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张泽洪(1978-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事农业生态与土壤质量研究。E-mail:zhangzehong2001@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  西华师范大学博士科研启动项目(2017E043);国家自然科学基金项目(41807075)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.006
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张泽洪, 贾立志, 余建平, 等. 干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):37-44.

ZHANG Zehong, JIA Lizhi, YU Jianping, et al. Effects of Grassy Slope Fire Prevention Project on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Arid Valleys Area[J]. 2023, 37(1): 37-44.
张泽洪, 贾立志, 余建平, 等. 干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(1):37-44. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.006.

ZHANG Zehong, JIA Lizhi, YU Jianping, et al. Effects of Grassy Slope Fire Prevention Project on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Arid Valleys Area[J]. 2023, 37(1): 37-44. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.006.

摘要

为探究干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对坡面径流侵蚀的影响

以四川省凉山州的3个27.5°的草地坡面为研究对象

进行流量分别为6

12 L/min的模拟冲刷试验。3个坡面的处理为:(1)移除植被地上地下部分

平整坡面代表草坡防火通道;(2)移除植被地上部分代表草坡防火隔离带;(3)未进行处理作为对照。通过收集坡面出口的产流量和产沙量

研究不同的防火工程在不同的放水冲刷流量下分别对坡面径流侵蚀的影响。结果表明:(1)草坡由于修建防火通道导致坡面土质松散

水分入渗量增加

初始产流时间表现为草坡防火通道(20.33 min)>对照坡面(7.62 min)>草坡防火隔离带(5.22 min);(2)3个流量下的累计产流量和累计产沙量均表现为草坡防火通道>草坡防火隔离带>对照坡面

并且随着放水流量的增加3个坡面之间的差异显著增加

表明草坡防火工程的修建加剧陡坡水蚀;(3)对照坡面的产流量和产沙量之间呈线性关系

而草坡防火通道坡面的产流量与产沙量之间的关系呈指数、对数或线性关系

草坡防火隔离带坡面的产流量和产沙量之间呈对数或线性关系

表明草坡防火工程的修建改变水沙之间原有的线性关系。因此

草坡防火工程建设后要特别重视坡面的水土流失问题

研究结果可为干旱河谷区草坡防火工程对水土流失影响及防治措施的实施提供科学参考。

Abstract

To explore the impact of grassy slope fire prevention project on runoff and sediment yield on grassy slope in arid valleys area

a series of sourcing experiments were conducted in three steep slopes of 27.5° in Liangshan Prefecture of Sichuan Province. The flow rates of sourcing experiments were 6

9 and 12 L/min

respectively. The three slopes were treated as follows: (1) Remove vegetation and level the slope to represent the grassy slope fire passage; (2) Remove the aboveground part of the vegetation to represent the grassy slope fire isolation zone; (3) No treatment as a control. The effects of different grassy slope fire prevention project on water erosion under different scouring flow rates were studied by collecting the runoff and sediment at the slope outlet

respectively. The results showed that: (1) Due to the loose soil on the slope and the increase of water infiltration during the construction of the grassy slope fire prevention project

the initial runoff time of the grassy slope fire passage (20.33 min) was larger than that of the control slope (7.62 min) and the grassy slope fire isolation zone (5.22 min). (2) The order of the cumulative runoff and cumulative sediment yield under the three flow rates were as follow: grassy slope fire passage > grassy slope fire isolation zone > control slope. Moreover

the difference between the three slopes increased significantly with the increase of the flow rates. The construction of grassy slope fire prevention project had aggravated the water erosion on the steep slope. (3) There were linear relationships between the runoff and sediment yield on the control slope

while the relationships between the runoff and sediment yield were exponential

logarithmic

or linear for the grassy slope fire passage. The relationships between the runoff and sediment yield for the grassy slope fire isolation zone were logarithmic or linear. The construction of the grass slope fire prevention project has changed the original linear relationships between runoff and sediment yield. Therefore

more attention should be paid on soil erosion after the construction of grassy slope fire prevention project on steep slopes. This research can provide scientific reference for the impact of grassy slope fire prevention project on soil erosion in arid valleys and the implementation of preventive measures on steep slopes.

关键词

Keywords

references

Montanarella L. Agricultural policy:Govern our soils[J].Nature,2015,528(7580):32-33.

史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.

Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J].Naure Communications,2017,8(1):e2013.

Quijano L, Van Oost K, Nadeu E, et al. Modelling the effect of land management changes on soil organic carbon stocks in a Mediterranean cultivated field[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28(2):515-523.

中华人民共和国水利部.2021年全国水土流失动态监测显示我国水土流失状况持续向好生态文明建设成效斐然. (2022-06-27). http://www.mwr.gov.cn/xw/slyw/202206/t20220627_1581897.html.

杨兆平,常禹.我国西南主要干旱河谷生态及其研究进展[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,25(4):90-93,99.

白夜,王博,武英达,等.凉山州森林火灾形成的火环境研究[J].林业资源管理,2020(5):116-112,130.

孙科辉,肖金香,冯敏玉,等.江西森林火灾与火险天气分析及综合预防技术措施[J].江西农业大学学报,2004,26(3):394-398.

Sidle R C, Ziegler A D. The dilemma of mountain roads[J].Nature Geoscience,2012,5(7):437-438.

Fernández-Raga M, Palencia C, Keesstra S, et al. Splash erosion:A review with unanswered questions[J].Earth-Science Review,2017,171:463-477.

常松涛,黄少燕,查轩,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):58-63.

Neris M, Tejedor M, Rodríguez J. Effect of forest floor characteristics on water repellency, infiltration, runoff, and soil loss in Andisols of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain)[J].Catena,2013,108:50-57.

Zhang G H, Tang K M, Ren Z P, et al. Impact of grass root mass density on soil detachment capacity by concentrated flow on steep slopes[J].Transactions of the ASAE,2013,56(3):927-934.

Gu C J, Mu X M, Gao P, et al. Distinguishing the effects of vegetation restoration on runoff and sediment generation on simulated rainfall on the hillslopes of the loess plateau of China[J].Plant and Soil,2020,447(4):1-20.

郭梅,姜仁安.边坡防护室内水力冲刷模拟试验及降雨入渗分析[J].辽宁省交通高等专科学校学报,2008,10(1):16-18.

闫斌,郭成久,果海威.关于边坡防护形式对降雨入渗影响的试验研究[J].水土保持科技情报,2004(3):17-18.

淡晨希,张琼,刘畅,等.生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(7):1853-1860.

李学斌,陈林,张硕新,等.围封条件下荒漠草原4种典型植物群落枯落物枯落量及其蓄积动态[J].生态学报,2012,32(20):6575-6583.

杨寒月,张光辉,张宝军.黄土丘陵区沟坡典型植物群落枯落物蓄积量及其持水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(3):83-90.

Zhou Z C, Gan Z T, Shangguan Z P, et al. Effects of grazing on soil physical properties and soil erodibility in semiarid grassland of the Northern Loess Plateau (China)[J].Catena,2010,82(2):87-91.

Zhao X N, Chen X L, Huang J, et al. Effects of vegetation cover of natural grassland on runoff and sediment yield in loess hilly region of China[J]. Journal of Food and Agriculture,2014,94:497-503.

Pan C Z, Shangguan Z P, Lei T W. Influences of grass and moss on runoff and sediment yield on sloped loess surfaces under simulated rainfall[J].Hydrological Processes,2010,20(18):3815-3824.

Li X, Niu J Z, Xie B Y. The effect of leaf litter cover on surface runoff and soil erosion in Northern China[J].PLoS One,2014,9(9):1-15.

张祯尧,孙佳美,余新晓,等.栓皮栎林下枯落物减流减沙效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):55-58.

Wang B, Zhang G H, Yang Y F, et al. Response of soil detachment capacity to plant root and soil properties in typical grasslands on the Loess Plateau[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2018,266:68-75.

Nagase A, Dunnett N. Amount of water runoff from different vegetation types on extensive green roofs:Effects of plant species, diversity and plant structure[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2012,104:356-363.

Tang C J, Liu Y, Li Z W, et al. Effectiveness of vegetation cover pattern on regulating soil erosion and runoff generation in red soil environment, southern China[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,129:1-9.

陆桂红,杨顺,王钧,等.植物根系固土力学机理的研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(2):152-156.

Wang J F, Yang Y F, Wang B, et al. Soil detachment caused by flowing water erosion in six typical herbaceous plant root systems on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Biosystems Engineering,2022,217:56-67.

浏览量

1021

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同水土保持技术模式的坡耕地产流、产沙特征

香根草植物篱带宽对紫色土坡地产流产沙的影响