滴喷灌施肥方式对土壤养分空间分异及茶苗根系生长的影响

刘子君; 叶赟; 王丽; 张遥; 齐永波; 穆静; 章力干

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

滴喷灌施肥方式对土壤养分空间分异及茶苗根系生长的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 滴喷灌施肥方式对土壤养分空间分异及茶苗根系生长的影响
- Effects of Drip Irrigation and Spray Irrigation Fertilization on Spatial Differentiation of Soil Nutrients and Root Growth of Tea Seedlings
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第6期页码：330-339
- 作者机构：
  
  农田生态保育与污染防控安徽省重点实验室, 安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,合肥,230036
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家果菜茶有机肥替代化肥委托项目(qmZC2019C003-2);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0200402-3)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.040
  中图分类号： S157.4
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘子君, 叶赟, 王丽, 等. 滴喷灌施肥方式对土壤养分空间分异及茶苗根系生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):330-339.

LIU Zijun, YE Yun, WANG Li, et al. Effects of Drip Irrigation and Spray Irrigation Fertilization on Spatial Differentiation of Soil Nutrients and Root Growth of Tea Seedlings[J]. 2022, 36(6): 330-339.
刘子君, 叶赟, 王丽, 等. 滴喷灌施肥方式对土壤养分空间分异及茶苗根系生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):330-339. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.040.

LIU Zijun, YE Yun, WANG Li, et al. Effects of Drip Irrigation and Spray Irrigation Fertilization on Spatial Differentiation of Soil Nutrients and Root Growth of Tea Seedlings[J]. 2022, 36(6): 330-339. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.040.

摘要

探究滴灌和喷灌对土壤理化和生物学性状及茶苗根系生长的影响

为科学灌溉施肥提供理论依据。土壤培养设置土施(SA)、喷施(FA)和滴施(DA)3种施肥方式

60天后

选取培养钵表土中心点为参照

根据距中心点水平和垂直方向距离差异

将培养土壤划分3个空间区域

观测pH、电导率、养分和生物学性质;茶树盆栽试验设置2个氮水平和土施、喷施、滴施3种施肥方式共6个处理

观测茶苗根系生长和形态。土培试验结果表明

FA与SA处理不同空间土壤区域无明显差异

而DA与FA之间差异明显

60天后离中心点水平5 cm、垂直0—10 cm的土壤区域内

其电导率、pH、碱解N、速效K和速效P含量DA较FA分别增加35.6%

30.7%

40.6%

34.3%和74.8%

区域内细菌、真菌和放线菌分别增加174.6%

167.0%和289.0%

脲酶和酸性磷酸酶活性呈相反变化

DA较FA分别降低42.5%和31.4%。盆栽试验结果表明

茶树根系生长整体表现为FA＞SA＞DA

FA较DA的茶苗根鲜重、根总长、根体积、根尖数、分支数和交叉数均明显提高

不同N水平之间的促根效应差异不明显。综上

施肥方式对土壤养分空间分布、土壤生物学特性及茶苗根系生长影响明显。DA滴头中心点微域土壤的电导率、养分含量和微生物数量较SA和FA增加显著

存在明显的微域集聚效应

而脲酶、酸性磷酸酶活性降低。DA施肥方式明显抑制茶苗根系生长

而FA则显著促进茶苗根系生长和形态建成。

Abstract

This research investigated the effects of drip and spray irrigation on the physical

chemical and biological properties of the soil and root growth of tea seedlings

and could provide a theoretical basis for scientific irrigation and fertilization. Three types of fertilizer application were set up

soil application (SA)

spray application (FA) and drip application (DA). After 15

45 and 60 days

the soil was divided into three spatial zones according to the difference in horizontal and vertical distance from the center of the topsoil of the culture bowl

and pH

conductivity

nutrients and biological properties were observed. In the pot experiment of tea seedlings

six treatments were set up

including two nitrogen levels and three fertilization methods of soil application

spraying and dropping. The root growth and morphology of tea seedlings were observed. The results of the soil culture showed that there was no significant difference between FA and SA treatments in different spatial soil regions

while there were significant differences between DA and FA. After 60 days

in the soil region 5 cm horizontally and 0—10 cm vertically from the center point

compared with FA

the conductivity

content of alkali-hydrolyzed N

available K and available P of DA increased by 35.6%

30.7%

40.6%

34.3% and 74.8%

respectively

and bacterial

fungal and actinomycetes in the region of DA increased by 174.6%

167.0% and 289.0%

respectively. The activities of urease and acid phosphatase in the soil region of DA showed opposite trend

decreased by 42.5% and 31.4%

respectively

compared with FA. The results of pot experiment showed that the overall root growth of tea trees followed the order of FA＞SA＞DA

and the root fresh weight

total root length

root volume

root tip number

branch number and cross number of tea seedlings in the FA treatment were significantly higher than those of DA

while there was no significant difference in the root promoting effect among different N levels. In summary

fertilization methods had significant effects on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients

soil biological properties and root growth of tea seedlings. Compared with SA and FA

the conductivity

nutrient content and microbial population in the micro domain at the center of the DA drip head increased significantly

and there was a significant micro domain aggregation effect

while the urease and acid phosphatase activities decreased. DA significantly inhibited the root growth of tea seedlings

while FA significantly promoted the root growth and morphological establishment of tea seedlings.

关键词

Keywords

references

Kafkafi U, Tarchitzky J. A tool for efficient fertilizer and water management[M].Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association International Potash Institute,2011.

李帅,卫琦,徐俊增,等.水肥一体化条件下控灌稻田土壤氮素及水稻生长特性研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2021,40(10):79-86.

Drechsel P, Heffer P, Magen H, et al. Managing water and fertilizer for sustainable agricultural intensification. 2015. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208412.

杨安,李燕青,李壮,等.氮磷钾肥不同滴灌撒施组合对富士苹

N吸收分配及利用率的影响[J].果树学报,2022,39(4):564-573.

Wang H, Wu L, Cheng M, et al. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigated cotton in northern Xinjiang, China[J].Field Crops Research,2018,219:169-179.

黄丽,范兴科.磷肥和钾肥不同配施方式对其养分在土壤中迁移的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):184-190.

牟洪臣,虎胆·吐马尔白,苏里坦,等.干旱地区棉田膜下滴灌盐分运移规律[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(7):18-22.

李树亮,梁斌,丁兆堂,等.微喷灌施用专用水溶肥在幼龄茶树上的试验研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(25):252-256.

赵伟霞,张萌,李久生,等.尿素浓度对喷灌夏玉米生长和产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(4):98-105.

贾国燏,骆洪义,褚屿,等.不同灌溉方式下水肥一体化对玉米养分吸收规律的影响[J].节水灌溉,2022(2):40-47.

朱忠锐,范永申,段福义,等.喷灌条件下河西走廊春小麦土壤硝态氮动态分布及产量关系[J].节水灌溉,2018(4):26-32.

陈康,邓兰生,涂攀峰,等.不同水肥调控措施对马铃薯种植土壤养分运移的影响[J].广东农业科学,2011,38(20):51-54.

张川,张亨年,闫浩芳,等.微喷灌结合滴灌对温室高温环境和作物生长生理特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):83-89.

孙玮皓,申孝军, Kader M H A,等.滴灌施肥时序对不同质地土壤水氮分布的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(3):47-53.

郭丙玉,高慧,唐诚,等.水肥互作对滴灌玉米氮素吸收、水氮利用效率及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3679-3686.

苏木德.不同水肥调控措施对马铃薯种植土壤养分运移的影响[J].福建农业,2015(2):137.

王海廷,赵营,罗健航,等.喷灌施肥对露地菜心产量及土壤氮素淋失的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(8):68-73.

涂琴,易萌,李红,等.施肥浓度对摇臂式喷头喷灌施肥均匀性的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2020,38(11):1180-1188.

满建国,王东,于振文,等.不同带长微喷带灌溉对土壤水分布与冬小麦耗水特性及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2186-2196.

孙富斌,尹娟,魏小东,等.滴灌施肥条件下土壤硝态氮空间分布规律室内模拟研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2021,39(6):807-813.

王冲,秦亚旭,张珂,等.渭北旱塬矮化苹果园滴灌下土壤剖面水分和养分时空分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):343-348.

朱忠锐,范永申,段福义,等.喷灌灌水与施肥对春小麦水分动态及产量的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2019,37(2):174-178.

臧小平,王甲水,周兆禧,等.微喷灌施肥对芒果产量、品质和养分吸收利用的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(增刊2):1-4.

鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.

李刚,卢楠.蓄水条件下土壤pH与电导率的空间分布与关系的研究[J].节水灌溉,2017(12):94-96.

孙治强,张楠,赵卫星,等.氮肥施用量对生菜产量、硝酸盐积累及土壤EC值、pH值的影响[J].江西农业学报,2007,19(4):44-45.

曹舰艇,杨红,彭艳,等.藏东南不同种植年限蔬菜大棚土壤pH及养分的变化特征[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(8):117-126.

曲成闯,陈效民,韩召强,等.施用生物有机肥对黄瓜不同生育期土壤肥力特征及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):279-284.

王理德,姚拓,何芳兰,等.石羊河下游退耕区次生草地自然恢复过程及土壤酶活性的变化[J].草业学报,2014,23(4):253-261.

曹群,丁文娟,赵兰凤,等.生物有机肥对冬瓜枯萎病及土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,2015,36(2):36-42.

Rrdersma S, Grierson P F. Phosphorus mobilization in agroforestry: Organic anions, phosphatase activity and phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere[J].Plant and Soil,2004,259(1):209-219.

樊军,郝明德.黄土高原旱地轮作与施肥长期定位试验研究Ⅰ.长期轮作与施肥对土壤酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(1):9-13.

薛冬,姚槐应,何振立,等.红壤酶活性与肥力的关系[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1455-1458.

张孝存,郑粉莉,安娟,等.黑土区坡耕地土壤酶活性与土壤养分关系研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(11):106-110.

焦晓光,魏丹,隋跃宇.长期施肥对黑土和暗棕壤土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响[J].土壤通报,2011,42(3):698-703.

Inukai Y, Ashikari M, Kitano H, et al. Function of the root system and molecular mechanism of crown root formation in rice[J].Plant and Cell Physiology,2004,45:S17.

林诚,陈子聪,吴一群,等.林地转变为茶园的土壤pH及养分变化特征[J].茶叶科学,2020,40(2):186-193.

浏览量

679

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

水肥一体化追氮配施氮肥增效剂对冬小麦生长和氮素利用率的影响

干旱区棉秆不同还田量对土壤理化性质及棉花生长的影响

调亏灌溉对鄂西柑橘果实膨大期和转色增糖期叶片养分、酶活性及根区土壤养分的影响

增温和放牧对河西盐渍化草地土壤理化性质及酶活性的影响

栗子坪自然保护区林分类型对土壤化学计量特征、微生物及其季节动态响应