西北大学城市与环境学院,西安,710127
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张家熊, 柳笑, 汪成成, 等. 基于空间异质性的秦岭水源涵养能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):290-297.
ZHANG Jiaxiong, LIU Xiao, WANG Chengcheng, et al. Construction of Water Conservation Capacity Evaluation Index System Based on Spatial Heterogeneity in Qinling Mountains[J]. 2022, 36(6): 290-297.
张家熊, 柳笑, 汪成成, 等. 基于空间异质性的秦岭水源涵养能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):290-297. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.035.
ZHANG Jiaxiong, LIU Xiao, WANG Chengcheng, et al. Construction of Water Conservation Capacity Evaluation Index System Based on Spatial Heterogeneity in Qinling Mountains[J]. 2022, 36(6): 290-297. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.035.
秦岭作为我国的南北分界线
构建一套完整的评价监测指标体系和深入剖析其内在驱动因素
关注其内在机理是为推动秦岭生态环境保护再上一个新台阶的必要工作
也是为了全面掌握反映水源涵养功能的驱动机制及变化规律。研究提出了基于地理加权主成分分析(GWPCA)方法构建秦岭水源涵养能力评价指标体系
对2010年秦岭水源涵养能力一级指标和二级指标空间动态变化进行了分析
揭示其空间变化分布机理。基于GWPCA
考虑气象因子、下垫面因子和社会因子的水源涵养效应
构建了包含10个空间变量的秦岭水源涵养能力指标体系。根据得出的结果将秦岭水源涵养能力等级划分为低、较低、中等、较高、高5个等级
揭示秦岭水源涵养能力空间变化规律
并以此提出生态管理建议。结果表明
秦岭大部分地区水源涵养能力在高等级和较高等级上
占整个区域的66.48%;部分经济发展区域和秦岭中部区域的水源涵养能力处于低与较低等级
极端气候事件和人类活动是造成其分布的主要原因。基于此方法构建的秦岭水源涵养能力指标体系
能够有效量化秦岭的水源涵养能力及其在空间上的异质性
并能明确主要驱动因子。
As the dividing line between the north and the south of China
it is necessary for the Qinling Mountains to construct a complete set of evaluation and monitoring index system. Its internal driving factors and internal mechanism should be studied to promote the ecological environment protection at a new level
and also to fully grasp the driving mechanism and changes of the water conservation function. In this study
an evaluation index system of water conservation capacity in the Qinling Mountains was proposed based on geoweighted principal component analysis (GWPCA). The spatial dynamic changes of primary and secondary indicators of water conservation capacity in the Qinling Mountains in 2010 were analyzed
and their spatial distribution mechanism were revealed. Based on GWPCA
considering the water conservation effects of meteorological factors
underlying surface factors and social factors
an index system of water conservation capacity in Qinling Mountains containing 10 spatial variables was constructed. According to the results
the water conservation capacity of the Qinling Mountains could be divided into five grades: low
lower
medium
high and higher. The spatial variation rules of water conservation capacity of the Qinling Mountains were revealed
and some suggestions for ecological management were put forward. The results showed that the water conservation capacity in most areas of Qinling Mountains was at high and higher levels
accounting for 66.48% of the whole region. The water conservation capacity in some economic development regions and the central region of Qinling Mountains is at low and low levels. Extreme climate events and human activities were the main reasons for its distribution. The index system of water conservation capacity in Qinling based on this method could effectively quantify the water conservation capacity in Qinling and its spatial heterogeneity
and could clarify the main driving factors.
黄海霞.祁连山水源涵养林可持续经营标准与指标体系的建立[J].甘肃林业科技,2002,27(2):15-18.
李金良,郑小贤.北京地区水源涵养林健康评价指标体系的探讨[J].林业资源管理,2004(1):31-34.
白杨,初冬,田良,等.武汉城市圈的水源涵养功能重要性评价研究[J].地球信息科学,2014,16(2):233-241.
安宝利,张征,王举位,等.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的沙棘涵养水源功能评价[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(2):39-43.
李莉娟,张娜.关于主成分分析的几种常用改进方法[J].统计与决策,2007(21):167-168.
Harris P, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted principal components analysis[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science,2011,25(10):1717-1736.
Fotheringham A S, Rogerson P A. The sage handbook of spatial analysis[M].London: SAGE Publications,2009.
Harris P, Clarke A, Juggins S, et al. Enhancements to a geographically weighted principal component analysis in the context of an application to an environmental data set[J].Geographical Analysis,2014,47(2):146-172.
Chen Y, Peloso G M, Liu C, et al. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome﹚idea or exonic variants[J].Genetic Epidemiology,2020,44:702-716.
Sabokbar H F, Roodposhti M S, Tazik E. Landslide susceptibility mapping using geographically-weighted principal component analysis[J].Geomorphology,2014,226:15-24.
Kallio M, Guillaume J, Kummu M, et al. Spatial variation in seasonal water poverty index for Laos: An application of geographically weighted principal component analysis[J].Social Indicators Research,2018,140:1131-1157.
Li Z, Cheng J, Wu Q. Analyzing regional economic development patterns in a fast developing province of China through geographically weighted principal component analysis[J].Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences,2016,9(3):1-13.
李乃强,徐贵阳.基于自然间断点分级法的土地利用数据网格化分析[J].测绘通报,2020(4):106-110,156.
黎家琦,武雪玲,唐诗怡.压力—状态—响应模型下的生态敏感性分析算法[J].测绘科学,2020,45(11):75-83,106.
中华人民共和国生态环境保护部.HJ192-2015生态环境状况评价技术规范[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2015.
陆福志,鹿化煜.秦岭—大巴山高分辨率气温和降水格点数据集的建立及其对区域气候的指示[J].地理学报,2019,74(5):875-888.
杨凤梅,王乃昂,王式功,等.近60 a来西秦岭及周边地区降水的分布格局[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):867-879.
赵婷,白红英,邓晨晖,等.2000—2016年秦岭山地植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4499-4509.
汲玉河,周广胜,王树东,等.2000—2019年秦岭地区植被生态质量演变特征及驱动力分析[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(6):617-625.
温晓金.恢复力视角下山区社会—生态系统脆弱性及其适应[D].西安:西北大学,2017.
苏亮,柳礼香.洛南县水土流失现状成因及治理对策探讨[J].地下水,2019,41(4):174-175.
上官超超,王雁林,姚翔龙,等.柞水县地质灾害分布规律及防治对策[C]//秦巴山区地质灾害与防治学术研讨会.秦巴山区地质灾害与防治学术研讨会论文集,西安,2015:130-132.
焦喜丽.陕西秦岭生态功能保护区地质灾害特征及其防治措施[J].陕西地质,2004,22(1):80-82.
李双双,张玉凤,张立伟,等.2000—2019年秦岭南北实际蒸散发时空变化特征[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(11):1900-1910.
柳礼香,彭芳,寇龙.秦岭地区生态建设中水土流失的危害及对策[J].陕西水利,2017(5):80-81.
王昭,刘建红,李同昇,等.秦巴特困区生态脆弱性与经济贫困的耦合关系:以陕西省山阳县为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(11):3908-3917.
夏军,马协一,邹磊,等.气候变化和人类活动对汉江上游径流变化影响的定量研究[J].南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(1):1-6.
胡克宏,张震.陕西秦岭山区留坝县生态质量时空特征及影响因素分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(6):751-760.
卓静,何慧娟,邹继业.近15 a秦岭林区水源涵养量变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(3):604-612.
徐省超,赵雪雁,宋晓谕.退耕还林(草)工程对渭河流域生态系统服务的影响[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(11):3893-3904.
0
浏览量
656
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621