1. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京,100038
2. 宁夏农林科学院林业与草地生态研究所, 宁夏防沙治沙与水土保持重点实验室, 宁夏生态修复与多功能林业综合研究中心,银川,750002
3. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所,北京,100091
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
韩新生, 刘广全, 许浩, 等. 宁夏南部半干旱黄土区3种土地利用类型的土壤水分时空变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):250-259.
HAN Xinsheng, LIU Guangquan, XU Hao, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Soil Moisture Under Three Land Use Types in the Semi-arid Loess Region of Southern Ningxia[J]. 2022, 36(6): 250-259.
韩新生, 刘广全, 许浩, 等. 宁夏南部半干旱黄土区3种土地利用类型的土壤水分时空变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):250-259. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.031.
HAN Xinsheng, LIU Guangquan, XU Hao, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Soil Moisture Under Three Land Use Types in the Semi-arid Loess Region of Southern Ningxia[J]. 2022, 36(6): 250-259. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.031.
选择宁南黄土区贾新庄组的3种土地利用类型(川地农田、阴坡梯田、阳坡人工林)
在2021年生长季使用土钻监测土壤含水量(SMC)
同时利用自动气象站监测气象数据
分析土地利用、坡位、作物种类影响下的土壤水分时空变化特征。结果表明:3种土地利用类型的SMC大小为川地农田(16.32%)>阴坡梯田(12.66%)>阳坡人工林(10.82%);随着研究时段推进
SMC呈先降后升的变化
SMC与降水量存在较好的时间协同性
气温、太阳辐射、饱和水汽压差与阳坡人工林SMC显著相关;随土层深度增加
川地农田、阴坡梯田、阳坡人工林的SMC分别呈升高、降低、先降后升的变化
0—100 cm土层的土壤水分变异系数大于100—200 cm土层。SMC季节变化分为相对稳定期(4—5月)、消退期(6—8月)和恢复期(9—10月);SMC土层变化分为活跃层(0—40 cm)、相对活跃层(40—140 cm)、相对稳定层(140—200 cm)。土壤水分的补给时间滞后于降水
下层土壤水分补给滞后于上层土壤。阴坡梯田和阳坡人工林SMC随坡位降低均先降后升
最小值分别在坡上和中下坡位。土地利用、坡位差异、作物种类、气象因子均是影响SMC的因素;从SMC的变异程度看
各因子对SMC的作用大小依次为气象>土地利用>坡位>作物种类。研究结果有利于指导半干旱黄土区的植被重建与生态产业发展
确定不同立地环境下的合理植被配置。
In this study
three land use types (flat field farmland
shady slope terrace and sunny slope plantation) of Jiaxinzhuang Formation in the loess region of southern Ningxia were selected. Soil water content (SMC) was observed by soil drill in the growing season of 2021. At the same time
meteorological data were monitored by an automatic weather station. The spatio-temporal variation characteristics of SMC under the influence of land use
slope position and crop species were analyzed. The results showed that the order of SMC of the three land use types was flat field farmland (16.32%)>shady slope terrace (12.66%)>sunny slope plantation (10.82%). With the advance of the study period
SMC decreased first and then increased. There was excellent temporal synergy between SMC and precipitation. Temperature
solar radiation and saturation vapor pressure deficit were significantly related to the SMC of sunny slope plantations. With the increase of soil depth
SMC increased in flat field farmland
decreased in shady slope terrace
first decreased and then increased in sunny slope plantation. The variation coefficient of SMC in the 0—100 cm soil layer was greater than that in the 100—200 cm soil layer. Seasonal variation of SMC were divided into a relatively stable period (April-May)
regression period (June-August) and recovery period (September-October). The change of SMC in different soil layers was divided into the active layer (0—40 cm)
the relatively active layer (40—140 cm) and the relatively stable layer (140—200 cm). The replenishment time of soil moisture lagged behind precipitation
and the replenishment of lower soil moisture lagged behind that of upper soil. SMC of shady slope terrace and sunny slope plantation decreased first and then increased with the decreasing of slope position
and the minimum values were at the upper and middle-down slope position
respectively. Land use
slope position
crop species and meteorological elements were all factors that affected SMC. In terms of the variation degree of SMC
the effect of each factor on SMC followed the order of meteorological>land use>slope position>crop species. The results of this study were conducive to guiding the vegetation reconstruction and ecological industry development in semi-arid loess area
and determining the reasonable vegetation allocation under different site environments.
常学尚,常国乔.干旱半干旱区土壤水分研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(1):156-163.
Bogena H R, Huisman J A, Baatz R, et al. Accuracy of the cosmicray soil water content probe in humid forest ecosystems: The worst case scenario[J].Water Resource Research,2013,49:5778-5791.
Heathman G C, Cosh M H, Merwade V, et al. Multi-scale temporal stability analysis of surface and subsurface soil moisture within the Upper Cedar Creek Watershed, Indiana[J].Catena,2012,95:91-103.
Dobriyal P, Qureshi A, Badola R, et al. A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,458/459:110-117.
Yang L, Chen L D, Wei W, et al. Comparison of deep soil moisture in two re-vegetation watersheds in semi-arid regions[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,513:314-321.
沈晗悦,信忠保,王志杰.北京山区侧柏林坡面土壤水分时空动态及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2676-2686.
韩新生.六盘山半干旱区三种典型植被的结构变化及其多功能影响[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2020.
安文明,韩晓阳,李宗善,等.黄土高原不同植被恢复方式对土壤水分坡面变化的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(13):4852-4860.
程谅,焦雄,邸涵悦,等.不同整地措施坡面土壤水分时空分布特征[J].土壤学报,2021,58(6):1423-1435.
董起广,张扬,陈田庆,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区小流域坡面土壤水分分布特征[J].中国农村水利水电,2018(7):65-68,73.
单玉琳,解建仓,韩霁昌,等.黄土高原坡面土壤水分特征及时间稳定性:以延安市九龙泉沟为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(6):1-7.
杜雨佳,赵勇钢,刘小芳,等.黄土丘陵区柠条种植带状结构对坡面土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):52-59.
曹伟,盛煜,吴吉春,等.青藏高原坡面冻土土壤水分空间变异特性[J].水科学进展,2017,28(1):32-40.
赵鑫,翟胜,李建豹,等.不同坡位条件对毛乌素沙地长柄扁桃林地土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):45-52.
杜康,张北赢.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):72-76.
施政乐,张建军,申明爽,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用类型对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):190-197.
包维斌,王幼奇,刘鹏,等.宁南山区不同土地利用类型下土壤水分分布及其干燥化特征[J].草地学报,2020,28(3):775-783.
王艳莉,刘立超,高艳红,等.人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态及空间分布[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):942-950.
艾宁,宗巧鱼,高金续,等.陕北黄土区雨季后山地枣林土壤水分动态变化研究[J].植物研究,2020,40(4):559-567.
白晓,贾小旭,邵明安,等.黄土高原北部土地利用变化对长期土壤水分平衡影响模拟[J].水科学进展,2021,32(1):109-119.
缪凌,董建国,汪有科,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型下的深层土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(2):13-18.
朱海,胡顺军,刘翔,等.不同龄阶梭梭根区土壤水分时空变化特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(3):860-867.
马月存,秦红灵,高旺盛,等.农牧交错带不同耕作方式土壤水分动态变化特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2523-2530.
王艳萍,王力,韩雪,等.黄土塬区不同土地利用方式土壤水分消耗与补给变化特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(22):7571-7579.
胡良军,邵明安.黄土高原植被恢复的水分生态环境研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1045-1048.
穆兴民.黄土高原土壤水分与水土保持措施相互作用[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(2):41-45.
白一茹,王幼奇,王建宇.黄土高原雨养区坡面土壤水力学性质空间特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):168-172,177.
0
浏览量
732
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621