中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100中国科学院大学, 北京 100190吕梁学院生命科学系,山西,吕梁,033000
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
郝旺林. 黄土丘陵区典型沟道侵蚀诱发的CO2通量估算[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):179-188.
Estimation of CO2 Flux Induced by Gully Erosion on the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2022, 36(6): 179-188.
郝旺林. 黄土丘陵区典型沟道侵蚀诱发的CO2通量估算[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):179-188. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.023.
Estimation of CO2 Flux Induced by Gully Erosion on the Loess Hilly Region[J]. 2022, 36(6): 179-188. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.023.
以黄土丘陵区典型侵蚀沟道为对象
基于沟道剖面有机碳和
137
Cs数据
采用碳库重分布模型估算了典型沟道侵蚀诱发的CO
2
通量
并通过检验模型预测效率、解析影响因子
提出了模型校正的思路。结果表明:(1)在长期侵蚀作用下
沟道侵蚀区和沉积区均表现为剧烈的侵蚀效应
侵蚀区侵蚀速率介于30.99~46.44 mm/a
沉积区侵蚀速率介于34.20~37.88 mm/a
沉积区土壤流失速率略小于侵蚀区;(2)碳库重分布模型估算显示
侵蚀区与沉积区均表现为较强烈的碳源效应
侵蚀区CO
2
通量介于18.41~28.44 g/(m
2
·a)
沉积区CO
2
通量介于22.19~29.25 g/(m
2
·a);(3)侵蚀部位、土壤容重、有机碳含量、侵蚀量、沟道平均坡度、植被地上部与地下部生物量共同解释了碳库重分布模型预测效率的变异特征(R
2
=0.68)
其中侵蚀部位、侵蚀量、有机碳含量、土壤容重、植被地下部对预测效率有强驱动效应;(4)引入被忽略的植被新输入有机碳库参数
有望校正碳库重分布模型
提升模型预测效率。该研究结果明确了碳库重分布模型在沟道侵蚀区相比沉积区有更高的CO
2
通量预测效率
为进一步提高模型的预测精度
可以考虑引入植被输入有机碳库作为校正参数。
Gully erosion leads to massive soil loss
which aggravates the migration
loss and morphological changes of organic carbon
and thus induces CO
2
emission effects. Most of the previous studies on CO
2
emission effects of eroded soil were carried out at watershed and regional scales by model estimation
but not enough attentionwas paid to the CO
2
emission effects induced by gully erosion. According to the carbon pool redistribution model
organic carbon and Cesium-137 content of soil profiles from three gullies were used to estimate the CO
2
flux induced by gully
erosion on the Loess Hilly Region
and the model prediction efficiency and its influencing factors were tested. The results showed that: (1) After long-term erosion
severe erosion occurred in both erosion area and sedimentary area of gullies in the three study areas. The erosion rate in erosion area was between 30.99 and 46.44 mm/a
and that in sedimentary area was between 34.20 and 37.88 mm/a
and the soil loss rate in eroded areas were slightly higher than that in deposition areas. (2) The stronger carbon source existe in both erosion and sedimentary areas. The modeling fluxes in erosion and sedimentary area of gullies ranged from 18.41 to 28.44 g/(m
2
·a)
and from 22.19 to 29.25 g/(m
2
·a)
respectively. (3) Erosion site
soil bulk density
soil organic carbon content
soil erosion amount
average slope of gully
aboveground biomass and underground biomass of vegetation jointly explained the variability of prediction efficiency of the carbon pool redistribution model (R
2
=0.68)
among which erosion site
erosion amount
organic carbon content
soil bulk density
and below-ground vegetation had strong driving effects on prediction efficiency. (4) The neglected parameter of new input organic carbon pool induced by vegetation should be introduced to correct the carbon pool redistribution model and improve the model prediction efficiency. It was clear that the carbon pool redistribution model had a higher prediction efficiency of CO
2
flux in gully erosion area compared with deposition area. In order to further improve the prediction accuracy of the model
the new organic carbon pool induced by vegetation should be considered as a calibration parameter incorporated in to the carbon pool redistribution model.
0
浏览量
6
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621