1. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 农业农村部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室,武汉,430070
2. 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司,昆明,650051
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
徐晗, 鄢紫薇, 胡荣桂, 等. 不同草本植被过滤带对径流中氮磷的生态阻控效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):140-147.
XU Han, YAN Ziwei, HU Ronggui, et al. Ecological Control Effect of Different Herbaceous Vegetative Filter Belts on Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Runoff[J]. 2022, 36(6): 140-147.
徐晗, 鄢紫薇, 胡荣桂, 等. 不同草本植被过滤带对径流中氮磷的生态阻控效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):140-147. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.018.
XU Han, YAN Ziwei, HU Ronggui, et al. Ecological Control Effect of Different Herbaceous Vegetative Filter Belts on Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Runoff[J]. 2022, 36(6): 140-147. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.018.
为明确在不同条件下植被过滤带对地表径流氮、磷的阻控规律
分别构建百慕大、马尼拉、高羊茅、玉龙草等4种植被过滤带和裸地对照组过滤带
通过模拟3种污染物浓度和3种水力负荷强度的径流
探讨不同草本植被过滤带对表流和渗流中的氮、磷的阻控效果。结果表明
与对照组相比
植被过滤带显著提高土壤系统对径流以及来水中的氮、磷等污染物的拦截能力
在3种水力负荷强度下
百慕大、马尼拉、高羊茅、玉龙草和裸地对照组的平均径流拦截率分别为56.10%
54.28%
63.16%
60.53%和39.10%
4种植被的径流拦截率均显著高于对照组(p<0.05);4种植被覆盖均显著降低表渗流量比
提高土壤的入渗能力;水力负荷强度的提高降低植被过滤带对NH4+—N和TP的去除效率
但植被过滤带去除率降低的幅度小于对照组;在一定范围内
渗流中TN、NO3-—N和TP的去除率随着来水中氮、磷浓度增加而提高;在一定的水力负荷下
根冠比越低的植被削减径流的能力越强。
In order to clarify the blockage and control law of nitrogen and phosphorus in simulated runoff under different conditions
five vegetative buffer strips were constructed with control
Cynodon dactylon
Zoysia matrella
Festuca elata and Ophiopogon japonicus
and the blockage and control effects on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in surface flow and seepage were explored by simulating runoff with different pollutant concentrations. The results showed that compared with the control
the vegetative buffer strips significantly improved the interception ability of the soil system on runoff and pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorus in the incoming water
and the average runoff reduction rates of the filter strips of Cynodon dactylon
Zoysia matrella
Festuca elata
Ophiopogon japonicus and the control group were 56.10%
54.28%
63.16%
60.53% and 39.10% respectively under three hydraulic load intensities. The runoff reduction rates of all four plantings were significantly higher than those of the control (p<0.05). All four plantings significantly reduced the surface infiltration ratio and improved the infiltration capacity of the soil. The increase in hydraulic load intensity reduced the removal efficiency of NH4+—N and total P (TP) in the vegetated filter zone
but the reduction in the removal rate of the vegetated treatment was less than that of the control. Within a certain range
the removal rates of total N (TN)
NO3-—N and TP in the seepage increased with the increase of N and P concentrations in the incoming water. Under a certain hydraulic load
the vegetative with low root to shoot ratio has a stronger ability to reduce runoff.
Zhang W Q, Jin X, Liu D, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of nitrogen and phosphorus and eutrophication assessment for a typical arid river: Fuyang River in northern China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2017,55:41-48.
Tang Q, Bao Y H, He X B, et al. Sedimentation and associated trace metal enrichment in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir,China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2014,479/480:258-266.
刘瑞霞,王立阳,孙菲,等.以农业面源污染阻控为目标的河流生态缓冲带研究进展[J].环境工程学报,2022,16(1):25-39.
Flanagan K, Branchu P, Ramier D, et al. Evaluation of the relative roles of a vegetative filter strip and a biofiltration swale in a treatment train for road runoff[J].Water Science and Technology,2017,75(4):987-997.
Abu-Zreig M, Rudra R P, Whiteley H R, et al. Phosphorus removal in vegetated filter strips[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2003,32(2):613-619.
Genea S M, Hoekstrab P F, Hannamc C, et al. The role of vegetated buffers in agriculture and their regulation across Canada and the United States[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2019,243:12-21.
Prosser R S, Hoekstra P F, Gene S, et al. A review of the effectiveness of vegetated buffers to mitigate pesticide and nutrient transport into surface waters from agricultural areas[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:1-13.
孙金伟,许文盛.河岸植被缓冲带生态功能及其过滤机理的研究进展[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(3):40-44.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].1版.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:127-135.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:22-74.
梁志权,张思毅,卓慕宁,等.不同雨强及坡度对华南红壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):1-6.
Rose C W, Yu B, Hogarth W L, et al. Sediment deposition from flow at low gradients into a buffer strip: A critical test of re-entrainment theory[J].Journal of Hydrology,2003,280(1):33-51.
王敏,黄宇驰,吴建强.植被缓冲带径流渗流水量分配及氮磷污染物去除定量化研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(11):2607-2612.
廖敏,叶照金,黄宇,等.长兴县合溪水库集雨区苗木地不同施肥管理模式对径流磷素流失的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7342-7350.
Zak D, Bronvang B, Carstensen M V, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff in integrated buffer zones[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2018,52(11):6508-6517.
孙东耀,仝川,纪钦阳,等.不同类型植被河岸缓冲带对模拟径流及总磷的消减研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(6):2393-2399.
佘冬立,阿力木·阿布来提,陈倩,等.不同入流条件下植被过滤带对坡面径流氮、磷的拦截效果[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3425-3432.
陈旭飞,刘通,程炯,等.华南地区草被过滤带对菜地径流、泥沙和磷阻控效果及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):377-383.
陈倩,傅瑜,佘冬立,等.坡面产流产沙过程对植被过滤带响应的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):104-109.
吴建强,黄沈发,黄宇弛,等.污染负荷及植被生物量变化对缓冲带污染物净化效果的影响[J].环境工程学报,2008,2(10):1425-1429.
Fernandez-Ugalde O, Virto I, Bescansa P, et al. No-tillage improvement of soil physical quality in calcareous, degradation-prone, semiarid soils[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2009,106(1):29-35.
李晓娜,张国芳,武美军,等.不同植被过滤带对农田径流泥沙和氮磷拦截效果与途径[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):39-44.
何聪,刘璐嘉,王苏胜,等.不同宽度草皮缓冲带对农田径流氮去除效果研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):55-58.
Lambrechts T, François S, Lutts S, et al. Impact of plant growth and morphology and of sediment concentration on sediment retention efficiency of vegetative filter strips: Flume experiments and VFSMOD modeling[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,511:800-810.
Wu J Q, Xiong L J, Sha C Y. Removal of N, P from seepage and runoff by different vegetated and slope buffer strips[J].Water Science and Technology,2020,82(2):351-363.
0
浏览量
726
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621