重庆降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度对土壤侵蚀风险的评估

魏兴萍; 肖成芳; 张爱国

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

重庆降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度对土壤侵蚀风险的评估

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 重庆降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度对土壤侵蚀风险的评估
- Assessment of Rainfall Erosivity and Erosivity Density on the Risk of Soil Erosion in Chongqing
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第6期页码：128-139
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 长江上游湿地科学研究重庆市重点实验室,重庆,401331
  2. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,401331
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  重庆市自然科学基金项目(cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0616,cstc2016jcyjA0150);国家自然科学基金项目(42107355,41202135)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.017
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏兴萍, 肖成芳, 张爱国. 重庆降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度对土壤侵蚀风险的评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):128-139.

WEI Xingping, XIAO Chengfang, ZHANG Aiguo. Assessment of Rainfall Erosivity and Erosivity Density on the Risk of Soil Erosion in Chongqing[J]. 2022, 36(6): 128-139.
魏兴萍, 肖成芳, 张爱国. 重庆降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度对土壤侵蚀风险的评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):128-139. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.017.

WEI Xingping, XIAO Chengfang, ZHANG Aiguo. Assessment of Rainfall Erosivity and Erosivity Density on the Risk of Soil Erosion in Chongqing[J]. 2022, 36(6): 128-139. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.017.

摘要

研究重庆降雨侵蚀力(RE)和侵蚀力密度(ED)的时空变化

有利于开展土壤侵蚀防治和水土流失风险评估。利用1961—2020年重庆34个气象站的逐日降雨数据、TM遥感影像资料

采用日降雨侵蚀力模型、Mann-Kendall非参数检验、变异系数、克里金插值、叠加分析等方法

对降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度进行时空分析

对重庆土壤侵蚀强度进行空间分析。结果表明:(1)重庆年平均降雨侵蚀力为5 672.32(MJ·mm)/ (hm2·h·a)

年平均侵蚀力密度为4.94 MJ/(hm2·h·a)

各季节平均降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度的变化趋势基本一致;(2)年降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度值均呈现渝东北最大

渝东南次之

渝西最小的规律。季节降雨侵蚀力和侵蚀力密度集中在夏季

表现为降雨侵蚀力渝东北最高

侵蚀力密度渝东最高;(3)重庆2020年土壤侵蚀强度以微度侵蚀为主

其次为轻度、中度、强度、极强度和剧烈侵蚀;(4)降雨侵蚀力、侵蚀力密度的侵蚀风险等级空间分布和土壤侵蚀强度等级空间分布相似

高值均出现在渝东北和渝东南地区。研究结果有助于管理者制定水土保持措施

有效防治重庆地区的水土流失。

Abstract

Studying the temporal and spatial changes of rainfall erosivity (RE) and erosivity density (ED) in Chongqing is conducive to soil erosion control and soil erosion risk assessment. Using the daily rainfall data and TM remote sensing image data of 34 meteorological stations in Chongqing from 1961 to 2020

the daily rainfall erosion force model

Mann-Kendall nonparametric test

coefficient of variation

Kriging interpolation

superposition analysis and other methods were used to analyze RE and ED. The spatial and temporal analysis of soil erosion intensity in Chongqing was carried out. The results showed that: (1) Chongqing’s annual average rainfall erosivity was 5 672.32 (MJ·mm)/(hm2·h·a)

the annual average erosive force density was 4.94 MJ/(hm2·h·a)

and the variation trend of average rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in each season were basically the same. (2) The annual RE and ED were the largest in northeast Chongqing

the second in southeast Chongqing

and the smallest in western Chongqing. Seasonal rainfall erosivity and erosivity density were concentrated in summer

and the rainfall erosivity was the highest in northeast Chongqing

and the erosivity density was highest in eastern Chongqing. (3) The soil erosion intensity in Chongqing in 2020 was dominated by slight erosion

followed by mild

moderate

intensity

extreme intensity and severe erosion. (4) The spatial distribution of the erosion risk level of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density was similar to the spatial distribution of soil erosion intensity level

and the highest values were both in northeast and southeast Chongqing. The research results could help managers to formulate soil and water conservation measures to effectively prevent and control soil erosion in Chongqing.

关键词

Keywords

references

Borrelli P, Diodato N, Panagos P. Rainfall erosivity in Italy: A national scale spatio-temporal assessment[J].International Journal of Digital Earth,2016,9(9):835-850.

Panagos P, Ballabio C, Borrelli P, et al. Rainfall erosivity in Europe[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,511:801-814.

中华人民共和国水利部.2020年中国水土保持公报[R/OL].(2021-09-30). http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/zgstbcgb/202109/t20210930_1545971.html.

Usda. Science documentation-Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Version 2 (RUSLE2)[M].Washington D C:USDA-AS,2008.

Zhu D Y, Xiong K N, Xiao H. Multi-time scale variability of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in the karst region of southern China, 1960—2017[J].Catena,2021,197(10):e104977.

Richardson C W, Foster G R, Wright D A. Estimation of erosion index from daily rainfall amount[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1983,26(1):153-156.

Yu B F, Rosewell C J. An assessment of a daily rainfall erosivity model for New South Wales RID G-5184-2010[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,1996,34(1):139-152.

章文波,谢云,刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):705-711.

Renard K G, Freimund J R. Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE[J].Journal of Hydrology,1994,157(1/4):287-306.

Kavian A, Nejad F, Habibnejad, et al. Modeling seasonal rainfall erosivity on a regional scale: A case study from Northeastern Iran[J].International Journal of Environmental Research,2011,5(4):939-950.

Lee J H, Heo J H. Evaluation of estimation methods for rainfall erosivity based on annual precipitation in Korea[J].Journal of Hydrology,2011,409(1/2):30-48.

吴洁玲,查轩,陈世发,等.1951—2018年韶关不同量级降雨侵蚀力变化[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):21-26.

Singh J, Singh O. Assessing rainfall erosivity and erosivity density over a western Himalayan catchment, India[J].Journal of Earth System Science,2020,129(B2):111-121.

Li X H, Ye X C. Variability of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in the Ganjiang River catchment, China: Characteristics and influences of climate change[J].Atmosphere,2018,9(2):e48.

Shin J Y, Kim T, Heo J H, et al. Spatial and temporal variations in rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in South Korea[J].Catena,2019,176:125-144.

Xu Z H, Pan B, Han M, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution of rainfall erosivity, erosivity density and correlation with El Nio-Southern Oscillation in the Huaihe River Basin, China[J].Ecological Informatics,2019,52:14-25.

Bagwan W A. An assessment of rainfall-induced land degradation condition using Erosivity Density (ED) and heatmap method for Urmodi River watershed of Maharashtra, India[J].Journal of Sedimentary Environments,2020,5(3):279-292.

Vantas K, Sidiropoulos E, Loukas A. Robustness spatiotemporal clustering and trend detection of rainfall erosivity density in Greece[J].Water,2019,11(5):e1050.

魏兴萍,蒲俊兵,赵纯勇.基于修正RISKE模型的重庆岩溶地区地下水脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2014,34(3):589-596.

中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准: SL 190—2007[S]北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

Lai C G, Chen X H, Wang Z L, et al. Spatio-temporal variation in rainfall erosivity during 1960—2012 in the Pearl River Basin, China[J].Catena,2016,137:382-391.

Tadić M P. Rainfall erosivity in Europe[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,511:801-814.

Bhardwaj P, Singh O. Spatial and temporal analysis of thunderstorm and rainfall activity over India[J].Atmosfera,2018,31(3):255-284.

Singh O, Bhardwaj P. Spatial and temporal variations in the frequency of thunderstorm days over India[J].Weather,2019,74(4):138-144.

汪言在,苟诗薇.重庆市降雨侵蚀力空间格局及其变化[J].地理科学,2013,33(1):116-122.

汪言在,苟诗薇,张述林.三峡库区(重庆段)降雨侵蚀力变化趋势及突变分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):1-6.

周琳,许武成,尹义星.近61年四川省降雨侵蚀力的时空变化趋势[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):8-14.

刘斌涛,陶和平,宋春风,等.我国西南山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化趋势研究[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(5):499-509.

陈晓瑜,孙晓航,黄奇晓,等.1970—2017年福建省降雨侵蚀力的时空变化特征[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2021,50(1):125-133.

伊力哈木·伊马木.新疆维吾尔自治区1981—2018年降雨侵蚀力的空间变化特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):1-9.

芦鑫,殷淑燕,高涛涛.1960—2017年秦岭南北地区降雨侵蚀力的时空变化特征研究[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2019,46(3):380-390.

Nearing M A, Yin S Q, Borrelli P, et al. Rainfall erosivity: An historical review[J].Catena,2017,157:357-362.

Liu S Y, Huang S Z, Xie Y Y, et al. Spatial-temporal changes of rainfall erosivity in the loess plateau, China: Changing patterns, causes and implications[J].Catena,2018,166:279-289.

浏览量

793

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

北京市近40年来降雨侵蚀力时空变异特征

基于不同重现期暴雨的延河流域降雨侵蚀力时空格局

喀斯特坡地侵蚀性降雨阈值初探

东北黑土区融雪径流侵蚀力时空分布

深圳市酸雨特征及其成因分析