1. 长安大学水利与环境学院,西安,710054
2. 长安大学旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安,710054
3. 青海省地质环境监测总站,西宁,810008
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张旭, 卢玉东, 王博, 等. 黄土高原南部黄土渗流特征的染色示踪研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):110-118.
ZHANG Xu, LU Yudong, WANG Bo, et al. Study on the Characteristics of Loess Seepage in the Southern Loess Plateau by Dye Tracing Method[J]. 2022, 36(6): 110-118.
张旭, 卢玉东, 王博, 等. 黄土高原南部黄土渗流特征的染色示踪研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):110-118. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.015.
ZHANG Xu, LU Yudong, WANG Bo, et al. Study on the Characteristics of Loess Seepage in the Southern Loess Plateau by Dye Tracing Method[J]. 2022, 36(6): 110-118. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.015.
为探究黄土中的渗流特征
明确不同初始条件对优先流的影响程度
使用亮蓝和离子染色剂
并控制入渗水量和初始含水率
在黄土高原南部进行染色示踪试验
根据获取的染色剖面图像
从定性和定量2个方面分析了优先流程度。结果表明:亮蓝染色剂在黄土中的染色深度有限
而离子染色剂经显色反应后能很好地示踪水的渗流;黄土高原南部黄土中优先流类型随土层深度从小到大为基质流—非均质指流—高相互作用大孔隙流—混合相互作用大孔隙流;优先流评价指数试坑A(0.55)>试坑C(0.48)>试坑B(0.46)
优先流程度由高到低为试坑A—试坑C—试坑B;在其他条件相同时
黄土中更多的入渗水量、更大的初始含水率抑制优先流的发育
使基质入渗深度更大
基质流程度更高
优先流程度降低。研究结果可为黄土地区灾害防治、探明地下水污染机制提供参考。
In order to explore the seepage characteristics in loess
and clarify the influence extent of different initial conditions on preferential flow
a dye tracing experiment was carried out in the southern Loess Plateau
using brilliant blue and ionic dye and controlling the infiltration water and initial water content. According to the obtained dyeing image
the preferential flow extent was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results showed that the dyeing depth of brilliant blue in loess was limited
while the ionic dye could well trace the seepage of water after color reaction. The type of preferential flow in loess in southern Loess Plateau from small to large with depth was in order as follows: homogeneous matrix flow
heterogeneous matrix flow and fingering
macropore flow with high interaction
macropore flow with mixed interaction. The order of preferential flow indicator was test pit A (0.55)>test pit C (0.48) >test pit B (0.46)
and the extent of preferential flow was from high to low: test pit A
test pit C
test pit B. When other conditions were the same
more infiltration water and higher initial water content in loess would inhibit the development of preferential flow
resulting in greater depth of matrix infiltration
higher extent of matrix flow
and lower extent of preferential flow. The study can provide reference for disaster prevention and control in loess area and for proving the mechanism of groundwater pollution.
Lin H. Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,393(1/2):3-19.
Chen G, Meng X M, Qiao L, et al. Response of a loess landslide to rainfall: Observations from a field artificial rainfall experiment in Bailong River Basin, China[J].Landslides,2018,15:895-911.
Southwick L M, Willis G H, Johnson D C, et al. Leaching of nitrate, atrazine, and metribuzin from sugarcane in southern Louisiana[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1995,24:684-690.
Li G, Lin H. Addressing two bottlenecks to advance the understanding of preferential flow in soils[J].Advances in Agronomy,2018,147:61-117.
唐双成,罗纨,贾忠华,等.雨水花园对不同赋存形态氮磷的去除效果及土壤中优先流的影响[J].水利学报,2015,46(8):943-950.
Sheng F, Liu H H, Wang K, et al. Investigation into preferential flow in natural unsaturated soils with field multiple-tracer infiltration experiments and the active region model[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,508(3):137-146.
彭海英,李小雁,崔步礼,等.土壤优势流研究方法综述[J].干旱气象,2011,29(2):137-143.
徐绍辉,张佳宝.土壤中优势流的几个基本问题研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999(6):27-30,34.
张珊珊,张茂省,孙萍萍,等.面向黄土地质灾害的优势流研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(2):274-280.
高朝侠,徐学选,赵娇娜,等.土壤大孔隙流研究现状与发展趋势[J].生态学报,2014,34(11):2801-2811.
盛丰,王康,张仁铎,等.田间尺度下土壤水流非均匀运动特征的染色示踪研究[J].水利学报,2009,40(1):101-108.
Zehe E, Flühler H. Preferential transport of isoproturon at a plot scale and a field scale tile-drained site[J].Journal of Hydrology,2001,247(1/2):100-115.
Nobles M M, Wilding L P, Lin H S. Flow pathways of bromide and Brilliant Blue FCF tracers in caliche soils[J].Journal of Hydrology,2010,393(1/2):114-122.
盛丰,张利勇,吴丹.土壤优先流模型理论与观测技术的研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(6):1-10.
Aeby P, Forrer J, Flühler H, et al. Image analysis for determination of dye tracer concentrations in sand columns[J].Soil Science Society of America,1997,61(1):33-35.
Morris C, Mooney S J. A high resolution system for the quantification of preferential flow in undisturbed soil using observations of tracers[J].Geodema,2004,118(1/2):133-143.
Janssen M, Lennartz B. Characterization of preferential flow pathways through paddy bunds with dye tracer tests[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,72(6):1756-1766.
朱钊岑,刘冰,刘婵,等.荒漠绿洲湿地土壤优先流与水分入渗特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(12):3979-3990.
Weiler M, Flühler H. Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils[J].Geoderma,2004,120(1/2):137-153.
张东旭,张洪江,程金花,等.基于多指标评价和分形维数的坡耕地优先流定量分析[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(12):214-220,277.
刘东生.黄土的物质成分和结构[M].北京:科学出版社,1966.
Lu J H, Wu L S. Visualizing bromide and iodide water tracer in soil profiles by spray methods[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2003,32(1):363-367.
李鑫,卢玉东,范文,等.黄土斜坡优先流促滑机理研究现状及展望[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):294-301.
孟凡旭,王树森,马迎梅,等.有机肥施用量对残塬沟壑区苹果园土壤优先流特征的影响[J].土壤,2020,52(6):1272-1280.
孙梅.长期施用有机肥旱地红壤孔隙的分布与变化特征[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2014.
徐学选,陈天林.黄土土柱入渗的优先流试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):82-85.
Gjettermann B, Nielsen K L, Petersen C T. Preferential flow in sandy loam soils as effected by irrigation intensity[J].Soil Technology,1997,11(2):139-152.
姚晶晶,程金花,张洪江,等.入渗水量对重庆四面山草地优先流影响的定量评价[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):45-51,73.
唐泽华,盛丰,高云鹏.入渗水量和试验尺度对土壤水非均匀流动的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):173-178.
张欣,张洪江,张福明,等.西南山区农地土壤前期含水量对优先流的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):1-7,14.
王策,张展羽,陈晓安,等.基于水量平衡原理的裂隙优先流双域渗透模型及其应用[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(10):314-326,348.
Nimmo J R. The process of preferential flow in the unsaturated zone[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2021,85(1):1-27.
王岩,陈友媛,彭昌盛,等.初始含水量对黄河口潮滩溶质优先运移的影响研究[J].海洋环境科学,2011,30(3):310-315.
0
浏览量
801
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621