太原理工大学水利科学与工程学院,太原,030024
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
常艺睿, 马娟娟, 孙西欢, 等. 上覆蓄水陶土层对黄土高原土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):101-109.
CHANG Yirui, MA Juanjuan, SUN Xihuan, et al. Effect of Overlying Water Storage Clay Layer on Soil Water Infiltration and Evaporation on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(6): 101-109.
常艺睿, 马娟娟, 孙西欢, 等. 上覆蓄水陶土层对黄土高原土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):101-109. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.014.
CHANG Yirui, MA Juanjuan, SUN Xihuan, et al. Effect of Overlying Water Storage Clay Layer on Soil Water Infiltration and Evaporation on the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(6): 101-109. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.014.
为探究蓄水陶土持水能力及改良黄土高原土壤水分运移特性
进行了蓄水陶土持水特性试验及室内上覆蓄水陶土层的土柱入渗和蒸发试验。蓄水陶土设置3个粒径水平(20~30
5
2 mm)
土柱试验上覆蓄水陶土层厚5 cm
并以不覆盖蓄水陶土的处理为对照(CK)。结果表明:室温15 ℃下
3种粒径的蓄水陶土40 s内均能达到饱和
且蓄水陶土吸水倍率介于30%~90%
同时释水速率较为缓慢
蓄水陶土持水性较好;就土柱入渗而言
不同粒径的蓄水陶土均显著促进土壤湿润锋运移距离
累积入渗量较CK处理增加40%~60%
且随粒径的增大而增大;在土柱蒸发方面
连续蒸发7天时
不同粒径蓄水陶土均在不同程度上抑制土壤蒸发
且粒径为5 mm时的效果最明显
其累积蒸发量比CK减小67.23%;上覆蓄水陶土层可减少土壤水分散失
上覆不同粒径蓄水陶土的土柱
在10—25 cm土层内的土壤含水率较CK可提高4~5倍。综合考虑土壤入渗及蒸发过程
上覆蓄水陶土的粒径为5 mm时效果最佳。研究结果能够为构建提高黄土高原坡面渗蓄能力的方法提供理论依据。
In order to explore water hold capacity of water storage clay and improve soil water movement characteristics of the Loess Plateau
the water retention test of water storage clay and the indoor infiltration and evaporation test of soil column with water storage clay layer were carried out. Three particle size levels (20~30
5 and 2 mm) were set for water storage clay. The thickness of water storage clay layer over the soil column was 5 cm
and the treatment without water storage clay was used as control (CK). The results showed that when the room temperature was 15 ℃
three particle sizes of water storage clay could reach saturation within 40s
and the water absorption rate was between 30%~90%. Meanwhile
the water release rate was relatively slow
so it indicated that the water retention of water storage clay was better. In terms of the infiltration of the soil column
the migration distance of wetting front was significantly promoted by water storage clay with different particle sizes
and the cumulative infiltration amount increased by 40%~60% compared with CK
and it increased with the increasing of the particle size. In terms of soil column evaporation
after continuous evaporation of seven days
soil evaporation was inhibited in varying degrees by water storage clay with different particle sizes. Moreover
the inhibition effect was the most obvious when the particle size was 5 mm
its accumulated evaporation was 67.23% lower than that of CK. The overlying water storage clay layer could reduce the loss of soil water. The soil moisture content in the 10—25 cm soil layer of the soil column covered by water storage clay with different particle sizes increased by 4~5 times compared with CK. With comprehensive consideration of soil infiltration and evaporation
the effect was the best when the particle size of water storage clay was 5 mm. This study could provide theoretical basis for constructing methods to improve the infiltration and storage capacity of slope on the Loess Plateau.
水利部.中国水土保持公报(2020年)[R].北京:中华人民共和国水利部,2021.
王承书,杨晓楠,孙文义,等.极端暴雨条件下黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤蓄水能力和入渗规律[J].土壤学报.2020,57(2):296-306.
宋日权,褚贵新,冶军,等.掺砂对土壤水分入渗和蒸发影响的室内试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(增刊1):109-114.
王慧芳,邵明安.含碎石土壤水分入渗试验研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(5):604-609.
Zhang S N, Wang Y, Sun L T, et al. Organic mulching positively regulates the soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions in tea plantation[J].BMC Microbiology,2020,20(1):1-13.
杨永秦,潘英华,张振华,等.聚丙烯酰胺对土壤保蓄水性能及盐分淋溶的影响[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2022,38(1):18-26,42.
Ibrahim H M, Alghamdi A G. Effect of the particle size of clinoptilolite zeolite on water content and soil water storage in a loamy sand soil[J].Water,2021,13:607-625.
孙益权,王美艳,张龙,等."泡沫砂"改良黏重黄壤孔隙结构的粒径效应[J].土壤,2020,52(3):597-602.
黄化刚,刘世碧,班国军,等.多孔改良剂对毕节烟区植烟土壤重金属铬镉铅的影响[J].土壤,2019,51(2):346-351.
蓝剑强.蓄水陶土材料的制备、性能及其应用研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2007.
安黛宗,肖劲东,刘珩,等.柱状蓄水多孔发泡陶土块[P].湖北:CN2656409,2004-11-17.
谭凌智,安黛宗,萧劲东.蓄水陶土对雨水面源污染物的吸附性能研究[J].中国给水排水,2008,24(5):98-101.
蓝剑强,安黛宗,萧劲东.发泡陶土在城市绿化中的应用研究[J].广东建材,2007(1):10-11.
梁进秋,申彦波,胡丽琴,等.FY-4A地表太阳入射辐射产品在山西高原的适用性研究[J].气象,2020,46(12):1575-1585.
郁丽萍.功能型复合高吸水树脂的制备及其性能研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2018.
郭华,樊贵盛.考虑土壤结构变形的Kostiakov入渗模型参数非线性预报模型[J].节水灌溉,2015(12):11-15.
侯党员.空气—沙子热交换器传热特性的实验研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2021.
陈超萍,乔丽芳,韩阳,等.景观环境常用有机地表覆盖物的吸水性能研究[J].中国园林,2020,36(11):79-83.
杨静静,王秀峰,魏珉,等.保水剂吸水、释水及吸肥特性研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(5):696-700.
姜雄,铁生年.膨润土/聚丙烯酰胺复合吸水保水材料的制备及性能研究[J].硅酸盐通报,2014,33(4):731-735.
马文博.不同用量保水剂对玉米生育性状、产量与土壤性质的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2021.
王立宁,陈振,张增志.发泡剂对矿渣基地质聚合物气孔结构及吸水性的影响[J].硅酸盐通报,2020,39(7):2085-2091.
曹丹妮,邸涵悦,郭忠录,等.演替梯度下土壤优先流特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):99-107.
吕文聪,邱阳,谢忠奎,等.砾石覆盖粒径对土壤入渗过程的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):46-51.
李晓菊,单鱼洋,王全九,等.腐殖酸对滨海盐碱土水盐运移特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):288-293.
孙池涛,邓亚鹏,张俊鹏,等.秸秆覆盖条件下滨海土壤蒸发阻力模型研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(12):284-291.
蔡永坤,李毅,冯浩.不同砂石覆盖度和粒径对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):273-277,297.
Edward C, Melamie L, Andrea V, et al. Obstacles, interfacial forms, and turbulence:A numerical analysisof soil-water evaporation across different interfaces[J].Transport in Porous Media,2020, 134(2):275-301.
0
浏览量
770
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621