林火前后坡面覆盖类型对产流产沙影响的模拟试验

王冠; 吴文清; 刘明明; 黄柔

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

林火前后坡面覆盖类型对产流产沙影响的模拟试验

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 林火前后坡面覆盖类型对产流产沙影响的模拟试验
- Simulation Experiment on the Influence of Slope Cover Types on Runoff and Sediment Yield Before and After Forest Fire
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第6期页码：82-87
- 作者机构：
  
  北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2021ZY52)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.011
  中图分类号： S157.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王冠, 吴文清, 刘明明, 等. 林火前后坡面覆盖类型对产流产沙影响的模拟试验[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):82-87.

WANG Guan, WU Wenqing, LIU Mingming, et al. Simulation Experiment on the Influence of Slope Cover Types on Runoff and Sediment Yield Before and After Forest Fire[J]. 2022, 36(6): 82-87.
王冠, 吴文清, 刘明明, 等. 林火前后坡面覆盖类型对产流产沙影响的模拟试验[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):82-87. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.011.

WANG Guan, WU Wenqing, LIU Mingming, et al. Simulation Experiment on the Influence of Slope Cover Types on Runoff and Sediment Yield Before and After Forest Fire[J]. 2022, 36(6): 82-87. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.011.

摘要

通过室内模拟降雨试验

设置3种降雨强度(30

90 mm/h)和3种地表覆盖类型(裸土坡面、1 cm马尾松枯落物覆盖、1 cm马尾松灰烬覆盖)

研究林火发生前后不同地表覆盖下的坡面产流产沙过程

明确枯落物和植物灰烬覆盖的减流减沙效益。结果表明:(1)相比裸坡

枯落物和灰烬覆盖下的坡面初始产流时间分别延长33%~80%和51%~200%

灰烬覆盖对延缓产流的效果更为明显;(2)相比裸坡

枯落物覆盖的减流效果稳定在12%~36%

而灰烬覆盖在中小雨强的减流效果高于70%

在90 mm/h雨强时减流效果降低至7%;(3)裸土坡面产流呈现先快速升高后稳定的趋势

而枯落物和灰烬覆盖坡面产流效果呈现"阶梯"形上升趋势;(4)枯落物覆盖能够减小径流携沙量和总产沙量

在3种雨强下减沙效益均高于85%

且高于同雨强下灰烬覆盖的减沙效益。枯落物覆盖的减流减沙效果在不同雨强下表现较为稳定

而灰烬覆盖的减流减沙效果受降雨强度的影响显著

且枯落物覆盖的减沙效益在3种雨强下均优于灰烬覆盖

说明在林火发生后地表覆盖改变是引起土壤侵蚀增加的重要因素之一。

Abstract

Through indoor simulated rainfall experiment

three kinds of rainy intensity (30

60 and 90 mm/h) and three types of slope cover (bare slope

1 cm Masson's pine litter cover

and 1 cm Masson's pine ash cover) were set up to study the process of runoff and sediment yield of slope under different ground cover before and after forest fire

and to clarify the benefits of runoff and sediment reduction under pre-fire litter cover and post-fire ash cover. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the bare slope

the initial runoff yield time was extended by 33%~80% and 51%~200% on litter-covered slope and ash-covered slope

respectively

and the ash cover had a more obvious ability in delaying runoff generation. (2) Compared with the bare slope

the runoff reduction benefit of litter cover was stable at 12%~36% under three rain intensities

while the runoff reduction benefit of ash cover was larger than 70% under 30 mm/h and 60 mm/h rain intensities

and reduced to 7% when the rain intensity was 90 mm/h. (3) The runoff yield on the bare slope showed a trend of rapid increase at first and then stable

while on the slope covered by litter and ash exhibited "stepwise" upward trend. (4) Litter cover could reduce runoff sediment carrying capacity and total sediment yield

and the sediment reduction benefits were all over 85% under the three rain intensities

and higher than that of the ash-covered slope under the same rainfall intensity. The runoff and sediment reduction benefits of the litter cover were relatively stable under different rainfall intensities

and the runoff and sediment reduction benefit of the ash cover was significantly affected by rainfall intensity. Moreover

the sediment reduction benefits of the litter cover was superior to the ash cover under three rain intensities

indicating that the change of land cover after forest fire was one of the critical factors causing the increase of soil erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

岳超,罗彩访,舒立福,等.全球变化背景下野火研究进展[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):385-401.

Moritz M A, Batllori E, Bradstock R A, et al. Learning to coexist with wildfire[J].Nature,2014,515:58-66.

Balfour V N, Doerr S H, Robichaud P R. The temporal evolution of wildfire ash and implications for post-fire infiltration[J].International Journal of Wildland Fire,2014,23:733-745.

刘发林,杨继敏.火干扰对径流及土壤侵蚀的模拟研究[J].土壤通报,2015,46(4):858-865.

何玉广,信忠保,余新晓,等.模拟降雨条件下侧柏林地枯落物对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):27-32.

林立文,邓羽松,李佩琦,等.桂北地区不同密度杉木林枯落物与土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):200-207.

Bodí M B, Martin D A, Balfour V N, et al. Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2014,130:103-127.

Bodí M B, Doerr S H, Cerdà A, et al. Hydrological effects of a layer of vegetation ash on underlying wettable and water repellent soil[J].Geoderma, 2012,191:14-23.

Balfour V N, Doerr S H, Robichaud P R. The temporal evolution of wildfire ash and implications for post-fire infiltration[J].International Journal of Wildland Fire,2014,23(5):733-745.

Wall S A, Roering J J, Rengers F K. Runoff-initiated post-fire debris flow Western Cascades, Oregon[J].Landslides,2020,17:1649-1661.

Thomaz E L. Ash physical characteristics affects differently soil hydrology and erosion subprocesses[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,29(3):690-700.

León J, Bodí M B, Cerdà A, et al. The contrasted response of ash to wetting: The effects of ash type, thickness and rainfall events[J].Geoderma,2013,209/210:143-152.

Moody J A, Shakesby R A, Robichaud P R, et al. Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2013,122:10-37.

苏立娟,何友均,陈绍志.1950—2010年中国森林火灾时空特征及风险分析[J].林业科学,2015,51(1):88-96.

舒筱武,郑畹,蔡雨新,等.马尾松在云南的引种成效[J].西部林业科学,2004,33(2):1-9.

翟雅男,陈奇伯,黎建强,等.云南松林计划烧除对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2022,20(2):72-79.

Balfour V N. Determining wildfire ash saturated hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity with laboratory and field methods[J].Catena,2014,135:358-368.

Jiménez-Pinilla P, Lozano E, Mataix-Solera J, et al. Temporal changes in soil water repellency after a forest fire in a Mediterranean calcareous soil: Influence of ash and different vegetation type[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,572:1252-1260.

Balfour V N, Woods S W. The hydrological properties and the effects of hydration on vegetative ash from the Northern Rockies, USA[J].Catena,2013,111:9-24.

Shakesby R A, Doerr S H. Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2006,74:269-307.

Brook A, Wittenberg L, Kopel D, et al. Structural heterogeneity of vegetation fire ash[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29:2208-2221.

Jordán A, Zavala L M, Granged A J P, et al. Wettability of ash conditions splash erosion and runoff rates in the post-fire[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,572:1261-1268.

Stoof C R, Gevaert A I, Baver C, et al Can pore-clogging by ash explain post-fire runoff?[J].International Journal of Wildland Fire,2016,25:294-305.

Prats S A, Abrantes J R C B, Coelho C D O A, et al. Comparing topsoil charcoal, ash, and stone cover effects on the postfire hydrologic and erosive response under laboratory conditions[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29:2102-2111.

徐军.林冠和枯落物结构对水分截留和溅蚀的影响[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.

Brook A, Wittenberg L, Kopel D, et al. Structural heterogeneity of vegetation fire ash[J].Land Degradation and Development,2018,29:2208-2221.

Verma S, Jayakumar S. Impact of forest fire on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil: A review[J].Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2012,2(3):e168.

浏览量

728

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于WEPP模型的工程建设中施工便道边坡水土流失特征——以林芝市巴宜区为例

野外模拟降雨条件下高寒草甸区植被退化和人工植被恢复坡面的产流产沙过程

黄土丘陵沟壑区典型植物群落切沟系统植被生长特性

短坡坡长变化对坡地风沙土产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响