1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 山东农业大学水利土木工程学院,山东,泰安,271018
3. 中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院,北京,100083
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
孟书翰, 厉晓峰, 杨佳慧, 等. 黄绵土细沟水流输沙能力对地表冲刷流量的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):63-69.
MENG Shuhan, LI Xiaofeng, YANG Jiahui, et al. Response of Sediment Transport Capacity of Rill Flow to Surface Scouring Discharge in Loess Soil[J]. 2022, 36(6): 63-69.
孟书翰, 厉晓峰, 杨佳慧, 等. 黄绵土细沟水流输沙能力对地表冲刷流量的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):63-69. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.009.
MENG Shuhan, LI Xiaofeng, YANG Jiahui, et al. Response of Sediment Transport Capacity of Rill Flow to Surface Scouring Discharge in Loess Soil[J]. 2022, 36(6): 63-69. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.009.
为明确黄绵土在径流冲刷下的细沟侵蚀特征和产流产沙规律
通过细沟模拟
设计3个流量(2
4
8 L/min)和4个坡度(5°
10°
15°
20°)
在变坡土槽中进行室内冲刷试验
实测不同坡度和流量下黄绵土在坡面细沟发育过程中产生的最大径流含沙量
并得到其相应的输沙能力(A)。结果表明
当坡度一定时
输沙能力随流量增大呈线性增大
且坡度越大增幅越明显;当流量较小时
输沙能力随坡度增加而缓慢增加
当流量达到8 L/min时
输沙能力随坡度增加的幅度更为明显
但坡度上升到15°以后几乎不再变化
说明流量对输沙能力的影响更为显著。含沙量(c)随沟长(x)的变化规律符合数学模型c=A(1-e-Bx)
控制所有流量坡度组合在不同沟长(1
2 m)条件下进行冲刷试验
将冲刷测量得到的径流含沙量与各组合下的输沙能力(A)代入关系式
利用待定系数法计算出不同试验条件下含沙量随沟长变化的衰减系数(B)。研究结果可为黄绵土水土保持研究与实践提供理论基础与科学依据。
To define the rill erosion characteristics and the law of runoff and sediment yield of loess soil in the process of rill development under runoff scouring
rill simulation test was conducted in variable slope soil troughs
and three flows (2
4 and 8 L/min) and four slope gradients (5°
10°
15° and 20°) were set up. The maximum runoff sediment concentrations during rill development on the loess soil slope under different slopes and flows were measured
then its corresponding sediment transport capacity (A) was obtained. The results showed that
when the slope was constant
the sediment transport capacity increased linearly with the increasing of the flow rate
and the steeper the slope was
the more obvious the increase was. When the flow rate was low
the sediment transport capacity increased slowly with the increasing of the slope gradient. When the flow rate reached 8 L/min
the sediment transport capacity increased faster with the increasing of slope gradient
but it hardly changed after the slope increased to 15°
indicating that flow rate had more significant effect on sediment transport capacity. The trend of sediment concentration (c) with length of rill (x) conformed to mathematical formula c=A(1-e-Bx). We run a simulation by scouring the slope surface of 1 m and 2 m under all combinations of different slopes and flow rates we had set up
and the sediment concentration of runoff measured by scouring and the sediment transport capacity (A) under each combination were substituted into the formula
and attenuation coefficient (B) of sediment concentration varying with the rill length under different test conditions was calculated by method of undetermined coefficient. The results could provide theoretical and scientific basis for soil and water conservation research and practice in loess soil.
王国惠,韩克勇.黄土高原地区的政府治理、生态环境与经济高质量发展[J].税务与经济,2021,43(3):89-94.
张晴雯.细沟水蚀动力过程试验研究[D].陕西 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2001.
Heathcote A J, Filstrup C T, Downing J A. Watershed sediment losses to lakes accelerating despite agricultural soil conservation efforts[J].PLoS One,2013,8(1):e53554.
赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].中国水土保持,2017,38(9):47-51,67.
史培军,刘宝元,张科利,等.土壤侵蚀过程与模型研究[J].资源科学,1999,23(5):11-20.
吕刚,刘雅卓,陈鸿,等.褐土和棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀过程及侵蚀产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):64-69.
Lei T W, Hajhighi K, Bralts V F, et al. Rill erosion and morphological evolution: A simulation model[J].Water Resources Research,1998,34(11): 3157-3168.
Julien P Y, Simons D B. Sediment transport capacity of overland flow[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1985,28(3):755-762.
雷廷武,张晴雯,赵军,等.细沟侵蚀动力过程输沙能力试验研究[J].土壤学报,2002,55(4):476-482.
Hessel R, Jetten V. Suitability of transport equations in modelling soil erosion for a small Loess Plateau catchment[J].Engineering Geology,2006,91(1):56-71.
雷廷武,张晴雯,赵军.陡坡细沟含沙水流剥蚀率的试验研究及其计算方法[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(3):24-27.
张晴雯,雷廷武,潘英华,等.细沟侵蚀动力过程极限沟长试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(2):32-35.
Gao X F, Li F H, Chen C, et al. Effects of thawed depth on the sediment transport capacity by melt water on partially thawed black soil slope[J].Land Degradation and Development,2019,30(1):84-93.
周陈燕.土壤细沟侵蚀输沙能力与剥蚀能力测量方法研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2016.
丁琳桥,陈晓燕,赵宇,等.紫色土细沟侵蚀输沙能力研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科版),2016,38(12):102-107.
高晨烨,张宽地,杨明义.基于无量纲水流强度指标的坡面流输沙能力计算方法[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(17):134-142.
张鹏,姚甜甜,喻武,等.基于室内土槽冲刷法的高寒土细沟侵蚀剥蚀率研究[J].高原农业,2020,4(4):392-398,411.
喻武,任德智,张鹏,等.藏东南高寒土坡面细沟水流输沙能力变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):76-82.
高鹏宇,詹振芝,蒋芳市,等.坡度和流量对崩积体坡面细沟水流输沙能力的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):68-73.
Chen C, Lei T W, Ban Y Y, et al. Effects of slope lengths on rill erosion under different hydrodynamic conditions in black soil sloping farmland of Northeast China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(5):155-162.
Huang Y H, Chen X Y, Luo B L, et al. An experimental study of rill sediment delivery in purple soil, using the volume-replacement method[J].Peer J,2015,3:e1220.
丁琳桥.紫色土细沟侵蚀输沙能力研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2016.
Yalin M S, Ferreira Da Silva A M. Regime channels in cohesionless alluvium[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1999, 37(6): 725-742.
Singh H V, Thompson A M. Effect of antecedent soil moisture content on soil critical shear stress in agricultural watersheds[J].Geoderma,2016,262:165-173.
邢行,陈晓燕,韩珍,等.饱和与非饱和黄绵土细沟径流水动力学特征及侵蚀阻力对比[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):92-97.
韩珍,陈晓燕,李彦海,等.近饱和与非饱和土壤细沟水流输沙能力的对比研究[J].山地学报,2020,38(6):841-850.
赵宇.黄土细沟侵蚀过程冲刷试验研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2015.
Zhang G H, Liu Y M, Han Y F, et al. Sediment transport and soil detachment on steep slopes: II. Sediment feedback relationship[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2009,73(4):1298-1304.
Foster G R, Meyer L D. Transport of soil particles by shallow flow[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1972,15(1):99-102.
张晴雯,陈尚洪,刘定辉,等.农业措施对玉米季坡耕地水沙过程的调控效应[J].核农学报,2016,30(7):1395-1403.
0
浏览量
727
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621