1. 四川农业大学林学院,成都,611130
2. 长江上游森林资源保育与生态安全国家林业和草原局重点实验室,成都,611130
3. 四川农业大学水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室,成都,611130
4. 四川农业大学资源学院,成都,611130
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
杨瑞杰, 何淑勤, 逯传琦, 等. 大渡河干旱河谷区横垄坡面产流产沙特征及水保效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):16-22.
YANG Ruijie, HE Shuqin, LU Chuanqi, et al. Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics and Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Cross Ridge Slope in Arid Valley of Dadu River[J]. 2022, 36(6): 16-22.
杨瑞杰, 何淑勤, 逯传琦, 等. 大渡河干旱河谷区横垄坡面产流产沙特征及水保效益[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):16-22. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.003.
YANG Ruijie, HE Shuqin, LU Chuanqi, et al. Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics and Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Cross Ridge Slope in Arid Valley of Dadu River[J]. 2022, 36(6): 16-22. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.003.
为弄清干旱河谷区横垄坡面水土流失特征及水保效益
采用野外调查与室内人工模拟降雨相结合的方法
以坡耕地平作坡面为对照
开展了4种降雨强度(30
60
90
120 mm/h)和4种坡度(10°
15°
20°
25°)条件下横垄坡面产流产沙特征及减流减沙效益。结果表明:(1)横垄坡面产流时间随降雨强度和坡度的增大而提前
且受坡度影响远小于降雨强度;同等条件下
横垄坡面产流时间滞后平作坡面8.14%~55.60%。(2)随着降雨强度和坡度的增大
横垄坡面产流率和产沙率均表现为增加趋势。(3)坡度与横垄坡面减流减沙效益随降雨强度的增大由正相关关系转变为负相关关系
而降雨强度与横垄坡面减流减沙效益关系复杂
无明显变化规律。降雨强度和坡度对横垄坡面产流产沙过程和减流减沙效益有重要影响
横垄坡面能够延长坡面径流形成时间
有效减少坡面产沙率
但横垄坡面减流减沙作用存在临界条件。研究结果可为区域坡耕地横垄措施合理布设和水土流失有效防控提供数据支撑和理论依据。
In order to understand the characteristics of soil and water loss and benefit of soil and water conservation on the cross ridge slope in arid valley area
field investigation and indoor artificial rainfall simulation were carried out
and the characteristics of runoff and sediment yield and benefit of runoff and sediment reduction on cross ridge slope were analyzed under four rainfall intensities (30
60
90 and 120 mm/h) and four slopes (10°
15°
20° and 25°). And the flat sloping farmland was taken as the control. The results showed that: (1) The runoff production time on the cross ridge slope was advanced with the increasing of rainfall intensity and slope gradient
and it was much less affected by slope than by rainfall intensity. Under the same conditions
the runoff production time on cross ridge slope lagged behind that of flat sloping farmland by 8.14%~55.60%. (2) With the increasing of rainfall intensity and slope gradient
both runoff yield and sediment yield on the cross ridge slope showed an increasing trend. (3) With the increasing of rainfall intensity
the relationship between slope gradient and benefit of runoff and sediment reduction on cross ridge slope changed from positive phase to negative phase
while the relationship between rainfall intensity and benefit of runoff and sediment reduction on cross ridge slope was complex without obvious change law. Rainfall intensity and slope gradient had important effect on the process of runoff and sediment yield and the benefit of runoff and sediment reduction on the cross ridge slope
and cross ridge slope could prolong the time of slope runoff formation
effectively reduce the slope sediment production rate
however there were critical conditions for the effect of runoff and sediment reduction on the cross ridge slope. The results could provide data support and theoretical basis for the regional reasonable layout of farmland cross ridge measures and the effective prevention and control of soil erosion.
范建容,杨超,包维楷,等.西南地区干旱河谷分布范围及分区统计分析[J].山地学报,2020,38(2):303-313.
杨勤业,郑度,刘燕华.横断山地区干旱河谷的自然特点及其开发利用[J].干旱区资源与环境,1988(2):17-24.
王小康,谷举,刘刚,等.横、顺坡垄作对黑土坡面侵蚀—沉积周期规律的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(2):430-439.
孙艳,李锦彬,吕文龙.坡度和降雨对西南土石山区坡耕地水土流失特征的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2015(10):96-98.
闫胜军,郭青霞,闫瑞,等.不同土地利用类型下水土流失特征及雨强关系分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):45-49.
申聪颖.两种粮草种植方式对不同坡度暗棕壤水土保持效应的影响[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2019.
Han Z, Zhong S Q, Ni J P, et al. Estimation of soil erosion to define the slope length of newly reconstructed gentle-slope lands in hilly mountainous regions[J].Scientific Reports,2019,9(1):e4676.
Arora S, Bhatt R, Sharma V, et al. Indigenous practices of soil and water conservation for sustainable hill agriculture and improving livelihood security.Environmental Management.. https: // doi. org/10. 1007/s00267-022-01602-1.
Zhao J L, Wang Z G, Dong Y F, et al. How soil erosion and runoff are related to land use, topography and annual precipitation: Insights from a meta-analysis of erosion plots in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021,802:e49665.
贾腾斌,吴发启,赵龙山,等.坡耕地上耕作形成的微地形复杂度特征与分析[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):152-156.
李菲,查同刚,尹婧,等.暴雨下川东黄壤区不同径流路径调控措施对坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):138-144.
王志明.横坡垄作坡面径流冲刷条件下产流产沙研究[J].价值工程,2021,40(31):155-158.
赵西宁,吴普特,冯浩,等.降雨径流调控利用与流域保水减沙效应研究[J].自然灾害学报,2014,23(4):46-53.
徐露,张丹,向宇国,等.不同耕作措施下金沙江下游紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J].山地学报,2020,38(6):851-860.
谢亚茹,程金花,李语晨,等.黄土区土壤结皮和垄高对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2017,48(10):42-49.
李建明,程冬兵,张长伟,等.三种水土保持措施下红壤坡地径流产沙特性[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(11):199-205.
包昂,范昊明,许秀泉,等.东北半干旱区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准比较[J].土壤通报,2022,53(1):81-88.
耿晓东.主要水蚀区坡面土壤侵蚀过程与机理对比研究[D].陕西 杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2010.
Sun C J, Hou H X, Chen W. Effects of vegetation cover and slope on soil erosion in the Eastern Chinese Loess Plateau under different rainfall regimes[J].Peer J,2021,9(3/4):e11226.
侯雨乐,刘瑞,赵景波.四川省汉源县大渡河干热河谷区清代洪涝灾害特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):271-277.
吴越.地质生态视角下小气候对山地城镇设计的影响研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2015.
安娟,于妍,吴元芝.降雨类型对褐土横垄坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):150-156.
温云浩,刘铁军,马林芊,等.东北黑土区横垄坡耕地的产流产沙过程[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):63-70.
纪丽静,王文龙,康洪亮,等.黄土区土质与土石质塿土堆积体水力侵蚀过程差异[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(5):1587-1598.
杨艳生,史德明,孙志刚.降雨、径流因子的初步研究:Ⅱ—土壤坡面侵蚀量预报[J].水土保持通报,1985(3):51-55.
罗键,尹忠,郑子成,等.不同降雨条件下紫色土横垄坡面地表微地形变化特征[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(16):3162-3173.
郑江坤,杨帆,王文武,等.不同降雨等级下耕作措施对坡地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):38-45.
张晶玲.天然降雨条件下横垄和顺垄产流产沙过程研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.
王治兵,余斌,朱云波,等.雨强与地形(上缓下陡)对坡面入渗影响的初步研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(2):314-317.
0
浏览量
801
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621