工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙分选特性与运移机制研究

吴彤; 娄永才; 李永红; 孙贯芳; 齐星圆; 杨树云; 赵莼; 岑云峰; 周富宇; 艾建卫; 姚怡航; 张洵; 刘文博; 高照良

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙分选特性与运移机制研究

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙分选特性与运移机制研究
- Sediment Sorting Characteristics and Transport Mechanism of Slope Erosion of Engineering Deposit
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第6期页码：1-7
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中兵勘察设计研究院有限公司,北京,100049
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41671283,41807066);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501706-02)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.001
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴彤, 娄永才, 李永红, 等. 工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙分选特性与运移机制研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):1-7.

WU Tong, LOU Yongcai, LI Yonghong, et al. Sediment Sorting Characteristics and Transport Mechanism of Slope Erosion of Engineering Deposit[J]. 2022, 36(6): 1-7.
吴彤, 娄永才, 李永红, 等. 工程堆积体坡面侵蚀泥沙分选特性与运移机制研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):1-7. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.001.

WU Tong, LOU Yongcai, LI Yonghong, et al. Sediment Sorting Characteristics and Transport Mechanism of Slope Erosion of Engineering Deposit[J]. 2022, 36(6): 1-7. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.001.

摘要

为揭示工程堆积体陡坡坡面在径流驱动下侵蚀泥沙颗粒分选特征及搬运机制

设计了3种上方来水流量(10

30 L/min)下的野外模拟径流冲刷试验

对杨凌弃土工程堆积体陡坡坡面(32°)侵蚀泥沙的颗粒分布特征进行分析。结果表明:侵蚀泥沙(分散前)中黏粒、细粉粒较原始土壤明显增加

易产生侵蚀;径流对团粒破碎作用影响侵蚀泥沙黏粒含量

当径流功率＜1.71 N/(m·s)时

黏粒含量与径流功率呈负相关

＞3.89 N/(m·s)时则呈正相关;侵蚀泥沙中细粉粒、粗粉粒主要以单粒的形式搬运

而黏粒以及砂粒多以团粒的形式搬运;侵蚀泥沙中黏粒表现为富集

砂粒表现为贫化;泥沙颗粒粒径决定其主要搬运形式

＜0.11 mm的泥沙颗粒以悬移/跃移搬运为主

＞0.11 mm的泥沙颗粒以滚动搬运为主;滚动搬运的贡献率随径流搬运能力的增强呈先增大后减小。研究结果将有助于揭示工程堆积体坡面水蚀过程机理

为提高工程堆积体陡坡坡面水蚀模型预测精度提供科学依据。

Abstract

In order to reveal the sorting characteristics and transportation mechanism of erosion sediment driven by runoff on the steep slope of engineering deposit

the field simulated runoff scouring test under three upper inflows of 10

and 30 L/min were designed

and the particle distribution characteristics of erosion sediment on the steep slope (32°) of the engineering deposit body in Yangling were analyzed. The results showed that the clay and fine silt in the eroded sediment (before dispersion) increased significantly compared with the original soil

which was easy to produce erosion. The fuction of runoff on the fragmentation of aggregates affected the clay content of eroded sediment. The clay content was negatively correlated with the runoff power when the runoff power was less than 1.71 N/ (m·s)

but it was positively correlated when runoff power was greater than 3.89 N/(m·s). In sediment

fine and coarse silt particles were mainly transported in the form of single grain

while clay and sand particles were mostly transported in the form of aggregates. In eroded sediment

clay particles were enriched and sand particles were depleted. The particle size of sediment determined its main transportation mode

sediment particles less than 0.11 mm were mainly suspension/saltation transport

and sediment particles more than 0.11 mm were mainly rolling transport. The contribution rate of rolling transport increased first and then decreased with the increasing of runoff transport capacity. The conclusion of this study was conductive to reveal the mechanism of slope water erosion process of engineering deposit body

and could provide scientific basis for improving the prediction accuracy of slope water erosion model on the steep slope of engineering accumulation.

关键词

Keywords

references

张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102.

Zhang L T, Gao Z L, Yang S W, et al. Dynamic processes of soil erosion by runoff on engineered landforms derived from expressway construction: A case study of typical steep spoil heap[J].Catena,2015,128:108-121.

Hao H X, Wang J G, Guo Z L, et al. Water erosion processes and dynamic changes of sediment size distribution under the combined effects of rainfall and overland flow[J].Catena,2019,173:494-504.

Saygin S D, Erpul G. Modeling aggregate size distribution of eroded sediment resulting from rain-splash and raindrop impacted flow processes[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2019,34(2):166-177.

Nearing M A, Foster G R, Lane L J, et al. A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-water erosion prediction project technology[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1989,32(5):1587-1593.

Foster G R. Erosionand sediment transport processes for agricultural watersheds - science direct[J].Developments in Environmental Modelling,1986,10:111-122.

Hairsine P B, Rose C W. Rainfall detachment and deposition: Sediment transport in the absence of flow-driven processes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1991,55(2):320-324.

黄鹏飞,王文龙,江忠善,等.黄土区工程堆积体水蚀测算模型坡度因子研究[J].泥沙研究,2015(5):57-62.

Proffitt A, Rose C. Soil erosion processes. II. Settling velocity characteristics of eroded sediment[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,1991,29(5):685-695.

Wan Y, El-Swaify S A. Characterizing inter rill sediment size by partitioning splash and wash processes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1998,62(2):430-437.

Shi Z H, Fang N F, Wu F Z, et al. Soil erosion processes and sediment sorting associated with transport mechanisms on steep slopes[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,454/455:123-130.

陈卓,高照良,李永红,等.2种扰动土壤工程堆积体坡面泥沙运移特征比对研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):34-40.

薛孟君,马岚,张栋,等.雨强对华北土石山区坡面侵蚀及其颗粒富集过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):11-17.

Loch R J, Donnollan T E. Field rainfall simulator studies on two clay soils of the Darling Downs, Queensland. I. The effect of plot length and tillage orientation on erosion processes and runoff and erosion rates[J].Soil Research,1983,21(1):1-15.

Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose C W, et al. Interrill soil erosion processes and their interaction on low slopes[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2010,32(5):711-724.

Moss A J, Walker P H, Hutka J. Raindrop-stimulated transportation in shallow water flows: An experimental study[J].Sedimentary Geology,1979,22(3/4):165-184.

Asadi H, Ghadiri H, Rose C W, et al. An investigation of flow-driven soil erosion processes at low stream powers[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,342(1/2):134-142.

Wang L, Shi Z H. Size selectivity of eroded sediment associated with soil texture on steep slopes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2015,79(3):917-929.

Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Characteristics of rill erosion in spoil heaps under simulated inflow: A field runoff plot experiment[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2020,202:e104655.

周佩华,王占礼.黄土高原土壤侵蚀暴雨标准[J].水土保持通报,1987(1):38-44.

赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面仿真模拟标准化参数[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):229-234.

娄永才,高照良,李永红,等.不同上方来水模式下工程堆积体坡面的植被调控[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(24):144-153.

刘青泉,安翼.土壤侵蚀的3个基本动力学过程[J].科技导报,2007,25(14): 28-37.

Slattery M C, Burt T P. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2015,22(8):705-719.

Asadi H, Moussavi A, Ghadiri H, et al. Flow-driven soil erosion processes and the size selectivity of sediment[J].Journal of Hydrology,2011,406(1):73-81.

张颖,郑西来,张晓晖,等.黄土高原幼树对坡面流水力学特性及泥沙颗粒组成的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(4):7-11,15.

邹小阳,周旺,孙文俊,等.工程堆积体土壤侵蚀影响因素国内研究进展[J].东北农业科学,2021,46(1):57-61.

Foster G R, Young R A, Neibling W H. Sediment composition for nonpoint source pollution analyses[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1985,28(1):133-139.

Kinnell P I A. Raindrop-impact-induced erosion processes and prediction: A review[J].Hydrological Processes,2010,19(14):2815-2844.

Hairsine P B, Sander G C, Rose C W, et al. Unsteady soil erosion due to rainfall impact: a model of sediment sorting on the hillslope[J].Journal of Hydrology,1999,220(3/4):115-128.

吴凤至,史志华,方怒放,等.不同降雨条件下侵蚀泥沙黏粒含量的变化规律[J].环境科学,2012,33(7):2497-2502.

徐震,高建恩,赵春红,等.雨滴击溅对坡面径流输沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):20-23.

浏览量

972

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

耕作对坡耕地水土流失和冬小麦产量的影响

黄土和红壤坡面侵蚀差异及其与土壤性质的关系

模拟降雨条件下坡度与地表糙度对径流产沙的影响

不同腐殖酸类对黄土坡面侵蚀和养分流失的影响

雨强对华北土石山区坡面侵蚀及其颗粒富集过程的影响