1. 河北农业大学林学院,河北,保定,071000
2. 河北地矿建设工程集团有限责任公司, 河北省地矿局国土资源勘查中心,石家庄,050000
3. 北京市林业果树科学研究院,北京,100093
[ "王佳欢(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持和林业生态研究。E-mail:706585572@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王佳欢, 杨新兵, 刘彦林, 等. 石灰岩弃渣与农田土复配土壤水分蒸发及覆盖物保水性能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):369-376.
WANG Jiahuan, YANG Xinbing, LIU Yanlin, et al. Water Evaporation and Mulch Water Retention of Mixed Soils with Limestone Waste Residue and Farmland Soil[J]. 2022, 36(5): 369-376.
王佳欢, 杨新兵, 刘彦林, 等. 石灰岩弃渣与农田土复配土壤水分蒸发及覆盖物保水性能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):369-376. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.045.
WANG Jiahuan, YANG Xinbing, LIU Yanlin, et al. Water Evaporation and Mulch Water Retention of Mixed Soils with Limestone Waste Residue and Farmland Soil[J]. 2022, 36(5): 369-376. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.045.
探究矿山废弃地弃渣与农田土复配后土壤的水分蒸发特性
以及覆盖物添加对水分蒸发的影响
对矿山恢复中土壤水分管理和改善具有实际意义。以石灰岩矿山废弃地现场的弃渣和附近农田土为复配材料
设置0∶10(T1)
3∶7(T2)
5∶5(T3)
7∶3(T4)
10∶0(T5)体积比例
在野外条件下采用土柱法模拟土壤水分蒸发过程
探究复配比例对土壤水分蒸发的影响以及不同覆盖物的保水性能。结果表明:(1)试验前和试验后表层复配土壤含水量均表现为T1>T2>T3>T4>T5
蒸发中期的逐日蒸发量和蒸发结束的累计蒸发量均随弃渣体积比例增加呈极显著降低趋势
不同复配土壤在蒸发前期和蒸发后期的逐日蒸发量没有显著性差异。(2)气象因子中
温度、风速对土壤水分蒸发的影响大于太阳辐射
相对湿度的影响不显著。土壤物理性质中
除毛管孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度与土壤水分蒸发达极显著相关外
其他因子均达显著水平。(3)裸土地添加覆盖物均能降低水分蒸发
根据蒸发量和蒸发速度分析得出
砾石覆盖(直径2~4 cm、厚度5 cm)效果最佳。(4)石灰岩矿山废弃地土壤重构最佳保水搭配方案为弃渣∶农田土以3∶7体积比例复配并覆盖砾石。研究结果可为当地治理采石废弃地提供理论支持。
Exploring the characteristics of soil water evaporation after the combination of mine waste residue and farmland soil and the effect of mulch on soil water evaporation is of practical significance to the management and improvement of soil water in mine restoration. Using the abandoned residue of limestone mine wasteland and nearby farmland soil as compound materials
the combination volume ratios of 0∶10 (T1)
3∶7 (T2)
5∶5 (T3)
7∶3 (T4) and 10∶0 (T5) were set. The soil column method was used to simulate the process of soil water evaporation under field conditions to explore the effect of compound ratios on soil water evaporation and the water retention capacity of different mulches. The results showed that: (1) The water content of surface mixed soil before and after the experiment was T1 > T2 > T3 > T4 > T5. The daily evaporation in the middle stage of evaporation and the cumulative evaporation at the end of evaporation decreased significantly with the increase of the volume ratios of abandoned slag. There was no significant difference in daily evaporation between different mixed soils in the early and later stages of evaporation. (2) Among the meteorological factors
the influence of temperature and wind speed on soil water evaporation was greater than that of solar radiation
and the effect of relative humidity was not significant. In soil physical properties
except for capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity
there was a significant correlation between soil water evaporation and other factors. (3) Adding mulch to bare land could reduce water evaporation. According to the analysis of evaporation and evaporation rate
gravel mulch (Diameter 2~4 cm
thickness 5 cm) had the best effect. (4) The best water conservation scheme of soil reconstruction in limestone mine wasteland was abandoned slag∶farmland soil of 3∶7 volume ratio and covered with gravel. The study could provide theoretical support for the local treatment of quarrying wasteland.
王乐,郭小平,韩祖光,等.基于废弃物的潞安煤矿废弃地改良土壤基质配比研究[J].土壤,2020,52(1):145-152.
荣浩,珊丹,刘艳萍,等.草原工程侵蚀区植被恢复模式的水土保持效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):24-28.
张进德,郗富瑞.我国废弃矿山生态修复研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7921-7930.
赵佳琪,陈晓琳,李玉灵.冀东矿区不同植被恢复类型尾矿基质粒径组成和养分特征研究[J].林业与生态科学,2021,36(3):262-268.
Kenton S, Christopher B, Sarah H, et al. Influence of spoil type on afforestation success and natural vegetative recolonization on a surface coal mine in Appalachia, United States[J].Restoration Ecology,2015,23(2):131-138.
位蓓蕾,胡振琪,张建勇,等.紫花苜蓿对草炭改良露天矿表土替代材料的响应[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(10):2020-2026.
胡振琪,朱永官,康惊涛.用于土壤改良的煤基营养剂:中国,CN 200510077469.6[P].2005-10-26.
Dlamini P, Ukoh I B, Rensburg L V, et al. Reduction of evaporation from bare soil using plastic and gravel mulches and assessment of gravel mulch for partitioning evapotranspiration under irrigated canola[J].Soil Research,2017,55(3):222-233.
车飞伟,李素艳,孙向阳,等.不同有机材料覆盖对土壤保水效果的影响[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):182-187.
周约,谢铁娜.不同厚度砾石覆盖对土壤蒸发的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(21):101-103.
龙桃,熊黑钢,张建兵,等.不同降雨强度下的草地土壤蒸发试验[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):240-245.
熊明明,陈海山,俞淼.CLM3.0对中国区域陆面过程的模拟试验及评估Ⅱ:土壤湿度[J].气象科学,2011,31(1):1-10.
李沙沙,韦杰,徐文秀,等.不同温度下紫色土与黄壤的水分持续性耗散特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(3):51-56.
唐柄哲,何丙辉,闫建梅.川中丘陵区土地利用方式对土壤理化性质影响的灰色关联分析[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1445-1452.
马生花,谢应忠,胡海英,等.荒漠草原2种典型群落类型下土壤含水量与土壤粒径分布的关系[J].中国水土保持,2019,40(7):61-65.
吕刚,王磊,卢喜平,等.不同复垦方式排土场砾石对饱和导水率和贮水能力的影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(6):1414-1426.
李渊博,李胜龙,肖波,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区藓结皮覆盖土壤的蒸发特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):208-215.
芮孝芳.水文学原理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004:65-122.
李艳,刘海军,黄冠华.麦秸覆盖条件下土壤蒸发阻力及蒸发模拟[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(1):98-106.
潘全良,陈坤,宋涛,等.生物炭及炭基肥对棕壤持水能力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):115-121.
苏彦尹,范兴科.基于称重法对影响蒸发蒸腾量的主要气象因子研究分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(3):40-48.
靳姗姗,汪星,汪有科,等.黄土丘陵枣林休眠期土壤水分损失及其剖面气态水分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):309-316.
彭焕华,赵传燕,梁继.黑河上游高寒草地蒸散发日变化及其影响因子分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(1):46-53.
穆家伟,查天山,贾昕,等.毛乌素沙地典型沙生灌木对土壤蒸发的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(12):39-45.
Xiao B, Wang H F, Fan J. Biological soil crusts decrease soil temperature in summer and increase soil temperature in winter in semiarid environment[J].Ecological Engineering,2013,58(5):52-56.
王丽丽,余海龙,黄菊莹,等.不同覆盖措施的土壤生态环境效应和作物增产效应述评[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(7):11-15.
Wang Y J, Xie Z H, Malhi S S, et al. Effects of gravel-sand mulch,plastic mulch and ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system combinations on water use efficiency,soil temperature and watermelon yield in a semi-arid Loess Plateau of northwestern China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2012,101(1):88-92.
胥生荣,张恩和,马瑞丽,等.覆盖对枸杞根系土壤环境和水分利用的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(2):12-22.
0
浏览量
587
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621