1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中科院水利部水土保持研究所, 水利部水土保持生态工程技术研究中心, 陕西 杨凌,712100
[ "费洪岩(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水分循环研究。E-mail:fhyan13563317149@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
费洪岩, 童倩, 万传宇, 等. 黄土高原不同林龄刺槐林土壤水分亏缺程度[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):240-246.
FEI Hongyan, TONG Qian, WAN Chuanyu, et al. Degree of Soil Moisture Deficit of[J]. 2022, 36(5): 240-246.
费洪岩, 童倩, 万传宇, 等. 黄土高原不同林龄刺槐林土壤水分亏缺程度[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):240-246. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.030.
FEI Hongyan, TONG Qian, WAN Chuanyu, et al. Degree of Soil Moisture Deficit of[J]. 2022, 36(5): 240-246. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.030.
通过定点监测刺槐林土壤水分含量
探究不同林龄刺槐林土壤水分分布与亏缺程度。采用空间代替时间的研究方法
选择10
15
25
40年人工刺槐林为研究对象
农地(0年)为对照
调查分析0—200 cm土层土壤水分分布情况。结果表明:各样地平均土壤含水量大小顺序为农地(18.80%)>10年刺槐林(16.43%)>15年刺槐林(15.47%)>40年刺槐林(13.87%)>25年刺槐林(13.38%);不同林龄刺槐林土壤水分均处于亏缺状态
随着林龄增加
土壤水分亏缺呈增大趋势
平均土壤水分亏缺程度为19.38%
25年刺槐林土壤水分亏缺程度最大(27.76%)
40年时略有恢复(25.80%);表层土壤水分变异程度最大
变异程度随林龄增加呈增大趋势
速变层、活跃层、次活跃层和相对稳定层4个层次只在40年刺槐林均有出现。研究结果可为黄土高原植被生态恢复和科学经营人工林提供一定的理论基础。
Soil moisture content of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation was monitored at fixed points to investigate the distribution and deficit degree of soil moisture of R. pseudoacacia plantation at different ages. Using the method of spatial sequence instead of time successional sequence
10
15
25 and 40 years R. pseudoacacia plantations were selected as the research objects
and farmland (0 years) was served as control to investigate and analyze the distribution of soil moisture content in the 0-200 cm soil layer. The results showed that the average soil moisture content was in order of 0 years (18.80%)>10 years (16.43%)>15 years (15.47%)>40 years (13.87%)>25 years (13.38%). The soil moisture deficit was found in all stands and showed an increase trend with the increasing of stand age. The average degree of soil moisture deficit was 19.38%
the highest value was observed in the 25 years plantation (27.76%)
and there was a slight recovery in the 40 years plantation (25.80%). The variation degree of surface soil water was the largest
and it increased with the increasing of stand age. The four levels of rapid change layer
active layer
sub-active layer and relatively stable layer were only observed in the 40 years plantation. The above research results could provide a certain theoretical basis for vegetation ecological restoration and scientific management of plantations on the Loess Plateau.
王舒,马岚,张栋,等.晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,52(3):253-258.
施万喜.陇东黄土高原农业资源特点与农业可持续发展路径分析[J].草业科学,2009,26(5):116-122.
赵丹阳,毕华兴,侯贵荣,等.晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):181-187.
刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.
李靖,马永禄,罗杰,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同林龄刺槐林养分特征与生物量研究[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(3):7-12.
刘江华,刘国彬,陈淑芸.刺槐林地土壤水分与林下植物生物量的关系[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):57-60.
Jia X X, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,546:113-122.
梁海斌,薛亚永,安文明,等.黄土高原不同退耕还林植被土壤干燥化效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):77-85.
张建军,张岩,张波.晋西黄土区水土保持林地的土壤水分[J].林业科学,2009,45(11):63-69.
Nan G W, Wang N, Jiao L, et al. A new exploration for accurately quantifying the effect of afforestation on soil moisture:A case study of artificial
Robinia pseudoacacia
in the Loess Plateau (China)[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2019,433:459-466.
刘青柏,刘明国,王玉涛,等.不同林型立地土壤水分性状及其持水能力的比较[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(5):775-779.
孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):163-169.
王国梁,刘国彬,党小虎.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式对土壤含水率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):31-35.
向慧昌,赵小虎.水分胁迫对刺槐生理和生化的影响[J].水土保持应用技术,2021(1):16-19.
施政乐,张建军,申明爽,等.晋西黄土区不同土地利用类型对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):190-197.
包维斌,王幼奇,刘鹏,等.宁南山区不同林龄杏树地土壤干层特征研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(8):101-110.
高宇,樊军,彭小平,等.水蚀风蚀交错区典型植被土壤水分消耗和补充深度对比研究[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7038-7046.
贾志清.晋西北黄土丘陵沟壑区典型灌草植被土壤水分动态变化规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(1):10-15.
Liu B X, Shao M A. Estimation of soil water storage using temporal stability in four land uses over 10 years on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,517:974-984.
杨智姣,温晨,杨磊,等.半干旱黄土小流域不同恢复方式对生态系统多功能性的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):8606-8617.
于博威,刘高焕,崔保山.晋西黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林土壤干燥化效应[J].环境生态学,2020,2(增刊1):51-58.
Jian S Q, Zhao C Y, Fang S M, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration on soil water storage and water balance in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2015,206:85-96.
Jia X X, Wang Y Q, Shao M A, et al. Estimating regional losses of soil water due to the conversion of agricultural land to forest in China's Loess Plateau[J].Ecohydrology,2017,10:596-606.
王力,邵明安,张青峰.陕北黄土高原土壤干层的分布和分异特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):436-442.
杨磊,张子豪,李宗善.黄土高原植被建设与土壤干燥化:问题与展望[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7382-7388.
张永旺,万珊珊,王俊,等.黄土高原植被演替过程中土壤水分亏缺[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):120-125,132.
Yang L, Wei W, Chen L D, et al. Response of temporal variation of soil moisture to vegetation restoration in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2014,115:123-133.
Deng L, Yan W M, Zhang Y W, et al. Severe depletion of soil moisture following land-use changes for ecological restoration:Evidence from northern China[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2016,366:1-10.
张良德,徐学选.延安燕沟流域刺槐根系分布特征[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):9-14.
Robichaud P R. Fire effects on infiltration rates after prescribed fire in Northern Rocky Mountain forests, USA[J].Journal of Hydrology,2000,231:220-229.
井乐,李建平,张翼,等.黄土高原不同土地利用方式下土壤干层差异[J].草业科学,2018,35(8):1829-1835.
Jin T T, Fu B J, Liu G H, et al. Hydrologic feasibility of artificial forestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2011,15:2519-2530.
冯向星,王玲,石伟,等.晋西北不同植被类型土壤水分空间分异[J].湖南林业科技,2016,43(2):92-96,112.
赵伶俐,王福平.宁夏南部黄土丘陵地土壤水分空间变异性分析[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(24):236-240.
0
浏览量
734
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621