1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 北京林业大学水土保持国家林业和草原局重点试验室,北京,100083
3. 北京林业大学北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心,北京,100083
4. 河北省承德市滦平县政府办,河北,承德,068250
[ "赵奕博(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态系统服务研究。E-mail:gszhaoyibo@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
赵奕博, 尹钊, 史常青, 等. 大清河流域河岸植被带污染物净化能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):130-135.
ZHAO Yibo, YIN Zhao, SHI Changqing, et al. Study on Pollutant Purification Capacity of Riparian Vegetation Zone in Daqing River Basin[J]. 2022, 36(5): 130-135.
赵奕博, 尹钊, 史常青, 等. 大清河流域河岸植被带污染物净化能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):130-135. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.018.
ZHAO Yibo, YIN Zhao, SHI Changqing, et al. Study on Pollutant Purification Capacity of Riparian Vegetation Zone in Daqing River Basin[J]. 2022, 36(5): 130-135. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.018.
为了解决白洋淀上游河岸带植被类型单一、生态功能低下等问题
从河岸植被带截留、净化面源污染物的生态功能定位出发
选取2种草本和1种灌木为研究对象
通过模拟径流冲刷试验
研究河岸植被带对氮、磷及泥沙污染物的净化效果。结果表明:(1)与单一灌木相比
单一草本的净化效率更好
狗牙根(Cynodon dactylon)的总磷、总氮和泥沙的净化效率最佳
分别为10.88%
6.96%
34.20%;黑麦草(Lolium perenne)对氨氮和硝氮有较好的净化效果
分别为10.11%和9.54%;(2)在多组植物组中
胡枝子(Lespedeza bicolor)、狗牙根、黑麦草的草灌组合净化效率较好
在各项指标平均值上分别较裸土组提高了13.31%
10.84%
9.64%
12.36%
46.43%;(3)灌草和混草的植物组合对5项污染物指标的净化效率均较高
混植组的去除效果优于单一植物组。河岸植被带对面源污染有着一定的净化效果
其中灌草和混草组合的净化效果较好
胡枝子、狗牙根、黑麦草的草灌植物组合表现出最好的净化效果。
In order to solve the problems of single vegetation type and low ecological function in the riparian zone in the upper reaches of Baiyangdian Lake
starting from the ecological function orientation of intercepting and purifying non-point source pollutants in the riparian vegetation zone
two kinds of herbs and one kind of shrub were selected as the research object to study the purification effect of riparian vegetation zone on nitrogen
phosphorus and sediment pollutants through a simulated runoff scouring test. The results were as follows: (1) Compared with single shrub
the purification efficiency of single herb was better
and the purification efficiency of total phosphorus
total nitrogen and sediment of Cynodon dactylon was the best
which were 10.88%
6.96% and 34.20% respectively; Lolium perenne had good purification effects on ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen
which were 10.11% and 9.54% respectively; (2) Among the multiple plant configurations
the purification efficiency of grass shrub combination of Lespedeza bicolor
Cynodon dactylon and Lolium perenne was better
and the average values of various indexes were increased by 13.31%
10.84%
9.64%
12.36% and 46.43% respectively compared with the bare soil; (3) The plant combination of shrub&herbs and mixed herbs had higher purification efficiency for five pollutant indexes
and the removal effect of mixed plant group was better than that of single plant group. In conclusion
riparian vegetation zone had purification effect on surface source pollution
among which the combination of shrub&herbs and mixed herbs had a better purification effect. The combination of grass and shrub plants of Lespedeza bicolor
Cynodon dactylon and Lolium perenne showed the best purification effect.
刘瑞霞,王立阳,孙菲,等.以农业面源污染阻控为目标的河流生态缓冲带研究进展[J].环境工程学报,2022,16(1):25-39.
杨波,汤洁,李海毅,等.6种北方乔木植物净化污水效果研究[J].北方园艺,2014(22):62-65.
王琼,范康飞,范志平,等.河岸缓冲带对氮污染物削减作用研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(2):665-677.
Magette W L, Brinsfield R B, Palmer R E, et al. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips[J].Transactions of the ASAE,1989,32(2):663-667.
Liu X M, Zhang X Y, Zhang M H. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping:A review and analysis[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2008,37(5):1667-1674.
David L C, Thomas E J, Weller D E. Nutrient flux in a landscape:Effects of coastal land use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal waters[J].Estuaries,1992,15(4):431-442.
Lowrance R, Altier L S, Newbold J D, et al. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in chesapeake bay watersheds[J].Environ Manage,1997,21(5):687-712.
Gharabaghi B, Rudra R, Whiteley H R, et al. Development of a management tool for vegetative filter strips[J]. Journal of Water Management Modeling,2002,83(7):e14796.
Nash D M, Hannah D, Halliwell, et al. Factors affecting phosphorous export from apastrure-based grazing system[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2000,140(3):59-68.
Wenger S. A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width extent and vegetation[M].Revised Version Georgia:University of Georgia Press,1999.
Pinay G, Roques L, Fabre A. Spatial and temporal patterns of denitrification in a riparian forest[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1993,30(4):581-591.
汤家喜,孙丽娜,孙铁珩,等.河岸缓冲带对氮磷的截留转化及其生态恢复研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(8):1514-1520.
孙东耀,仝川,纪钦阳,等.不同类型植被河岸缓冲带对模拟径流及总磷的消减研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(6):2393-2399.
Zhang H L, Gao X, Sun L N. Ecological modification to riparian buffer strips of Liaohe River, Northeast China[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,955/959:1973-1976.
李芸,王斌,袁静,等.基于VFSMOD模型的植被缓冲带对千岛湖地区农田面源污染磷负荷削减效果模拟[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(1):29-37.
王成龙.基于纳氏试剂分光光度法的水质氨氮检测与数据分析[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2011.
汤典峰,刘成富.过硫酸钾氧化-酚二磺酸分光光度法对总氮的测定[J].山东化工,2019,48(11):53-56.
曹梓豪,赵清贺,左宪禹,等.基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):739-747.
李凯,程金花,陈仲旭.密云水库库滨带不同植被配置模式下面源污染特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(6):1183-1192.
李萍萍,崔波,付为国,等.河岸带不同植被类型及宽度对污染物去除效果的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(6):47-52.
Lee K H, Isenhart T M, Schultz R C. Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,58(1):1-8.
李林英,苏天杨,姚延梼.不同植被带植物在河岸缓冲带中所起的不同作用研究[J].天津农业科学,2010,16(6):69-72.
胡威,王毅力,储昭升.草皮植被带对洱海流域面源污染的削减效果[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(9):46-52.
吴尧.河岸植被缓冲带植被类型与宽度对水质净化效益的影响[J].现代园艺,2021,44(13):49-51.
段诚.典型库岸植被缓冲带对陆源污染物阻控能力研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2014.
杨文航,任庆水,秦红,等.三峡库区消落带不同海拔狗牙根草地土壤微生物生物量碳氮磷含量特征[J].草业学报,2018,27(2):57-68.
孙清斌,尹春芹,邓金锋,等.施用外源物对尾矿土壤种植胡枝子修复效应初探[J].土壤,2019,51(5):986-994.
赵警卫,胡彬.河岸带植被对非点源氮、磷以及悬浮颗粒物的截留效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):51-55.
0
浏览量
684
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621