1. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点试验室,西安,710048
2. 中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室,北京,100038
[ "谢梦瑶(1996-),女,博士研究生,主要从事旱区水文过程及生态响应研究。E-mail:xiemengyao000@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
谢梦瑶, 任宗萍, 张晓明, 等. 砒砂岩区小流域坡沟系统地形及侵蚀分异规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):112-120.
XIE Mengyao, REN Zongping, ZHANG Xiaoming, et al. Topography and Erosion Differentiation of Slope-gully System in Small Basin in Pisha Sandstone Area[J]. 2022, 36(5): 112-120.
谢梦瑶, 任宗萍, 张晓明, 等. 砒砂岩区小流域坡沟系统地形及侵蚀分异规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):112-120. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.016.
XIE Mengyao, REN Zongping, ZHANG Xiaoming, et al. Topography and Erosion Differentiation of Slope-gully System in Small Basin in Pisha Sandstone Area[J]. 2022, 36(5): 112-120. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.016.
作为黄河流域典型生态脆弱区之一的砒砂岩区
水土流失治理难度大
区域地形、侵蚀在坡沟系统的分布迥异。区域土壤侵蚀研究多集中于刻画侵蚀空间分布及不同地类差异性研究
从坡沟系统细化开展研究工作较少
不能较好地为后续精细化治理提供支撑。因此
选取位于准格尔旗的3个典型砒砂岩区小流域
结合目视解译的流域沟沿线
开展了流域地形、水力侵蚀分布规律及其关联性研究。结果表明:流域地形因子分布特征与地貌特征分布一致
高值集中分布在沟道
低值则集中在坡面
且特拉沟小流域(覆沙)沟道处的地形因子统计值最大;砒砂岩典型流域水力侵蚀在坡面、沟道空间分布存在差异
流域坡面以微度侵蚀为主
占比达87%~97%
沟道微度侵蚀占比较坡面该值下降54%~72%
什卜尔泰支沟(裸露)沟道处的水力侵蚀模数均值最高
达97.5 t/(hm2·a);坡度、地表粗糙度、地表切割深度与水力侵蚀模数呈显著正相关关系(p<0.001)
阳坡成为强度侵蚀以上单元的主要分布坡向
占比达56.8%~75.8%。因此
该区在后续小流域综合治理过程中
沟道及其阳坡是亟待加强的区域。
As one of the typical ecologically fragile areas in the Yellow River Basin
the Pisha sandstone area is difficult to control soil erosion
meanwhile the distribution of topography and erosion in the slope and gully systems is quite different in this area. Most of the studies on regional soil erosion have focused on the spatial distribution of erosion and the differences in erosion between different land types
but less work has been done on regional erosion from the perspective of slope and gully systems
which can’t provide theoretical support for subsequent refined management. In this study
three typical small basins located in Jungar Banner were selected as the study area
firstly
the slope and gully system were divided according to the shoulder line extracted by visual interpretation
and then the distribution and correlation between topography and hydraulic erosion based on geostatistics were carried out. The Results showed that the distribution characteristics of topographic factors in the selected basins were consistent with the distribution of geomorphological characteristics
the high values were concentrated in the gully system
while the low values were concentrated in the slope system
meanwhile the maximum statistical values of the topographic factors appeared in the gully system of Telagou small basin (covered with sand). There existed differences in the spatial distribution of water erosion between the slope and gully systems in typical basins
in which the slope systems were dominated by slight erosion
accounting for 87% to 97%
and the proportion of slight erosion in gully systems were 54% to 72% lower than that in the slope systems
while the highest average soil erosion modulus occurred in the gully system of Shibuertai small basin (bare rock)
up to 97.5 t/(hm2·a). There was a significant positive correlation between slope
roughness
cutting depth and soil erosion modulus (p<0.001). Sunny slopes were the main distribution direction of the units above the intensity erosion
accounting for 56.8% to 75.8%. To sum up
gully systems and their sunny slopes were the parts that need to be strengthened urgently in the subsequent comprehensive management of small basins in this area.
Wang H, Zhao W W, Li C J, et al. Vegetation greening partly offsets the water erosion risk in China from 1999 to 2018[J].Geoderma,2021,401:e115319.
姚文艺,肖培青,张攀.补强砒砂岩区治理短板筑牢黄河流域生态安全屏障[J].中国水土保持,2020(9):61-65.
胡春宏.黄河水沙变化与治理方略研究[J].水力发电学报,2016,35(10):1-11.
姚文艺.新时代黄河流域水土保持发展机遇与科学定位[J].人民黄河,2019,41(12):1-7.
马晓妮,任宗萍,谢梦瑶,等.砒砂岩区植被覆盖度环境驱动因子量化分析:基于地理探测器[J].生态学报,2022,42(8):3389-3399.
Xie M Y, Ren Z P, Li Z B, et al. Changes in runoff and sediment load of the Huangfuchuan River following a water and soil conservation project[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,75(5):590-600.
王承书,高峰,孙文义,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟系统不同降雨类型的土壤入渗特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):3111-3122.
朱冰冰,霍云霈,周正朝.黄土高原坡沟系统植被格局对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(4):149-156.
张霞,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面草带分布对坡沟水土流失的防控作用及其优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(7):122-128.
Wang H, Wang J, Zhang G H. Impact of landscape positions on soil erodibility indices in typical vegetation-restored slope-gully systems on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2021,201:e105235.
Zhu P Z, Zhang G H, Wang H X, et al. Effectiveness of typical plant communities in controlling runoff and soil erosion on steep gully slopes on the Loess Plateau of China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2021,602:e126714.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
Liu B Y, Xie Y, Li Z G, et al. The assessment of soil loss by water erosion in China[J].International Soil and Water Conservation Research,2020,8(4):430-439.
章文波,谢云,刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):705-711.
Sharpley A N, Williams J R. EPIC-The erosion/productivity impact calculator:1. Model Documentation[J].U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin,1990(1768):e235.
杨力华,庞国伟,杨勤科,等.近50年来王茂沟流域侵蚀沟变化及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):64-70.
白雪莲,郑海颖,王理想,等.砒砂岩黄土区植被盖度对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3776-3784.
Ren Z P, Zhang X, Zhang X C, et al. Sand cover enhances rill formation under laboratory rainfall simulation[J].Catena,2021,205:e105472.
Xu Y X, Zhu G F, Wan Q Z, et al. Effect of terrace construction on soil moisture in rain-fed farming area of Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Hydrology:Regional Studies,2021,37:e100889.
Su B Q, Su Z X, Shangguan Z P. Trade-off analyses of plant biomass and soil moisture relations on the Loess Plateau[J].Catena,2021,197:e104946.
徐澜,王云强,孙慧,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带小流域土壤水分季节变化特征与主控因素[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):122-129.
0
浏览量
607
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621