耕作措施对玉米生长期黄壤坡耕地径流及可溶性有机碳流失的影响

安龙龙; 郑子成; 王永东; 李廷轩; 杨李娇

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

耕作措施对玉米生长期黄壤坡耕地径流及可溶性有机碳流失的影响

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 耕作措施对玉米生长期黄壤坡耕地径流及可溶性有机碳流失的影响
- Effects of Tillage Practices on Runoff and Dissolved Organic Carbon Loss from Yellow Soil Sloping Farmland During Maize Growth Periods
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第5期页码：75-81
- 作者机构：
  
  四川农业大学资源学院,成都,611130
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "安龙龙(1997-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事养分流失及环境效应研究。E-mail:anlonglong97@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(41271307)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.011
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
安龙龙, 郑子成, 王永东, 等. 耕作措施对玉米生长期黄壤坡耕地径流及可溶性有机碳流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):75-81.

AN Longlong, ZHENG Zicheng, WANG Yongdong, et al. Effects of Tillage Practices on Runoff and Dissolved Organic Carbon Loss from Yellow Soil Sloping Farmland During Maize Growth Periods[J]. 2022, 36(5): 75-81.
安龙龙, 郑子成, 王永东, 等. 耕作措施对玉米生长期黄壤坡耕地径流及可溶性有机碳流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):75-81. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.011.

AN Longlong, ZHENG Zicheng, WANG Yongdong, et al. Effects of Tillage Practices on Runoff and Dissolved Organic Carbon Loss from Yellow Soil Sloping Farmland During Maize Growth Periods[J]. 2022, 36(5): 75-81. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.011.

摘要

为探明黄壤坡耕地不同耕作措施下径流及可溶性有机碳(dissolved organic carbon

DOC)迁移途径与流失特征。以顺坡垄作、平作和横坡垄作措施下玉米种植坡耕地为研究对象

采用野外径流小区监测与室内分析相结合的方式

探讨自然降雨条件下坡耕地地表径流、壤中流及其DOC流失特征。结果表明:(1)种植玉米坡耕地径流量及DOC通量均受雨量等级影响显著

随雨量等级增大而增大

且玉米成熟期流失量均最大。(2)地表径流、0-20 cm壤中流和20-40 cm壤中流分别占总径流量的78.98%

9.05%

11.97%

DOC流失通量分别占总通量的74.90%

11.97%

13.13%。(3)横坡垄作DOC流失量显著小于顺坡垄作

横坡垄作径流量分别是平作的0.93倍

是顺坡垄作的0.86倍;横坡垄作DOC通量是平作的0.85倍

是顺坡垄作的0.79倍。雨量等级增加将显著加剧玉米种植坡耕地径流及DOC流失

研究区玉米成熟期径流及DOC流失最为严重

地表径流是坡面径流及DOC流失的主要途径

横坡垄作措施可以有效减少坡面径流及DOC流失。

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the migration path and loss characteristics of runoff and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in sloping farmland of yellow soil at each maize growth period under different tillage measures. Taking the down slope ridge planting

flat planting and cross ridge planting as the research object

the surface runoff

interflow and DOC loss under natural rainfall were discussed by combining field runoff plot and laboratory analysis. The results showed that: (1) The slope runoff and DOC flux at each growth stage of maize were significantly affected by rainfall levels

and increased with the increase of rainfall levels and the losses were the largest at maturity. (2) The surface runoff

interflow of 0-20 cm and interflow of 20-40 cm accounted for 78.98%

9.05% and 11.97% of the total runoff respectively

and DOC flux accounted for 74.90%

11.97% and 13.13% of the total loss flux respectively. (3) The amount of DOC loss on the slope of cross ridge planting was significantly less than that of down slope ridge planting

and the runoff of cross ridge planting was 0.93 times that of flat planting and 0.86 times that of down slope ridge planting. The DOC flux of cross ridge planting was 0.85 times that of flat planting and 0.79 times that of down slope ridge planting. The increase of rainfall levels would significantly aggravate the slope runoff and DOC loss. Surface runoff and DOC flux had the largest loss during maize maturity in the study area and the surface runoff was the main way of slope runoff and DOC loss

the cross ridge planting could effectively reduce slope runoff and DOC loss.

关键词

Keywords

references

Ritson J P, Bell M, Graham N J D, et al. Simulated climate change impact on summer dissolved organic carbon release from peat and surface vegetation:Implications for drinking water treatment[J].Water Research,2014,67:66-76.

林超文,陈一兵,黄晶晶,等.不同耕作方式和雨强对紫色土养分流失的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(10):2241-2249.

杨青,杨广斌,赵青松,等.喀斯特地区不同降雨和植被覆盖的坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):9-16.

彭遥,周蓓蓓,陈晓鹏,等.间歇性降雨对黄土坡地水土养分流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):54-60.

费凯,张丽萍,邓龙洲,等.极端暴雨下裸地坡面径流及壤中流中碳素输移特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(3):623-635.

李灿,曾和平.不同空间尺度下植被覆盖对土壤有机碳流失的影响研究进展[J].云南大学学报,2019,41(1):194-204.

武均,蔡立群,张仁陟,等.耕作措施对旱作农田土壤颗粒态有机碳的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(5):728-736.

安娟,刘前进,吴希媛.横坡垄作下土壤湿润速率对褐土坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(10):101-107.

邓良基,侯大斌,凌静.四川旱耕地的特征、问题及持续利用探讨[J].西南农业学报,2001,14(增刊1):96-102.

Miao C, Ashouri H,Hsu K L, et al. Evaluation of the PERSIANN-CDR daily rainfall estimates in capturing the behavior of extreme precipitation events over China[J].Journal of Hydrometeorology,2015,16(3):1387-1396.

郑江坤,杨帆,王文武,等.不同降雨等级下耕作措施对坡地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):38-45.

Moore S, Evans C D, Page S E, et al. Deep instability of deforested tropical peatlands revealed by fluvial organic carbon fluxes[J].Nature,2013,493(7434):660-663.

陈美淇,张卓栋,王晓岚,等.西南黄壤和西北黄土坡面侵蚀产沙规律比较研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):53-60.

武万华,何淑勤,宫渊波,等.玉米季横垄坡面径流及可溶性有机碳流失特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(5):31-38.

尹晓爱,方乾,杨通杭,等.模拟玉米茎秆流对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):67-72.

杨帅,尹忠,郑子成,等.四川黄壤区玉米季坡耕地自然降雨及其侵蚀产沙特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):7-12.

何超,王磊,郑粉莉,等.垄作方式对薄层黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):24-28.

吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18,78.

喻艳红,张桃林,李清曼,等.温度和水土比对红壤吸附低分子量有机酸的影响[J].土壤,2011,43(1):50-55.

Humphrey V, Berg A, Ciais P, et al. Soil moisture-atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability[J].Nature,2021,592(7852):65-69.

赵富王,王宁,苏雪萌,等.黄土丘陵区主要植物根系对土壤有机质和团聚体的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):105-113.

马瑞,郑子成,王双,等.山地黄壤区玉米不同生育期土壤抗蚀性特征[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):107-114.

郑子成,林代杰,李廷轩,等.不同耕作措施下成熟期玉米对径流及侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):24-28.

赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启,等.不同农业耕作措施下坡耕地填洼量特征与变化[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(12):249-254.

王双,叶良惠,郑子成,等.玉米成熟期黄壤坡耕地径流及其氮素流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):28-33.

浏览量

761

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

玉米成熟期黄壤坡耕地径流及其氮素流失特征研究

不同坡度下玉米生长期紫色土坡面径流及其

耕作措施对红壤坡耕地土壤有机碳流失/淋失过程的影响

玉米苗期横垄坡面侵蚀产沙与有机碳流失特征

细沟侵蚀阶段玉米季坡耕地氮素流失特征