1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,呼和浩特,010018
2. 国家林业局荒漠生态系统保护与修复重点实验室,呼和浩特,010000
3. 鄂尔多斯市林业和草原事业发展中心,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017299
[ "张鹏(2000-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:2461769004@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
张鹏, 李龙, 李艳, 等. 植被斑块格局对砒砂岩坡面土壤侵蚀强度的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):58-65.
ZHANG Peng, LI Long, LI Yan, et al. Effect of Vegetation Patch Pattern on Soil Erosion Intensity on Arsenic Sandstone Slope[J]. 2022, 36(5): 58-65.
张鹏, 李龙, 李艳, 等. 植被斑块格局对砒砂岩坡面土壤侵蚀强度的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):58-65. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.009.
ZHANG Peng, LI Long, LI Yan, et al. Effect of Vegetation Patch Pattern on Soil Erosion Intensity on Arsenic Sandstone Slope[J]. 2022, 36(5): 58-65. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.009.
选取水力侵蚀极其剧烈的砒砂岩区为研究对象
基于野外径流小区的连续监测试验
采用三维激光扫描、无人机航拍与方差均值比率法相结合
对比分析砒砂岩坡面3种典型自然植被格局(聚集分布、均匀分布、随机分布)下的产流产沙特征与坡面微地形的演变规律。结果表明:(1)均匀分布格局对减缓水力侵蚀条件下砒砂岩坡面土壤侵蚀强度的效果最明显
与裸坡相比
减流率达到64%
减沙率达到72%
土壤流失量最少
为0.05 kg/m2。径流泥沙量之间存在多项式曲线关系
拟合函数为y=-0.0462X2+0.5355X-0.865
R2=0.736。(2)均匀分布格局的侵蚀区面积最小
为12.28 m2;沉积区面积最大
为3.44 m2
土壤侵蚀强度较其他坡面弱
以轻度侵蚀为主。(3)均匀分布格局的径流泥沙量与平均沉积深度之间的相关性较强
与径流量呈显著正相关(p<0.05)
相关系数为0.603;与泥沙量呈极显著正相关(p<0.01)
相关系数为0.771。
The arsenic sandstone area with extremely severe hydraulic erosion was selected as the research object. Based on continuous monitoring experiments of runoff plots in the field
3D laser scanning
UAV aerial photography and variance-mean ratio method were used to compare and analyze the characteristics of flow and sand production and the evolution of slope microtopography under three typical natural vegetation patterns (aggregated distribution
uniform distribution and random distribution) on arsenic sandstone slopes. The results showed that: (1) The uniform distribution pattern had the most obvious effect on mitigating soil erosion on arsenic sandstone slopes under hydraulic erosion conditions
with a flow reduction rate of 64%
a sand reduction rate of 72%
and the lowest soil loss of 0.05 kg/m2 compared was bare slopes. There was a polynomial curve relationship between runoff and sediment volume
and its fitting function was y=-0.0462X2+0.5355X-0.865
R2=0.736. (2) The erosion area of the uniform distribution pattern was the smallest
which was 12.28 m2
and the deposition area was the largest
which was 3.44 m2
and the soil erosion intensity was weaker than other slopes
mainly light erosion. (3) The correlation between runoff sediment volume and average deposition depth of uniform distribution pattern was strong
with a significantly positively correlated with runoff volume (p<0.05)
and the correlation coefficient was 0.603
and had a highly significant positive correlation with sediment volume (p<0.01)
and the correlation coefficient was 0.771.
卫午毓,肖培青,张攀,等.复合侵蚀作用下砒砂岩坡面产流产沙过程试验[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):18-22.
张攀,唐洪武,姚文艺,等.细沟形态演变对坡面水沙过程的影响[J].水科学进展,2016,27(4):535-541.
周春红,张风宝,刘宝元,等.细沟间侵蚀影响因子交互作用定量分析[J].土壤学报,2022,59(2):420-429.
苏涛,张兴昌,王仁君,等.植被覆盖对砒砂岩地区边坡侵蚀的减流减沙效益[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):98-101,255.
Hou J Y, Liu C J, Yu X X, et al.Direct and indirect effects of rainfall and vegetation coverage on runoff, soil loss, and nutrient loss in a semi-humid climate[J].Hydrological Processes,2020,35(1):39-85.
贾莲莲,刘雅丽,朱冰冰,等.不同草带空间分布对坡面细沟侵蚀调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):145-148,153.
Maxim S, Efim K. Assessing mutuality of change in soil and vegetation patch pattern characteristics by means of Cellular Automata simulation[J].Geomorphology,2005,77(1):35-46.
赵炯昌,潘岱立,卫伟,等.植被格局对土壤入渗和水沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1373-1380.
赵明,杨晓楠,陈攀宇,等.灌木斑块格局对产流及产沙过程的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):735-743.
徐宪立,马克明,傅伯杰,等.植被与水土流失关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):3137-3143.
王瑞杰,闫峰.2000-2018年西北砒砂岩区植被覆盖度与地形效应[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1194-1202.
吉静怡,赵允格,杨凯,等.黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面产流产沙与其分布格局的关联[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1381-1390.
Jabi O, Doelman A, Chirilus-Bruckner M, et al. The existence of localized vegetation patterns in a systematically reduced model for dryland vegetation[J].Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena,2020,412(1):26-37.
任柯蒙,卫伟,赵西宁,等.黄土丘陵区坡面植被盖度及其配置格局的水蚀效应模拟[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):8031-8039.
张霞.黄土区地貌与植被格局的侵蚀动力过程试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2018.
吴志毅,王明玖,李志强,等.2种方法在荒漠草原植物种群分布格局中的适用性比较[J].草业科学,2008,25(4):145-147.
甘卓亭,叶佳,周旗,等.模拟降雨下草地植被调控坡面土壤侵蚀过程[J].生态学报,2010,30(9):2387-2396.
Li L, Qin F C, Yang X L, et al. Relationship between the slope microtopography and the spatial redistribution pattern of soil organic carbon under water erosion[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,76(5):435-445.
Dan D, Han J, Deng C, et al. Effect of shrub-grass vegetation coverage and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainfall[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2021, 36(1):34-42.
杨振奇,郭建英,秦富仓,等.天然降雨条件下裸露砒砂岩区人工植被的减流减沙效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):100-104,112.
李强,李占斌,鲁克新,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被格局产流产沙试验研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2008,30(4):102-104.
苏远逸,李鹏,任宗萍,等.植被空间配置对凸型坡侵蚀及泥沙颗粒分选的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):145-151.
李坤,姚文艺,肖培青,等.植被对土壤入渗和地表产流过程的影响研究进展[J].中国水土保持,2017,58(3):27-30.
钱秋颖,秦富仓,李龙,等.自然降雨条件下坡面侵蚀地表粗糙度的空间异质性[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):46-52.
张赢,李晓丽,常平,等.砒砂岩风化物坡面水力侵蚀影响因素探究[J].水文,2019,39(5):14-18.
魏霞,李勋贵,李占斌.黄土高原坡沟系统径流泥沙过程[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2010,46(5):7-10,18.
李龙,秦富仓,钱秋颖,等.冲刷条件下裸露砒砂岩区坡面细沟微形态变化及其侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):37-43.
秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.
Bautista S, Mayor G, Bourakhouadar J, et al. Plant spatial pattern predicts hillslope runoff and erosion in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape[J].Ecosystems,2007,10(6):987-998.
Ludwig J A, Wilcox B P, Breshears D D, et al. Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes[J].Ecology,2005,86(2):288-297.
0
浏览量
702
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621