1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 国家林业局水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室,北京,100083
3. 交通运输部公路科学研究所,北京,100088
[ "沈子雅(1998-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:ziyashen2016@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
沈子雅, 程金花, 赵溦, 等. 降雨条件下灌草配置方式对褐土坡面径流泥沙特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):17-23.
SHEN Ziya, CHENG Jinhua, ZHAO Wei, et al. Effects of Different Configuration Patterns of Shrub and Grass on Runoff and Sediment Characteristics from Cinnamon Soil Under Rainfall Conditions[J]. 2022, 36(5): 17-23.
沈子雅, 程金花, 赵溦, 等. 降雨条件下灌草配置方式对褐土坡面径流泥沙特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):17-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.003.
SHEN Ziya, CHENG Jinhua, ZHAO Wei, et al. Effects of Different Configuration Patterns of Shrub and Grass on Runoff and Sediment Characteristics from Cinnamon Soil Under Rainfall Conditions[J]. 2022, 36(5): 17-23. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.05.003.
为探究不同灌草配置方式对褐土坡面土壤侵蚀的影响
通过室内模拟降雨试验
以种植灌木胡枝子(Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.)以及草本紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的褐土坡面为研究对象
设计3种降雨强度(30
60
90 mm/h)、3种灌草覆盖度(灌草覆盖度比例分别为1∶2(Ⅰ)
2∶1(Ⅱ)
1∶1(Ⅲ))以及3种灌草空间配置方式(灌木位于坡上(US)、坡中(MS)、坡下(LS))
分析降雨条件下不同灌草覆盖度及不同灌草空间配置交互作用下产流产沙及减流减沙特征。结果表明:(1)坡面产流产沙量在降雨初期大幅度增加
随后增加趋势逐渐减缓
最后趋于稳定。当灌丛位于坡下(LS)且灌草覆盖度为Ⅱ时
产流产沙量显著低于其他灌草配置方式。(2)不同灌草覆盖度减流减沙率大小关系为Ⅱ>Ⅰ>Ⅲ;不同灌草空间配置下减流减沙率大小关系为LS>MS>US。其中最大减流率达61.58%
最大减沙率达93.27%。不同灌草配置方式间的减流率及减沙率具有显著差异。(3)通过双因素方差分析研究灌草空间配置方式对坡面总产流产沙量的显著性和贡献率发现
灌草覆盖度和灌草空间配置对总产流量和总产沙量均有显著性影响(p<0.05)
但是灌草覆盖度和灌草空间配置交互作用对坡面总产流量和总产沙量影响并不显著。(4)灌丛于坡下、灌丛覆盖度为50%、草本覆盖度为25%的灌草配置方式有最好的减流减沙率
能最好地削减径流泥沙。研究结果可为北京褐土地区水土保持措施布设提供支撑。
In order to explore the effects of different configuration patterns of shrub and grass on soil erosion from cinnamon soil
a simulation rainfall experiments was conducted on cinnamon soil slopes planted with shrub (Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.) and the herbs (Medicago sativa L.). Three kinds of rainfall intensity (30
60
90 mm/h)
three kinds of vegetation coverage (ratio of shrubs and herbs coverage was 1∶2 (Ⅰ)
2∶1 (Ⅱ)
1∶1 (Ⅲ)) and three kinds of vegetation patterns (shrubs were located on up-slope (US)
middle-slope (MS)
low-slope (LS)) were designed to analysis the characters of runoff generation and sediment yield and the benefit of runoff and sediment reduction with the interaction between the vegetation coverage and vegetation patterns under rainfall conditions. The results showed that: (1) Runoff generation and sediment yield on slope increased greatly at the beginning of rainfall
and then the trend of increase gradually slowed down
and finally stabilized. When the shrubs were located at the low slope (LS) and the vegetation coverage was Ⅱ
the runoff generation and sediment yield were the least. (2) The relationship of the effect of runoff reduction and sediment reduction between different vegetation coverage was Ⅱ>Ⅰ>Ⅲ. The relationship of the effect of runoff reduction and sediment reduction between different vegetation patterns was LS>MS>US. (3) A double factor variance analysis showed that vegetation coverage and vegetation patterns exhibited a significant effect on runoff generation and sediment yield (p<0.05)
but the interaction between the vegetation coverage and vegetation patterns became insignificant on runoff generation and sediment yield. (4) When the shrubs at the low slope with 50% shrub cover and 25% herbs cover
this configuration pattern had the best runoff and sediment reduction efficiency. The results of the study could provide support for the deployment of soil and water conservation measures in cinnamon soil area of Beijing.
赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国生态环境状况与生态文明建设[J].生态学报,2016,36(19):6328-6335.
程金花,秦越,张洪江,等.华北土石山区模拟降雨下土壤溅蚀研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):153-161.
Zhao C H, Gao J E, Huang Y E, et al. The contribution of astragalus adsurgens roots and canopy to water erosion control in the water-wind crisscrossed erosion region of the Loess Plateau, China[J].Land Degradation and Development,2017,28(1):265-273.
肖培青,姚文艺,申震洲,等.苜蓿草地侵蚀产沙过程及其水动力学机理试验研究[J].水利学报,2011,42(2):232-237.
朱永杰,毕华兴,常译方,等.90%盖度狗牙根草地对次降雨径流削减作用[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(10):103-109.
李智勇,张梦杰,陈明玉,等.苜蓿对坡面产流产沙及土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):54-60.
焦若禺,宋孝玉,赵新凯,等.黄土沟壑区黑麦草植被冠层与根系坡面水沙效益及水力特性[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(1):208-218.
王青杵,王改玲,石生新,等.晋北黄土丘陵区不同人工植被对水土流失和土壤水分含量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):71-74,79.
肖培青,姚文艺,王昌高.灌木减流减沙效应及其水力学机理试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2012,37(5):33-37.
朱高立,黄炎和,林金石,等.模拟降雨条件下秸秆覆盖对崩积体侵蚀产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):27-31,37.
常松涛,黄少燕,查轩,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):58-63.
罗娅,杨胜天,刘晓燕,等.黄土高原次降雨径流产沙变化及其与雨强和植被盖度变化的相关性[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(4):698-709.
陈鹏,张铁钢,董智,等.灌草格局对砒砂岩区产流产沙特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(9):116-121.
苏远逸,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面植被格局对坡沟系统能量调控及水沙响应关系的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):32-39.
秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.
王志刚,杨海龙,刘慧博,等.河岸边坡草被减流减沙效应及其坡面流水动力学特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):8-13.
贾莲莲.模拟降雨条件下黄土坡面侵蚀过程与调控试验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2010.
陈科兵,吴发启,姚冲.黄土高原南部地区人工模拟暴雨条件下不同坡度谷子坡耕地产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):90-95,103.
杨青,杨广斌,赵青松,等.喀斯特地区不同降雨和植被覆盖的坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):9-16.
王恒星,张建军,孙若修,等.晋西黄土区不同植被格局坡面产流产沙特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(3):85-95.
王思思,龙佳,丁涵.北京市21种植物的叶片吸水性能与冠层雨水截留能力研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2020,42(9):100-110.
宇涛,张霞,李占斌,等.不同草带覆盖位置条件下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):22-27,122.
程圣东,李鹏,李聪,等.降雨-植被格局耦合作用对坡沟系统水沙特征影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2016,24(2):230-241.
Zhang X, Li P, Li Z B, et al. Effects of precipitation and different distributions of grass strips on runoff and sediment in the loess convex hillslope[J].Catena,2018,162:130-140.
梁方晖,赵凌平,谭世图,等.灌草立体配置对退化草地土壤水分和养分的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(12):18-25.
邓景成.灌草植被盖度对产流产沙影响的模拟降雨实验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
张志旭.黄土高原沟壑区草地植被减流减沙优化格局研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2021.
0
浏览量
776
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621