2个不同抗旱性小麦品种耗水特征及根系生理特性对开花期干旱的响应

王荣荣; 王海琪; 蒋桂英; 尹豪杰; 谢冰莹; 张婷

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

2个不同抗旱性小麦品种耗水特征及根系生理特性对开花期干旱的响应

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 2个不同抗旱性小麦品种耗水特征及根系生理特性对开花期干旱的响应
- Response of Water Consumption and Root Physiological Characteristics of Two Different Drought-tolerant Wheat Varieties to Anthesis Stage Drought
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第4期页码：253-264
- 作者机构：
  
  石河子大学农学院,新疆,石河子,832000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王荣荣(1997—),女,硕士研究生,主要从事作物生理生态研究。E-mail:1179679457@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（32060422）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.032
  中图分类号： S512.1
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王荣荣, 王海琪, 蒋桂英, 等. 2个不同抗旱性小麦品种耗水特征及根系生理特性对开花期干旱的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):253-264.

WANG Rongrong, WANG Haiqi, JIANG Guiying, et al. Response of Water Consumption and Root Physiological Characteristics of Two Different Drought-tolerant Wheat Varieties to Anthesis Stage Drought[J]. 2022, 36(4): 253-264.
王荣荣, 王海琪, 蒋桂英, 等. 2个不同抗旱性小麦品种耗水特征及根系生理特性对开花期干旱的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):253-264. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.032.

WANG Rongrong, WANG Haiqi, JIANG Guiying, et al. Response of Water Consumption and Root Physiological Characteristics of Two Different Drought-tolerant Wheat Varieties to Anthesis Stage Drought[J]. 2022, 36(4): 253-264. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.032.

摘要

为探明不同抗旱性小麦品种的耗水特征、根系生理特性及产量对开花期干旱的响应，以抗旱性强品种"新春6号"（XC 6）和抗旱性弱品种"新春22号"（XC 22）为试材，在土柱栽培和大田条件下设置常规灌溉（CK）、开花期轻度干旱（T1）和中度干旱（T2）处理，研究干旱胁迫对滴灌麦田耗水特征、不同土层根系生理特性和产量的影响。结果表明：开花期干旱后2个小麦品种全生育期耗水量和耗水强度均表现为CK>T1>T2，拔节—孕穗期耗水模系数最大。T1处理复水后伤流液、根系活力、根系水力学导度（Lpr）、过氧化氢酶（CAT）、过氧化物酶（POD）和超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性及可溶性蛋白（SP）含量显著提高，进而促进地上部质量和千粒重增加，提高产量和水分利用效率。与XC 22相比，XC 6伤流液、Lpr、根系活力、SOD、POD、SP含量、地上部质量以及产量均显著增加，T1处理下XC 6的伤流液、Lpr较XC 22高5.4%~25.1%，2.2%~15.7%；0—20，20—40，40—60 cm土层SOD （6.9%~20.0%，2.6%~24.7%和3.6%~31.1%）、POD （4.1%~19.1%，3.9%~25.2%和3.7%~21.6%）、CAT （7.8%~15.2%，8.3%~13.3%和10.8%~13.3%）活性及SP （4.5%~20.4%，0.8%~29.4%和1.3%~7.9%）含量显著高于XC 22。根质量、地上部质量和产量与耗水量呈二次抛物线关系，与伤流液、Lpr、MDA和CAT活性呈显著正相关。水分处理与品种互作对Lpr、POD、CAT活性及SP含量影响显著。因此，抗旱性强品种开花期轻度干旱可降低耗水量，提高根系SP含量及抗氧化酶活性，增强根系活力，促进地上部质量提高，有利于提高产量和水分利用效率。

Abstract

In order to explore the water consumption characteristics

root physiological characteristics and yield response to anthesis stage drought of different drought-tolerant wheat varieties

taking drought-tolerant variety "Xinchun 6" (XC 6) and drought-intolerant variety "Xinchun 22" (XC 22) as the experimental materials

conventional irrigation (CK)

mild drought (T1) and moderate drought (T2) at anthesis stage were set up under soil column cultivation and field conditions to investigate the effects of drought stress on water consumption characteristics

root physiological characteristics of different soil layers and yield of drip irrigation wheat field. The results showed that after anthesis stage drought

the water consumption and water consumption intensity of the two wheat varieties in the whole growth period were CK>T1>T2

and the water consumption modelcoefficient reached the maximum at the jointing-booting stage. After rehydration with T1 treatment

the bleeding fluid

root activity

hydraulic conductivity (Lpr)

the avtivity of catalase (CAT)

peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and soluble protein (SP) content significantly increased

which promoted the increase of shoot mass and 1 000 grain weight

and improved yield and water use efficiency. Compared with XC 22

bleeding fluid

Lpr

root activity

SOD

POD

SP content

shoot quality and yield of XC 6 all significantly increased. In T1 treatment

the bleeding fluid and Lpr of XC 6 were 5.4% to 25.1%

2.2% to 15.7%higher than those of XC 22

respectively

and the SOD (6.9% to 20.0%

2.6% to 24.7% and 3.6% to 31.1%)

POD (4.1% to 19.1%

3.9% to 25.2% and 3.7% to 21.6%)

CAT (7.8% to 15.2%

8.3% to 13.3% and 10.8% to 13.3%) activities and SP content(4.5% to 20.4%

0.8% to 29.4% and 1.3% to 7.9%) in 0-20

20-40 and 40-60 cm soil layers were significantly higherthan those of XC 22

respectively. Root mass

shoot mass and yield had a quadratic parabola relationship with water consumption

and there was a significant positive correlation with bleeding fluid

Lpr

MDA and CAT activities. The interaction between water treatment and varieties had significant effects on Lpr

POD

CAT and SP content. Therefore

mild anthesis stage drought of drought-tolerant variety could reduce water consumption

improve root SP content and antioxidant enzyme activity

so as to enhance root activity

improve shoot mass

and improve yield and water use efficiency.

关键词

Keywords

references

韩一军, 韩亭辉."十四五"时期我国小麦增产潜力分析与实现路径[J].农业经济问题, 2021(7):38-46.

苏勃, 高学杰, 效存德. IPCC《全球1.5℃增暖特别报告》冰冻圈变化及其影响解读[J].气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(4):395-404.

Cairns J E, Crossa J, Zaidi P H, et al. Identification of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat tolerant donors in maize[J].Crop Science, 2013, 53(4):1335-1346.

Farshad N, Soodabeh J, Mehdi G, et al. Studying the physiological and yield responses of sunflower inbred lines to full and limited irrigation[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(7):1605-1611.

赵丽英, 邓西平, 山仑.水分亏缺下作物补偿效应类型及机制研究概述[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15(3):523-526.

程裕伟, 马富裕, 冯治磊, 等.滴灌条件下春小麦耗水规律研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(2):112-117.

王利彬, 祖伟, 董守坤, 等.干旱程度及时期对复水后大豆生长和代谢补偿效应的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11):150-156.

李盛有, 董丽杰, 王雅珍, 等.不同土壤水分下大豆根冠互作对产量和农艺性状的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(3):251-256, 268.

Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals[J].Plant Cell and Environment, 2010, 31(1):11-38.

张秀, 朱文美, 董述鑫, 等.灌水量与密度互作对冬小麦籽粒产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1):163-174.

张军, 李晓萍, 陈新宏, 等.长期土壤干旱下扬花期冬小麦部分生理生化反应及抗旱性分析[J].麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(6):765-773.

罗宏海, 张宏芝, 张亚黎, 等.干旱区膜下滴灌条件下土壤深层水对棉花根系生长、分布及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2012, 23(2):395-402.

牛静.花铃期干旱胁迫复水后棉花根系的补偿机制研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2016.

Sun H Y, Liu C M, Zhang X Y, et al. Effects of irrigation on water balance, yield and WUE of winter wheat in the North China Plain[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 85:211-218.

Kang S Z, Zhang L, Liang Y L, et al. Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2002, 55:203-216.

李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000.

Miyamoto N, Steudle E, Hirasawa T, et al. Hydraulic conductivity of adventitious roots of rice (

Oryza sativa

L.)[J].Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 2001, 70(1):198-199.

樊勇明, 李伟, 温仲明, 等.黄土区不同恢复年限草地群落生物量及根冠比对氮添加的响应[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(24):1-12.

杜太生, 康绍忠, 王振昌, 等.隔沟交替灌溉对棉花生长、产量和水分利用效率的调控效应[J].作物学报, 2007, 33(12):1982-1990.

陈晓远, 罗远培.开花期复水对受旱冬小麦的补偿效应研究[J].作物学报, 2001, 27(4):512-516.

王泽义, 张恒嘉, 王玉才, 等.板蓝根耗水特性和其产量及品质对膜下滴灌调亏的响应[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3):318-325.

刘佳, 袁宏伟, 杨继伟.不同气候条件下不同生育期干旱胁迫对冬小麦耗水量和水分利用效率的影响[J].节水灌溉, 2020(12):22-27, 31.

刘为健, 杨文稼, 王盈盈, 等.2个小麦品种水分利用效率的差异及其与深层水分利用的关系[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3):245-251, 258.

黄玲, 高阳, 邱新强, 等.灌水量和时期对不同品种冬小麦产量和耗水特性的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29(14):99-108.

黄超, 刘战东, 赵犇, 等.不同产量水平下冬小麦生长发育和耗水特性研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(10):10-16.

闫学梅, 于振文, 张永丽, 等.不同小麦品种耗水特性和籽粒产量的差异[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(3):694-700.

Rejeth R, Manikanta C L N, Beena R, et al. Water stress mediated root trait dynamics and identification of microsatellite markers associated with root traits in rice (

Oryza sativa

L.)[J].Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2020, 26(6):1225-1236.

张芸香, 王林, 田吉, 等.盐碱胁迫对文冠果幼苗水力学特征和碳素分配的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 3(6):299-304.

柏彦超, 钱晓晴, 沈淮东, 等.不同水、氮条件对水稻苗生长及伤流液的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(1):76-81.

Luo H H, Tao X P, Hu Y Y, et al. Response of cotton root growth and yield to root restriction under various water and nitrogen regimes[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2015, 178(3):384-392.

闫振华, 刘东尧, 贾绪存, 等.花期高温干旱对玉米雄穗发育、生理特性和产量影响[J].中国农业科学, 2021, 54(17):3592-3608.

Alhoshan M, Ramin A A, Zahedi M, et al. Effects of water deficit on shoot, root and some physiological characteristics in some greenhouse grown potato cultivars[J].Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2020, 23:433-444.

王美, 赵广才, 石书兵, 等.施氮及花后土壤相对含水量对黑粒小麦灌浆期氮素吸收转运及分配的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(7):864-873.

Wu B, Zhang H, Wang D. Timely supplemental irrigation changed nitrogen use of wheat by regulating root vertical distribution[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2018, 181(3):396-408.

张胜全, 方保停, 王志敏, 等.春灌模式对晚播冬小麦水分利用及产量形成的影响[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(4):2035-2044.

Panda R K, Behera S K, Kashyap P S. Effective management of irrigation water for wheat under stressedconditions[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2003, 63(1):37-56.

浏览量

732

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

旱地全膜覆土穴播春小麦的耗水特征及其对产量的影响

覆膜时期与施氮量对旱地玉米土壤耗水特征及产量的影响

秸秆还田与种植密度对玉米氮素吸收利用与产量的影响

微咸水滴灌下不同离子组成对土壤盐分、玉米离子吸收特性及产量的影响

黄土保护性耕作对农田土壤结构、水分及玉米产量的影响