不同植被恢复措施下高寒沙化草地植被与土壤变化特征

李宇章; 王亚妮; 胡宜刚; 李以康; 张振华

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.027

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同植被恢复措施下高寒沙化草地植被与土壤变化特征

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 不同植被恢复措施下高寒沙化草地植被与土壤变化特征
- Characteristics of Vegetation and Soil Under Different Restoration Measures in Alpine Desertification Grassland
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第4期页码：211-218
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所适应与进化重点实验室,西宁,810008
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院沙坡头沙漠研究试验站,兰州,730000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "李宇章(1997—),男,青海西宁人,在读硕士生,主要从事退化高寒草地生态系统生态修复研究。E-mail:liyuzhang21@mails.ucas.ac.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  青海省重点研发与转化计划项目"海南州小流域的综合治理及示范"（2019-SF-152）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.027
  中图分类号： Q148
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李宇章, 王亚妮, 胡宜刚, 等. 不同植被恢复措施下高寒沙化草地植被与土壤变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):211-218.

LI Yuzhang, WANG Yani, HU Yigang, et al. Characteristics of Vegetation and Soil Under Different Restoration Measures in Alpine Desertification Grassland[J]. 2022, 36(4): 211-218.
李宇章, 王亚妮, 胡宜刚, 等. 不同植被恢复措施下高寒沙化草地植被与土壤变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):211-218. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.027.

LI Yuzhang, WANG Yani, HU Yigang, et al. Characteristics of Vegetation and Soil Under Different Restoration Measures in Alpine Desertification Grassland[J]. 2022, 36(4): 211-218. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.027.

摘要

草地沙化是青藏高原草地生态环境恶化的显著问题之一，为研究不同恢复措施对高寒沙化草地植被与土壤的影响，以沙化草地（DG）、人工草本恢复草地（AG）、人工灌丛恢复草地（AS）以及天然草地（NG）为研究对象，基于植被群落和土壤特征的变化及两者的相互关系，评价了不同人工植被恢复措施对高寒沙化草地22年的恢复效果。结果表明：（1） AG和AS分别使DG的地上生物量增加至109.21，1 293.21 g/m2，但2种恢复措施的草本地上生物量均显著低于NG，而AG的植被群落物种丰富度比AS显著低31.48%（p<0.05）。（2）与DG的0—10 cm表层土壤相比，AG的土壤孔隙度、含水量、总碳和总氮含量分别显著提高7.94%，67.95%，22.09%和257.14%，AS的这些指标也分别显著提高6.41%，43.00%，17.18%和242.86%；但2种恢复措施的土壤碳氮养分含量均显著低于NG （p<0.05）。（3） AS和AG的土壤有机碳矿化总累积量分别比DG显著提高133.39%和116.96%，但均显著低于NG，2种恢复措施间无显著差异（p>0.05）。可见，人工植被恢复措施显著促进沙化草地植被以及土壤恢复，但灌丛恢复更有利于提高植被物种丰富度，而草本恢复更有利于增加沙化草地土壤水分。

Abstract

Grassland desertification is one of the most serious ecological and environmental problems in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. To investigate the characteristics of vegetation and soil under different restoration measures in alpine desertification grassland

desertification grassland (DG)

artificial herbage grassland (AG)

artificial shrub grassland (AS) and natural grassland (NG) were selected to study the changes of vegetation community and soil characteristics and their relationship

and to evaluate the restoration effect of different artificial vegetation restoration measures on alpine desertification grassland after 22-year restoration. The results showed that:(1) AG and AS increased the aboveground biomass of desertification grassland to 109.21 and 1 293.21 g/m2

respectively. However

the aboveground biomass of herbs under AG and AS were significantly lower than that of NG

and the species richness of AG was significantly lower than that of AS by 31.48% (p<0.05). (2) Compared with the 0-10 cm surface soil of DG

the soil porosity

water content

total carbon and total nitrogen contents of AG significantly increased by 7.94%

67.95%

22.09% and 257.14%

respectively. And these indexes of AS significantly increased by 6.41%

43.00%

17.18% and 242.86%

respectively. However

the content of soil carbon and nitrogen in the two restoration measures were significantly lower than that of NG (p<0.05). (3) The total accumulation of soil organic carbon mineralization in AS andAG was significantly higher than that in DG by 133.39% and 116.96%

respectively

but both were significantly lower than that in NG

and there was no significant difference between the two restoration measures (p>0.05). Therefore

artificial vegetation restoration measures significantly promoted vegetation and soil restoration in desertification grassland

but shrub restoration was more conducive to improve the species richness of vegetation communities

while herb restoration was more conducive to increase soil moisture of desertification grasslands.

关键词

Keywords

references

孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].地理学报, 2012, 67(1):3-12.

韩光中, 屈建军, 俎瑞平.安多县沙漠化过程中土壤理化性质的演变特征[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(5):1032-1037.

张利, 周广胜, 汲玉河, 等.中国草地碳储量时空动态模拟研究[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(10):1392-1405.

Wang Z Q, Zhang Y Z, Yang Y, et al. Quantitative assess the driving forces on the grassland degradation in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, in China[J].Ecological Informatics, 2016, 33:32-44.

赵燕兰, 周青平, 曾鹂, 等.沙化草地植被恢复治理技术研究综述[J].草原与草业, 2017, 29(3):7-11.

胡金娇, 周青平, 吕一河, 等.青藏高原东缘半湿润沙地典型生态恢复模式的效果比较研究[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7410-7418.

王亚妮, 胡宜刚, 王增如, 等.人工植被重建对沙化高寒草地土壤真菌群落特征的影响[J/OL].土壤学报:1-13[2021-12-27]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32. 1119. P. 20211208. 1558. 002. html.

刘建军.青海省贵南县荒漠化和沙化土地现状分析与治理对策研究[J].林业资源管理, 2017(2):12-15, 117.

刘任涛, 朱凡.人工与自然恢复方式对流动沙地土壤与植被特征的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(6):1-7.

任康.青藏铁路沿线严重沙害区植被恢复措施及恢复效果研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2019.

何群, 席欢, 万婷.不同植被恢复模式对红原沙化草地土壤理化性质的影响[J].四川环境, 2017, 36(1):35-40.

陈俊松, 文毅, 储小院.不同封禁保护措施对沙化土地含水率、粒径的影响研究[J].林业调查规划, 2018, 43(5):36-39, 44.

田丽慧, 张登山, 彭继平, 等.高寒沙地人工植被恢复区地表沉积物粒度特征[J].中国沙漠, 2015, 35(1):32-39.

李云飞, 谢婷, 石万里, 等.腾格里沙漠东南缘植被恢复对土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(1):14-23.

廖洪凯, 龙健, 李娟, 等.花椒种植对喀斯特山区土壤水稳性团聚体分布及有机碳周转的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1):106-113.

辜翔, 张仕吉, 刘兆丹, 等.湖南东部植被恢复对土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12):1211-1224.

贾志锋, 马祥, 徐成体, 等.短期封育对贵南县轻度退化高寒草甸植被特征的影响[J].草业科学, 2019, 36(11):2766-2774.

张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 等.枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J].草地学报, 2021, 29(增刊1):156-164.[HT5"SS]

Blair G J, Lefroy R D B, Lisle L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural system[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1995, 46(7):393-406.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2005:34-110.

Moses F, Dong S K, Li Y, et al. The relationships between plant diversity, plant cover, plant biomass and soil fertility vary with grassland type on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2019, 286(C):e106659.

苏旭, 栾策, 吴奇, 等.生物炭对玉米/大豆、玉米/花生间作系统土壤水肥热及产量的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1):115-122.

姜林, 胡骥, 杨振安, 等.植物功能群去除对高寒草甸群落结构、多样性及生产力的影响[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(4):1402-1411.

戚登臣, 陈文业, 刘振恒, 等.黄河首曲-玛曲县高寒草甸沙化演替进程中群落结构及种群生态位特征[J].西北植物学报, 2011, 31(12):2522-2531.

万昊, 刘卫国, 魏杰.黄土高原植被演替对土壤碳库及δ

C的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1):100-105.

王艳红, 于镇华, 李彦生, 等.植物-土壤-微生物间碳流对大气CO

浓度升高的响应[J].土壤与作物, 2018, 7(1):22-30.

任玉连, 曹乾斌, 李聪, 等.南滚河自然保护区森林群落特征与土壤性质之间关联分析[J].西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3):50-59.

陈晓芬, 刘明, 江春玉, 等.红壤性水稻土不同粒级团聚体有机碳矿化及其温度敏感性[J].土壤学报, 2019, 56(5):1118-1127.

浏览量

734

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同氮素用量对高肥力稻田水稻-土壤-水体氮素变化及环境影响分析

某铅锌冶炼厂废弃地复垦整理区土壤重金属污染评价

水溶性有机质对镉在土壤中吸附行为的影响

鄂尔多斯高原北部不同植被类型下土壤性状的分异

云南省土壤和植物性饲料中矿质元素含量及相关性研究