三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素

张轩铭; 戴翠婷; 李朝霞; 周怡雯; 王天巍; 李豪

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素
- Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Purple Sandstone with Different Degrees of Development in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第4期页码：92-98
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华中农业大学水土保持研究中心,武汉,430070
  2. 武汉蓝天绿野咨询设计有限公司,武汉,430021
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张轩铭(1999—),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与环境生态研究。E-mail:xmzhang1999@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（42077065，U2240222）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.012
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张轩铭, 戴翠婷, 李朝霞, 等. 三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):92-98.

ZHANG Xuanming, DAI Cuiting, LI Zhaoxia, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Purple Sandstone with Different Degrees of Development in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2022, 36(4): 92-98.
张轩铭, 戴翠婷, 李朝霞, 等. 三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):92-98. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.012.

ZHANG Xuanming, DAI Cuiting, LI Zhaoxia, et al. Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Purple Sandstone with Different Degrees of Development in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. 2022, 36(4): 92-98. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.012.

摘要

为探究典型母岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征，在三峡库区王家桥小流域采用圆盘入渗仪测定新成土（S1）、雏形土（S2）、淋溶土（S3）3种紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗过程，探究入渗过程的影响因素，并用3种常用模型进行入渗过程模拟，分析比较这些模型的适宜性。结果表明：（1）不同发育程度间土壤理化性质差异显著。雏形土和淋溶土土壤容重较新成土分别增加10.71%，19.50%，土壤总孔隙度分别降低8.79%，18.69%，通气孔隙度分别降低67.40%，8.16%，土壤黏粒含量分别增加10.01%，38.36%，砂粒含量分别减小8.09%，48.29%，土壤有机质分别增加2.88%，8.68%。（2）不同发育程度土壤间初始入渗率、平均入渗率、饱和导水率均表现为新成土>雏形土>淋溶土，雏形土、淋溶土平均入渗率及饱和导水率分别是新成土的0.99，0.58和0.89，0.83倍。（3）不同发育程度土壤理化性质差异对土壤入渗具有显著影响，土壤入渗速率与总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、通气孔隙度、砂粒含量呈正相关关系，与容重、黏粒含量、有机质含量呈负相关关系。（4） Horton模型对紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗过程拟合效果最优（R2=0.942），Kostiakov模型次之（R2=0.858），Philip模型拟合效果较差（R2=0.832）。通过观测与模拟不同发育程度土壤入渗过程，研究结果可为流域土壤水分运移规律探究提供有益借鉴。

Abstract

In order to explore the soil water infiltration characteristics of typical parent rocks with different developmental degrees

a disc infiltration meter was used to determine the infiltration process of three kinds of purple sandstone with different development degrees

which were Entisol (S1)

Cambisols (S2) and Alfisol (S3)

to explore the influencing factors of the infiltration process

and three common models were used to simulate the infiltration process to analyze and compare the suitability of these models. The results showed that:(1) There were significant differences in soil physicochemical properties among different development degrees. Compared with the Entisol

the soil bulk density of the Cambisols and Alfisol increased by 10.71% and 19.50%

the total soil porosity decreased by 8.79% and 18.69%

the aeration porosity decreased by 67.40% and 8.16%

and the soil clay content increased by 10.01% and 38.36%

the sand content decreased by 8.09% and 48.29%

and the soil organic matter increased by 2.88% and 8.68%

respectively. (2) The initial infiltration rate

average infiltration rate and saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils followed the order of Entisol>Cambisols>Alfisol

and the average infiltration rate and saturated hydraulic conductivity of Cambisols and Alfisol were 0.99

0.58 and 0.89

0.83 times higher than those of the Entisol

respectively. (3) Differences in soil physical and chemical properties of different soil development levels had a significant impact on soil water infiltration. Soil infiltration rate was positively correlated with total porosity

capillary porosity

aeration porosity and sand content

while negatively correlated with bulk density

clay content and organic matter. (4) The Horton model had a better fitting effect on the purple sandstone soil water infiltration process with different development degrees (R2=0.942)

followed by the Kostiakov model (R2=0.858)

and the Philip model had a poor fitting effect (R2=0.832). By observing and simulating the process of soil water infiltration of different development levels

the research results could provide a useful reference for the study of the soil water migration law in the watershed.

关键词

Keywords

references

Abrol V, Ben-Hur M, Verheijen F G A, et al. Biochar effects on soil water infiltration and erosion under seal formation conditions:Rainfall simulation experiment[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2016, 16(12):2709-2719.

Schwartz R C, Schlegel A J, Bell J M, et al. Contrasting tillage effects on stored soil water, infiltration and evapotranspiration fluxes in a dryland rotation at two locations[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 190:157-174.

Wang H, Zhang G H, Liu F, et al. Effects of biological crust coverage on soil hydraulic properties for the Loess Plateau of China[J].Hydrological Processes, 2017, 31(19):3396-3406.

Tongway D J, Ludwig J A. Vegetation and soil patterning in semi-arid mulga lands of Eastern Australia[J].Australian Journal of Ecology, 1990, 15(1):23-34.

吕贻忠, 李保国.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2006.

罗友进.区域成土过程:认识与表达[D].重庆:西南大学, 2011.

Torrent J, Nettleton W D. Simple textural index for assessing chemical weathering in soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1979, 43(2):373-377.

Lichter J. Rates of weathering and chemical depletion in soils across a chronosequence of Lake Michigan sand dunes[J].Geoderma, 1998, 85(4):255-282.

Cho K W, Song K G, Cho J W, et al. Removal of nitrogen by a layered soil infiltration system during intermittent storm events[J].Chemosphere, 2009, 76(5):690-696.

吴奇凡, 樊军, 杨晓莉, 等.晋陕蒙接壤区露天矿层状土壤水分入渗特征与模拟[J].土壤学报, 2015, 52(6):1280-1290.

Schwen A, Zimmermann M, Bodner G. Vertical variations of soil hydraulic properties within two soil profiles and its relevance for soil water simulations[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 516:169-181.

Müller K, Katuwal S, Young I, et al. Characterising and linking X-ray CT derived macroporosity parameters to infiltration in soils with contrasting structures[J].Geoderma, 2018, 313:82-91.

Zhong S Q, Han Z, Du J, et al. Relationships between the lithology of purple rocks and the pedogenesis of purple soils in the Sichuan Basin, China[J].Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):e13272.

龚子同.中国土壤系统分类:理论·方法·实践[M].北京:科学出版社, 1999.

云慧雅, 毕华兴, 王珊珊, 等.不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6):183-189.

冯娜, 刘冬冬, 赵荣存, 等.岩溶山地植被恢复中碳酸盐岩红土入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):162-169, 175.

Villarreal R, Lozano L A, Salazar M P, et al. Pore system configuration and hydraulic properties. Temporal variation during the crop cycle in different soil types of Argentinean Pampas Region[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198:e104528.

崔浩浩, 张光辉, 张亚哲, 等.层状非均质包气带渗透性特征及其对降水入渗的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(3):1-9.

Ren Z P, Zhu L J, Wang B, et al. Soil hydraulic conductivity as affected by vegetation restoration age on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8(4):546-555.

Zaibon S, Anderson S H, Kitchen N R, et al. Hydraulic properties affected by topsoil thickness in switchgrass and corn-soybean cropping systems[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2016, 80(5):1365-1376.

Lin H S, McInnes K J, Wilding L P, et al. Effects of soil morphology on hydraulic properties I. Quantification of soil morphology[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1999, 63(4):948-954.

Fischer C, Tischer J, Roscher C, et al. Plant species diversity affects infiltration capacity in an experimental grassland through changes in soil properties[J] Plant and Soil, 2015, 397(1):1-16.

Chang Z Q. Soil water infiltration of Subalpine Shrub Forest in Qilian Mountains, northwest of China[J].Agronomy Journal, 2020, 113(12):829-839.

唐嘉鸿.微地形主导下紫色泥岩发育土壤的发生特征[D].重庆:西南大学, 2019.

崔浩浩, 张冰, 冯欣, 等.不同土体构型土壤的持水性能[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(4):1-5.

林代杰, 郑子成, 张锡洲, 等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报, 2010, 24(1):33-36.

李志, 袁颖丹, 胡耀文, 等.海拔及旅游干扰对武功山山地草甸土壤渗透性的影响[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(2):635-645.

Latorre B, Peña C, Lassabatere L, et al. Estimate of soil hydraulic properties from disc infiltrometer three-dimensional infiltration curve. Numerical analysis and field application[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 527:1-12.

浏览量

767

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

模拟降雨下植物篱-草沟系统茎秆直径对紫色土区泥沙粒径与氮磷迁移的影响

极端降雨条件下三峡库区浅层滑坡发育特征及主控因素

三峡库区典型退耕模式对土壤水力特性的影响

三峡库区临库水稻田氮磷径流流失过程与强度

人类活动加剧三峡库区湿地景观破碎化