1. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安,710127
2. 西北大学陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安,701027
3. 旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业和草原局重点实验室,西安,701027
[ "王海于(1993—),男,甘肃陇南人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事区域土壤侵蚀评价研究。E-mail:hywang@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王海于, 庞国伟, 王春梅, 等. 基于无人机航摄的坡形对浅沟发育的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):85-91.
WANG Haiyu, PANG Guowei, WANG Chunmei, et al. Effects of Slope Shapes on Ephemeral Gully Development Based on UAV[J]. 2022, 36(4): 85-91.
王海于, 庞国伟, 王春梅, 等. 基于无人机航摄的坡形对浅沟发育的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):85-91. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.011.
WANG Haiyu, PANG Guowei, WANG Chunmei, et al. Effects of Slope Shapes on Ephemeral Gully Development Based on UAV[J]. 2022, 36(4): 85-91. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.011.
为探究坡形对浅沟发育的影响,以陕西省靖边县狼儿子沟无人机航摄影像为基础数据,通过目视解译得到浅沟(指瓦背状地形底部)225条,统计了浅沟条数、浅沟长度、沟头到分水岭的距离及浅沟密度等指标。利用浅沟地形分水线上的高程点进行插值得到原始坡面数字高程模型(digital elevation model,DEM),以此DEM提取地形曲率以表征坡形,进而分析坡形与浅沟指标的关系。结果表明:(1)以浅沟地形分水线上的高程点插值后的DEM对浅沟进行了综合,能较好地表达浅沟发育之前原始坡面的地形特征。(2)从单一坡形来看,横向凹形坡的浅沟密度最大,纵向凹形坡的浅沟沟头到分水岭的平均距离最大;纵向凸形坡的浅沟条数以及浅沟平均长度均最大;从组合坡形来看,双凸形坡和凸凹形坡上的浅沟平均长度与沟头到分水岭的平均距离均大于双凸形坡和凹凸形坡。双凹形坡的浅沟长度与双凸形坡和凸凹形坡的浅沟长度具有显著性差异(p<0.05);凹凸形坡的浅沟长度与双凸形坡和凸凹形坡的浅沟长度具有显著性差异(p<0.05)。凹凸形坡的浅沟沟头到分水岭的距离与凸凹形坡的浅沟沟头到分水岭的距离具有显著性差异(p<0.1)。(3)不同形态坡面浅沟发育的地形曲率分布特征具有明显差异。
In order to explore the influence of slope shape on the development of ephemeral gully
225 ephemeral gullies were obtained by visual interpretation based on the photography of unmanned aerial vehicle in the Langerzigou in Jingbian County
Shaanxi Province. The number and length of ephemeral gullies
the distance from the gully head to the watershed and the gully density were calculated. The original slope DEM was obtained by interpolating the elevation points on the ephemeral gully watershed
and the DEM was used to extract the terrain curvature to describe the hillslope shape
and then analyze the relationship between the slope shape and the ephemeral gully index. The results showed that:(1) The DEM after the elevation point interpolation on the ephemeral gully watershed was used to synthesize the ephemeral gully
which could well describe the original slope topographic features before the development of ephemeral gully. (2) From the point of view of single slope shape
the gully density of the transverse concave slope was the highest
and the number of ephemeral gullies
the average distance from the gully head to the watershed of the longitudinal concave slope were the largest. The average length of the ephemeral gully and the number of the longitudinal convex slope were the largest. From the point of view of the combined slope shape
the average length of the ephemeral gully and the average distance from the gully head to the watershed on the biconvex slope and the concave slope were larger than those on the biconvex slope and the concave-convex slope. The ephemeral gully length of double concave slope was significantly different from that of double convex slope and convex-concave slope (p<0.05). The ephemeral gully length of concave-convex slope was significantly different from that of double convex slope and convex concave slope (p<0.05).There was a significant difference in the distance from the gully head to the watershed between the concave-convex slope and the convex-concave slope (p<0.1). (3) The terrain curvature distribution characteristics of ephemeral gully development on different slope are obviously different.
Stoffel M, Marston R A. Treatise on geomorphology[M].San Diego:Academic Press, 2013.
刘宝元, 杨扬, 陆绍娟.几个常用土壤侵蚀术语辨析及其生产实践意义[J].中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(1):9-16.
徐锡蒙, 郑粉莉, 武敏.雨强和坡度对黄土陡坡地浅沟形态特征影响的定量研究[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(11):124-132.
郑粉莉, 徐锡蒙, 覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8):48-59, 116.
张宗祜.黄土高原土壤侵蚀基本规律[J].第四纪研究, 1993, 13(1):34-40.
唐克丽, 郑世清, 席道勤, 等.杏子河流域坡耕地的水土流失及其防治[J].水土保持通报, 1983, 3(5):43-48.
杨丽娜, 范昊明, 郭成久, 等.不同坡形坡面侵蚀规律试验研究[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(4):237-239, 243.
张科利.浅沟发育对土壤侵蚀作用的研究[J].中国水土保持, 1991(4):19-21, 65.
Peter A S, Larisa S S, Andrew V M. Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis[J].Geoderma, 2002, 107(1):1-32.
曹银真.黄土地区梁峁坡的坡地特征与土壤侵蚀[J].地理研究, 1983, 2(3):19-29.
Qin C Z, Zhu A X, Shi X, et al. Quantification of spatial gradation of slope positions[J].Geomorphology, 2009, 110(3):152-161.
Lucain D, Thomas B. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis[J].Geomorphology, 2006, 81(3/4):330-344.
陈渭南.黄土丘陵坡面三维形态初论[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1990, 1(1):69-73.
邢伟民, 王镱潼, 徐浩林, 等.坡形和PAM对黄土坡地水土养分迁移特征的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):135-142.
冯大光, 范昊明, 王铁良.不同坡形坡度径流量产生规律的试验研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2017, 48(3):373-378.
王颢霖, 焦菊英, 唐柄哲, 等.陕北子洲"7·26"暴雨后坡耕地细沟侵蚀及其影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(11):122-130.
季翔, 黄炎和, 林金石, 等.基于DEM的坡形与水土流失的关系:以西溪小流域为研究区[J].中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(2):161-171.
汤国安, 李发源, 刘学军.数字高程模型教程[M].北京:科学出版社, 2010.
王雷.黄土高原小流域侵蚀沟道空间频谱分析[D].陕西杨凌:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2013.
张科利, 唐克丽, 王斌科.黄土高原坡面浅沟侵蚀特征值的研究[J].水土保持学报, 1991, 5(2):8-13.
国家测绘局测绘标准化研究所. CH/T 1015.2-2007基础地理信息数字产品1:10000, 1:50000生产技术规程第2部分:数字高程模型(DEM)[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2007.
周启鸣, 刘学军.数字地形分析[M].北京:科学出版社, 2006.
Zevenbergen L W, Thorne C R. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1987, 12(3):47-56.
国家测绘局测绘标准化研究所.基础地理信息数字产品1:10000, 1:50000数字高程模型:CH/T 1008-2001[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2001.
张岩, 范聪慧, 龚颖华, 等.基于QuickBird影像的黄土丘陵区坡面浅沟侵蚀速率研究[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(8):239-244.
仲原, 王春梅, 庞国伟, 等.黄土高原浅沟空间分异特征研究[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(5):1-13.
Gündoǧan R, Alma V, Dindaroǧlu T, et al. Monitoring and estimation of soil losses from ephemeral gully erosion in mediterranean region using low altitude unmanned aerial vehicles[J].The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2017, XLII-4/W6:59-61.
罗来兴.划分晋西、陕北、陇东黄土区域沟间地与沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报, 1956, 23(3):201-222.
范昊明, 王铁良, 周丽丽, 等.不同坡形坡面径流流速时空分异特征研究[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(6):35-38.
Moore I D, Burch G J. Modelling erosion and deposition:Topographic effects[J].Transactions of the ASAE, 1986, 29(6):1624-1630.
0
浏览量
814
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621