1. 吉林农业大学资源与环境学院,长春,130118
2. 吉林省商品粮基地土壤资源可持续利用重点实验室,长春,130118
3. 吉林省正源环保科技有限公司,长春,130000
4. 公主岭市勾家店水库灌区管理所, 吉林 公主岭,136121
[ "刘殿民(1998—),男,硕士研究生,辽宁营口人,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail:liudianmin0526@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
刘殿民, 沈海鸥, 武佳龙, 等. 黑土坡面垄侧少耕措施的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):1-6.
LIU Dianmin, SHEN Haiou, WU Jialong, et al. Analysis of Soil Erosion Characteristics of Half-ridge Less Tillage Measure on the Black Soil Hillslope[J]. 2022, 36(4): 1-6.
刘殿民, 沈海鸥, 武佳龙, 等. 黑土坡面垄侧少耕措施的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.001.
LIU Dianmin, SHEN Haiou, WU Jialong, et al. Analysis of Soil Erosion Characteristics of Half-ridge Less Tillage Measure on the Black Soil Hillslope[J]. 2022, 36(4): 1-6. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.04.001.
为探究黑土区坡耕地垄侧少耕措施对土壤侵蚀特征的影响,在5°和7°坡面开展人工模拟降雨试验,降雨强度为75,100 mm/h,横垄处理方式包括全松(土壤容重均为1.00 g/cm3)、上松下实(土壤容重分别为1.00,1.20 g/cm3)、上实下松(土壤容重分别为1.20,1.00 g/cm3)及全实(土壤容重均为1.20 g/cm3)4种。结果表明:垄侧少耕措施有助于延缓横垄溢流时间,具有明显的调控土壤侵蚀作用。土壤侵蚀量大小总体表现为全松>上松下实>全实>上实下松。除75 mm/h降雨强度下的5°坡面外,与全松处理相比,上实下松和全实处理的径流量分别减少16.1%~19.4%和6.6%~11.4%,土壤侵蚀量分别减少25.0%~52.5%和17.9%~31.6%,且上实下松和全实处理的径流率和土壤侵蚀速率随降雨历时的变化相对比较平稳。可见,垄侧少耕措施在调控总径流量和土壤侵蚀量的同时,也具有较好地调控径流侵蚀过程的作用。因此,建议根据黑土区坡耕地具体降雨特征和地形坡度等因素科学选用垄侧少耕措施。
To reveal effects of the half-ridge less tillage measure on soil erosion characteristics at sloping farmlands of the Chinese black soil region
the artificial simulated rainfall experiments were carried out on 5° and 7° slopes with 75 mm/h and 100 mm/h rainfall intensities. The cross ridge treatments included all looseness (the soil bulk density was 1.00 g/cm3)
upper looseness+lower compaction (the soil bulk densities was 1.00 and 1.20 g/cm3
respectively)
upper compaction+ lower looseness (the soil bulk densities was 1.20 and 1.00 g/cm3
respectively) and all compaction (the soil bulk density was 1.20 g/cm3). The results showed that the half-ridge less tillage measuredelayed the overflow time of crossridge
and obviously regulated soil erosion. The soil erosion amounts decreased in the order of all looseness>upper looseness+lower compaction>all compaction>upper compaction+lower looseness. Except for the 5° slope with 75 mm/h rainfall intensity
compared with the all looseness treatment
the total runoff amounts of the upper compaction+lower looseness and all compaction treatments decreased by 16.1% to 19.4% and 6.6% to 11.4%
respectively
the soil erosion amounts decreased by 25.0% to 52.5% and 17.9% to 31.6%
respectively. Furthermore
the changes of both runoff rate and soil erosion rate of the upper compaction+ lower looseness and all compaction treatments with rainfall duration were relatively stable. Therefore
the half-ridge less tillage measure not only controlled the total runoff and soil erosion amounts but also regulated the runoff and soil erosion processes. In conclusion
the half-ridge less tillage measure should be selected scientifically according to the specific rainfall characteristics and topographic slope gradients of farmlands in the black soil region.
窦森.吉林省黑土地保护与高值化利用工程[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2020, 42(5):473-476.
牟廷森, 沈海鸥, 李洪丽, 等.不同坡度下掺沙对黑土坡面径流侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):43-47, 55.
杨献坤, 许文旭.东北黑土区裸露坡地土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].吉林农业大学报, 2021, 10(1):47-57.
何煦, 桑琦明, 郑粉莉, 等.东北不同黑土厚度区多营力作用的坡面土壤侵蚀试验研究[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):103-109, 115.
牛晓乐, 秦富仓, 杨振奇, 等.黑土区坡耕地几种耕作措施水土保持效益研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(5):67-72.
耿煜函, 肖洋, 张美芝, 等.东北黑土区坡耕地侵蚀沟研究现状及进展[J].中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21):80-85.
闫雷, 纪晓楠, 孟庆峰, 等.免耕措施下黑土区坡耕地土壤肥力质量评价[J].东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(5):43-54.
Hernanz J L, López R, Navarret L, et al. Long-term effects of tillage systems and rotations on soil structural stability and organic carbon stratification in semiarid central Spain[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2002, 66(2):129-141.
陈强, Yuriy S K, 陈渊, 等.少免耕土壤结构与导水能力的季节变化及其水保效果[J].土壤学报, 2014, 51(1):11-21.
贺云锋, 沈海鸥, 张月, 等.黑土区坡耕地不同秸秆还田方式的水土保持效果分析[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):89-94.
朱姝, 窦森, 关松, 等.秸秆深还对土壤团聚体中胡敏素结构特征的影响[J].土壤学报, 2016, 53(1):127-136.
郑粉莉, 赵军.人工模拟降雨大厅及模拟降雨设备简介[J].水土保持研究, 2004, 11(4):177-178.
He J, Li H, Kuhn N J. Effect of ridge tillage, no-tillage, and conventional tillage on soil temperature, water use, and crop performance in cold and semi-arid areas in Northeast China[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research, 2010, 48(8):737-744.
姜义亮, 郑粉莉, 温磊磊, 等.降雨和汇流对黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响试验研究[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8207-8215.
魏永霞, 王鹤, 吴昱, 等.生物炭对不同坡度坡耕地土壤水动力学参数的影响[J].农业机械学报, 2019, 50(3):231-240.
平翠枝, 红梅, 王文东, 等.不同耕作方式对黑土区农田土壤物理特性的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2020, 36(7):83-89.
边锋, 郑粉莉, 徐锡蒙, 等.东北黑土区顺坡垄作和无垄作坡面侵蚀过程对比[J].水土保持通报, 2016, 36(1):11-16.
邹文秀, 陆欣春, 陈旭, 等.东北黑土区农田土壤水分剖面分布与大气降水关系的研究[J].土壤通报, 2019, 50(2):267-273.
沈海鸥, 郑粉莉, 温磊磊, 等.降雨强度和坡度对细沟形态特征的综合影响[J].农业机械学报, 2015, 46(7):162-170.
刘冉, 余新晓, 蔡强国, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区黄土坡面侵蚀过程及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8):2886-2894.
韩巍, 徐晓旭, 李冬, 等.耕作方式对辽西褐土区土壤穿透阻力的影响及机理[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):143-149.
苏鹏, 贾燕锋, 曹馨月, 等.东北黑土区不同坡段等间距植物篱减流减沙特征[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3):22-26, 35.
王磊, 何超, 郑粉莉, 等.黑土区坡耕地横坡垄作措施防治土壤侵蚀的土槽试验[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15):141-148.
Wolschick N H, Bertol I, Barbosa F T, et al. Remaining effect of long-term soil tillage on plant biomass yield and water erosion in a Cambisol after transitionto no-tillage[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 213:105-149.
Ao C, Zeng W Z, Yang P L, et al. The effects of slope shape and polyacrylamide application on runoff, erosion and nutrient loss from hillslopes under simulated rainfall[J].Hydrological Processes, 2021, 35(4):e14130.
张兴义, 乔宝玲, 李健宇, 等.降雨强度和坡度对东北黑土区顺坡垄体溅蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(16):110-117.
覃自阳, 何丙辉, 甘凤玲.模拟降雨下重庆喀斯特槽谷区径流氮磷元素流失特征[J].中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(5):129-140.
宋鸽, 史东梅, 朱红业, 等.不同耕作措施对红壤坡耕地耕层质量的影响[J].土壤学报, 2020, 57(3):610-622.
Shen H O, He Y F, Hu W, et al. The temporal evolution of soil erosion for corn and fallow hillslopes in the typical Mollisol region of Northeast China[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, 186:200-205.
Li H R, Liu G, Gu J, et al. Response of soil aggregate disintegration to the different content of organic carbon and its fractions during splash erosion[J].Hydrological Processes, 2021, 35(2):e14060.
0
浏览量
1068
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621