不同条件下生态缓冲带对氟化物面源污染的阻控效果

徐颖; 谭婷; 任劲松; 李玉; 向彪; 朱永乐; 汤家喜

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.046

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同条件下生态缓冲带对氟化物面源污染的阻控效果

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 不同条件下生态缓冲带对氟化物面源污染的阻控效果
- Interception and Control Effects of Ecological Buffer Zone on Fluoride Non-point Source Pollution Under Different Conditions
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：361-367
- 作者机构：
  
  辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院,辽宁,阜新,123000
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "徐颖(1969-),女,副教授,主要从事水环境污染治理研究。E-mail:zb0595@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（41501548）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.046
  中图分类号： X173
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
徐颖, 谭婷, 任劲松, 等. 不同条件下生态缓冲带对氟化物面源污染的阻控效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):361-367.

XU Ying, TAN Ting, REN Jingsong, et al. Interception and Control Effects of Ecological Buffer Zone on Fluoride Non-point Source Pollution Under Different Conditions[J]. 2022, 36(2): 361-367.
徐颖, 谭婷, 任劲松, 等. 不同条件下生态缓冲带对氟化物面源污染的阻控效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):361-367. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.046.

XU Ying, TAN Ting, REN Jingsong, et al. Interception and Control Effects of Ecological Buffer Zone on Fluoride Non-point Source Pollution Under Different Conditions[J]. 2022, 36(2): 361-367. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.046.

摘要

生态缓冲带可有效截留阻控非点源污染物向水体中迁移。选取紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)、高羊茅(Festuca elata Keng ex E. Alexeev)、草木樨(Melilotus officinalis (Linn.))、早熟禾(Poa annua L.)和黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)5种草本植物构建模拟生态缓冲带

通过人工模拟径流试验

探讨不同植被类型、污染物入流浓度、生态缓冲带坡度以及施加生物炭种类条件下

生态缓冲带对径流中氟离子阻控效果的影响。结果表明:早熟禾生态缓冲带对径流中氟化物的阻控效果最好

当流量为0.5 L/min

入流浓度为4 mg/L

坡度为5°时

其对氟化物浓度的阻控效率为13.1%

质量阻控效率为92.6%;当流量为0.5 L/min

入流浓度为8 mg/L

坡度为5°时

其浓度阻控效率为20.6%

质量阻控效率为96.4%;坡度越小

生态缓冲带对氟化物阻控效果越好;当流量为0.5 L/min

入流浓度为4 mg/L

坡度为5°时

添加玉米秸秆生物炭后的生态缓冲带径流阻控效率均有提高

其中草木樨缓冲带最为明显

其地表径流的阻控效率提高23.8%。

Abstract

The ecological buffer zone can effectively intercept and control the migration of non-point source pollutants into the water body. Alfalfa

tall fescue

sweet clover

Kentucky bluegrass and ryegrass were selected to construct a simulated ecological buffer zone. Through an artificial runoff simulation experiment

the effects of ecological buffer zone on the inhibition and control effect of fluoride ion in runoff under the different conditions

including different vegetation types

pollutant inflow concentrations

ecological buffer zone slopes and biochar types were discussed. The results showed that the ecological buffer zone of Kentucky bluegrass had the best effect on the inhibition and control of fluoride in runoff. When the flow was 0.5 L/min

the inflow concentration was 4 mg/L and the slope was 5°

the inhibition and control efficiency of fluoride concentration was 13.1% and the quality inhibition and control efficiency was 92.6%. When the flow rate was 0.5 L/min

the inflow concentration was 8 mg/L and the slope was 5°

the concentration resistance control efficiency was 20.6% and the mass resistance control efficiency was 96.4%. This means the smaller the slope

the better effect of ecological buffer zone on fluoride inhibition and control. When the flow was 0.5 L/min

the inflow concentration was 4 mg/L and the slope was 5°

the runoff inhibition and control efficiency of the ecological buffer zone was improved by adding corn straw biochar

especially the sweet clover buffer zone

whose surface runoff inhibition and control efficiency was increased by 23.8%.

关键词

Keywords

references

Chen Y C, Zang L, Shen G F, et al. Resolution of the ongoing challenge of estimating nonpoint source neonicotinoid pollution in the Yangtze River basin using a modified mass balance approach[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2019,53(5):2539-2548.

付婧,王云琦,马超,等.植被缓冲带对农业面源污染物的削减效益研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):1-8.

Zak D, Bronvang B, Carstensen M V, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff in integrated buffer zones[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2018,52(11):6508-6517.

汤家喜,何苗苗,周博文,等.辽河上游河岸植被过滤带对地下渗流中氮磷截留效果的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):39-45.

付婧,王云琦,王玉杰,等.不同入流条件下草本缓冲带对污染物削减作用[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):129-134.

杨波.河岸缓冲带对辽河面源污染的阻控作用研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2018.

张鸿龄,李天娇,赵志芳,等.辽河河岸植被缓冲带构建及其对固体颗粒物和氮阻控能力[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(7):2185-2192.

陈旭飞,刘通,程炯,等.华南地区草被过滤带对菜地径流、泥沙和磷阻控效果及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):377-383.

魏忠平,朱永乐,汤家喜,等.模拟黑麦草植被缓冲带对径流中氮、磷以及悬浮颗粒物的截留效果研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2020,51(3):328-334.

Carretta L, Cardinali A, Zanin G, et al. Effect of vegetative buffer strips on herbicide runoff from a nontilled soil[J].Soil Science,2017,182(8):1-7.

乔晓霞,孙熠,刘玉洁.辽宁省典型地区高氟地下水的分布特征及成因分析[J].地下水,2014,36(4):33-34.

汤家喜,朱永乐,李梦雪,等.不同生物炭对水中氟离子的吸附特征研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(11):2270-2278.

周其家,白晓亮,孙继权.草木樨种植的关键技术[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2011(5):99-100.

刘福英,苏琴.高羊茅、早熟禾草坪栽培与管理技术[J].青海农技推广,2007(4):43.

谭定贵.紫花苜蓿种植推广技术运用[J].农民致富之友,2013(12):184.

Fernández-Ugalde O, Virto I, Bescansa P, et al. No-tillage improvement of soil physical quality in calcareous, degradation-prone, semiarid soils[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2009,106(1):29-35.

王敏,吴建强,黄沈发,等.不同坡度缓冲带径流污染净化效果及其最佳宽度[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):4951-4956.

庾从蓉,段佩怡.植被过滤带的污染物去除效率研究进展[J].水资源保护,2018,34(2):68-74.

申小波,陈传胜,张章,等.不同宽度模拟植被过滤带对农田径流、泥沙以及氮磷的拦截效果[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(4):721-729.

马艺坤,杨方社,李怀恩,等.不同参数下植被过滤带对径流中农药的净化效果研究[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(5):876-882.

孙晓涛.植被过滤带拦截径流和泥沙效果的VFSMOD模型适用性研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2014.

Vol Norris. The use of buffer zones to protect water quality:A review[J].Water Resources Management,1993,7(4):722-726.

肖波,喻定芳,赵梅,等.保护性耕作与等高草篱防治坡耕地水土及氮磷流失研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(3):315-323.

Dorioz J M, Wang D, Poulenard J, et al. The effect of grass buffer strips on phosphorus dynamics:A critical review and synthesis as a basis for application in agricultural landscapes in France[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2007,117(1):4-21.

Kimetu J, Lehmann J. Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2010,48(7):577-585.

褚军,薛建辉,金梅娟,等.生物炭对农业面源污染氮、磷流失的影响研究进展[J].生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(4):409-415.

Oussible M, Crookston R K, Larson W E. Subsurface compaction reduces the root and shoot growth and grain yield of wheat[J].Agronomy Journal,1992,84(1):34-38.

Jeffery S, Verheijen F G, Van D, et al. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2011,144(1):175-187.

浏览量

741

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

光伏板配置对坡面产流产沙的影响

生物炭-秸秆隔层协同改良对盐碱土壤水分入渗过程的影响

雅鲁藏布江流域水循环要素时空演变及径流驱动因素

施用生物炭对果园土壤氮磷时空分布与流失阻控的影响

生物炭结合藓类植物对土壤稳定性的影响