沙柳沙障腐烂过程对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响

梁钰镁; 高永; 王瑞东; 段晓婷; 郭鑫

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.039

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

沙柳沙障腐烂过程对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 沙柳沙障腐烂过程对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响
- Effects of
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：305-311
- 作者机构：
  
  内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,呼和浩特,010020
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "梁钰镁(1993-),女,在读博士研究生,主要从事荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:liang490002878@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目“不同气候区新材料研发、筛选与施配技术及效果研究”（2018YFC0507101）国家自然科学基金项目“大气-沙土界面动态过程对沙柳沙障耐蚀性的强化机制”（41861044）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.039
  中图分类号： S154;S793.9
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梁钰镁, 高永, 王瑞东, 等. 沙柳沙障腐烂过程对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):305-311.

LIANG Yumei, GAO Yong, WANG Ruidong, et al. Effects of[J]. 2022, 36(2): 305-311.
梁钰镁, 高永, 王瑞东, 等. 沙柳沙障腐烂过程对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):305-311. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.039.

LIANG Yumei, GAO Yong, WANG Ruidong, et al. Effects of[J]. 2022, 36(2): 305-311. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.039.

摘要

为探究沙柳沙障腐烂过程土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的变化规律

以铺设10年的沙柳沙障为研究对象

采用野外原位取样和室内指标测定法

结合RDA多元数据排序分析

揭示影响土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的主要环境因子。结果表明:(1)随铺设年限的增加

土壤中的C:N与C:P呈上升趋势

10年后的C:N是1年的16.14倍

而N:P呈下降趋势

10年后下降83.96%;(2)随腐烂程度的加剧

土壤MBC、MBN与MBP均呈先上升后下降趋势

7年均达到最大值

分别为1年的2.67

2.18

1.43倍;(3)土壤碱性磷酸酶活性随铺设年限增加呈先上升后下降趋势

6年时最大且表现出显著性差异(P<0.05)

但脲酶与蔗糖酶活性均为1年时显著大于其他各组(P<0.05);(4)RDA分析结果表明

土壤理化因子对土壤微生物生物量及酶活性影响的大小顺序为速效钾>含水率>碳氮比>碱解氮>酸碱度>速效磷>氮磷比>碳磷比

即速效钾与含水率为主要驱动因子。研究结果对进一步探讨荒漠生态系统土壤碳、氮、磷养分循环提供了重要的理论依据。

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in soil microbial biomass and enzymes activities during the decaying of Salix psammophila sand barriers. The sand barriers which had been laid for ten years were used as the research object. The research methods included field in-situ sampling and laboratory tests. Combined with RDA data sequencing analysis

the main environmental factors affecting soil microbial biomass and enzymes activities were revealed. The results showed that the values of C:N and C:P in soil increased with the increase of laying years. The C:N value in 10 years was 16.14 times of that in one year

while the N/P decreased by 83.96% after 10 years. The soil MBC

MBN and MBP increased firstly and then decreased with the decaying

and reached the maximum value in the 7th year

which was 2.67

2.18 and 1.43 times that in the 1st year

respectively. With the increase of decaying years

the activity of soil alkaline phosphatase increased first and then decreased. It peaked in the 6th year and showed a significant difference (P<0.05)

but the activities of urease and sucrose in one year were significantly higher than those in others (P<0.05). The RDA analysis showed that the sequences of the major soil physical and chemical factors affecting soil microbial biomass and enzymes activities were as follows:available potassium>water content>C:N ratio>alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen>pH>available phosphorus>N:P ratio>C:P ratio. The main driving factors were soil available potassium and water content. The results of this study could provide an important theoretical basis for the study on soil carbon

nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in the desert ecosystem.

关键词

Keywords

references

Zhang Y L, Chen L J, Chen X H, et al. Response of soil enzyme activity to long-term restoration of desertified land[J].Catena,2015,133:64-70.

Adamczyk B, Kilpeläinen P, Kitunen V, et al. Potential activities of enzymes involved in N, C, P and S cycling in boreal forest soil under different tree species[J].Pedobiologia,2014,57(2):97-102.

Liang Y C, Yang Y F, Yang C G, et al. Soil enzymatic activity and growth of rice and barley as influenced by organic manure in an anthropogenic soil[J].Geoderma,2003,115(1/2):149-160.

Miralles I, Domingo F, Cantón Y, et al. Hydrolase enzyme activities in a successional gradient of biological soil crusts in arid and semi-arid zones[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2012,53:124-132.

Dick R P, Burns R G. A brief history of soil enzymology research[J].Methods of Soil Enzymology,2011,9:1-34.

吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等. 土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2006.

Larsen K S, Jonasson S, Michelseni A. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles and their effects on biological processes in two arctic ecosystem types[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2002,21(3):187-195.

Guan Z Y, Zhao Y, Tong X L. Effect of Polyphenol of leaf litter on the leaf breakdown in a subtropical Stream[J].Ecological Science,2008,27(5):436-438.

高永.沙柳沙障[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.

荣文文.内蒙古大塔-何家塔铁路风沙路基综合防护体系[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(4):129-138.

Wang R D, Gao Y, Dang X H, et al. Microstructure and biodegradation of long-established

Salix psammophila

sand barriers on sand dunes[J].Environmental Technology and Innovation,2021,21:e101366.

Dai Y J, Dong Z, Li H L, et al. Effects of checkerboard barriers on the distribution of aeolian sandy soil particles and soil organic carbon[J].Geomorphology,2019,338:79-87.

张志伟,尹惠妍,周尧治,等.不同设置年限沙障对沙漠土壤理化性质的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(5):68-77.

龚萍.沙柳沙障腐蚀过程及防腐抗蚀效果研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012.

Yang X, Liang Y M, Gao Y, et al. Decay process characteristics and fungal community composition of

Salix psammophila

sand barriers in an arid area, northern China[J].Sustainability,2021,13(14):1-13.

王瑞东,党晓宏,高永,等.毛乌素沙地沙柳沙障破损规律与植被恢复的研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,39(3):71-77.

卢胜旭,许恩兰,吴东梅,等.米槠人工林土壤微生物群落组成对凋落物输入的响应[J].森林与环境学报,2020,40(1):16-23.

张艳,李勋,宋思梦,等.马尾松与乡土阔叶树种凋落叶混合分解过程中微生物生物量特征[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(4):681-690.

陆宇明,许恩兰,吴东梅,等.凋落物双倍添加和移除对米槠林土壤水解酶活性及其化学计量比的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):313-320.

Rajala T, Peltoniemi M, Pennanen T, et al. Fungal community dynamics in relation to substrate quality of decaying Norway spruce (

Piceaabies

Karst.) logs in boreal forests[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2012,81:494-505.

Kaiser C, Franklin O, Dieckmann U, et al. Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay[J].Ecology Letters,2014,17:680-690.

胡宗达,刘世荣,史作民,等.川滇高山栎林土壤氮素和微生物量碳氮随海拔变化的特征[J].林业科学研究,2012,25(3):261-268.

孔涛,刘紫薇,沈海鸥,等.辽西北沙地苹果-大豆间作对土壤养分和微生物量分布的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(2):340-351.

Kardol P, Cregger M A, Campany C E, et al. Soil ecosystem functioning under climate change:Plant species and community effects[J].Ecology,2010,91(3):767-781.

Sinsabaugh R L, Hill B H, Shah J J F. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment[J].Nature,2009,462(7274):795.

郭新送,张娟,巩有才,等.生草不同条件还田对桃园土壤微生物、酶活性及养分供应的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):307-312,320.

Yin R, Deng H, Wang H L, et al. Vegetation type affects soil enzyme activities and microbial functional diversity following revegetation of a severely eroded red soil in sub-tropical China[J].Catena,2014,115:96-103.

Razavi B S, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. Temperature selects for static soil enzyme systems to maintain high catalytic efficiency[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,97:15-22.

Bell T H, Klironomos J N, Henry H A L. Seasonal responses of extracellular enzyme activity and microbial biomass to warming and nitrogenaddition[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2010,74(3):820-828.

Stark S, Männistö M K, Eskelinen A. Nutrient availability and pH jointly constrain microbial extracellular enzyme activities in nutrient-poor tundrasoils[J].Plant and Soil,2014,383(1/2):373-385.

林雅超,高广磊,丁国栋,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤理化性质与微生物生物量的动态变化[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(5):1445-1454.

李旺霞,陈彦云,陈科元,等.不同降雨量对雨养农业区土壤酶活性和土壤微生物的影响[J].南方农业学报,2015,46(9):1579-1583.

浏览量

731

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同处理采伐剩余物对营造杉木幼林土壤胞外酶活性的影响

东北黑土区不同覆盖作物对土壤酶活性的影响及调控机制探究

滇中华山松林不同季节土壤微生物碳利用效率对氮沉降的响应

青藏高原典型高寒草地土壤化学性质和酶活性特征

闽江河口湿地不同生境土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征