生物炭与强还原处理对设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质的影响

闫代红; 吉春阳; 何云华; 马亚培; 马红亮; 高人; 尹云锋

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

生物炭与强还原处理对设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质的影响

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 生物炭与强还原处理对设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质的影响
- Effects of Biochar and Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Dissolved Organic Matter in Facility Vegetable Soils
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：283-291
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建师范大学湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地,福州,350007
  2. 福建师范大学地理科学学院,福州,350007
  3. 福清市现代农业发展中心, 福建福清,350300
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "闫代红(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤生态与环境研究。E-mail:dhyan0329@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  福建省自然科学基金项目（2021J01143）福建省公益类项目（2020R1002005）国家自然科学基金项目（31470628,31770659）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.036
  中图分类号： X53;S153.6
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
闫代红, 吉春阳, 何云华, 等. 生物炭与强还原处理对设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):283-291.

YAN Daihong, JI Chunyang, HE Yunhua, et al. Effects of Biochar and Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Dissolved Organic Matter in Facility Vegetable Soils[J]. 2022, 36(2): 283-291.
闫代红, 吉春阳, 何云华, 等. 生物炭与强还原处理对设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):283-291. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.036.

YAN Daihong, JI Chunyang, HE Yunhua, et al. Effects of Biochar and Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Dissolved Organic Matter in Facility Vegetable Soils[J]. 2022, 36(2): 283-291. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.036.

摘要

利用田间试验

探讨生物炭与强还原处理(RSD)对退化设施蔬菜土壤可溶性有机质(DOM)的影响。处理为对照(CK)、生物炭修复(BC)、淹水(SF)、淹水覆膜(SFF)、强还原修复(RSD)、RSD与生物炭联合修复(RSD+BC)

对比研究不同处理对0-20

20-40 cm土壤DOM含量及光谱特征的影响。结果表明:0-20 cm土层中

相比CK

其他处理土壤pH均显著增加

BC、SF、SFF和RSD处理的NO3--N含量分别降低31.9%

59.4%

40.0%和22.3%(P<0.05)。RSD处理可溶性有机氮(DON)含量显著提高;RSD和RSD+BC处理的可溶性有机碳(DOC)含量分别显著提高188.2%和201.4%(P<0.05)

DOC/DON比值增加

但使DOM芳香化程度和腐殖化程度降低

结构变得简单。土壤DOM组分以类富里酸和类腐殖酸物质为主

且RSD+BC处理的荧光强度达到最大。对于20-40 cm土层

各处理的荧光强度和DOC含量均显著降低

但相比CK

RSD和RSD+BC处理的DOC含量仍显著增加(P<0.05)

而BC和RSD+BC处理使得DON含量降低。综上

RSD+BC联合修复短期内可以减缓土壤酸化

提升土壤DOC含量

但降低土壤DOM芳香化和腐殖化程度。研究结果可为退化设施蔬菜地土壤修复和环境风险评价提供科学参考。

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) and biochar (BC) application on dissolved organic matter (DOM) in degraded vegetable soils. In this study

six treatments

i.e.

(1)soil untreated (CK)

(2) soil incorporated with 1% (w/w) biochar (BC)

(3) soil flooded (SF)

(4) soil flooded and covered with plastic film (SFF)

(5) soil incorporated with 1% (w/w) alfalfa residue

flooded and covered with plastic film (RSD)

and (6) soil incorporated with 1% (w/w) alfalfa residue and 1% (w/w) biochar

flooded and covered with plastic film (RSD+BC) were performed to compare the effects of different treatments on DOM content and its spectral characteristics in soil 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm of layers. The results showed that for 0-20 cm soil

compared with CK

soil pH value of other treatments was increased significantly

and NO3--N contents of BC

SFF

and RSD treatments were significantly decreased by 31.9%

59.4%

40.0%

and 22.3%

respectively. Soil dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) content was significantly increased by RSD treatment (P<0.05). The contents of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in RSD and RSD+BC treatments were significantly increased by 188.2% and 201.4% (P<0.05)

respectively

whereas the degree of DOM aromatization and humification was decreased under the two treatments. Soil DOM was mainly composed of fulvic acid-like and humic acid-like material

and the fluorescence intensity of DOM in RSD+BC treatment reached the maximum. For 20-40 cm soil

the fluorescence intensity and DOC contents of all treatments were decreased significantly compared with that of 0-20 cm soil. However

compared with CK

the DOC contents in RSD and RSD+BC treatments were still increased significantly (P<0.05)

while the DON contents in BC and RSD+BC treatments were decreased. These results implied that the combination of biochar and RSD could further alleviate soil acidification in the short period

improve soil DOC content

and reduce the degree of soil DOM aromatization and humification. This study provides scientific guidance for the remediation and environmental risk assessment of degraded facility vegetable soil.

关键词

Keywords

references

蔡祖聪.我国设施栽培养分管理中待解的科学和技术问题[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):36-43.

Li Y L, Wang B Y, Chang Y F, et al. Reductive soil disinfestation effectively alleviates the replant failure of Sanqi ginseng through allelochemical degradation and pathogen suppression[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2019,103(8):3581-3595.

蔡祖聪,张金波,黄新琦,等.强还原土壤灭菌防控作物土传病的应用研究[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):469-476.

Biederbeck V O, Janzen H H, Campbell C A, et al. Labile soil organic matter as influenced by cropping practices in an aridenvironment[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1994,26(12):1647-1656.

缪闯和,吕贻忠.黑土、潮土和红壤可溶性有机质的光谱特征及结构差异[J].土壤,2021,53(1):168-172.

Lehmann J, Rillig M C, Thies J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota:A review[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2011,43(9):1812-1836.

胡华英,殷丹阳,曹升,等.生物炭对杉木人工林土壤养分、酶活性及细菌性质的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(11):4138-4148.

王光飞,马艳,郭德杰,等.不同用量秸秆生物炭对辣椒疫病防控效果及土壤性状的影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(1):204-215.

吕伟静,陈冉,马志婷,等.生物炭及改性生物炭对平邑甜茶幼苗生长及土壤的影响[J].植物生理学报,2021,57(3):597-604.

Lei Z F, Li Q, Song X Z, et al. Biochar mitigates dissolved organic carbon loss but does not affect dissolved organic nitrogen leaching loss caused by nitrogen deposition in Moso bamboo plantations[J].Global Ecology and Conservation,2018,16:e00494.

程蕾,林开淼,周嘉聪,等.氮沉降对毛竹林土壤可溶性有机质数量与光谱学特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(5):1754-1762.

Smebye A, Alling V, Vogt R D, et al. Biochar amendment to soil changes dissolved organic matter content and composition[J].Chemosphere,2016,142(1):100-105.

吉春阳,何云华,马亚培,等.强还原处理和生物炭对设施蔬菜土壤DOM数量和光谱特征的影响[J].环境科学学报,2021,41(3):1066-1073.

Liu S S, Zhu Y R, Liu L Z, et al. Cation-induced coagulation of aquatic plant-derived dissolved organic matter:Investigation by EEM-PARAFAC and FT-IR spectroscopy[J].Environmental Pollution,2018,234:726-734.

马亚培,李宇轩,谢欢,等.氮沉降与生物炭对土壤可溶性有机质的影响[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(10):4514-4521.

Saadi I, Borisover M, Armon R, et al. Monitoring of effluent DOM biodegradation using fluorescence, UV and DOC measurements[J].Chemosphere,2006,63(3):530-539.

Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, et al. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter[J].Environmental Science andTechnology,2003,37:5701-5710.

Kalbitz K, Geyer W, Geyer S. Spectroscopic properties of dissolved humic substances-a reflection of land use history in a fen area[J].Biogeochemistry,1999,47(2):219-238.

Chen B L, Zhou D D, Zhu L Z. Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2008,42:5137-5143.

王军,施雨,李子媛,等.生物炭对退化设施蔬菜地土壤及其修复过程中N

O产排的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):713-723.

刘本娟,谢祖彬,刘琦,等.生物质炭引起的土壤碳激发效应与土壤理化特性的相关性[J].土壤,2021,53(2):343-353.

Budai A, Rasse D P, Lagomarsino A, et al. Biochar persistence,priming and microbial responses to pyrolysis temperature series[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2016,52(6):749-761.

Ye R Z, Horwath W R. Influence of rice straw on priming of soil C for dissolved organic C and CH

production[J].Plant and Soil,2017(1/2),417:231-241.

Zhu E X, Liu T, Zhou L, et al. Leaching of organic carbon from grassland soils under anaerobiosis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2020,141:e107684.

杨绒,严德翼,周建斌,等.黄土区不同类型土壤可溶性有机氮的含量及特性[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):1397-1403.

罗煜,赵小蓉,李贵桐,等.生物质炭对不同pH值土壤矿质氮含量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):166-173.

Zhu L X, Xiao Q, Shen Y F, et al. Effects of biochar and maize straw on the short-term carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a cultivated silty loam in China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24:1019-1029.

汤宏,沈健林,刘杰云,等.秸秆的不同组分对水稻土微生物量碳氮及可溶性有机碳氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):264-271.

芮绍云,袁颖红,周际海,等.改良剂对旱地红壤微生物量碳、氮及可溶性有机碳、氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):260-265.

陈安强,付斌,鲁耀,等.有机物料输入稻田提高土壤微生物碳氮及可溶性有机碳氮[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(21):160-167.

Ouyang L, Wang F, Tang J, et al. Effects of biochar amendment on soil aggregates and hydraulic properties[J].Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2013,13(4):991-1002.

高洁,江韬,李璐璐,等.三峡库区消落带土壤中溶解性有机质(DOM)吸收及荧光光谱特征[J].环境科学,2015,36(1):151-162.

余旭芳,周俊,任兰天,等.小麦秸秆堆肥水溶性有机物的结构和组成演变[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2021,41(4):1199-1204.

李彬彬,武兰芳,许艳艳,等.秸秆还田土壤溶解性有机碳的官能团特征及其与CO

排放的关系[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(12):2535-2543.

赵世翔,于小玲,李忠徽,等.不同温度制备的生物质炭对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响:对土壤腐殖物质组成及性质的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(2):769-782.

范春辉,张颖超,王家宏.pH值对秸秆腐殖化溶解性有机质紫外光谱和荧光光谱的影响[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2015,35(7):1933-1937.

Michel K, Matzner E, Dignac M F, et al. Properties of dissolved organic matter related to soil organic matter quality and nitrogen additions in Norway spruce forest floors[J].Geoderma,2006,130(3/4):250-264.

狄丽燕,孔范龙,王森,等.胶州湾滨海湿地凋落物分解对土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(22):8483-8493.

刘翥,杨玉盛,朱锦懋,等.中亚热带森林转换对土壤可溶性有机质数量与光谱学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6288-6297.

浏览量

730

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

生物炭-秸秆隔层协同改良对盐碱土壤水分入渗过程的影响

施用生物炭对果园土壤氮磷时空分布与流失阻控的影响

生物炭结合藓类植物对土壤稳定性的影响

生物炭配施硝化/脲酶抑制剂及秸秆覆盖对红壤茶园氮磷淋失影响

水炭运筹对黄河三角洲钠质盐土降盐效果