森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室, 北京林业大学林学院,北京,100083
[ "孟海(1991-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤学研究。E-mail:16603479962@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
孟海, 王海燕, 侯文宁, 等. 重庆笋溪河流域河岸带水体-土壤-植物的氮磷特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):275-282.
MENG Hai, WANG Haiyan, HOU Wenning, et al. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Water-Soil-Plant System in the Riparian Zone of the Sunxi River Watershed, Chongqing[J]. 2022, 36(2): 275-282.
孟海, 王海燕, 侯文宁, 等. 重庆笋溪河流域河岸带水体-土壤-植物的氮磷特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):275-282. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.035.
MENG Hai, WANG Haiyan, HOU Wenning, et al. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Water-Soil-Plant System in the Riparian Zone of the Sunxi River Watershed, Chongqing[J]. 2022, 36(2): 275-282. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.035.
为明晰重庆笋溪河流域河岸带水体、土壤和植物的氮磷特征及其影响因素
采用描述性统计、聚类分析、相关分析和冗余分析的方法
探讨三峡库尾小流域河岸带水体、土壤和植物的氮、磷含量特征、空间分布和各圈层氮磷的相关性及水体氮磷的影响因素。结果表明:(1)河岸带受河流区段影响
从上游到下游
水体氮磷与土壤全氮的含量先减小后增大
下游存在明显的农业氮输入
而土壤硝态氮、全磷和有效磷与植物氮磷的含量逐渐增加;(2)河岸带水体总氮与植物不同营养器官的氮含量均呈显著正相关(P<0.01)
水体总磷与土壤全磷和有效磷均呈显著正相关(P<0.001)
且土壤全磷、有效磷均与海拔呈显著负相关(P<0.001);(3)河岸带水体氮磷受土壤氮磷、植物氮磷和地形的影响
其中土壤氮磷为主导因子
且土壤20-40 cm有效磷、0-20 cm有效磷、20-40 cm全磷、0-20 cm全磷和0-20 cm硝态氮的置换检验均达到显著水平(P<0.05)
变异解释率依次为25.11%
21.71%
11.14%
8.13%和3.05%。河流区段对河岸带水体、土壤和植物中的氮磷含量有影响
从上游到下游
氮磷含量逐渐积聚
而差异性减小;河岸带水体、土壤和植物中的氮、磷彼此间存在一定的相关性
同时受海拔、坡度和坡向的影响。耕地是造成流域下游农业面源污染的主要原因
需加强中下游河岸带植物防护和堤岸土壤保持的能力及优化河岸带的土地利用结构
为三峡库区小流域农业面源污染控制提供依据。
In order to clarify the characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus and influencing factors in water-soil-plant system in the riparian zone of the Sunxi River watershed
Chongqing
the descriptive statistics
cluster analysis
correlation analysis and redundancy analysis were carried out to study the characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus content and spatial distribution in water
soil and plants in the riparian zone of the small watershed at the end of the Three Gorges Reservoir
as well as to study the correlation between nitrogen and phosphorus in each sphere and the factors influencing nitrogen and phosphorus in water. The results showed that:(1) The riparian zone was affected by the river section. From upstream to downstream
the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in water and soil total nitrogen decreased first and then increased
while the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in the plant
soil nitrate nitrogen
total and available phosphorus gradually increased. There existed an obvious agricultural nitrogen input in the downstream. (2) The total nitrogen content in water was significantly positively related to the nitrogen content in different vegetative organs of plant (P<0.01). Total phosphorus content in water was significantly positively related to soil total and available phosphorus content (P<0.001)
and both soil total and available phosphorus content were significantly negatively related to altitude (P<0.001). (3) The content of nitrogen and phosphorus in riparian water were affected by the content of soil nitrogen and phosphorus
plant nitrogen and phosphorus and topography
and among them
soil nitrogen and phosphorus were the dominant factors. The permutation test of available phosphorus at soil depth of 20-40 cm
available phosphorus at 0-20 cm
total phosphorus at 20-40 cm
total phosphorus at 0-20 cm and nitrate nitrogen at 0-20 cm were all significant (P<0.05)
with the variation interpretation rate of 25.11%
21.71%
11.14%
8.13% and 3.05%
respectively. The river section had an impact on the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water
soil and plants in the riparian zone. From upstream to downstream
nitrogen and phosphorus gradually accumulated
but the difference decreased. Nitrogen and phosphorus in water
soil and plants had a certain correlation with each other
and were also affected by altitude
slope and aspect. Cultivated land was the main cause of agricultural non-point source pollution in the lower reaches of the river basin. It was necessary to strengthen the ability of plant protection and soil conservation in the middle and lower reaches
and to optimize the land use pattern in the riparian zone
so as to provide a basis for agricultural non-point source pollution control in small watersheds in the Three Gorges Reservoir area.
韩路,王海珍,于军.河岸带生态学研究进展与展望[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(5):879-886.
Zhang Z Y, Wan C Y, Zheng Z W, et al. Plant community characteristics and their responses to environmental factors in the water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir in China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2013,20(10):7080-7091.
虞慧怡,扈豪,曾贤刚.我国农业面源污染的时空分异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(9):1-6.
胡静锋.重庆市农业面源污染测算与空间特征解析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(1):135-144.
Cottingham K L, Ewing H A, Greer M L, et al. Cyanobacteria as biological drivers of lake nitrogen and phosphorus cycling[J].Ecosphere,2015,6(1):1-19.
高可伟,朱元荣,孙福红,等.我国典型湖泊及其入湖河流氮磷水质协同控制探讨[J].湖泊科学,2021,33(5):1400-1414.
Cai L H, Deng H Y, Wei H X, et al. Research framework and key issues for non-point source pollution in agriculture induced by water-loss and soil-erosion[J].Advanced Materials Research,2013,2480:3855-3866.
金晓丹,吴昊,陈志明,等.长江河口水库沉积物磷形态、吸附和释放特性[J].环境科学,2015,36(2):448-456.
李子,张艳芳.基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):178-185.
Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Abinod S, et al. Estimation of soil erosion risk within a small mountainous sub-watershed in Kerala, India, using Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and geo-information technology[J].Geoscience Frontiers,2012,3(2):209-215.
陈雅如,肖文发.三峡库区土地利用与生态环境变化研究进展[J].生态科学,2017,36(6):213-221.
郑永林,王海燕,王一格,等.三峡库区笋溪河流域面源污染及其与土壤可蚀性
k
值的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(1):208-213.
李明龙,贾梦丹,孙天成,等.三峡库区非点源污染氮磷负荷时空变化及其来源解析[J].环境科学,2021,42(4):1839-1846.
李乐,刘常富.三峡库区面源污染研究进展[J].生态科学,2020,39(2):215-226.
陈影,陈苏,马鸿岳,等.河流河岸带自然生境恢复评价研究进展[J].生态科学,2021,40(4):223-228.
中华人民共和国生态环境部.HJ 2.3-2018环境影响评价技术导则地表水环境[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021:1-50.
中华人民共和国生态环境部.HJ 964-2018环境影响评价技术导则土壤环境(试行)[S].北京:中国科学出版社,2021:1-21.
中华人民共和国生态环境部.HJ 710.1-2014生物多样性观测技术导则陆生维管植物[S].北京:中国科学出版社,2021:1-25.
中华人民共和国生态环境部.GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021:1-3.
吴鹏,崔迎春,赵文君,等.喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(3):80-92.
龚小杰,王晓锋,刘婷婷,等.流域场镇发展下三峡水库典型入库河流水体碳、氮、磷时空特征及富营养化评价[J].湖泊科学,2020,32(1):111-123.
Zhu B, Wang Z H, Wang T, et al. Non-point-source nitrogen and phosphorus loadings from a small watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2012,9(1):10-15.
王宏,徐娅玲,张奇,等.沱江流域典型农业小流域氮和磷排放特征[J].环境科学,2020,41(10):4547-4554.
李家科,彭凯,郝改瑞,等.黄河流域非点源污染负荷定量化与控制研究进展[J].水资源保护,2021,37(1):90-102.
李锐,牛江波,杨超,等.长江上游江津段河岸带对陆源氮磷的拦截作用研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(10):11-19.
Qu H Y, Jia G M, Liu X, et al. Soil extracellular enzymatic stoichiometry along a hydrologic gradient of hillslope riparian zone off Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2019,83(5):1575-1584.
刘雄,向玲,赵丹蕊,等.不同海拔金佛山方竹叶片氮磷化学计量特征及影响因素[J/OL].应用与环境生物学报:1-11.https://doi.org/10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2021.02054.
蔡雅梅,冯民权.汾河河岸带土壤氮、磷的时空分布规律及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):222-229,236.
徐兵兵,卢峰,黄清辉,等.东苕溪水体氮、磷形态分析及其空间差异性[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(4):1181-1188.
于贵瑞,高扬,王秋凤,等.陆地生态系统碳氮水循环的关键耦合过程及其生物调控机制探讨[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(1):1-13.
周强,姜允斌,郝记华,等.磷的生物地球化学循环研究进展[J].高校地质学报,2021,27(2):183-199.
钱进,沈蒙蒙,王沛芳,等.河岸带土壤磷素空间分布及其对水文过程响应[J].水科学进展,2017,28(1):41-48.
王丽,王力,王全九.不同坡度坡耕地土壤氮磷的流失与迁移过程[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):69-75.
李文政,刘目兴,易军,等.三峡山地不同坡位土壤的水分特征曲线及水力学性质[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):135-142.
叶宏萌,杨浩,袁旭音,等.基于流域沉积物氮磷形态的生态风险评价:以沙溪流域为例[J].环境化学,2020,39(12):3471-3479.
Chen Z T, Arif M, Wang C Y, et al. Effects of hydrological regime on foliar decomposition and nutrient release in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:e661865.
0
浏览量
677
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621