祁连山中部青海云杉年内径向生长季节变化及其对环境因子的响应

石建周; 刘贤德; 田青; 万艳芳; 赵维俊

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

祁连山中部青海云杉年内径向生长季节变化及其对环境因子的响应

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 祁连山中部青海云杉年内径向生长季节变化及其对环境因子的响应
- Seasonal Variation of Annual Radial Growth of
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：261-267
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 甘肃农业大学林学院,兰州,730070
  2. 甘肃省祁连山水源涵养林研究院,甘肃,张掖,734000
  3. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京,100091
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "石建周(1993-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事森林生态水文研究。E-mail:shijianzhou5131118@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（32060247）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.033
  中图分类号： P942;S791.18
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
石建周, 刘贤德, 田青, 等. 祁连山中部青海云杉年内径向生长季节变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):261-267.

SHI Jianzhou, LIU Xiande, TIAN Qing, et al. Seasonal Variation of Annual Radial Growth of[J]. 2022, 36(2): 261-267.
石建周, 刘贤德, 田青, 等. 祁连山中部青海云杉年内径向生长季节变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):261-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.033.

SHI Jianzhou, LIU Xiande, TIAN Qing, et al. Seasonal Variation of Annual Radial Growth of[J]. 2022, 36(2): 261-267. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.033.

摘要

以祁连山中段排露沟小流域青海云杉为研究对象

2018年5-10月应用带状树木径向生长记录仪对4株青海云杉径向生长过程进行测定

并同步测定气象因子和土壤温度、湿度

分析单株青海云杉径向生长的季节变化特征及其树木个体之间的差异

确定青海云杉在不同生长阶段的限制因子。结果表明:(1)4株青海云杉6月8日左右开始生长

7月28日左右结束生长

生长期约51天。(2)青海云杉径向生长季节变化特征在个体之间存在差异

胸径较小的树木(DBH=10.0 cm和11.0 cm)

生长启动晚

结束早

生长期短

年累积生长量少

而胸径较大的树木(DBH=18.3 cm和21.0 cm)正好相反

生长期长

年累积生长量多。(3)青海云杉径向生长具有明显的季节变化模式

分为3个阶段

分别为启动生长阶段(5-6月初)、快速生长阶段(6月初至7月末)和结束生长阶段(8-10月)

平均生长速率分别为0.35

12.99

0.54 μm/d。(4)青海云杉在不同的生长阶段限制因子不同

其中

启动生长阶段

降雨和土壤温度是限制生长的主要因子;快速生长阶段

降雨和土壤体积含水量是主要因子。因此

从整个生长季来看

土壤温度和水分是影响青海云杉年内径向生长的主要因子。

Abstract

Took Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) in the small watershed of Pailugou in the central Qilian Mountains as the research object. From May to October 2018

the radial growth process of four strains of Qinghai spruce was measured using the belt tree radial growth recorder

and the meteorological factors were simultaneously measured. Based on the soil temperature and humidity

the seasonal variation characteristics of the radial growth of individual Qinghai spruce and the differences between trees were analyzed

and the limiting factors of Qinghai spruce in different growth stages were also determined. The results showed that:(1) The four Qinghai spruce plants began to grow on June 8 and ended on July 28

with a growth period of about 51 days. (2) The characteristics of the radial growth season of Qinghai spruce were different among individuals. The growth of trees with smaller DBH (DBH=10.0 cm and 11.0 cm) started later and ended earlier

resulting in the shorter growing period and less annual cumulative growth

while trees with larger DBH (DBH=18.3 cm and 21.0 cm) gave an opposite results

with a longer growing period and more annual cumulative growth. (3) The radial growth of Qinghai spruce had an obvious seasonal change pattern

which was divided into three stages:the initial growth stage (May to early June)

the rapid growth stage (early June to late July) and the end growth stage (August to October) with the average growth rates of 0.35 μm/d

12.99 μm/d and 0.54 μm/d respectively. (4) The limiting factors of Qinghai spruce growth were different among different growth stages:in the initial growth stage

rainfall and soil temperature were the main factors restricting growth

and during the rapid growth stage

rainfall and soil volumetric water content were the main factors. Therefore

from the perspective of the entire growing season

soil temperature and moisture were the main factors affecting the annual radial growth of Qinghai spruce.

关键词

Keywords

references

Peng C H, Ma Z H, Lei X D, et al. A drought-induced pervasive increase in tree mortality across Canada's boreal forests[J].Nature Climate Change,2011,1(9):467-471.

Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models[J].Nature Climate Change,2013,3(2):52-58.

Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T, Rossi S, et al. Using simple causal modeling to understand how water and temperature affect daily stem radial variation in trees[J].Tree Physiology,2007,27(8):1125-1136.

Boisvenue C, Running S W. Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity-evidence since the middle of the 20th century[J].Global Change Biology,2010,12(5):862-882.

苑丹阳,赵慧颖,李宗善,等.伊春地区红松和红皮云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1150-1160.

康剑,蒋少伟,黄建国.阿尔泰山萨彦岭4种优势树种径向生长对气候因子的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(17):6135-6146.

温晓示,陈彬杭,张树斌,等.不同林龄、树种落叶松人工林径向生长与气候变化的关系[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(1):27-36.

张贇,尹定财,张卫国,等.普达措国家公园2个针叶树种径向生长对温度和降水的响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(15):5383-5392.

韩艳刚,周旺明,齐麟,等.长白山树木径向生长对气候因子的响应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(5):1513-1520.

Zhang Y, Bergeron Y, Gao L S, et al. Tree growth and regeneration dynamics at a mountain ecotone on Changbai Mountains, Northeastern China:Which factors control species distributions?[J]Ecoscience,2014,21(3/4):387-404.

董满宇,江源,杨浩春,等.芦芽山林线白杄生长季径向生长动态[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(9):956-964.

Kocher P, Horna V, Leuschner C. Environmental control of daily stem growth patterns in five temperate broad-leaved tree species[J].Tree Physiology,2012,32(8):1021-1032.

牛豪阁,张芬,于爱灵,等.祁连山东部青杄年内径向生长动态对气候的响应[J].生态学报,2018,38(20):7412-7420.

Liu Z B, Wang Y H, Tian A, et al. Intra-annual variation of stem radius of

Larix principis-rupprechtii

and its response to environmental factors in Liupan Mountains of Northwest China[J/OL].Forests,2017,8(10):e382.

王金叶,王艺林,金博文,等.干旱半干旱区山地森林的水分调节功能[J].林业科学,2001,37(5):120-125.

拓锋,刘贤德,黄冬柳,等.祁连山大野口流域青海云杉种群数量动态[J].生态学报,2021,41(17):6871-6882.

车宗玺,刘贤德,敬文茂,等.祁连山林区苔藓垂直分布特征与水文功能分析[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6):71-74.

王彬,于澎涛,于艺鹏,等.祁连山不同年龄青海云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应[J].林业科学,2021,57(3):1-8.

王延芳,张永香,勾晓华,等.祁连山中部低海拔地区青海云杉径向生长的气候响应机制[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):161-169.

李晓青,刘贤德,王立,等.祁连山青海云杉直径结构及其对径向生长的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(5):1117-1123.

Wan Y F, Yu P T, Li X Q, et al. Seasonal pattern of stem diameter growth of

Picea crassifolia

in the Qilian Mountains, Northwestern China[J].Forests,2020,11(5):e494.

芦倩,李毅,刘贤德,等.祁连山排露沟流域土壤有机碳空间变异性研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):238-243.

冯芳,冯起,刘贤德,等.祁连山排露沟流域降水δ

O和δD特征及水汽来源[J].中国沙漠,2017,37(5):997-1005.

李兴欢,刘瑞鹏,毛子军,等.小兴安岭红松日径向变化及其对气象因子的响应[J].生态学报,2014,34(7):1635-1644.

季倩雯,郑成洋,张磊,等.河北塞罕坝樟子松径向生长动态变化及其与气象因子的关系[J].植物生态学报,2020,44(3):257-265.

Ma J, Guo J B, Wang Y H, et al. Variations in stem radii of

Larix principis-rupprechtii

to environmental factors at two slope locations in the Liupan Mountains, Northwest China[J].Journal of Forestry Research,2021,32(2):513-527.

Deslauriers A, Rossi S, Anfodillo T. Dendrometer and intra-annual tree growth:What kind of information can be inferred?[J].Dendrochronologia,2008,25(2):113-124.

Tian Q Y, He Z B, Xiao S C, et al. Response of stem radial growth of Qinghai spruce (

Picea crassifolia

) to environmental factors in the Qilian Mountains of China[J].Dendrochronologia,2017,44:76-83.

王梅,达光文,王英成,等.祁连山青海云杉天然林林分径级结构空间分布格局分析[J].林业资源管理,2013(6):127-132,147.

肖生春,肖洪浪,司建华,等.胡杨径向生长日变化特征分析[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(4):816-822.

Silva R P D, Santos J D, Tribuzy E S, et al. Diameter increment and growth patterns for individual tree growing in Central Amazon, Brazil[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2002,166(1/3):295-301.

管伟,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松树干直径生长变化及其对环境因子的响应[J].林业科学,2007,43(9):1-6.

谭红朝,李秧秧.树干直径变化与其水分传输和贮存关系研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(6):51-55.

Korner C. A re-assessment of high elevation treeline positions and their explanation[J].Oecologia,1998,115(4):445-459.

Zweifel R, Zimmermann L, Newbery Z D M. Intra-annual radial growth and water relations of trees:Implications towards a growth mechanism[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2006,57(6):1445-1459.

Wang B, Chen T, Xu G B, et al. Alpine timberline population dynamics under climate change:A comparison between Qilian juniper and Qinghai spruce tree species in the middle Qilian Mountains of northeast Tibetan Plateau[J].Boreas,2016,45(3):411-422.

浏览量

852

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同退化程度刺槐人工林树干液流对环境因子的响应

四川栗子坪自然保护区不同海拔土壤氮组分垂直特征及季节动态

环境因子及沉水植物对底泥磷释放的影响研究

茂兰喀斯特森林亚优势种短萼海桐树干液流特征及其环境因子响应