荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应

陈林; 宋乃平; 杨新国; 李学斌

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应
- Responses of Soil Moisture to Precipitation Under Three Typical Land-Use Patterns in Desert Steppe
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：153-160
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,银川,750021
  2. 宁夏大学西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室培育基地,银川,750021
  3. 宁夏大学生态环境学院,银川,750021
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈林(1983-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事修复生态学研究。E-mail:chenlin198388@163.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0500709）国家自然科学基金项目（31960359）宁夏自然科学基金项目（2020AAC03105）宁夏重点研发计划项目（2021BEG02005）第三批宁夏青年科技人才托举工程项目（TJGC2018068）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.020
  中图分类号： S152.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈林, 宋乃平, 杨新国, 等. 荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):153-160.

CHEN Lin, SONG Naiping, YANG Xingguo, et al. Responses of Soil Moisture to Precipitation Under Three Typical Land-Use Patterns in Desert Steppe[J]. 2022, 36(2): 153-160.
陈林, 宋乃平, 杨新国, 等. 荒漠草原不同土地利用类型土壤水分对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):153-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.020.

CHEN Lin, SONG Naiping, YANG Xingguo, et al. Responses of Soil Moisture to Precipitation Under Three Typical Land-Use Patterns in Desert Steppe[J]. 2022, 36(2): 153-160. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.020.

摘要

降水是荒漠草原生态系统重要的水分来源

也是不同时空尺度上各种生物过程的重要驱动因子。为了解荒漠草原土壤水分对降水的响应

以3种典型土地利用方式(天然草地、灌木地和沙地)为研究对象

研究荒漠草原降水事件对不同土地利用类型土壤水分的影响。结果表明:研究期内降水量以<5 mm的小降水事件为主

发生次数占总事件的72%;从降水强度来看

<10 mm/h的降水事件居多

达到86%。0~250 cm的平均土壤含水量以沙地最高

灌木林和天然草地的平均土壤含水量几乎相等

但天然草地平均土壤含水量的波动较大。3种土地利用类型下

表层(<10 cm)土壤含水量波动较大

深层(>80 cm)土壤含水量则相对稳定。与草地和灌木地相比

沙地湿润锋响应最快

入渗深度最大。在102.6 mm的降水量条件下

天然草地累计入渗量最大(7.36 mm)

其次为沙地(3.47 mm)

灌木林地入渗量最低(2.64 mm)。因此

从最大蓄存和有效利用降水资源的角度来看

荒漠草原生态恢复过程中构建草地是该区域可以选择的土地利用方式。

Abstract

Precipitation is an important source of water in desert steppe ecosystem

and is also an important driving factor of various biological processes on different spatial and temporal scales. In order to understand the response of desert steppe soil moisture to precipitation

this study took three typical land use patterns (natural grassland

shrub land and sandy land) in desert steppe as research objects to study the effect of precipitation events on soil moisture under different land use types. The results showed that precipitation in the study period was mainly small precipitation events less than 5 mm

accounting for 72% of the total. Judging from the precipitation rate

precipitation events less than 10 mm/h were the majority

reaching 86%. The average soil water content of 0~250 cm was highest in sandy land. The average soil water contents of shrub forest and natural grassland were almost equal

but the average soil water content of natural grassland fluctuated greatly. Under the three types of land use

the soil water content fluctuated greatly in the surface layer (<10 cm)

while it was relatively stable in the deep (>80 cm). Compared with grassland and shrub land

the wet front of sand had the fastest response and the largest infiltration depth. Under the rainfall of 102.6 mm

the cumulative infiltration amount of natural grassland was the largest (7.36 mm)

followed by sand (3.47 mm)

and shrub land (2.64 mm). Therefore

from the point of view of maximum storage and effective utilization of precipitation resources

natural grassland should be a land use type worthy of selection during the ecological restoration and reconstruction of desert steppe.

关键词

Keywords

references

Rötzer K, Montzka C, Bogena H, et al. Catchment scale validation of SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture products using hydrological modeling and temporal stability analysis[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,519:934-946.

Zhang X, Zhao W W, Liu Y X, et al. The relationships between grasslands and soil moisture on the Loess Plateau of China:A review[J].Catena,2016,145:56-67.

Feng H H, Liu Y B. Combined effects of precipitation and air temperature on soil moisture in different land covers in a humid basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,531:1129-1140.

Zhang Y W, Shangguan Z P. The change of soil water storage in three land use types after 10 years on the Loess Plateau[J].Catena,2016,147:87-95.

杨磊,张涵丹,陈利顶.黄土宽梁缓坡丘陵区次降雨对土壤水分补给效率与阈值研究[J].中国科学:地球科学,2018,48(4):457-466.

张浩,王新平,张亚峰,等.干旱荒漠区不同生活型植物生长对降雨量变化的响应[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(7):1847-1853.

Zhou J, Fu B J, Gao G Y, et al. Temporal stability of surface soil moisture of different vegetation types in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Catena,2015,128(4):1-15.

邱扬,傅伯杰,王军,等.黄土丘陵小流域土壤水分时空分异与环境关系的数量分析[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):741-747.

Wang Y Q, Hu W, Zhu Y J, et al. Vertical distribution and temporal stability of soil water in 21-m profiles under different land uses on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,527:543-554.

Wang X P, Cui Y, Pan Y X, et al. Effects of rainfall characteristics on infiltration and redistribution patterns in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008,358(1/2):134-143.

Li Q, Zhu Q, Zheng J S, et al. Soil moisture response to rainfall in forestland and vegetable plot in Taihu Lake Basin, China[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2015,25(4):426-437.

Noborio K, Mclnnes K J, Heilman J L. Measurements of cumulative infiltration and wetting front location by time domain reflectometry[J].Soil Science,1996,161(8):480-483.

Wang X P, Wang Z N, Berndtsson R, et al. Desert shrub stemflow and its significance in soil moisture replenishment[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2011,15(2):561-567.

Speak A F, Rothwell J J, Lindley S J, et al. Rainwater r unoff retention on an aged intensive green roof[J].Science of the Total Environment,2013,461/462(7):28-38.

Nawaz R, Mcdonald A, Postoyko S. Hydrological performance of a full-scale extensive green roof located in a temperate climate[J].Ecological Engineering,2015,82:66-80.

Zhang S, Guo Y. Analytical probabilistic model for evaluating the hydrologic performance of green roofs[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2013,18(1):19-28.

李晋波,姚楠,赵英,等.不同放牧条件下锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分分布特征及降水入渗估算[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(10):61-70.

杨建振.陕北毛乌素沙地生物结皮的土壤水分效应及其人工培育技术初探[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.

杨永梅.毛乌素沙地沙漠化驱动因素的研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.

Kim D G, Park S J. Distribution of average rainfall event-depth for overflow risk-based design of detention storage basin (in Korean with English abstract)[J].Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater,2008,22(1):15-22.

Dominguez-Romero L, Ayuso Munoz J L, Garcia Marin A P. Annual distribution of rainfall erosivity in western Andalusia, southern Spain[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,62(6):390-403.

Ahn J, Cho W, Kim T, et al. Flood frequency analysis for the annual peak flows simulated by an event-based rainfall-runoff model in an urban drainage basin[J].Water,2014,6(12):3841-3863.

Huxman T, Snyder K, Tissue D, et al. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems[J].Oecologia,2004,141(2):254-268.

Schwinning S, Sala O E. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems[J].Oecologia,2004,141(2):211-220.

吕刚,傅昕阳,李叶鑫,等.海州露天煤矿排土场复垦区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2017,31(3):123-128.

Li Y, Cai T J, Man X L, et al. Canopy interception loss in a

Pinus sylvestris

var.

mongolica

forest of Northeast China[J].Journal of Arid Land,2015,7(6):831-840.

浏览量

793

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

荒漠草原不同覆被类型土壤水分动态及其对降水的响应

基于电阻层析成像技术的黄土区多土地利用类型土壤水分反演

暴雨强度与过程对渭北旱塬塬边土壤水分亏缺的调控机制

丛枝菌根真菌接种对喀斯特石漠化人工林土壤特性的影响

雷达探测分析广西丘陵坡耕地整地措施对土壤水分的影响