干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律

王佳妮; 张晓明; 丁树文; 王云琦; 段晓阳; 杨清杰

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律
- Crack Evolution and Shrinkage Deformation Rules of Benggang Soil Under Dry-Wet Cycles
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：114-121
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 华中农业大学资源与环境学院,武汉,430070
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "王佳妮(1997-),女,山西运城人,博士研究生,主要从事崩岗土体稳定性研究。E-mail:798603101@qq.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（41771307,41201271）长江科学院开放研究基金项目（CKWV2017522/KY）2020年湖北省大学生创新创业训练项目（S202010504045）华中农业大学2021年大学生科技创新基金项目（2021096）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.015
  中图分类号： TU443
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王佳妮, 张晓明, 丁树文, 等. 干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):114-121.

WANG Jiani, ZHANG Xiaoming, DING Shuwen, et al. Crack Evolution and Shrinkage Deformation Rules of Benggang Soil Under Dry-Wet Cycles[J]. 2022, 36(2): 114-121.
王佳妮, 张晓明, 丁树文, 等. 干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):114-121. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.015.

WANG Jiani, ZHANG Xiaoming, DING Shuwen, et al. Crack Evolution and Shrinkage Deformation Rules of Benggang Soil Under Dry-Wet Cycles[J]. 2022, 36(2): 114-121. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.015.

摘要

为提高崩岗土体稳定性

抑制崩壁崩塌。试验共设计6次干湿循环

利用工业相机对脱湿过程中崩岗4层土进行定时定点拍照并结合数字图像处理技术

研究干湿效应下崩岗土体的裂隙演化及收缩变形规律。结果表明:(1)脱湿过程中土体形态变化顺序为轴向收缩、径向收缩和裂隙发育;(2)表面裂隙率与液限、塑性指数、黏粒含量呈显著正相关关系

4层土中表面裂隙率最大值为过渡层18.78%

最小值为砂土层5.41%

崩岗土体剖面上两者为相邻土层

较大差异性会严重破坏崩岗的稳定性;(3)随干湿循环的进行

径向收缩不再发生

轴向收缩、表面裂隙率、裂隙平均宽度逐渐减小

裂隙总长度、裂隙总条数、裂隙交点个数、被分割的土块个数先增加后减小

各参数均在第3次干湿循环后趋于稳定

4层土中过渡层受干湿循环影响最大

砂土层最小。研究结果可为在降雨-蒸发反复交替过程中崩岗发生机理研究提供科学依据。

Abstract

In order to improve the stability of Benggang soil

prevent Benggang wall collapse

an experiment was conducted to study the crack evolution rules and shrinkage deformation rules of Benggang soil under the effect of Dry-Wet (D-W) cycles. A total of six D-W cycles were designed for the experiment

in which the four layers of soil were photographed at a fixed time and fixed site by using industrial cameras during the dehumidification process and in combination of digital image processing technology. Results showed as follows:(1) In the process of dehumidification

the sequence of soil morphology changes was:axial shrinkage

radial shrinkage

and crack development. (2) There was an obvious positive correlation between shrinkage cracking degree and liquid limit

plastic index and clay content. The maximum value of shrinkage cracking degree in the four layers of soil was 18.78% for the transition layer

and the minimum value was 5.41% for the sandy layer. The two soil layers were adjacent to each other on the section of the Benggang

and their great difference caused the terrible influence on the stability of Benggang. (3) As the D-W cycles

the radial shrinkage phenomenon no longer occurred. The rate of axial shrinkage

the rate of surface cracks

and the average width of the cracks gradually decreased. The total length of the cracks

the total number of crack strips

the number of crack intersections

and the number of lumps initially increased

then decreased

all parameters stabilized after the 3rd D-W cycles. Among the four soil layers

the transition layer was the most affected by D-W cycles

and the sandy layer was the smallest. These results could provide a scientific basis for the study on the mechanism of Benggang occurrence during the rain-evaporation cycles.

关键词

Keywords

references

林金石,庄雅婷,黄炎和,等.不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):106-110.

冯舒悦,王军光,文慧,等.赣南崩岗侵蚀区不同部位土壤抗剪强度及影响因素研究[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):71-83.

詹振芝,黄炎和,蒋芳市,等.砾石含量及粒径对崩岗崩积体渗透特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):85-90,95.

汪和青,刘伟平.崩岗区岩土固结特性试验研究[J].南昌大学学报(工科版),2016,38(1):28-31,78.

冯延云,张晓明,丁树文,等.干湿循环作用下崩岗土体抗拉强度的衰减性分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):168-174.

冯延云,张晓明,朱丽丽,等.初始含水率对崩岗土体抗拉特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):41-49.

杨彩迪,牛玉华,张晓明,等.添加砾石对崩岗岩土无侧限抗压强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(24):118-124.

卫杰,张晓明,张鹤,等.干湿循环对崩岗不同层次土体无侧限抗压强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):107-111,118.

张晓明,丁树文,蔡崇法,等.干湿效应下崩岗岩土不均匀沉降变形规律与崩壁崩塌机制[J].岩土力学,2013,34(增刊2):299-305.

刘昌鑫,潘健,邓羽松,等.干湿循环作用对崩岗土体稳定性的研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):253-258.

魏玉杰,吴新亮,蔡崇法.崩岗体剖面土壤收缩特性的空间变异性[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(6):153-159.

范本贤,黄英,孙书君,等.云南红土的循环胀缩特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):120-127,133.

唐朝生,施斌,崔玉军.土体干缩裂隙的形成发育过程及机理[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(8):1415-1423.

易顺民,黎志恒,张延中.膨胀土裂隙结构的分形特征及意义[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(3):294-298.

Corte A, Higashi A. Experimental research on desiccation cracks in soil. Research Report[A]. U.S. Army Snow Ice and Permafrost Research Estabilishment[C]. Illinois,USA,1960.

王东伟,唐朝生,李胜杰,等.膨胀土干缩变形特性试验研究[J].高校地质学报,2019,25(5):756-765.

Albrecht B A, Benson C H. Effect of desiccation on compacted natural clays[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2001,1271:67-75.

Omidi G H, Thomas J C, Brown K M. Effect of desiccation cracking on the hydraulic conductivity of a compacted clay liner[J].Water, Soil and Soil Pollution,1996,89:91-103.

唐朝生,崔玉军,施斌,等.膨胀土收缩开裂过程及其温度效应[J].岩土工程学报,2012,34(12):2181-2187.

Rodriguez R, Sanchez M, Ledesma A, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of desiccation of a mining waste[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2007,44:644-658.

曾浩,唐朝生,刘昌黎,等.控制厚度条件下土体干缩开裂的界面摩擦效应[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(3):544-553.

袁权,谢锦宇,任柯.边界约束对膨胀土干缩开裂的影响[J].工程地质学报,2016,24(4):604-609.

Nahlawi H, Kodikara J K. Laboratory experiments on desiccation cracking of thin soil layer[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2006,24:1641-1664.

骆赵刚,汪时机,杨振北,等.膨胀土裂隙发育的厚度效应试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(10):1922-1930.

Prat P C, Ledesma A, Lakshmikantha M R. Size effect in the cracking of drying soil[A]. In Proceedings of the 16

European Conference of Fracture [C]. Springer,2006.

李文杰,张展羽,王策,等.干湿循环过程中壤质黏土干缩裂缝的开闭规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):126-132.

叶万军,万强,申艳军,等.干湿循环作用下膨胀土开裂和收缩特性试验研究[J].西安科技大学学报,2016,36(4):541-547.

张家俊,龚壁卫,胡波,等.干湿循环作用下膨胀土裂隙演化规律试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(9):2729-2734.

曹玲,王志俭,张振华.降雨-蒸发条件下膨胀土裂隙演化特征试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(2):413-421.

浏览量

815

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

控制厚度条件下崩岗土体的裂隙演化特征

麦壳添加对盐渍滩涂土壤水盐运移及干缩性状的影响

桂东南花岗岩红壤区典型崩岗剖面风化强度对理化特性的影响

集中水流下土石混合崩积体坡面侵蚀水动力特征试验研究

砾石含量及粒径对崩岗崩积体渗透特性的影响