1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京,100875
2. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京,100875
[ "邢书昆(1996-),男,山东聊城人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:201921051020@mail.bnu.edu.cn" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
邢书昆, 张光辉, 王滋贯, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区浅层滑坡和崩塌形态特征与发育临界地形[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):106-113.
XING Shukun, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Ziguan, et al. Morphological Characteristics and Critical Topography of Shallow Landslide and Collapse in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(2): 106-113.
邢书昆, 张光辉, 王滋贯, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区浅层滑坡和崩塌形态特征与发育临界地形[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):106-113. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.014.
XING Shukun, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Ziguan, et al. Morphological Characteristics and Critical Topography of Shallow Landslide and Collapse in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. 2022, 36(2): 106-113. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.014.
退耕还林(草)工程的深入实施有效遏制了黄土高原水土流失
但以浅层滑坡和崩塌为主的重力侵蚀在黄土高原广泛分布
且已成为小流域侵蚀泥沙主要来源之一。为探究黄土丘陵沟壑区浅层滑坡和崩塌的形态特征和发育临界地形
在陕西省安塞区纸坊沟小流域调查了53处浅层滑坡和40处崩塌
记录其植被特征
同时进行无人机摄影测量。结果表明:浅层滑坡的规模通常大于崩塌
且形态变化范围更大;浅层滑坡长度、宽度、周长和面积与沟壑密度呈显著负相关(P<0.01)
与距离沟道远近呈显著正相关(P<0.01)
崩塌的形态特征与沟壑密度和距离沟道远近的相关性较弱;浅层滑坡和崩塌均较为集中地分布在坡度和地形湿度指数适中(30°~55°和0.50~2.00)、径流流路比降和径流流路长度较小(60.0%~120.0%和0~15.00 m)的区域
而在坡度和径流流路比降较大(>55°和>120.0%)、地形湿度指数和径流流路长度较小(<0.50和<15.00 m)的区域
崩塌较为发育;反之
在坡度和径流流路比降较小(<30°和<120.0%)、地 形湿度指数和径流流路长度较大(>2.00和>15.00 m)的区域
浅层滑坡较为发育;灌木坡面浅层滑坡和崩塌主要发生的坡向范围是0~180°
草本坡面浅层滑坡主要发生的坡向范围是0~90°和270°~360°。研究结果对于理解浅层滑坡和崩塌的发生过程和临界地形条件、估算小流域产沙量和控制侵蚀具有重要意义。
The implementation of the "grain-for-green" project has effectively mitigated soil erosion of hill slope on the Loess Plateau. However
gravity erosion
including both shallow landslide and collapse
is widely distributed on the Loess Plateau and has become one of the dominant source of erosion sediment in small watershed. To explore the morphological characteristics and critical topography of shallow landslide and collapse in hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau
53 shallow landslides and 40 collapses were investigated in Zhifanggou small watershed in Ansai District
Shaanxi Province
and their vegetation characteristics were also recorded. Photogrammetry was performed by unmanaged aircraft vehicle. The results showed that the sizes of shallow landslide were usually larger than those of collapse. The variations in morphological characteristics of shallow landslide were greater than those of collapse. The length
width
perimeter and area of shallow landslide were negatively correlated with gully density (P<0.01)
and were positively correlated with the distance to gully system (P<0.01). Nevertheless
the correlations between the morphological characteristics of collapse
and gully density and distance were loose. Shallow landslide and collapse were concentrated on where the slope and topographic wetness index (30°~55° and 0.50~2.00) were moderate
flow path gradient and flow path length were small (60.0%~120.0% and 0~15.00 m). Nevertheless
in areas where the slope and flow path gradient were large (>55° and >120.0%)
and the topographic wetness index and flow path length were small (<0.50 and <15.00 m)
gravity erosion was dominated by collapse. On the contrary
in areas where the slope and flow path gradient were small (<30° and <120.0%)
and the topographic wetness index and flow path length were large (>2.00 and >15.00 m)
gravity erosion was dominated by shallow landslide. Shallow landslide and collapse widely occurred on slopes covered by shrub communities with the aspect of 0~180°. Shallow landslide was also distributed on slopes covered by herbs with the aspects of 0~90° and 270°~360°. The research results are helpful for understanding the occurrence process and critical topographic conditions of shallow landslide and collapse estimating sediment yield and controlling erosion in small watershed.
Li M Y, Ma C, Du C, et al. Landslide response to vegetation by example of July 25-26, 2013, extreme rainstorm, Tianshui, Gansu Province, China[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2020,80(1):751-764.
王新刚,刘凯,连宝琴,等.黄土-泥岩滑坡诱发因素及形成机理研究进展[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(3):404-413.
曹银真.黄土地区重力侵蚀的类型和成因[J].中国水土保持,1985(6):10-15,65.
黄玉华,武文英,冯卫,等.陕北延安"7.3暴雨"诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征[J].西北地质,2014,47(3):140-146.
同霄,彭建兵,朱兴华,等.降雨作用下黄土浅层滑坡的危险性分析[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):109-113.
Guo W Z, Luo L, Wang W L, et al. Sensitivity of rainstorm-triggered shallow mass movements on gully slopes to topographical factors on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Geomorphology,2019,337:69-78.
尚慧,倪万魁,杜光波,等.黄土滑坡形成机理分析:以宁夏彭阳县为例[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2011,22(2):26-33.
Qiu H J, Cui Y F, Hu S, et al. Size distribution and size of loess slides in response to slope height and slope gradient based on field survey data[J].Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk,2019,10(1):1443-1458.
Qiu H J, Cui P, Regmi A D, et al. Slope height and slope gradient controls on the loess slide size within different slip surfaces[J].Physical Geography,2017,38(4):303-317.
Ayalew L, Yamagishi H. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan[J].Geomorphology,2005,65:15-31.
殷昊,刘飞,杜立新,等.黄土高原区地形与植被分布规律对滑坡发生概率的影响[J].现代地质,2010,24(5):1016-1021.
Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Xiao P Q, et al. Gravity erosion on the steep loess slope:Behavior, trigger and sensitivity[J].Catena,2015,135:231-239.
Rengers F, McGuire L, Coe J A, et al. The influence of vegetation on debris-flow initiation during extreme rainfall in the northern Colorado Front Range[J].Geology,2016,44(10):823-826.
邢书昆,张光辉,朱平宗.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕年限对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):41-48,54.
Wang G L, Li T L, Xing X L, et al. Research on loess flow-slides induced by rainfall in July 2013 in Yan'an, NW China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,73(12):7933-7944.
Yildiz A, Graf F, Rickli C, et al. Determination of the shearing behaviour of root-permeated soils with a large-scale direct shear apparatus[J].Catena,2018,166:98-113.
曹银真.黄土地区重力侵蚀的机理及预报[J].水土保持通报,1981(4):19-23.
Li T L, Wang C Y, Li P. Loess Deposit and Loess Landslides on the Chinese Loess Plateau[M]//Wang F, Miyajima M, LI T, et al. Progress of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technology in Asia. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013:235-261.
杨寒月,张光辉,张宝军.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟坡典型植物群落生长特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):62-67.
Wang H, Zhang G H, Li N N. Variation in soil erodibility under five typical land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2019,174:24-35.
胡胜.黄土高原滑坡空间格局及其对地貌演化的影响[D].西安:西北大学,2019.
王洪明,杨勤科,姚志宏.小流域尺度土壤水分与地形湿度指数的相关性分析[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):110-113.
叶宗裕.关于多指标综合评价中指标正向化和无量纲化方法的选择[J].浙江统计,2003(4):25-26.
Florsheim J, Nichols A. Landslide area probability density function statistics to assesshistorical landslide magnitude and frequency in coastal California[J].Catena,2013,109(5):129-138.
邱海军,崔鹏,胡胜,等.陕北黄土高原不同地貌类型区黄土滑坡频率分布[J].地球科学,2016,41(2):343-350.
Zhang M, Liu J. Controlling factors of loess landslides in western China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2010,59:1671-1680.
Peruccacci S, Brunetti M T, Luciani S, et al. Lithological and seasonal control on rainfall thresholds for the possible initiation of landslides in central Italy[J].Geomorphology,2012,139:79-90.
Dai F, Lee F. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong[J].Geomorphology,2002,42(3/4):213-228.
Mcguire L, Rengers F, Kean J, et al. Elucidating the role of vegetation in the initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides:Insights from an extreme rainfall event in the Colorado Front Range[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2016,43:9084-9092.
毛佳睿,武雄.山西省黄土崩塌影响因素及时空分布特征[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(10):3799-3807.
0
浏览量
790
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621