植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性影响的分析

钟彩尹; 崔鹏; 朱帅润; 卿毅伟; 吴礼舟

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性影响的分析

更新时间：2024-11-07

- 植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性影响的分析
- Analysis of the Influence of Root Water Absorption on the Stability of Unsaturated Soils Slope
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第2期页码：99-105
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 成都理工大学环境与土木工程学院,成都,610059
  2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都,610054
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "钟彩尹(1999-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方向的学习和研究。E-mail:zhongcaiyin@stu.cdut.edu.cn" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金重大项目“大梯度环境下坡面岩土体物理力学性质与灾变条件空间格局”（41790432）
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.013
  中图分类号： TU411.7
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
钟彩尹, 崔鹏, 朱帅润, 等. 植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性影响的分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):99-105.

ZHONG Caiyin, CUI Peng, ZHU Shuairun, et al. Analysis of the Influence of Root Water Absorption on the Stability of Unsaturated Soils Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 99-105.
钟彩尹, 崔鹏, 朱帅润, 等. 植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性影响的分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):99-105. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.013.

ZHONG Caiyin, CUI Peng, ZHU Shuairun, et al. Analysis of the Influence of Root Water Absorption on the Stability of Unsaturated Soils Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 99-105. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.013.

摘要

为了量化植物根系吸水对非饱和土边坡稳定性的影响及为植被护坡的植物种类选择提供参考

采用COMSOL Multiphysics建立二维边坡

模拟不同根系形态、根长及降雨条件下的根系吸水引起的非饱和土边坡孔隙水压力的分布变化

并采用极限平衡理论对边坡稳定系数进行定量计算。结果表明:指数形根系吸水产生的吸力最大

比裸坡增大4.2倍

抛物线形根系吸水产生的吸力最小

但仍比裸坡增大2.7倍;根系越长吸水影响深度越大;根系越短

产生的吸力越大

且吸力在边坡表面的变化越显著;短期降雨后

含根系边坡吸力比裸坡高12~20 kPa;指数形根系对非饱和土边坡稳定性提高贡献最大

比裸坡提高1.54倍

抛物线形最小

但仍比裸坡稳定性提高1.36倍。根系吸水对非饱和土边坡的稳定性提高有积极作用

在采用植被护坡的方式时

应优先考虑指数形根系的植被。

Abstract

To quantify the influence of root water absorption on unsaturated soils slope stability and provide reference for plant species selection of vegetation slope protection

a two-dimensional slope was established by COMSOL Multiphysics. The distribution of pore-water pressure in unsaturated soils slope caused by root water absorption under different root morphology

root length and rainfall conditions was simulated

and the slope stability factor was quantitatively calculated using the limit equilibrium method. Results demonstrated that the suction generated by the exponential root uptake water is the largest

which is 4.2 times larger than that of the bare slope

and the suction generated by the parabolic root uptake water is the smallest

which is still 2.7 times larger than that of the bare slope. The longer the root was

the greater the influential depth of water uptake was. The shorter the root was

the greater the suction generated

and the more remarkable the change of suction on the slope surface. After short-term rainfall

the suction of root soil slope was still 12~20 kPa higher than that of bare slope. The exponential root system contributed more to the stability improvement of unsaturated soils slope

which was 1.54 times higher than that of bare slope. While the parabolic root system was the smallest

but it was still 1.36 times higher than that of bare slope. The root water absorption has a positive effect on the stability of the unsaturated soils slope. For vegetation slope protection

priority will be give to the vegetation with the exponential root.

关键词

Keywords

references

Switala B M, Wu W. Numerical modelling of rainfall-induced instability of vegetated slopes[J].Geotechnique,2018,68(6):481-491.

Mahannopkul K, Jotisankasa A. Influences of root concentration and suction on

Chrysopogon zizanioides

reinforcement of soil[J].Soils and Foundations,2019,59(2):500-516.

Zhang J, Li Y, Yang T Q, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of moisture in rooted-soil[J].Catena,2021,200(1):1-11.

Wang X H, Ma C, Wang Y Q, et al. Effect of root architecture on rainfall threshold for slope stability:Variabilities in saturated hydraulic conductivity and strength of root-soil composite[J].Landslides,2020,17(11):1-13.

Li Y P, Wang Y Q, Ma C, et al. Influence of the spatial layout of plant roots on slope stability[J].Ecological Engineering,2016,91(1):477-486.

张锋,凌贤长,吴李泉,等.植被须根护坡力学效应的三轴试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(增刊2):3979-3985.

嵇晓雷.基于植被根系分布形态的生态边坡稳定性研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2013.

吉喜斌,康尔泗,陈仁升,等.植物根系吸水模型研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(5):1079-1086.

Nyambayo V P, Potts D M. Numerical simulation of evapotranspiration using a root water uptake model[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2010,37(1/2):175-186.

Feddes R A, Kowalik P, Kolinska-Malinka K, et al. Simulation of field water uptake by plants using a soil water dependent root extraction function[J].Journal of Hydrology,1976,31(1/2):13-26.

Prasad R. A linear root water uptake model[J].Journal of Hydrology,1988,99(3/4):297-306.

Lynch J. Root architecture and plant productivity[J].Plant Physiology,1995,109(1):7-13.

Murielle G, Sidle R C, Alexia S. The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow:Implications for slope stability[J].Biological Science,2011,61(11):869-879.

Leung A K, Garg A, Coo J L, et al. Effects of the roots of

Cynodon dactylon

and

Schefflera heptaphylla

on water infiltration rate and soil hydraulic conductivity[J].Hydrological Processes,2015,29(15):3342-3354.

马瑶.植被护坡水文效应对边坡稳定性影响的研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2018.

朱景汕.降雨-蒸发环境下黄土边坡破坏机理试验研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2017.

Chui T F M, Freyberg D L. The use of COMSOL for integrated hydrological modeling[R].Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference. Boston, 2007:217-223.

张攀,徐永福,武孝天.植物根系吸水对边坡稳定性的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(8):120-125,136.

Genuchten V T M. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1980,44(5):892-898.

Charles W W, Zhang Q, Ni J J, et al. A new three-dimensional theoretical model for analysing the stability of vegetated slopes with different root architectures and planting patterns[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2021,130(1):1-11.

Fredlund D G, Morgenstern N R, Widger R A. The shear strength of unsaturated soils[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1978,15(3):313-321.

吴宏伟.大气-植被-土体相互作用:理论与机理[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(1):1-47.

浏览量

820

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

持续降雨条件下黄土边坡稳定性试验研究

重庆市典型工程堆积体边坡物理力学变化及稳定性特征

基于HYDRUS模型渠道渗漏模拟及影响因素分析