1. 山东农业大学林学院, 泰山森林生态系统定位研究站,山东,泰安,271018
2. 水利部牧区水利科学研究所,呼和浩特,010020
[ "耿林昇(1996-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土流失过程与机制研究。E-mail:stbcgls@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
耿林昇, 李红丽, 董智, 等. 放牧对希拉穆仁草原土壤入渗过程影响的定量评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):70-77.
GENG Linsheng, LI Hongli, DONG Zhi, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Grazing on Soil Infiltration Process in Xilamuren Grassland[J]. 2022, 36(2): 70-77.
耿林昇, 李红丽, 董智, 等. 放牧对希拉穆仁草原土壤入渗过程影响的定量评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):70-77. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.009.
GENG Linsheng, LI Hongli, DONG Zhi, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Grazing on Soil Infiltration Process in Xilamuren Grassland[J]. 2022, 36(2): 70-77. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.009.
为定量评估放牧对草原土壤入渗的影响
了解和防治放牧造成的水土流失
科学评估草原水文调节功能
采用双环入渗法研究了放牧对典型草原土壤入渗性能的影响
并收集影响土壤入渗的环境特征变量。结果表明:(1)土壤入渗能力均受到放牧活动的干扰
随着放牧强度的增加
土壤初渗速率、稳渗速率减小
达到稳渗时的历时缩短
而轻度放牧对土壤入渗性能却具有增强作用
LG的初渗速率(5.12 mm/min)、稳渗速率(1.93 mm/min)、2 h累积入渗量(213.42 mm)均较好
快速入渗至稳渗阶段历时延长。(2)不同放牧强度下
放牧强度与土壤初渗速率、稳渗速率、累积入渗量呈显著负相关关系
相关系数分别为-0.646
-0.770
-0.531。植被盖度、砂粒体积百分数、孔隙度均与土壤入渗速率呈正相关关系
而土壤容重则相反。土壤容重、总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度对土壤入渗速率的影响最为显著。适度放牧(LG
1.5羊/(hm2·月))会改善土壤特征参数及植被生长情况
提高土壤的入渗性能。(3)通过土壤入渗模型分析
Horton模型对土壤入渗速率及土壤累积入渗的拟合效果均表现为最好。研究结果可为放牧条件下典型草原的土壤入渗及水文调节功能的定量评估提供参考。
In order to quantitatively evaluate the impact of grazing on the process of grassland soil infiltration
understand and prevent soil erosion by grazing and scientifically evaluate the hydrological regulation function of grassland
this study took Xilamuren grassland as the main research object and used the double-loop infiltration method to study the effects of grazing on soil infiltration performance of typical grassland and collected the environmental characteristic variables affecting soil infiltration. The results showed that:(1) The soil infiltration capacity was disturbed by grazing activities. With the increasing of grazing intensity
the initial soil infiltration rate and steady infiltration rate decreased
and the time to reach steady infiltration shortened. However
light grazing (LG) enhanced the infiltration performance of the soil. The initial infiltration rate (5.12 mm/min)
steady infiltration rate (1.93 mm/min) and cumulative infiltration capacity (213.42 mm) for 2 hours were all good under the LG condition. The duration from the rapid infiltration stage to the stable infiltration stage of LG was prolonged. (2) Under different grazing intensities
there was a significant negative correlation between grazing intensity and soil initial infiltration rate
steady infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration amount
and the correlation coefficients were -0.646
-0.770 and -0.531
respectively. Vegetation coverage
sand volume percentage and porosity were all positively related to soil infiltration rate
while soil bulk density was the opposite. Soil bulk density
total porosity and capillary porosity had the most significant effect on soil infiltration rate. Appropriate grazing (LG
1.5 sheep/(hm2·month)) improved soil characteristic parameters and vegetation growth
and increased soil infiltration performance. (3) Through the analysis of soil infiltration model
the Horton model had the best fitting effect on soil infiltration rate and soil cumulative infiltration. This study could provide a reference for the quantitative evaluation of soil infiltration and hydrological regulation function of typical grassland under grazing conditions.
齐瑞鹏,张磊,颜永毫,等.定容重条件下生物炭对半干旱区土壤水分入渗特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(8):2281-2288.
吕刚,顾宇书,魏忠平,等.白石砬子自然保护区几种主要植被类型土壤入渗特性研究[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(5):780-786.
Bagarello V, Castelini M, Prima S D, et al. Soil hydraulic properties determined by infiltration experiments and different heights of water pouring[J].Geoderma,2014,213:492-501.
王承书,杨晓楠,孙文义,等.极端暴雨条件下黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤蓄水能力和入渗规律[J].土壤学报,2020,57(2):296-306.
娄义宝,史东梅,江娜,等.土壤侵蚀对坡耕地土壤水分及入渗特性影响[J].土壤学报,2020,57(6):1399-1410.
马婧怡,贾宁凤,程曼.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3471-3481.
王艳萍,王力,韩雪,等.黄土塬区不同土地利用方式土壤水分消耗与补给变化特征[J].生态学报,2015,35(22):7571-7579.
王兴,宋乃平,杨新国,等.放牧扰动下草地植物多样性对土壤因子的响应[J].草业学报,2013,22(5):27-36.
王涵,赵文武,贾立志.近10年土壤水蚀研究进展与展望:基于文献计量的统计分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(1):141-151.
陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):18-23.
李新荣,张志山,黄磊,等.我国沙区人工植被系统生态-水文过程和互馈机理研究评述[J].科学通报,2013,58(增刊1):397-410.
Michal D, Tomas V, Jaromir D, et al. Interpretation of ponded infiltration data using numerical experiments[J].Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics,2016,64(3):289-299.
Jesús R C, Igor B, Hadis M, et al. The impact of vineyard abandonment on soil properties and hydrological processes[J].Vadose Zone Journal,2017,16(12):1-7.
郭茹茹,杨磊,李宗善,等.半干旱黄土高原苜蓿草地撂荒过程土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):8618-8626.
于洋,卫伟,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵区坡面整地和植被耦合下的土壤水分特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3441-3449.
Mirzaee S, Zolfaghari A A, Gorji M, et al. Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes[J].Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science,2014,60(5):681-693.
王琴,蒙仲举,汪季,等.希拉穆仁草原近自然恢复状态下植被-土壤响应特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1159-1167.
李博.中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(6):1-9.
樊才睿,张成福,史小红,等.草甸草原不同放牧强度草地土壤水分入渗特征[J].节水灌溉,2020(3):27-32.
吴军虎,李玉晨,邵凡凡,等.生化黄腐酸对土壤物理性质及水分运动特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):159-164,171.
程慧娟,张俊友,王全九.垂直线源灌不同线源直径下的入渗规律及其模型适用性研究[J].节水灌溉,2020(6):29-32,37.
Jha M K, Mahapatra S, Mohan C, et al. Infiltration characteristics of lateritic vadose zones:Field experiments and modeling[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,187:219-234.
李卓,刘永红,杨勤.土壤水分入渗影响机制研究综述[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(5):124-130.
耿林昇,李红丽,董智,等.放牧对希拉穆仁草原土壤粒度特征的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(12):121-126.
邹慧,高光耀,傅伯杰.干旱半干旱草地生态系统与土壤水分关系研究进展[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3127-3136.
张娜,秦艳,金轲,等.放牧对典型草原群落特征及土壤物理性状的影响[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(4):91-100.
李茜,孙亚男,林丽,等.放牧高寒嵩草草地不同演替阶段土壤酶活性及养分演变特征[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(7):2267-2274.
尤全刚,薛娴,彭飞,等.高寒草甸草地退化对土壤水热性质的影响及其环境效应[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1183-1192.
李平,王冬梅,丁聪,等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1610-1620.
杨思维,张德罡,牛钰杰,等.短期放牧对高寒草甸表层土壤入渗和水分保持能力的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):96-101.
孙福海,肖波,张鑫鑫,等.黄土高原生物结皮覆盖对土壤积水入渗特征的影响及其模型模拟[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(10):82-91.
吕文聪,邱阳,谢忠奎,等.砾石覆盖粒径对土壤入渗过程的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):46-51.
杜建会,方政,林志斌.广州市典型绿地土壤水分入渗特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(24):9869-9877.
0
浏览量
771
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621