1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,呼和浩特,010018
2. 内蒙古农业大学林学院,呼和浩特,010019
[ "吴佩瑶(1996-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:3201503788@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
吴佩瑶, 秦富仓, 董晓宇, 等. 坡度影响下的砒砂岩区裸露坡面水分入渗特征及模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):64-69.
WU Peiyao, QIN Fucang, DONG Xiaoyu, et al. Water Infiltration Characteristics and Simulation on Exposed Slope in Pisha Rock Area Under the Influence of Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 64-69.
吴佩瑶, 秦富仓, 董晓宇, 等. 坡度影响下的砒砂岩区裸露坡面水分入渗特征及模拟[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):64-69. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.008.
WU Peiyao, QIN Fucang, DONG Xiaoyu, et al. Water Infiltration Characteristics and Simulation on Exposed Slope in Pisha Rock Area Under the Influence of Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 64-69. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.008.
为探究不同坡度(5°
10°
20°
30°)条件下
不同质地砒砂岩土壤(灰白色、混合色、紫红色)的水分入渗特征及最优入渗模型。通过室内模拟土柱法对土壤的水分入渗特征和拟合结果进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)研究区不同坡面土壤容重在1.513~1.737 g/cm3
30°坡面下的灰白色砒砂岩土壤入渗能力较强
5°坡面下的紫红色砒砂岩土壤入渗能力较弱。(2) 在砒砂岩土壤一维垂直 入渗过程中
初始入渗率为2.000~8.600 cm/min
入渗时间3.500~5.000 min后达到稳定入渗率(0.160~1.800 cm/min)。入渗率、湿润锋运移速率与时间呈幂函数递减关系。坡度的大小、砒砂岩的质地均影响砒砂岩土壤入渗能力
坡度越小、颜色越深
入渗率、累计入渗率越低
湿润锋运移越慢;且初始入渗速率、稳定入渗速率、初始湿润锋运移速率、稳定湿润锋运移速率的值均随着坡面坡度的减小、砒砂岩土壤颜色的加深呈现减小趋势。(3)Kostiakov模型、Philip模型对于砒砂岩区土壤水分入渗结果拟合较好
决定系数均在0.900以上。Kostiakov模型 决定系数的平均值0.948拟合效果最优;Philip模型决定系数的平均值0.937拟合效果其次;Horton模型决定系数的平均值0.688拟合效果较差。通过平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、偏差百分比(PBIAS)、纳什效率系数(NSE)验证Kostiakov模型和Philip模型模拟值与实测值的差异性小、两者吻合程度高。
In order to explore the water infiltration characteristics and optimal infiltration model of arsenic sandstone soil (gray white
mixed color
purplish red) with different textures under different slopes (5°
10°
20°
30°)
the characteristics of soil water infiltration and fitting results were compared and analyzed by indoor simulated soil column method. The results showed that:(1) The soil bulk density of different slopes in the study area is 1.513~1.737 g/cm3. The soil infiltration capacity of gray white arsenic sandstone under 30° slope was strong
and the soil infiltration capacity of purple red arsenic sandstone under 5° slope was weak. (2) In the process of one-dimensional vertical infiltration of arsenic sandstone soil
the initial infiltration rate was 2.000~8.600 cm/min
and the stable infiltration rate (0.160~1.800 cm/min) was reached after the infiltration time was 3.500~5.000 min. The infiltration rate and wetting front migration rate decreased with time in a power function. The smaller the slope and the darker the color was
the lower the infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration rate was
and the slower the migration of wetting front was. The values of initial infiltration rate
stable infiltration rate
initial wetting front migration rate
and stable wetting front rate all decreased with the decrease of slope gradient and the deepening of arsenic sandstone soil color. (3) Kostiakov model and Philip model fit well the results of soil water infiltration in arsenic sandstone area
and the determination coefficients were more than 0.900. The average value of the decision coefficient of Kostiakov model was 0.948
and the fitting effect was the best. The average value of Philip model determination coefficient was 0.937
and the fitting effect was the second. The average value of the determination coefficient of Horton model was 0.688
and the fitting effect was poor. Through the mean absolute error (MAE)
root mean square error (RMSE)
percentage of deviation (PBIAS)
and Nash efficiency coefficient (NSE)
it was verified that the simulated values of Kostiakov model and Philip model have little difference and high degree of coincidence with the measured values.
陈科皓,韩霁昌,程杰,等.砒砂岩研究进展及利用前景[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(17):72-77.
宋土顺,刘立,王玉洁,等.鄂尔多斯盆地漂白砒砂岩特征及成因[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(5):679-684.
冷元宝,姚文艺.砒砂岩特征及其资源利用[J].中国水利,2015(8):15-17.
肖培青,姚文艺,刘慧,等.砒砂岩地区水土流失研究进展与治理途径[J].人民黄河,2014,36(10):92-94,109.
钱秋颖,秦富仓,李龙,等.自然降雨条件下坡面侵蚀地表粗糙度的空间异质性[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):46-52.
朱良君,张光辉,任宗萍.4种土壤入渗测定方法的比较[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):163-167.
杜建会,方政,林志斌.广州市典型绿地土壤水分入渗特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(24):9869-9877.
莫斌,陈晓燕,雷廷武,等.不同方法测定紫色土坡耕地入渗性能试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):1-5.
陈娟,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原灰钙土土壤入渗特征及测定方法比较[J].节水灌溉,2019(5):21-26.
莫斌,陈晓燕,刘涛,等.紫色土丘陵区土壤入渗及其测定方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(2):116-121.
寇小华,王文,郑国权.土壤水分入渗模型的研究方法综述[J].亚热带水土保持,2013,25(3):53-55.
杨振奇,秦富仓,李旻宇,等.砒砂岩区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(4):733-739.
康金林.不同土体构型红壤水分入渗特征及适用预报模型研究[D].南昌:江西农业大学,2016.
王佳坤,郭月峰,祁伟,等.砒砂岩土壤水分入渗规律及适用模型研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(增刊1):117-121.
徐振剑,权鑫,史红伟,等.黄土坡面侵蚀过程与侵蚀-沉积空间分布特征[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(6):98-105.
吴军虎,张铁钢,赵伟,等.容重对不同有机质含量土壤水分入渗特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):63-67,268.
康金林,杨洁,刘窑军,等.初始含水率及容重影响下红壤水分入渗规律[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):122-126.
牛文全,樊晓康,陈俊英.初始含水率对涌泉根灌土壤渗透特征的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2012,30(4):491-496.
魏瑶瑶,王俊,张永旺,等.黄土高原不同植被类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(2):16-20.
秦倩倩,邱聪,郑大柽,等.油松人工林火烧迹地早期土壤入渗动态[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(8):903-917.
郭智辉,简文彬,刘青灵,等.基于现场原型试验的斜坡降雨入渗分析及入渗模型研究[J].岩土力学,2021,42(6):1635-1647.
宋日权,褚贵新,冶军,等.掺砂对土壤水分入渗和蒸发影响的室内试验[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(增刊1):109-114.
刘文光.夹砂层土壤膜孔灌水分入渗规律数值模拟研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2018.
许浒,王健,索梅芹,等.基于人工模拟降雨的黄潮土坡面侵蚀规律研究[J].水力发电,2021,47(7):7-11.
李长明,王立久,杨大令,等.黄河砒砂岩中蒙脱石的基本特征[J].人民黄河,2016,38(6):11-14.
李平,王冬梅,丁聪,等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1610-1620.
李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分入渗能力影响模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):40-45.
王佳坤.砒砂岩土壤水分入渗特征及适用模型研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020.
易三桂,蔡文涛,来利明,等.鄂尔多斯高原软梁、硬梁弃耕农田土壤水分入渗特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):49-56.
0
浏览量
763
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621