1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,401331
2. 三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室,重庆,401331
[ "甘凤玲(1989-),女,讲师,博士,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:359140315@qq.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
甘凤玲, 苟俊菲, 刘春红, 等. 草带宽度对紫色土坡面细沟形态及水土流失特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):25-32.
GAN Fengling, GOU Junfei, LIU Chunhong, et al. Effect of Grass Strip Width on Rill Erosion Morphology, Soil and Water Loss Characteristics on Purple Soil Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 25-32.
甘凤玲, 苟俊菲, 刘春红, 等. 草带宽度对紫色土坡面细沟形态及水土流失特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):25-32. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.003.
GAN Fengling, GOU Junfei, LIU Chunhong, et al. Effect of Grass Strip Width on Rill Erosion Morphology, Soil and Water Loss Characteristics on Purple Soil Slope[J]. 2022, 36(2): 25-32. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.003.
为了解不同草带宽度对紫色土坡耕地水土流失的影响
以铺设四季青草带的紫色土坡面为研究对象
采用放水冲刷模拟试验
以裸坡为对照组
研究不同放水冲刷流量和草带宽度条件下坡面细沟形态变化和减沙减流效应。结果表明:(1)沟深随草带宽度增大呈先减小后增大趋势
而沟宽、沟长和沟宽深比均随草带宽度呈先增加后减小趋势;此外
沟宽、沟深和沟长随流量的增大而增大
而宽深比随流量的变化不明显;(2)当流量较小时(4 L/min)
各坡面产流率和产沙率随着草带宽度的增大而减少
100 cm草带宽度的减流效益最高
为48.41%;当流量较大时(8 L/min)
75 cm草带宽度的减流减沙效益最高
分别为20.07%和58.11%。(3)有草带的坡面产流产沙率、土壤侵蚀速率与沟宽、沟深呈极显著相关关系
相对于减流效益而言
草带对减沙效益更为显著。综上可知
草带能有效降低径流泥沙量
对紫色土坡耕地的水土流失具有较好的防治效果。
In order to understand the impacts of different grass strip widths on the soil and water loss of in purple soil sloping farmland
taking the Agrostis stolonifera grass strips paved on purple soil slope as the research objects
and through the indoor simulated scouring
we study the impacts of different grass strip widths and drainage scouring flows on the slope rill erosion morphology and the effects of sediment and flow reduction. The bare slope was used as the control group. The results showed that:(1) With the increasing of grass strip width
the rill depth decreased first and then increased
while the rill width
rill length and width-depth ratio showed a contrary tendency. In addition
the rill width
rill length and rill depth increased with the increasing of discharge
but the change of width-depth ratio was not obvious. (2) When the discharge flow was small (4 L/min)
the runoff and sediment yield rate decreased with the increasing of grass strip width
and the outflow runoff decreased by 48.41% by for the 100 cm grass strip
which was the greatest. When the discharge was large (8 L/min)
the 75 cm grass strip had the minimum runoff and sediment yield rate
which had the maximum reduction rate of runoff (20.07%) and sediment (58.11%). (3) Under interception of the grass strip
the runoff and sediment yield rate and soil erosion rate had significant correlation with rill width and rill depth. Compared with runoff interception and reduction
the grass strip had more significant impact on sediment interception and reduction. From these results we concluded that the grass strip was very efficient in reducing the runoff and sediment
and had a good control effect on water and soil loss of purple soil sloping farmland.
宇涛,张霞,李占斌,等.不同草带覆盖位置条件下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):22-27.
Mohammad A G, Adam M A. The impact of vegetative cover type on runoff and soil erosion under different land uses[J].Catena,2010,81:97-103.
刘枭宏,李铁,谌芸,等.香根草植物篱带宽对紫色土坡地产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):93-101.
何丙辉,陈晶晶,向明辉,等.不同生长年限的植物篱对坡耕地紫色土土壤侵蚀和土壤有机质的影响[J].三峡生态环境监测,2016,1(1):36-45.
Pan D L, Yang S W, Song Y Q, et al. The tradeoff between soil erosion protection and water consumption in revegetation:Evaluation of new indicators and influencing factors[J].Geoderma,2019,347:32-39.
Zhang X C, Wang Z L. Interrill soil erosion processes on steep slopes[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,548:652-664.
马勇勇,李占斌,任宗萍,等.草带布设位置对坡沟系统水文连通性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):170-176.
丁文峰,李勉.不同坡面植被空间布局对坡沟系统产流产沙影响的实验[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1870-1878.
曹梓豪,赵清贺,左宪禹,等.基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):739-747.
张梦璇,郭建英,董智,等.不同放牧强度荒漠草原产流产沙过程模拟[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):41-46.
张金阁,马岚,张栋,等.华北土石山区草地过滤带布设方式对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):76-80.
高军,尤迎华,谈晓珊,等.植被过滤带阻控径流污染的机制及研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(9):91-97.
赵清贺,冀晓玉,徐珊珊,等.河岸植被对坡面径流侵蚀产沙的阻控效果[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(13):170-178.
张霞,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面草带分布对坡沟水土流失的防控作用及其优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(7):122-128.
陈旭飞,刘通,程炯,等.华南地区草被过滤带对菜地径流、泥沙和磷阻控效果及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):377-383.
Wanyama J, Herremans K, Maetens W, et al. Effectiveness of tropical grass species as sediment filters in the riparian zone of Lake Victoria[J].Soil Use and Management,2012,28(3):409-418.
郭利刚.构建"山水林田湖草"生态保护与修复的内生机制[J].中国资源综合利用,2019,37(11):133-135.
张泽,丘海红,胡宝清.山水林田湖草空间格局与生态变化分析:以桂西南喀斯特-北部湾海陆交互关键带为例[J].中国科技论文,2021,16(1):65-70.
李建兴,何丙辉,梅雪梅,等.紫色土区坡耕地不同种植模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):725-731.
倪世民,冯舒悦,王军光,等.不同质地重塑土坡面细沟侵蚀形态与水力特性及产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):149-156.
翟婷婷,谌芸,李铁,等.植物篱篱前淤积带与篱下土坎土壤水库和抗剪性能对比研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):599-607.
陈义君,彭石磊,谌芸,等.紫色土坡耕地香根草根系的固土抗蚀效应[J].草业科学,2015,32(4):485-491.
崔志强,王文龙,郭明明,等.不同植被措施下排土场边坡细沟发育时空特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1155-1165.
Appels W M, Bogaart P W, Sjoerd E A T M van der Zee. Surface runoff in flat terrain:How field topography and runoff generating processes control hydrological connectivity[J].Journal of Hydrology,2016,534:493-504.
Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburger K. Modelling the effect of support practices (P-factor) on the reduction of soil erosion by water at European scale[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2015,51:23-34.
黄荣珍,朱丽琴,王赫,等.红壤退化地森林恢复后土壤有机碳对土壤水库库容的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):238-248.
Abu-Zreig M. Rudra R P, Lalonde M N, et al. Experimental investigation of runoff reduction and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips[J].Hydrological Process,2004,18(11):2029-2037.
0
浏览量
853
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621