1. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所, 国家林业和草原局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京,100091
2. 电子科技大学资源与环境学院,成都,611731
[ "孙美荣(1998-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事遥感生态水文学研究。E-mail:18434306185@163.com" ]
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
孙美荣, 孙鹏森, 张明芳, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对流域水文恢复力影响的研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):13-24.
SUN Meirong, SUN Pengsen, ZHANG Mingfang, et al. Progress in the Effects of Climate Change and Human Activities on Watershed Hydrological Resilience[J]. 2022, 36(2): 13-24.
孙美荣, 孙鹏森, 张明芳, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对流域水文恢复力影响的研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(2):13-24. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.002.
SUN Meirong, SUN Pengsen, ZHANG Mingfang, et al. Progress in the Effects of Climate Change and Human Activities on Watershed Hydrological Resilience[J]. 2022, 36(2): 13-24. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.02.002.
水文恢复力是流域或生态系统维持水文稳定性的重要参考指标
深入研究植被结构和水文恢复力之间的关系是未来在全球变化背景下生态水文学的重要方向。但目前水文恢复力对气候变化与人类活动等不同干扰方式的响应机制还缺乏系统的研究
水文恢复力的形成机制及其与植被结构的关系也尚无全面的认识。系统总结了当前水文恢复力的主要概念
从水分利用效率、Budyko框架的水平衡、植被景观结构变化与受到干旱干扰的恢复时间等不同角度总结了5种主要的算法
分析了气候变化、人类活动和植被结构对水文恢复力的响应特点并分析了水文恢复力发挥作用的内在机制。结果表明:(1)Budyko模式和生态系统水分利用效率在水文恢复力的计算中具有重要价值;(2)在能量限制的流域
水文恢复力随着暖干化程度增大而减小;在水分限制的流域
水文恢复力随着暖干化程度增大而增大;(3)森林主导的流域比其他生物群落主导的流域具有更高的水文恢复力;(4)大面积森林采伐或者造林通常会降低流域的水文恢复力;(5)天然林、多样性较高的植被结构有利于维持较高的水文恢复力;(6)干扰条件下植被水分利用效率较高的流域有利于维持较高的水文恢复力;(7)流域植被类型的多样性水平高、景观破碎化程度低、植被结构稳定、土壤储水量大或者有积雪补给的流域其水文恢复力较高。未来需要探索和发展支持流域多种稳定状态下的水文恢复力计算方法。
Hydrological resilience is an important reference index for maintaining hydrologic stability of watershed or ecosystem. An in-depth study of the relationship between vegetation structure and hydrological resilience will be an important direction of ecological hydrology under the background of global change in the future. However
there is still a lack of systematic research on the response mechanism of hydrological resilience to different intervention modes such as climate change and human activities
then the formation mechanism of hydrological resilience and its relationship with vegetation structure have not been fully understood. This paper systematically summarized the main concepts of hydrological resilience
and five main algorithms from different perspectives such as water use efficiency
water balance of Budyko framework
vegetation landscape structure change and recovery time disturbed by drought. The responses of climate change
human activities and vegetation structure to hydrological resilience were analyzed
and the internal mechanism of hydrological resilience was analyzed. (1) Budyko model and water use efficiency of ecosystem have significant value in the calculation of hydrological resilience. (2) In the energy-limited watershed
the hydrological resilience decreases with the increases of the degrees of warming and drying. In the water-limited watersheds
the hydrological resilience increases with the increases of the degrees of warming and drying. (3) Forest-dominated watersheds have higher hydrological resilience than other bioceno-dominated catchments. (4) Large-scale deforestation or afforestation usually reduces the hydrological resilience of watersheds. (5) Natural forest and vegetation structure with high diversity are conducive to maintaining high hydrological resilience. (6) The watersheds with higher water use efficiency of vegetation under disturbance are conducive to maintaining high hydrological resilience. (7)The hydrological resilience of the watershed with high diversity of vegetation
low degree of landscape fragmentation
stable vegetation structure
large soil water storage or snow replenishment was higher. It is necessary to explore and develop hydrological resilience calculation methods under various stable states in the future.
Labat D, Godderis Y, Probst J L, et al. Evidence for global runoff increase related to climate warming[J].Advances in Water Resources,2004,27(6):631-642.
Chmura D J, Anderson P D, Howe G T, et al. Forest responses to climate change in the northwestern United States: Ecophysiological foundations for adaptive management[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2011,261(7):1121-1142.
Chen Z W, Lei H M, Yang H B, et al. Historical and future trends in wetting and drying in 291 catchments across China[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions,2017,21(4):2233-2248.
Elsner M M, Cuo L, Voisin N, et al. Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State[J].Climatic Change,2010,102(1/2):225-260.
罗旭,梁宇,贺红士,等.气候变化、林火和营林措施对寒温带典型森林生态弹性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(5):1699-1712.
Venäläinen A, Lehtonen I, Laapas M, et al. Climate change induces multiple risks to boreal forests and forestry in Finland: A literature review[J].Global Change Biology,2020,26(8):4178-4196.
李朝月,方海燕.泰国蒙河流域水沙变化趋势及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(2):590-598.
Yang H B, Yang D W. Derivation of climate elasticity of runoff to assess the effects of climate change on annual runoff[J/OL].Water Resources Research,2011,47(7). DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009287.
周贵尧,周灵燕,邵钧炯,等.极端干旱对陆地生态系统的影响:进展与展望[J].植物生态学报,2020,44(5):515-525.
Davidson E A, de Araújo A C, Artaxo P, et al. The Amazon Basin in transition[J].Nature,2012,481(7381):321-328.
Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale[J].Water Resources Research,2001,37(3):701-708.
Fang J Y, Piao S L, He J S, et al. Increasing terrestrial vegetation activity in China, 1982—1999[J].Science in China (Series C: Life Sciences),2004,47(3):229-240.
Feng X M, Fu B J, Piao S L, et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits[J].Nature Climate Change,2016,6:1019-1022.
李月辉,常禹,胡远满,等.人类活动对森林景观影响研究进展[J].林业科学,2006,42(9):119-126.
Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.
Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Engineering within ecological constraints[M].Washington: National Academies Press, 1996.
Walker B, Salt D. A crash course in the science of resilience. In: The Community Resilience Reader: Essential Resources for an Era of Upheaval[M].Washington: Island Press, 2017:207-308.
Gerten D, Lucht W, Schaphoff S, et al. Hydrologic resilience of the terrestrial biosphere[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2005,32(21):1-4.
Budyko M I. Climate and life[M].New York: Academic Press,1974:41-251.
Lou Y Y, Yang Y T, Yang D W,et al. Quantifying the impact of vegetation changes on global terrestrial runoff using the Budyko framework [J/OL].Journal of Hydrology,2020,590(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125389.
Creed I F, Spargo A T, Jones J A. Changing forest water yields in response to climate warming: Results from long-term experimental watershed sites across North America[J].Global Change Biology,2014,20(10):3191-3208.
Zhang M F, Wei X H, Sun P S, et al. The effect of forest harvesting and climatic variability on runoff in a large watershed: The case study in the Upper Minjiang River of Yangtze River basin[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,464:1-11.
Sharma A, Goyal M K. Assessment of ecosystem resilience to hydroclimatic disturbances in India [J/OL].Global Change Biology,2017,24(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13874.
Sharma A, Goyal M K. District-level assessment of the ecohydrological resilience to hydroclimatic disturbances and its controlling factors in India[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,564:1048-1057.
Beer C, Ciais P, Reichstein M, et al. Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level [J/OL].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2009,23(2). DOI: 10.1029/2008GB003233.
Oldfield J D. Mikhail Budyko’s (1920—2001) contributions to Global Climate Science: From heat balances to climate change and global ecology[J].Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2016,7(5):682-692.
Fu G B, Charles S P, Chiew F H S. A two-parameter climate elasticity of stream flow index to assess climate change effects on annual stream flow [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2007,43(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005890.
Williams C A, Reichstein M, Buchmann N, et al. Climate and vegetation controls on the surface water balance: Synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a global network of flux towers [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2012,48(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011586.
Xue B L, Wang G Q, Xiao J F, et al. Global convergence but regional disparity in the hydrological resilience of ecosystems and watersheds to drought[J].Journal of Hydrology,2020,591:e125589.
Helman D, Lensky I M, Yakir D, et al. Forests growing under dry conditions have higher hydrological resilience to drought than do more humid forests[J].Global Change Biology,2016,23(7):2801-2817.
Du C Y, Sun F B, Yu J, et al. New interpretation of the role of water balance in an extended Budyko hypothesis in arid regions[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2016,20(1):393-409.
Xue B L, Helman D, Wang G Q, et al. The low hydrologic resilience of Asian Water Tower basins to adverse climatic changes[J].Advances in Water Resources,2021,155:e103996.
Zhang S L, Yang H B, Yang D W, et al. Quantifying the effect of vegetation change on the regional water balance within the Budyko framework[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2016,43(3):1140-1148.
Veettil A V, Konapala G, Mishra A K, et al. Sensitivity of drought resilience-vulnerability-exposure to hydrologic ratios in contiguous United States[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,564:294-306.
Peterson T J, Western A W, Argent R M. Analytical methods for ecosystem resilience: A hydrological investigation [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2012,48(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012150.
Mishra V, Lilhare R. Hydrologic sensitivity of Indian sub-continental river basins to climate change[J].Global and Planetary Change,2016,139:78-96.
Ciemer C, Boers N, Hirota M, et al. Higher resilience to climatic disturbances in tropical vegetation exposed to more variable rainfall[J].Nature Geoscience,2019,12(3):174-179.
Harder P, Pomeroy J W, Westbrook C J. Hydrological resilience of a Canadian Rockies headwaters basin subject to changing climate, extreme weather, and forest management[J].Hydrological Processes,2015,29(18):3905-3924.
Spence C, Hedstrom N, Tank S E, et al. Hydrological resilience to forest fire in the subarctic Canadian shield[J].Hydrological Processes,2020,34(25):4940-4958.
Piao S L, Ciais P, Huang Y, et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China [J].Nature,2010,467(7311):43-51.
Helman D, Osem Y, Yakir D, et al. Relationships between climate, topography, water use and productivity in two key Mediterranean forest types with different water-use strategies[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2017,232:319-330.
Osem, Y, O’Hara K. An ecohydrological approach to managing dryland forests: Integration of leaf area metrics into assessment and management[J].Forestry,2016,89(4):338-349.
Raz-Yaseef N, Rotenberg E, Yakir D. Effects of spatial variations in soil evaporation caused by tree shading on water flux partitioning in a semi-arid pine forest[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2010,150(3):454-462.
Miranda J D, Armas C, Padilla F M, et al. Climatic change and rainfall patterns: Effects on semi-arid plant communities of the Iberian Southeast[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2011,75(12):1302-1309.
Barbeta A, Mejía-Chang M, Ogaya R, et al. The combined effects of a long-term experimental drought and an extreme drought on the use of plant-water sources in a Mediterranean forest[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(3):1213-1225.
Huxman T E, Smith M D, Fay P A, et al. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency[J].Nature,2004,429(6992):651-654.
Wada Y, Beek L V, Wanders N, et al. Human water consumption intensifies hydrological drought worldwide [J/OL].Environmental Research Letters,2013,8(3). DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034036.
Findell K L, Shevliakova E, Milly P C D, et al. Modeled impact of anthropogenic land cover change on climate [J].Journal of Climate,2007,20(14):3621-3634.
Weiskel P K, Vogel R M, Steeves P A, et al. Water use regimes: Characterizing direct human interaction with hydrologic systems [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2007,43(4). DOI:10.1029/2006WR005062.
Betts R A, Boucher O, Collins M, et al. Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide[J].Nature,2007,448(7157):1037-1041.
Piao S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, et al. Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO
2
on global river runoff trends[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2007,104(39):15242-15247.
Lu Y H, Fu B J, Feng X M, et al. A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: Quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J].PLoS One, 2012,7(2):e31782.
Zhang Y, Peng C H, Li W Z, et al. Multiple afforestation programs accelerate the greenness in the 'Three North’ region of China from 1982 to 2013[J].Ecological Indicators,2016,61:404-412.
Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M, et al. Recent trends in vegetation greenness in China significantly altered annual evapotranspiration and water yield [J/OL].Environmental Research Letters,2016,11(9). DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094010.
Esquivel-Hernández G, Sánchez-Murillo R, Birkel C, et al. Hydro-climatic a?嵤??散敯湨慹湤?呯?????潡汬氠楲湥杳敩牳???奣???潥桳物敬物????攠瑣?慮汤???湯据牳攠慡獣敲?楳湳?晴潲牯数獩瑣?睬愠瑢敩牯?略獳攠?敦映晃楯捳楴敡渠捒祩?慡獛?慝琮浅潣獯灨桹敤牲楯捬?捧慹爬戲漰渱?搬椱漰砨椶搩攺?挱漸渶挰攮渼瑢牲愾瑛椵漶湝猠?牨楥獮攠孃?崠?乡慲瑫甠牔攬??ち??????????????㈠???????扮牤?孉??嵩??敬湥条???奮???慥汥汮?????牦漠灴?祥椠敷汯摲?獤攠湴獨楲瑯極癧楨琠祬?潮晤?杵汳潥戠慭污?浡慧橥潭牥?慴杛牊楝挮畎污瑴畵牲慥氠?捵潳畴湡瑩牮楡敢獩?瑩潴?搬爲漰由朹栬琲?愲温携?琲栲攭?瀲爹漮樼敢捲琾敛搵?捝栠慔湯杮敧猠?椠湗?琠桂敲?普畤瑴甠牍攬嬠?嵵?匠捙椠敍測挠敥?漠晡?琮栠敆?呲潥瑳慴氠??湮癡楧牥潭湥浮整渠瑩?㈠び?????????????ㄠ??扮牥?孡??嵳?剳敨楯捲桴猠瑴敥楲湭?????慮桳湩?????楲慢楯獮?偳??敵瑥?慴汲???汯楮洠慛瑊支?敌硝琮牎敡浴敵獲?愠湃摯?瑭桵敮?捣慡牴扩潯湮?挬礲挰氲攰嬬?崱?丱愩琮甠牨整??び????はど????土??金???劳????戴父?嬭??崹??申愷渹朸????坢慲渾杛‵堸???敨敡湮慧渠?吠????敥瑩?慘氠???牓潵畮朠桐琠?琬椠浥楴渠条?椮渠晔汨略攠湥捦敦獥?瑴栠敯?氠敦杯慲捥祳?漠晨?瑲牶敥敳?杩牮潧眠瑡桮?爠散捬潩癭敡牴祩季?嵶??汩潡扢慩汬??桹愠湯杮攠??楮潯汦潦朠祩?㈠ちㄠ???????????????????扥爠?孡??崠??湵杤特椠獩据栠?????慰桰湥????呮潪睩慡牮摧猠?慩?捥潲洠灯慦爠慙扡汮敧?煺略愠湒瑩楶晥楲挠慢瑡楳潩湮?潊晝?牊敯獵楲汮楡敬渠捯敦嬠?嵹?呲牯敬湯摧獹?椲渰??挬漴氶漴术礴?愵渺搱??瘱漮氼畢瑲椾潛渵????????????水???????L, McMahon T A, et al. A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005,310(1/4):28-61.
张雷,孙鹏森,刘世荣.川西亚高山森林不同恢复阶段生长季蒸腾特征[J].林业科学,2020,56(1):1-9.
Hund S V, Allen D M, Laura M, et al. Groundwater recharge indicator as tool for decision makers to increase socio-hydrological resilience to seasonal drought[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,563:1119-1134.
Sinha J, Sharma A, Khan M, et al. Assessment of the impacts of climatic variability and anthropogenic stress on hydrologic resilience to warming shifts in Peninsular India [J/OL].Scientific Reports,2018,8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32091-0.
Mao F, Clark J, Karpouzoglou T, et al. HESS opinions: A conceptual framework for assessing socio-hydrological resilience under change[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2017,21(7):3655-3670.
Yu Z, Liu S, Wang J, et al. Natural forests exhibit higher carbon sequestration and lower water consumption than planted forests in China[J].Global Change Biology,2018,25(1):68-77.
Rigling A, Bigler C, Eilmann B, et al. Driving factors of a vegetation shift from Scots pine to pubescent oak in dry Alpine forests[J].Global Change Biology,2013,19(1):229-240.
Jencso K G, McGlynn B L. Hierarchical controls on runoff generation: Topographically driven hydrologic connectivity, geology, and vegetation [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2011,47(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010666.
Sivapalan M, Thompson S E, Harman C J, et al. Water cycle dynamics in a changing environment: Improving predictability through synthesis [J/OL].Water Resources Research,2011,47(10).https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011377.
Moore G W, Bond B J, Jones J A, et al. Structural and compositional controls on transpiration in 40- and 450-year-old riparian forests in western Oregon, USA[J].Tree Physiology,2004,24(5):481-491.
Ford C R, Hubbard R M, Vose J M. Quantifying structural and physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians[J].Ecohydrology,2011,4(2):183-195.
Schoonmaker A S, Lieffers V J, Landhäusser S M. Viewing forests from below: Fine root mass declines relative to leaf area in aging lodgepole pine stands[J].Oecologia,2016,181(3):733-747.
Muñoz-Villers L E, Holwerda F, Gómez-Cárdenas M, et al. Water balances of old-growth and regenerating montane cloud forests in central Veracruz, Mexico[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,462:53-66.
Zhang M, Liu N, Harper R, et al. A global review on hydrological responses to forest change across multiple spatial scales: Importance of scale, climate, forest type and hydrological regime[J].Journal of Hydrology,2017,546:44-59.
Peng C, Ma Z, Lei X, et al. A drought-induced pervasive increase in tree mortality across Canada’s boreal forests[J].Nature Climate Change,2011,1(9):467-471.
Iijima Y, Ohta T, Kotani A, et al. Sap flow changes in relation to permafrost degradation under increasing precipitation in an eastern Siberian larch forest[J].Ecohydrology,2014,7(2):177-187.
Walker X J, Mack M C, Johnstone J F. Stable carbon isotope analysis reveals widespread drought stress in boreal black spruce forests[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(8):3102-3113.
Gentine P, D’Odorico P, Lintner B, et al. Interdependence of climate, soil, and vegetation as constrained by the Budyko curve [J/OL].Geophysical Research Letters,2012,39(19). DOI:10.1029/2012GL053492.
Zhang M F, Wei X H. Deforestation, forestation, and water supply[J].Science,2021,371(6533):990-991.
Yang Y, Guan H, Batelaan O, et al. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to drought across global terrestrial ecosystems[J].Scientific Reports,2016,6:e23284.
Sun Y, Piao S L, Huang M T, et al. Global patterns and climate drivers of water-use efficiency in terrestrial ecosystems deduced from satellite-based datasets and carbon cycle models[J].Global Ecology and Biogeography,2016,25(3):311-323.
Khalifa M, Elagib N A, Ribbe L, et al. Spatio-temporal variations in climate, primary productivity and efficiency of water and carbon use of the land cover types in Sudan and Ethiopia[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,624:790-806.
Tang X G, Wang Z M, Liu D W, et al. Estimating the net ecosystem exchange for the major forests in the northern United States by integrating MODIS and AmeriFlux data[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2012,156:75-84.
Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M, et al. Water use efficiency of China’s terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5:e13799.
周雄,孙鹏森,张明芳,等.西南高山亚高山区植被水分利用效率时空特征及其与气候因子的关系[J].植物生态学报,2020,44(6):628-641.
Liu Y, Zhou Y, Ju W, et al. Evapotranspiration and water yield over China’s landmass from 2000 to 2010[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2013,17(12):4957-4980.
Kannenberg S A, Schwalm C R, Anderegg W R L. Ghosts of the past: How drought legacy effects shape forest functioning and carbon cycling[J].Ecology Letters,2020,23(5):891-901.
Niu S L, Xing X R, Zhang Z, et al. Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: From leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe[J].Global Change Biology,2011,17(2):1073-1082.
[8
0
浏览量
1211
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621