生物质炭和腐殖质对稻田土壤CH

陈峰; 刘娟; 郑梅群; 姜培坤; 吴家森; 李永夫; 李松昊

doi:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.047

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

生物质炭和腐殖质对稻田土壤CH

更新时间：2025-03-12

- 生物质炭和腐殖质对稻田土壤CH
- Effects of Biochar and Humus on CH
- 水土保持学报 2022年36卷第1期页码：368-374
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江农林大学亚热带森林培育国家重点实验室, 浙江临安,311300
  2. 浙江农林大学浙江省森林生态系统碳循环与固碳减排重点实验室, 浙江临安,311300
  3. 杭州市临安区农林技术推广中心, 浙江临安,311300
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "陈峰(1994—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事土壤碳汇与全球气候变化研究。E-mail: chenfengzafu@126.com" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  浙江省重点研发计划项目(2019C02008-03);国家自然科学基金项目(31700540)
- DOI：10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.047
  中图分类号： S511.3
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈峰, 刘娟, 郑梅群, 等. 生物质炭和腐殖质对稻田土壤CH[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):368-374.

CHEN Feng, LIU Juan, ZHENG Meiqun, et al. Effects of Biochar and Humus on CH[J]. 2022, 36(1): 368-374.
陈峰, 刘娟, 郑梅群, 等. 生物质炭和腐殖质对稻田土壤CH[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(1):368-374. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.047.

CHEN Feng, LIU Juan, ZHENG Meiqun, et al. Effects of Biochar and Humus on CH[J]. 2022, 36(1): 368-374. DOI： 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.047.

摘要

为探讨生物质炭与腐殖质单独施用与配合施用对稻田土壤CH4和N2O气体排放以及水稻产量的影响。以浙江临安潜育性水稻土的稻田系统为研究对象

设置2个水稻秸秆生物质炭添加水平(0

20 t/hm2)和3个腐殖质水平(0

0.6

1.2 t/hm2)

共6个处理

分别为: (1)B0F0(对照

不添加生物质炭和腐殖质); (2)B0F1(腐殖质用量为0.6 t/hm2); (3)B0F2(腐殖质用量为1.2 t/hm2); (4)B1F0(生物质炭用量为20 t/hm2); (5)B1F1(生物质炭和腐殖质用量分别为20

0.6 t/hm2); (6)B1F2(生物质炭和腐殖质用量分别为20

1.2 t/hm2)

研究生物质炭和腐殖质输入对水稻产量、稻田CH4和N2O气体排放的影响。结果表明: (1)与B0F0相比

单独施用生物质炭和腐殖质或生物质炭与腐殖质配施均降低了土壤CH4累积排放量

但增加了土壤N2O累积排放量; (2)生物质炭处理对GWP(global warming potential)和GHGI(greenhouse gas intensity)没有显著影响(P＞0.05)

腐殖质处理显著降低了GWP和GHGI(P＜0.05)

生物质炭和腐殖质对GWP和GHGI存在显著交互作用(P＜0.05);(3)与B0F0相比

单独施用生物质炭和腐殖质或者生物质炭与腐殖质配施均能在一定程度上减少单位水稻产量的温室气体排放强度(GHGI)

B0F2处理的GHGI最低

表明单施腐殖质处理(腐殖质用量为1.2 t/hm2)稻田土壤的减排效果和环境效应最好。研究结果为进一步探讨稻田土壤固碳减排提供数据支撑和理论依据。

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of single and combined application of biochar and humus on CH4 and N2O emission in paddy field and rice yield

taking the paddy field system of gleyic paddy soil in Lin'an

Zhejiang Province as the research object

two addition levels of rice straw biochar (0 and 20 t/hm2) and three addition levels of humus (0

0.6 and 1.2 t/hm2) were set in the experiment

and a total of six treatments were carried out

which were B0F0 (control

without biochar or humus)

B0F1 (humus dosage of 0.6 t/hm2)

B0F2 (humus dosage of 1.2 t/hm2)

B1F0 (biochar dosage of 20 t/hm2)

B1F1 (the amounts of biochar and humus were 20 t/hm2 and 0.6 t/hm2

respectively)

B1F2 (the amounts of biochar and humus were 20 t/hm2 and 1.2 t/hm2

respectively). Effects of biochar and humus addition on rice yield

CH4 and N2O emissions in rice fields were studied. The results showed that: (1) Compared with B0F0

application of biochar and humus alone or combination all reduced cumulative CH4 emission and increased cumulative emission of N2O in soil. (2) Biochar treatment had no significant effect on GWP (global warming potential) and GHGI (greenhouse gas intensity) (P>0.05). Humus treatment significantly decreased GWP and GHGI (P < 0.05). Biochar and humus had significant interaction on GWP and GHGI (P < 0.05). (3) Compared with B0F0

the application of biochar and humus alone or the combined application could reduce greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) per unit rice yield to a certain extent. The GHGI of B0F2 treatment was the lowest

indicating that the application of humus alone (the amount of humus was 1.2 t/hm2) had the best emission reduction effect and environmental effect. The results could provide data support and theoretical basis for further discussion on carbon sequestration and emission reduction in paddy soil.

关键词

Keywords

references

Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K, et al. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group Ι to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change[M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013: e1535.

尉海东. 稻田甲烷排放研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(18): 6-10.

薛建福, 濮超, 张冉, 等. 农作措施对中国稻田氧化亚氮排放影响的研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11): 1-9.

陈凤霞, 吕杰, 史元, 等. 我国稻米质量安全生态环境的现状及发展对策[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(2): 109-112.

唐海明, 肖小平, 汤文光, 等. 长期施肥对双季稻田甲烷排放和关键功能微生物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22): 7668-7678.

史明, 胡林潮, 黄兆琴, 等. 生物质炭的加入对土壤吸附菲能力以及玉米幼苗对菲吸收量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(5): 912-916.

Zhang A F, Bian R J, Pan G X, et al. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 127: 153-160.

肖欣娟, 夏建国, 马黛玉, 等. 茶渣生物质炭对茶园土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 294-300.

周际海, 陈晏敏, 袁颖红, 等. 秸秆与生物质炭施用对土壤温室气体排放的影响差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4): 248-254.

刘成, 刘晓雨, 张旭辉, 等. 基于整合分析方法评价我国生物质炭施用的增产与固碳减排效果[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(3): 696-706.

陈佳, 姜增明, 费云鹏, 等. 复合肥与腐殖酸配施对盐碱地改良及棉花生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(10): 54-57.

张沁怡, 李文蔚, 阳晶, 等. 腐殖酸对水稻剑叶光合特性、必需元素和产量的影响及其相关性研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2015, 30(2): 185-191.

Sun L Y, Ma Y C, Liu Y L, et al. The combined effects of nitrogen fertilizer, humic acid, and gypsum on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from a coastal saline rice field[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(19): 19502-19511.

鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000, 146-226.

蒋晨, 麻培侠, 胡保国, 等. 生物质炭还田对稻田甲烷的减排效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(15): 184-191.

Feng Y Z, Xu Y P, Yu Y C, et al. Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 46: 80-88.

Heitmann T, Goldhammer T, Beer J, et al. Electron transfer of dissolved organic matter and its potential significance for anaerobic respiration in a northern bog[J]. Global Change Biology, 2007, 13(8): 1771-1785.

Shen J L, Tang H, Liu J Y, et al. Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2014, 188(4): 264-274.

Sánchez-García M, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero M A, et al. Biochar increases soil N

O emissions produced by nitrification-mediated pathways[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2014, 2(2): e25.

张斌, 刘晓雨, 潘根兴, 等. 施用生物质炭后稻田土壤性质、水稻产量和痕量温室气体排放的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23): 4844-4853.

曲晶晶. 生物质炭稻田施用下的土壤固碳减排效应及其对水稻生产力的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.

Liu X Y, Zhang A F, Ji C Y, et al. Biochar's effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions: A meta-analysis of literature data[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 373(1): 583-594.

Shang Q Y, Yang X X, Gao C M, et al. Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: A 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(6): 2196-2210.

蓝兴福, 王晓彤, 周雅心, 等. 炉渣与生物炭施加对福州平原水稻田温室气体排放的后续影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(1): 489-498.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

生物炭添加对盐渍土CT孔隙序列分形特征来源的影响

聚丙烯酰胺改性生物质炭对盐碱化土壤盐分洗脱的影响

施用生物质炭对旱地红壤有机碳矿化及碳库的影响

生物质炭对旱作农田土壤持水特性的影响